|
The answer to the topic question: obviously yes I do have a side question that’s kind of related. With all of the articles/discussions around this topic, why aren’t intersex athletes also discussed with them or even much at all? For those who are against transgender athletes competing, it’s probably inconvenient. But including them in the discussion seems, to me, to strengthen the argument that our gender (or sex) categorization of many sports should probably just be rethought anyways. Hopefully this doesn’t make it seem like I’m tokenizing either intersex or transgender people, because that’s not my intent. It just seems like they both face a lot of the same discrimination in sports Kalit fucked around with this message at 22:48 on Apr 6, 2022 |
# ¿ Apr 6, 2022 22:27 |
|
|
# ¿ May 22, 2024 08:31 |
|
mastershakeman posted:Title IX exists for a reason, maybe you disagree with it but it's there. Title IX isn't about sex segregation? At least I'm assuming Borscht was talking about 1 category that included everyone and not only males.
|
# ¿ Apr 7, 2022 02:55 |
|
So….I’m confused. At first, when Koos took over as moderation and it was announced positions would not be moderated, a lot of people were excited. But now, when the possibility of a naive person who read some bullshit headline about transgenders in sports come up, that support is suddenly flipped into something akin to “ban immediately”? I’m honestly confused. Obviously, some people are bringing it up in bad faith. But that’s not always the case. How to differentiate it of course is another question
|
# ¿ Apr 9, 2022 22:26 |
|
Liquid Communism posted:I'm curious exactly what post you're defending as the work of a 'naive person', because I can't say I've seen any of that here. Oh yea, after that person kept posting, it became obvious. 1000% after the pm poo poo came out. But I’m talking about the hypothetical after their very first post, which seemed stupid but possibly good faith still
|
# ¿ Apr 9, 2022 22:30 |
|
A big flaming stink posted:so like, let's take a look at the example in question: TBH, in a vacuum, I could read those as some opinion by a lovely person who I grew up with in rural MN that could be swayed away from their position. Maybe I'm naive, but
|
# ¿ Apr 9, 2022 23:18 |
|
some plague rats posted:You seem far more concerned with the feelings and opinions of some hypothetical dipshit you grew up with than those of the people you're talking to right here and now who are affected by this poo poo so I don't know if "naive" is the word I would use. I'm sorry I'm concerned with changing people's views on a forum about Debate & Discussion. Kalit fucked around with this message at 23:27 on Apr 9, 2022 |
# ¿ Apr 9, 2022 23:24 |
|
Pollyanna posted:Quick correction, don’t refer to a person as “a transgender”. It’s just “a trans person”, or “_____ is trans”. Thank you for the correction, I will be more conscious of this in the future.
|
# ¿ Apr 9, 2022 23:57 |
|
E: Nevermind, mis-read a post
Kalit fucked around with this message at 16:45 on Apr 11, 2022 |
# ¿ Apr 11, 2022 16:31 |
|
|
# ¿ May 22, 2024 08:31 |
|
BIG-DICK-BUTT-gently caress posted:I don't know what the solution is, I know little about gender studies, that's why I'm asking folks w more knowledge and experience. Housing trans folks in separate facilities seems like the least-messy solutiom I'm confused, what does fertility/two people being able to reproduce have to do with gender?
|
# ¿ Apr 17, 2022 13:11 |