Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Atrocious Joe
Sep 2, 2011

https://i.imgur.com/RxN8hYH.mp4

So in the theme of regional threads, one for the former socialist bloc in Europe makes sense. These states are incredibly diverse, but over the past decades have seen the destruction of socialist systems, the brutal implementation of neoliberal capitalism, and a political sphere often dominated by reactionaries. A lot of the same political trends occur across the vast region.

Belarus
https://twitter.com/evangershkovich/status/1294974816114679808?s=20
https://twitter.com/franakviacorka/status/1294908760880816129?s=20
The Radio Liberty/Atlantic Council guy above is pretending that the chant is "radio liberty" instead of "give us liberty." Never trust US propagandists!
https://twitter.com/nypost/status/1293583686466785281?s=20
https://twitter.com/kazbek/status/1295092256022695936?s=20

Currently having a massive protest movement after suspicious election results. The current president Lukashenko came down hard on the protests. If Lukashenko is overthrown, NATO and western vultures hope to swoop in and privatize what remains of the social services in the country.

quote:

Lukashenko’s traditional approach was to secure his position by guaranteeing Belarusian neutrality and a degree of engagement with Europe, while demanding subsidies from Russia that would enable him to buy the allegiance of the population. However, that bargain frayed in the years after the Ukraine crisis of 2014,  when Lukashenko’s room for geopolitical maneuver between Russia and the West contracted. Moreover, Lukashenko, despite his willingness to work with the Kremlin, has always wanted to be president of an independent Belarusian state, not a governor of a province in greater Russia. He was reportedly unnerved by proposals that began to be floated as to how Russian president Vladimir Putin might circumvent the then-ban on standing again for the presidency in 2024—which envisioned Putin taking the helm of the currently moribund Russia-Belarus “Union State” and turning that position into a new and more powerful chief executive role that would effectively demote Lukashenko.
At the same time, given the economic contraction in Russia, and Russia’s ongoing geo-economic projects designed to reduce its need for Ukraine as a transit state (which also has the same result of reducing the importance of Belarus), Moscow began to question the whether it was getting value for the rubles it was expending subsidizing Lukashenko.
Earlier this year, two crises erupted in Belarus-Russia relations. The first had to do with oil transit and Belarus’s ability to purchase energy at below-market rates. Lukashenko depicted this crisis as a case of Russian economic aggression against Belarusian sovereignty and looked for non-Russian suppliers—including from the United States. He found receptive ears in Western capitals, and in a sign of warming relations, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo visited the country in February 2020 and declared that the United States “wants to help Belarus build its own sovereign country.” Steps were taken to ease Western restrictions on the country and the United States was in the process of restoring diplomatic ties to the ambassadorial level.
The second was Lukashenko’s efforts, prior to the August ballot, to accuse Moscow of seeking to interfere in the country’s elections and destabilize the country as a pretext for installing more pliant leaders. This culminated in a bizarre incident when mercenaries associated with the Wagner Group, en route to assignments in Africa, were detained in Belarus on the grounds that they were going to foment an insurrection. Lukashenko seemed to be hoping that Western governments would reflexively back him as a bulwark to Putin’s expansionism.
Those efforts have failed.
Western sanctions are certainly going to be imposed against Lukashenko. Going further, some European states, notably Lithuania, no longer recognize Lukashenko as president and support instead the opposition candidate Svetlana Tikhanovskaya as the legitimate winner of the elections. But Moscow is in no hurry to shore up Lukashenko as he faces domestic protests and Western pressure. Putin offered relatively anodyne congratulations to Lukashenko for his victory, but over the last several months, the attitude in the Russian press towards Lukashenko had taken a harsher tone—an out of touch ruler who was willing to betray his Russian allies.
https://nationalinterest.org/feature/belarus-crisis-what-happens-now-167030

quote:

In the last decade, it became apparent that there is almost no way to oppose inequality and authoritarianism in the post-Soviet space without this struggle being co-opted into an anti-communist, or anti-leftist, position – even though the ‘authoritarians’ are quite vehemently anti-communist themselves. The anti-socialist sentiments in society are so strong that the two polar opposites to communism – capitalism and nationalism – come sweeping in and claim the protestors.

