|
poo poo. Yeah, we gotta G2, then.
|
#
?
May 27, 2020 05:35
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 9, 2024 16:02 |
|
|
Indeed you do! 
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2020 06:37
|
|
|
Yup, that was a really nice move they made.
|
|
#
?
May 27, 2020 11:14
|
|
|
OZ: There and back again. 
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2020 05:41
|
|
|
So, lesson learned. Being on the bottom row is a bad idea. Edit: Do we retreat GZ back to the other side?
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2020 05:48
|
|
|
PMush Perfect posted:So, lesson learned. Being on the bottom row is a bad idea. If we moved GZ to G3W, we'd be threatening OZ again.
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2020 17:08
|
|
|
Maigius posted:If we moved GZ to G3W, we'd be threatening OZ again. I like it, limits their options.
|
|
#
?
May 28, 2020 22:33
|
|
|
All right. 
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2020 05:46
|
|
|
They're running! 
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2020 15:14
|
|
|
Potentially stupid idea, but maybe start building a tower to reach to O2. Perhaps G1 next to G4, domes facing N and up?
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2020 15:41
|
|
|
Maigius posted:Potentially stupid idea, but maybe start building a tower to reach to O2. Perhaps G1 next to G4, domes facing N and up?
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2020 15:53
|
|
|
Does GY to G3S help us at all? I'm down for moving G1; I think we need to unstuck ourselves how we can. SoftNum fucked around with this message at 16:12 on May 29, 2020 |
|
#
?
May 29, 2020 16:10
|
|
|
SoftNum posted:Does GY to G3S help us at all?
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2020 16:28
|
|
|
SelenicMartian posted:It loses the game. I'm not seeing this?
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2020 16:39
|
|
|
SoftNum posted:I'm not seeing this? OZ to the now empty G3W.
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2020 16:46
|
|
|
I think moving GZ onto the same cube as GY makes us lose by DQ? It's a deliberate concession move, I think.
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2020 16:49
|
|
|
Maigius posted:OZ to the now empty G3W. Never mind, misread which scepter you were talking about.
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2020 16:56
|
|
|
PMush Perfect posted:I think moving GZ onto the same cube as GY makes us lose by DQ? It's a deliberate concession move, I think. OK I see that in the rules now. These rules are written in a profoundly stupid way.
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2020 17:11
|
|
|
PMush Perfect posted:We need to do something to shake it up, or they'll just keep us pinned at ground level forever. That seems like a dramatic shake-up. I like it. I'm ok with this. The only other move I could think of would be GZ to G4E or O1E to threaten O4.
|
|
#
?
May 29, 2020 21:57
|
|
|
Building up! 
|
|
#
?
May 30, 2020 06:33
|
|
|
Do you have stairs in your house? 
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2020 06:41
|
|
|
We might be in a pickle.
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2020 06:48
|
|
|
PMush Perfect posted:We might be in a pickle. We certainly are, although I'm not sure that move makes it much worse. If we want to continue building up to O2, we can move G4 on top of G1 with the nob facing W.
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2020 12:33
|
|
|
Ugh. We're just reacting. And even if we do complete the tower, we can't use it because then OZ -> G1 wins. We need to come up with something that puts them on the back foot. Edit: What if we put G1 on top of O3? Would that give us any kind of room to maneuver, or take some of theirs? Edit 2: If we can pin all of their cubes with our cubes, then they'll have no choice but to start moving pawns, and that means they'll probably be forced into a suboptimal play. So, I say we get into a cube war until either something gets moved in such a way that a new avenue opens for us, or we put then in an uncomfortable position. girl dick energy fucked around with this message at 12:43 on May 31, 2020 |
|
#
?
May 31, 2020 12:38
|
|
|
PMush Perfect posted:Ugh. We're just reacting. And even if we do complete the tower, we can't use it because then OZ -> G1 wins. We need to come up with something that puts them on the back foot. I like that plan, although we can't block O4 unless they move OY.
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2020 17:37
|
|
|
EasilyConfused posted:I like that plan, although we can't block O4 unless they move OY.
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2020 17:55
|
|
|
PMush Perfect posted:Ugh. We're just reacting. And even if we do complete the tower, we can't use it because then OZ -> G1 wins. We need to come up with something that puts them on the back foot. I also like the G1 to top of G3 plan
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2020 22:14
|
|
|
Okay, so G1 on O3. Does G1 only have one nub, or two?
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2020 22:29
|
|
|
PMush Perfect posted:Okay, so G1 on O3. Does G1 only have one nub, or two? Two nubs.
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2020 22:36
|
|
|
Maigius posted:Two nubs.
|
|
#
?
May 31, 2020 22:58
|
|
|
You do now!  And a behind-the-wall supplement 
|
|
#
?
Jun 1, 2020 07:37
|
|
|
You gave it to them, and they're running with it.  
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2020 08:20
|
|
|
GZ can now move to G5 safely.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2020 08:27
|
|
|
drat, we've really hosed ourselves.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2020 10:42
|
|
|
I don't think this game is designed to be played with teams of minds against each other.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2020 11:07
|
|
|
PMush Perfect posted:I don't think this game is designed to be played with teams of minds against each other. Yeah it seems likely that it's intended to be played in real time without people checking every line and angle constantly. but eh. good experence. GY -> O6W would allow us to cap another cube likely.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2020 13:46
|
|
|
SoftNum posted:GY -> O6W would allow us to cap another cube likely.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2020 14:01
|
|
|
We should have a decent chance of getting GZ onto O6 to capture it next turn as well if we move it to O5.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2020 14:54
|
|
|
I like GY to O6W. We had them pinned multiple times and they got out of it, so I don't think we need to prioritize getting GZ out of there over a good chance of eliminating another cube.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2020 14:59
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 9, 2024 16:02 |
|
|
Maigius posted:We should have a decent chance of getting GZ onto O6 to capture it next turn as well if we move it to O5. I assume you mean G5, but if they move OY to the top of O2, they eliminate G1, prevent us from taking O6, and threaten GZ all at once.
|
|
#
?
Jun 2, 2020 15:02
|
|