|
TACD posted:Was trying to find out exactly what the Starmer / Saville thing was since I missed it and: As they say about parliamentary privilege there, it's because it's such an offensively loaded claim that it would be an easy libel case. Posted at the end of the last thread was Raab showing how dangerous it is to repeat without parliamentary privilege https://twitter.com/RupertMyers/status/1488428780683243526 So yes, the Times will spare no expense to make it clear that it's baseless because they could be sued for implying it.
|
#
¿
Feb 1, 2022 12:44
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 10, 2024 14:48 |
|
|
At least this time the press actually cares that a bunch of childfuckers are harassing the nominal left.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 8, 2022 12:34
|
|
|
Starmer can't sue Johnson either because it was said in the House of Commons so he has privilege. Other Tories have been very careful not to repeat the allegation as Johnson made it.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 8, 2022 15:35
|
|
|
Saw a few blue ticks on Twitter saying that the Russian military has been told to prepare to invade. Would be pretty funny if Johnson stupidly saying we were only using the diplomacy to trick them while we fortify ended up being what causes this to kick off. Not funny as in actually funny, darkly funny that war is caused because our embarrassment of a prime minister wanted to distract from his myriad crimes and scandals by trying to be Churchill and ending up more like Fredrick North or Chamberlain.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 11, 2022 19:44
|
|
|
COMRADES, THE RED WIND IS UPON US oh it's just destroying poo poo and making people miserable?
|
|
#
¿
Feb 17, 2022 16:34
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 10, 2024 14:48 |
|
|
Wasn't expecting to wake up to ground invasion of Ukraine. Thought he'd stick to Donbas. Been funny watching Johnson try and act like NATO gives a poo poo about what he has to say about it though.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 24, 2022 11:41
|
|