Currently, I see overwhelming kneejerk support for the protests in Belarus without any nuance or reflection on the problematic parts of it, and I see obvious support for Belarusian nationalism. The ‘right side’ of history is, once again, defined precisely. Very few people, unfortunately, are ready to discuss the negatives of the protests. Very few are brave enough to oppose the majority’s opinions. Those aligned with Lukashenko support the violent cops, whether they’re coming from the left of the right. But there are also Marxist skeptics who want Lukashenko gone, but don’t want a Maidan-style revolt.
They are, however, all silenced by the red-and-white flag-wielding majority: Those who denounce parallels with the Maidan but remain staunchly supportive of Ukrainian nationalism in general. Every criticism they face, like a discussion of this flag’s nationalist origins, or Poland and Lithuania’s nationalist and perpetual influence on the protests, is discounted as Russian propaganda.

The violence on the ground in Belarus is real. The autocracy is real. There can be no doubts about that. But the neoliberal and nationalist tendencies seem to be as much of a threat to worker solidarity as the regime’s wrongdoings. I am incredibly invested in observing the events unfolding in Belarus because I have seen all of it before, in Russia personally and in Ukraine from a distance. And I hate to see the worst repeat yet again, with the same stalwarts of neoliberalism at the helm, denouncing communism, virtue-signaling to nationalism.

As I watch this, already lonely in the shadow of the right-wingers dominating the debate, I want nothing more in life than for more people in the post-Soviet space to stop being afraid of socialism and start being afraid of capitalism, nationalism, and fascism.

https://www.rt.com/russia/498140-minsk-protests-similar-kiev-moscow/
I admit I’m no expert on Belarus, and I’d be delighted to find out that there are strong working class organizations on the ground to turn to.

Russia
Rigged the US election in 2016 by poo poo-posting, and the CIA says they’re going to do it again in 2020.
In reality it’s a country with a lot of stuff going on internally and diplomatically. From gas deals with Europe, to Crimea, and the Syrian War, and that’s just the stuff that consistently makes headlines. Also may have invented the COVID-19 vaccine? Guess we’ll find out soon if that’s real.

Oliver Stone interviewed Putin a few years ago. So you can listen to the devil himself.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GfRhd3VEt78

Ukraine
We need to talk about commercial surrogacy
https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/the-stranded-babies-of-the-coronavirus-disaster

quote:

As a result, every year, thousands of would-be parents travel abroad, to the handful of countries where surrogacy is legal. One of the biggest destinations is the United States, which has cutting-edge reproductive technology and the most permissive laws: both same-sex couples and unmarried people can have children via a surrogate. But the price tag is out of reach for many people, and, in the past decade, Ukraine has emerged as a cheaper alternative. Ukrainian surrogates give birth to several thousand babies every year, the majority of whom have foreign parents. The country has around fifty reproductive clinics and numerous agencies that act as middlemen, matching couples with egg donors and surrogates.
COVID-19 threw this system into chaos. There are no official numbers on how many babies were stranded around the world. Robin Pope, an Oregon-based lawyer who represents intended parents, estimates that at least two hundred babies were stuck in the U.S., cared for by an improvised network of surrogates, relatives, baby nurses, and Good Samaritans. She told me that the son of one of her Chinese clients is still in the care of his surrogate mother. “The dad can’t get a flight out, and his baby is almost five months old,” she said. According to Ukraine’s human-rights ombudsman, at least a hundred and twenty-five babies have been stranded in the country since the pandemic began.
The problem there made headlines when the country’s largest reproductive agency, BioTexCom, released a video showing forty-five screaming newborns lined up in trolleys under the chandeliers of a hotel ballroom. The company had transformed the hotel, which it owns, into a giant nursery for babies who were awaiting their parents. A handful of nurses circulated among the children, feeding and cuddling them. “We show babies to their parents online and our managers arrange video calls,” one of the nurses said, in a voice-over. “It’s heartbreaking to see how the parents miss their little ones.” The video set off a fierce debate in Ukraine about the country’s surrogacy industry. Several politicians called for a ban on the service for foreigners. Mykola Kuleba, the country’s commissioner for children’s rights, lamented that Ukraine had become “an international online store for babies.” The video also revived criticism of BioTexCom: the company was involved in one notorious case where a set of parents abandoned their baby in Ukraine after she was born with health problems. In 2019, the company’s director, Albert Tochilovsky, was briefly placed under house arrest, following allegations of child trafficking, document forgery, and tax avoidance. (A spokesperson for the company noted that the director was not convicted, saying, “He was charged, but the investigation didn’t find any evidence.”)
There’s a bunch of other post-Soviet states with stuff going on. Armenia and Azerbijian might be at war by the time I post this for example.
Also this is probably the thread where we get nostalgic about Tito too
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0RRnCnO1Y2c

