Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Nocheez
Sep 5, 2000

Can you spare a little cheddar?
Nap Ghost

Klyith posted:

I think this would produce a prettier picture for people to look at, but ruin it for astronomy.

#1 the ever so slight imperfections in the image that happen because the main mirror isn't a platonic parabola but a bunch of hexagons, those would also get differenced. I think that would make blurring or distortion to everything away from the center of the picture.

#2 The double set of spikes would still contaminate data on things that astronomers care about. So now you'd have twice as much area near the big stars that is inaccurate spectrum or whatever.


And even if you could do the re-point without using fuel, it would still be wear and tear on the gyro wheels. This thing's life is gonna be primarily limited by how much it has to maneuver. Plus it would take probably 10 times longer per photo, because maneuvering a spacecraft is slooooow.

Wouldn't it be easier to just rotate the whole universe 7.5 degrees instead?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply