|
Smilie tagging would be good.
|
#
¿
Jul 15, 2020 19:30
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 21, 2024 22:43 |
|
|
Athanatos posted:dog holding beer dog doge cheer cheers Beer, drink, drinking, glass, alcohol To save you some work: if it has 'doge' in the text a search for 'dog' will find it too. Same for cheers/cheer and drinking/drink. 'dog holding beer' is fine to stay in there in case someone wants to type the phrase out. e: and iirc 'dog holding beer' was the original hover text which should typically stay anyway astral fucked around with this message at 20:11 on Jul 15, 2020 |
|
#
¿
Jul 15, 2020 20:07
|
|
|
One way to organize it might be a new "Help tag all the smilies!" thread with a list of the smilies in the order Athanatos sees them in the OP, then people could reply with suggested tags which could be edited into said OP before eventually being applied to the actual smilies list in an organized fashion.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 15, 2020 21:00
|
|
|
Gone Fashing posted:theres only one post for https://forums.somethingawful.com/dictionary.php?act=3&topicid=2019
|
|
#
¿
Jul 16, 2020 01:52
|
|
and it says "gently caress that butt real good," is that canon? its one of my favorite smilies so im curious
|
Athanatos posted:They both point toward different uploads with different descriptions. The last one in the database with the same smilie code.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 16, 2020 02:02
|
|
|
Acerbatus posted:What happened to :kyoon: The SAclopedia article has a lot of  ; could that be what you're thinking of?
|
|
#
¿
Jul 16, 2020 08:29
|
|
|
cda posted::eng101: - Teacher smiling hat mortarboard static classic Might be worth changing 'sad' in eng99 to ':eng101: but sad' and/or ':eng101: derivative' Similarly for the square: ':eng101: but square' and/or ':eng101: derivative'
|
|
#
¿
Jul 16, 2020 17:58
|
|
|
Jiru posted:I also want to mention I am avoiding repeating any text already in the smilie code (I am not checking all the descriptions though), since I think those are searchable by default? So, for example, edit: See later post(s). astral fucked around with this message at 20:50 on Jul 16, 2020 |
|
#
¿
Jul 16, 2020 20:17
|
|
may be tagged "ten" and "bucks" but not 10, since there's no need to repeat. Is that OK?
|
Snowy posted:Well poo poo that sucks I mean, it could be adjusted to do so. edit: See later post(s). astral fucked around with this message at 20:51 on Jul 16, 2020 |
|
#
¿
Jul 16, 2020 20:33
|
|
|
Jiru posted:Ouch You've convinced me that searching each word individually would work better with what we have. e: Keep going how you've been doing it (not writing out each thing a billion ways) and I'll send Jeffrey some adjustments to the smilie search code. astral fucked around with this message at 20:57 on Jul 16, 2020 |
|
#
¿
Jul 16, 2020 20:45
|
|
. That kinda complicates things, if we are supposed to keep it under 100 characters (and also add individual, standarized terms like "green", "money", "banknote" and variations thereof), because that string is already at 94 with spaces. Can't really think of a solution here, short of adding a big flashing note for the search box saying to use individual terms, or something like that.
is "green creature" or "green monster" or "tentacle monster" or "monster with glasses"; with the tagging "animated, green, lovecraft, tentacles, creature, monster, terror, cool, tinted, glasses" it won't come up, and accounting for each variation seems a bit... unwieldy?
|
astral posted:You've convinced me that searching each word individually would work better with what we have. I did this and also made the click-to-copy thing work again. Jeffrey just pushed it live.  Now you can search e.g. 'yellow animated' or 'animated yellow' and it will give you plenty of results.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 16, 2020 22:53
|
|
|
For captainpop and chanpop, I'd recommend changing 'eye pop' to 'eyepop' (or just adding 'eyepop' to the tags) - the new search approach will find 'eyepop' whether the user types 'eye pop' or 'eyepop'. You're a true hero for doing all these, Athanatos.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 17, 2020 03:35
|
|
|
Snowy posted:I had to do a little research and won't be offended if someone can point out where I have been completely ignorant and/or oblivious Couple notes for these two: 'gaming' is in the smilie text so you don't necessarily need to add a 'gaming' tag; also, if someone searches 'games' it will find the 'games' in 'videogames' so it does not need an extra 'games' tag. Thank you and everyone else for working on this project! e: you also have 'flashing' in there twice for the first quoted one astral fucked around with this message at 03:00 on Jul 18, 2020 |
|
#
¿
Jul 18, 2020 02:48
|
|
- frog, get, out, in, animated, green, purple, flashing, eyes, mouth, tongue, flashing, files, filez, eating, character, games, videogames, gaming
- frog, get, out, animated, purple, flashing, eyes, seizure, games, computer, character, videogames, gaming, games
|
Jiru posted:
For this one I'd recommend having the full phrase (or at least putting "I'm" and "the" in there somewhere)
|
|
#
¿
Jul 18, 2020 18:01
|
|
- static, brown, juggernaut, bitch, x-men, movie, comic, helmet, half, basketball
|
Yeah, 'vanity' tag should probably be when it's about a person. If it's about a forum, maybe it could have a 'subforum' tag instead but that's probably unnecessary if it has the forum acronym already e.g. 'byob' or 'fyad'.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 25, 2020 19:11
|
|
|
Jiru posted:Yeah, same for me. If it was bought for/by someone with the intention of representing a poster, I'd use "vanity", regardless of who bought it. Doubly so if it's some inside joke, but for icons that will see some use outside of that (for example the rainbow bridge) it may also be useful to tag them just in case all someone knows about a smilie is "it was bought for X". If the poster's name is different from the smilie name, and they don't object to it, it might make sense to have them in the tags if there's room.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 26, 2020 07:17
|
|
|
Speaking as someone who has looked for several smilies in the past with only a vague idea of what they might be named: thank you again, everyone who worked on tagging them (and Athanatos for being willing to manually edit each one)!
|
|
#
¿
Jul 26, 2020 20:17
|
|
|
"emoticonned" would get people asking questions
|
|
#
¿
Jul 27, 2020 09:57
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 21, 2024 22:43 |
|
|
Bob Socko posted:Hi, hello, yes, I have personal and emotional investment in this smiley. Would a search for "run" catch the preexisting "run!" tag? Yes; keep the ! quote:Also, is there a way to add Seahawks as a tag? Thank you for your time, god bless. Hammerite posted:
Just dropping 'national' and 'league' to add 'seahawks' should be good.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 27, 2020 23:16
|
|