Atrocious Joe has issued a correction as of 03:13 on Aug 18, 2020

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Mayor Dave
Feb 20, 2009

Bernie the Snow Clown
i have a few armenian friends and judging by their posts things are getting bad even in the us between expat communities, supposedly there have been stabbings in glendale and fights regularly, i don't know how true that is though

is it ok if i don't shed tears for lukashenko? it sucks that there's no space to be both anti-authoritarian and anti-imperialist

Ardennes
May 12, 2002
I would say Belarus is in a situation that is still unknown in exactly what the demands of the opposition (despite the obvious) are including even new elections or not (if not Tsikhanouskaya would just be president without a valid vote...I don't know how that would be democratic). In the end, it is unclear if the opposition wants a full cultural shift, dissolving the Union state and/or mass privatization. It is assumed by some that the opposition wants just internal political reform, but the opposition really hasn't stated it or given assurances in the last week.

That said, I would say that is clear grievances going on (COVID/economics) that have brought people to the streets but a lot of it boils down to what the opposition actually wants to do. As along as there is that ambiguity, who knows?

I don't know how it will shake out, but to me the current "we will figure it out afterwards" attitude is at very least an issue of concern.

-------------------

That said, in Russia, there is clearly seething anger at the government that has been building across the last year and a half after pensions got slashed. This has been compounded by COVID (Russia did a poor job, maybe not the worst but certainly very poor), that welfare payments were purely tied to number of children, and the general growing inequalities in Russian society.

It isn't even the fact that the Russian government is low on funds or is in dire straits currency reserves are near an all time high, but that I guess VVP loves living life on the edge and wants to see how far he can push it.

The irony is that while Russia has been pushing more aggressively outside its borders to a fair amount of success, internally the country is still very clearly mismanaged. (I don't know why Lukashenko (for example) just doesn't resort to economic populism either.)

Ardennes has issued a correction as of 17:01 on Aug 17, 2020

Taintrunner
Apr 10, 2017

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS
Oh I heard this poo poo absolutely rules here's a link I stumbled onto

https://twitter.com/franakviacorka/status/1295257067419242497

sounds like fun

e-dt
Sep 16, 2019

It looks like all the plausible outcomes for Belarus are lovely in one way or another. Lukashenko seems like definitely the most lovely, though. Oh well. Why did I ever think anything could turn out well in the short term?

uncop
Oct 23, 2010
Thanks for making this thread, because I've been living in a weird situation I must tell about. At work I'm involved with half as many Belarusians as non-Belarusians (they work remotely as superexploited labor). Urban liberal young men, half of whom are pretty activist about what's happening in there.

The Finns are literally like "why isn't the EU sanctioning Belarus already or NATO sending the tanks to the border, we need to do something as the leaders of the free world!" and generally watch the unrest as if the task were to finally bring western civilization itself into Belarus and as if the local activists obviously can't help but look up to it.

If I went and complained about Finnish imperialism to randos, they'd probably laugh, but holy poo poo how hard it's been revealed at me recently, like a complete mask off moment that the people taking their masks off don't notice themselves. They just casually thirst for blood like American right-wing pundits, and they're centrist libs! Politics talk at work makes me sick nowadays. So, anyway, I couldn't ignore what's happening in Belarus even if I wanted to.

Today, one of the political dudes told us about unions joining the struggle, the part about the state television strike was really juicy. They sound like they're winning, too organized to beat down with violence and their concerns cut across the population widely enough that they won't abruptly run out of sympathizers, beating them up will just produce more.

I've noticed that I can't help but respect people confronting a violence machine in hope of a better future, even if they're just libs with lib goals. Like, in these acute situations all a normal person can do is either play with the cards they've been dealt or fold entirely. If their political goals aren't the FYGM kind, they're good people, right? There's always this inkling of hope about well organized nationalists outside the first world, like maybe they'll push back imperialism in the country a bit and have a bit more of the cake to share. But I don't feel like I've ever seen such hopes realized? I really hope there aren't surprise Nazis in similar numbers as in Ukraine.

