- How!
- Oct 29, 2009
-
|
Did the Soviet Union have parks? Green spaces or 3rd places have been disappearing rapidly in the US - I remember explicitly being taught the USSR didn't have any.
As I think about it now though... I don't even know how the concept works in theory or execution in communism - you don't really need to have a space protected from capitalist development the same way the US does.
They even have ice cream parks
|
#
¿
Jan 11, 2024 17:41
|
|
- Adbot
-
ADBOT LOVES YOU
|
|
|
#
¿
May 21, 2024 07:15
|
|
- How!
- Oct 29, 2009
-
|
Going through old notes and found the answer.
"State Capitalism".
I had forgotten all about this because it doesn't really exist. There is technically a theory answer though, and state capitalism is it.
The other ones are free market (no govt interference at all, or only govt for defense)
The ever popular laissez-faire, which the US teaches that the US is the best example. Govt does defense, and greater good regulation only.
And controlled capitalism. Add welfare to the above govt.
nvm sorry I don’t even want to engage
|
|
#
¿
Mar 6, 2024 02:46
|
|
- How!
- Oct 29, 2009
-
|
I would like to thank this thread. I work with a young Mormon man with a very good heart, and the knowledge here has been instrumental in opening his eyes. It’s honestly heartening to talk to the younger ppl sometimes.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 9, 2024 02:56
|
|
- How!
- Oct 29, 2009
-
|
Can we just threadban this tedious motherfucker? His posts are barely English and we're lucky if he ever writes a complete sentence, let alone a complete loving thought.
hes actually kind of a good learning tool for idiots like me, but only because of the rest of you. it’s like “what to say to idiots at the bar 101”
|
|
#
¿
Mar 12, 2024 22:48
|
|
- How!
- Oct 29, 2009
-
|
Someone summoned the anti coat?!?
Starting off with a missile and "negative" value. This isn't at all what I was going for. Marx, capitalists, are both cool with consumable products existing.
Anti coat is in refence only to use value. If something can have a use value, then something without a use value must exist.
So if a coat exists, that same linnen must be able to be arranged into an item with no use value, or "anti coat".
This entire argument is just a translation abuse by me*. If we use a more appropriate "value in use" translation, then it's more clear. Is there a value in using this item? A hammer can be used as a hammer. A broken hammer can not be used as a hammer. There is value in using a hammer. There is not value in using a broken hammer.
are you talking about art?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 12, 2024 20:02
|
|
#
¿
Jan 11, 2024 17:41
