|
I've seen transphobes cite this article as proof that trans people shouldn't be allowed in sport https://bjsm.bmj.com/content/55/11/577.full?ijkey=yjlCzZVZFRDZzHz&keytype=ref but it actually shows that there's no advantage in performance after just 1-2 years of treatment except for running, which declined and might further decline with time. So it seems like a pretty easy choice. Politically though it seems like it's bait for chuds and more conservative dems.
|
#
¿
Apr 6, 2022 16:19
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 22, 2024 13:05 |
|
|
Jaxyon posted:Yes get familiar with "12%" because that study is one of the only ones in existence that shows any sort of advantage at all and the bigots will use it as a bludgeon til the end of time. It's hilarious because even the conclusion mostly refutes their talking points. Is anyone familiar with the studies this rear end in a top hat here cites: https://www.reddit.com/r/worldnews/comments/txo13s/comment/i3nbtov/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3 The first one is the same (of course) but there are a bunch more: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40279-020-01389-3, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25377496/.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 6, 2022 21:09
|
|
|
Jaxyon posted:I'd to point out 7 pages in not a single person has disputed my first post in the thread with any substance(data, studies, statistics) whatsoever including the person who posted frankly horrible things at people in their PMs before getting banned. That said there are 2-3 papers I posted earlier that I didn't have time to review yet. I just want to have a clear understanding of the science to shut up transphobes.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 8, 2022 09:17
|
|
|
Lol someone's getting probated for that  I don't think a few examples would prove anything really in a way that actual statistical analysis would. But it's definan argument that gets busted out by the transphobes.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 9, 2022 11:01
|
|