Ramrod Hotshot
May 30, 2003

If Lukashenko goes, my guess is that the end result is Belarus falling closer into Russian orbit. Between him being deposed/stepping down and new elections, the opposition will splinter, average citizens will see the danger of a power vaccuum, and a plurality will go to a pro-Russian candidate who promises stability. There might be even be some fuckery like there was in eastern Ukraine and Crimea. I'm not a Russia Truther by any means, but Putin does not want to let go of Belarus so easily. The Union State has been a long term project of his. Hell, he even wanted to use the concept to constitutionally stay on as president of a supranational entity containing Russia and Belarus.

uncop
Oct 23, 2010
Right, I've was told that Russia has so far said that they want to stay out of it as long as the opposition is a homegrown movement, because the gamble wouldn't be worth it if they are not being driven out. It's a good incentive for the opposition not to invite western imperialisms in with open arms.

The opposition splintering would suck for the country though and it looks pretty likely now that you said it. I heard that it's composed of basically all the anti-Lukashenko folks united by the fact that their preferred candidates were jailed before the election and there was just that one person to vote for apart from him.

Victory Position
Mar 16, 2004

well, this can't be good for weev

there may be an extradition treaty in the works :tinfoil:

Ardennes
May 12, 2002

uncop posted:

Right, I've was told that Russia has so far said that they want to stay out of it as long as the opposition is a homegrown movement, because the gamble wouldn't be worth it if they are not being driven out. It's a good incentive for the opposition not to invite western imperialisms in with open arms.

The opposition splintering would suck for the country though and it looks pretty likely now that you said it. I heard that it's composed of basically all the anti-Lukashenko folks united by the fact that their preferred candidates were jailed before the election and there was just that one person to vote for apart from him.

There is a dilemma here though because while none of the outside actors partially like Lukashenko, the question again resolves around Belarus' future status. In addition, the EU has brought up potential sanctions but also seems to be dragging its feet on the issue. I think a big part of the reason he is still around is each side (the opposition, Russia, EU etc) is waiting for the other one to make their move.

We will see if the US tries to stick its dick in as well.

---------------------

That said, if the opposition goes in a wild direction, I don't see Russia just laying down and taking it. Russia isn't and really can't just let Belarus join the West's security umbrella even if the result is open warfare.

Ardennes has issued a correction as of 17:10 on Aug 17, 2020

Riot Bimbo
Dec 28, 2006


I know I have radicalized a lot, because I know seeing this stuff like six years ago would've excited me (euromaidan did lol) but now i'm just depressed, nervous about where this leads when the imperial hand is found behind all this, etc.

Taintrunner
Apr 10, 2017

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS
wait. Finland is the leader of the free world?

Ardennes
May 12, 2002
Granted, I think it helps to separate what is going on the ground and the people involved and the broader never ending geopolitical chess match. There are ways to resolve this that are relatively win-win for both sides.

——

Also regarding Finland, it is more nationalist the you would think.

Ardennes has issued a correction as of 19:45 on Aug 17, 2020

ContinuityNewTimes
Dec 30, 2010

Я выдуман напрочь
I've heard the chant is "give us freedom" which makes a lot more sense for the march for freedom than the name of a radio station

And by heard I mean literally with my ears, in that video, "day nam svaboda"

ContinuityNewTimes has issued a correction as of 19:51 on Aug 17, 2020

uncop
Oct 23, 2010

Taintrunner posted:

wait. Finland is the leader of the free world?

All the countries that consider their international meddling to be a favor to the party being meddled with consider themselves leaders of the free world. International imperialist cooperation allows all of them to consider themselves to have some kind of crucial transformative role in the world that would be a downright crime to abandon.

They all justify their meddling basically the same way, from Finland to Canada to Japan. We have to be there, because if we weren't there, it would be worse, and if it's bad now, that's only because *the others* (which tends to include the USA because we all consider ourselves better and more worthy of leadership than you) are making it worse harder than we are able to make it better.

uncop has issued a correction as of 20:01 on Aug 17, 2020

Jose
Jul 24, 2007

Adrian Chiles is a broadcaster and writer

Victory Position posted:

well, this can't be good for weev

there may be an extradition treaty in the works :tinfoil:

transnistria is moldova not belarus

mortons stork
Oct 13, 2012
I have one contribution to make to this thread, knowing very little about belarus, being focused far more on russia myself.
https://jacobinmag.com/2020/08/belarus-protests-lukashenko-minsk
but jacobin's just had an interview with left-wing writers from belarus. its fairly interesting, in how the left space is occupied by the dictator who has coopted leftwing imagery and language for his own use, combining it with soviet nostalgia and renewal to ensure that no real left wing voices are left with much power. i also feel like those tactics by lukashenko might be the reason a lot of western twitter lefties are confused, and tankies are straight up kneejerk siding with him

dead gay comedy forums
Oct 21, 2011


you can be anti-authoritarian and anti-imperialist, like the lefty general strike guys who seem to be the sharpest tools in the shed in knowing how dire things are and hopefully will be able to pull a miracle

