? This poll is closed. |
|||
---|---|---|---|
Yes | 44 | 35.20% | |
No | 81 | 64.80% | |
Total: | 125 votes |
|
I Can't Believe It's Not Bikechat
|
# ¿ Dec 4, 2020 20:31 |
|
|
# ¿ May 10, 2024 13:35 |
|
CommieGIR posted:Between this: one way or another https://twitter.com/vinodsparrow/status/1338431183588188160 https://twitter.com/Viss/status/1338575536793083906?s=20
|
# ¿ Dec 14, 2020 21:53 |
|
Mr. Nice! posted:Breaking - haven't found a link yet but Bill Barr just resigned. For Whom The Barr Tolls
|
# ¿ Dec 15, 2020 03:37 |
|
MazelTovCocktail posted:Honestly gently caress Google and Facebook. I honestly don’t care about them. Some of the worst scum I have ever dealt with. my dude, you either have no idea how the internet works or don't understand what section 230 actually governs. repealing it would fundamentally break the internet (read: economy) due to incredible liability exposure. it's not just social media companies that would be affected, it's everything. trusting congress to "reasonably rewrite" the law is also a ridiculous folly.
|
# ¿ Dec 29, 2020 22:50 |
|
MazelTovCocktail posted:No, I do. I just don’t care anymore. That said not changing it means things continue down the path they are now, and honestly I think you could make an argument that a total legal shield was not the best idea. I refuse to believe the only two outcomes are corpo slavery or the new dark age DX ending. i think you are confusing antitrust laws (good) with repealing section 230 protections (bad). they are most definitely not the same.
|
# ¿ Dec 29, 2020 23:14 |
|
|
# ¿ May 10, 2024 13:35 |
|
bulletsponge13 posted:I saw another post that it was to allow them close to him time to grieve privately. a 2 hour "debate" followed by the democrat-controlled house voting to certify. it's 100% performative.
|
# ¿ Dec 31, 2020 23:15 |