Ardennes
May 12, 2002

mortons stork posted:

I have one contribution to make to this thread, knowing very little about belarus, being focused far more on russia myself.
https://jacobinmag.com/2020/08/belarus-protests-lukashenko-minsk
but jacobin's just had an interview with left-wing writers from belarus. its fairly interesting, in how the left space is occupied by the dictator who has coopted leftwing imagery and language for his own use, combining it with soviet nostalgia and renewal to ensure that no real left wing voices are left with much power. i also feel like those tactics by lukashenko might be the reason a lot of western twitter lefties are confused, and tankies are straight up kneejerk siding with him

That said, the guy being interviewed seems to have thrown up his hands at demanding any type of economic concessions from either side and again to just hope for the best. I think that is the issue here, Lukashenko has given just the appearance of Soviet nostalgia while the official opposition doesn't seem to have any clear economic programme.

Any attempt to form an independent left has water thrown on it.

Ardennes has issued a correction as of 22:06 on Aug 17, 2020

Ghost of Mussolini
Jun 26, 2011

dead gay comedy forums posted:

you can be anti-authoritarian and anti-imperialist, like the lefty general strike guys who seem to be the sharpest tools in the shed in knowing how dire things are and hopefully will be able to pull a miracle
I wish them the best of luck. This group is also one of the first to get poo poo on and sidelined, as per evidence from Romania, Bulgaria, Poland, Czech Rep, Slovakia, Georgia, et al.

Doktor Avalanche
Dec 30, 2008

e-dt posted:

It looks like all the plausible outcomes for Belarus are lovely in one way or another. Lukashenko seems like definitely the most lovely, though. Oh well. Why did I ever think anything could turn out well in the short term?

how is lukasehnko the most lovely when the other side are neolibs who want to privatize everything and immiserate millions

Ardennes
May 12, 2002

Doctor Jeep posted:

how is lukasehnko the most lovely when the other side are neolibs who want to privatize everything and immiserate millions

Admittedly, it isn't clear. It is why it is a geopolitical/political no-man's land atm.

Victory Position
Mar 16, 2004

Doctor Jeep posted:

how is lukasehnko the most lovely when the other side are neolibs who want to privatize everything and immiserate millions

I'm not sure what kind of fighting words are, "I'll never relinquish power, even in death," are, but they do sound grim; the question here is would the armed forces follow the letter of that to its miserable end

I. M. Gei
Jun 26, 2005

CHIEFS

BITCH



This has nothing to do with politics or Lukashenko, but I gotta ask it here since this thread might be the most relevant place for my question outside of D&D.

I’m about to buy something from a store in Poland that I need to ship to the US, but the place I’m ordering from doesn’t do international shipping. They will ship to anywhere in Poland, though. What’s the best way to ship this thing from Poland to the US?

I’m thinking I need to get it shipped from the store to a “middle man” address somewhere in Poland, and then ship it to the US from that address instead. How can I do that?

Atrocious Joe
Sep 2, 2011

Continuity RCP posted:

I've heard the chant is "give us freedom" which makes a lot more sense for the march for freedom than the name of a radio station

And by heard I mean literally with my ears, in that video, "day nam svaboda"

I saw this elsewhere too, and it makes more sense and is less depressing. I'm clarifying that in the OP

that's what I get for trusting some guy from the Atlantic Council

Zeno-25
Dec 5, 2009

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS
What is the worst case outcome for US interests in Belarus?

I can get behind that :d2a:

twoday
May 4, 2005



C-SPAM Times best-selling author

Zeno-25 posted:

What is the worst case outcome for US interests in Belarus?

I can get behind that :d2a:

full integration of the Union State, which then fuses with the Eurasian Union to form USSR 2.0

dead gay comedy forums
Oct 21, 2011


twoday posted:

full integration of the Union State, which then fuses with the Eurasian Union to form USSR 2.0

I think you are skipping just a few steps

Top City Homo
Oct 15, 2014


Ramrod XTreme

dead gay comedy forums posted:

I think you are skipping just a few steps

chinese belt and road

annex kazakhstan

china belarus russia kazakhsatn union state

ussr 2.0 bing bong so simple

Peanut President
Nov 5, 2008

by Athanatos

twoday posted:

full integration of the Union State, which then fuses with the Eurasian Union to form USSR 2.0

you forgot that ukraine joins

mortons stork
Oct 13, 2012

Ardennes posted:

That said, the guy being interviewed seems to have thrown up his hands at demanding any type of economic concessions from either side and again to just hope for the best. I think that is the issue here, Lukashenko has given just the appearance of Soviet nostalgia while the official opposition doesn't seem to have any clear economic programme.

Any attempt to form an independent left has water thrown on it.

It looks like this everywhere though. The left is so powerless to influence policy proposal, even during mass upheaval. It is disheartening, to say the least.

ContinuityNewTimes
Dec 30, 2010

Я выдуман напрочь

Atrocious Joe posted:

I saw this elsewhere too, and it makes more sense and is less depressing. I'm clarifying that in the OP

that's what I get for trusting some guy from the Atlantic Council

Mark Ames can eat a bag of dicks too

e-dt
Sep 16, 2019

Doctor Jeep posted:

how is lukasehnko the most lovely when the other side are neolibs who want to privatize everything and immiserate millions

I assumed that the protests spoke for the majority of Belarusians. Obviously I would rather Belarus not go through shock :airquote:therapy:airquote:. Although looking at the Jacobin interview posted above, it seems like Lukashenko has been pursuing some neoliberal policies as well:

quote:

Additionally, the government has been consistently dismantling the welfare state model and its social obligations to its citizens. This was apparent with the 2004 introduction of individual contracts with workers instead of collective agreements; the 2017 “tax on unemployment”; and the exclusion of military service, maternity leave, and university or college studies from the years that count toward your pension. The tight monetary policy of the past five years also led to a wage freeze, while prices continued to rise.

Doktor Avalanche
Dec 30, 2008

e-dt posted:

I assumed that the protests spoke for the majority of Belarusians. Obviously I would rather Belarus not go through shock :airquote:therapy:airquote:. Although looking at the Jacobin interview posted above, it seems like Lukashenko has been pursuing some neoliberal policies as well:

what if they do speak for the majority? i don't see what importance that has if we're talking about material consequences.
regarding lukashenko's neolib policies, yeah i can believe he did that, and?

e-dt
Sep 16, 2019

Doctor Jeep posted:

what if they do speak for the majority? i don't see what importance that has if we're talking about material consequences.
regarding lukashenko's neolib policies, yeah i can believe he did that, and?

you're probably right, my opinion earlier was coming from a place of ignorance

ContinuityNewTimes
Dec 30, 2010

Я выдуман напрочь

Doctor Jeep posted:

what if they do speak for the majority? i don't see what importance that has if we're talking about material consequences.
regarding lukashenko's neolib policies, yeah i can believe he did that, and?

Active hostility to the concept of democracy is quite a stance

ContinuityNewTimes
Dec 30, 2010

Я выдуман напрочь
I can kind if understand it from the point of view of class dictatorship but this is just the dictatorship of a dude

Doktor Avalanche
Dec 30, 2008

Continuity RCP posted:

Active hostility to the concept of democracy is quite a stance

Continuity RCP posted:

I can kind if understand it from the point of view of class dictatorship but this is just the dictatorship of a dude

how about you try actually understanding what i wrote instead of inventing this "active hostility"
or are you also calling the people who criticize donald trump's response to the covid epidemic in the US "actively hostile" to democracy because he won an election which means nothing he does may be criticized

ContinuityNewTimes
Dec 30, 2010

Я выдуман напрочь

Doctor Jeep posted:

how about you try actually understanding what i wrote instead of inventing this "active hostility"
or are you also calling the people who criticize donald trump's response to the covid epidemic in the US "actively hostile" to democracy because he won an election which means nothing he does may be criticized

Your position appears to be that the Belarusians can't topple their dictator because some of them are liberals.

E: or perhaps that the protests are worse than the dictator, again because liberals

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Minera
Sep 26, 2007

All your friends and foes,
they thought they knew ya,
but look who's in your heart now.

Taintrunner posted:

wait. Finland is the leader of the free world?

what country does consider itself that in the coming decades, insofar as dictating neoliberal policy world wide and starting wars everywhere and defending capitalism at all costs

a miraculous US recovery? the EU? china??? or is capitalism free of enough threats to keep itself going without any country leading as much as the US did before climate change kills everyone

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply