Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
10 Beers
May 21, 2005

Shit! I didn't bring a knife.

Everyone posted:


Venkman isn't "rapey" though he is manipulative. He isn't the ESP girl's professor. He paid her and the guy to take part in the experiment and the bad politics is that girl is presented as a literal dumb blonde for falling for Venkman's "you have a psychic gift" bullshit.

He did show up to Dana's apartment for a date with a lot of Thorazine that he uses to sedate her.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Everyone
Sep 6, 2019

by sebmojo

10 Beers posted:

He did show up to Dana's apartment for a date with a lot of Thorazine that he uses to sedate her.

Personal use?

Xealot
Nov 25, 2002

Showdown in the Galaxy Era.

theironjef posted:

If Korg was born to and raised by his two dads, then how come in Ragnarok he had a mom with a new boyfriend, who he hates? I guess it must be some found family thing.

One of Korg's "dads" was trans and identified as a woman. Leave your bigoted anti-Kronan transphobia out of the thread, please.

theironjef
Aug 11, 2009

The archmage of unexpected stinks.

Xealot posted:

One of Korg's "dads" was trans and identified as a woman. Leave your bigoted anti-Kronan transphobia out of the thread, please.

Then how come he's misgendering his mom in Love and Thunder? There's no win here. Either Korg is a plot hole or a transphobe.

Xealot
Nov 25, 2002

Showdown in the Galaxy Era.

theironjef posted:

Then how come he's misgendering his mom in Love and Thunder? There's no win here. Either Korg is a plot hole or a transphobe.

Good point, we need to cancel Korg.

LividLiquid
Apr 13, 2002

Xealot posted:

One of Korg's "dads" was trans and identified as a woman. Leave your bigoted anti-Kronan transphobia out of the thread, please.
Please don't do this. My life isn't a punchline.

Okay, it is, but not because I'm trans.

Xealot
Nov 25, 2002

Showdown in the Galaxy Era.

LividLiquid posted:

Please don't do this. My life isn't a punchline.

Okay, it is, but not because I'm trans.

TBH neither is mine. No offense intended.

It's mostly absurd that a source of "queer representation" in the MCU involves a CG rock person.

LividLiquid
Apr 13, 2002

Gotchya'. Sorry. Thank you.

I wouldn't have said anything at all if a half-assed one-liner didn't pop into my head to go with the request.

A True Jar Jar Fan
Nov 3, 2003

Primadonna

Xealot posted:

It's mostly absurd that a source of "queer representation" in the MCU involves a CG rock person.

Yeah, Valkyrie will never have an onscreen romance but we've got... This? I guess?

Xealot
Nov 25, 2002

Showdown in the Galaxy Era.

A True Jar Jar Fan posted:

Yeah, Valkyrie will never have an onscreen romance but we've got... This? I guess?

Progress!

Disney's great at shoving offhanded queer meet-cutes into easily-excised moments in the epilogue. Korg can hang out with Le Fou and that Star Wars Resistance lady.

LividLiquid
Apr 13, 2002

They used to blame "middle America," and now they blame China. But at a certain point, you're just not allowing interracial couples to appease the Klan. Which is a terrible metaphor because they are absolutely still doing that.

Xealot
Nov 25, 2002

Showdown in the Galaxy Era.

I'm mostly dreading the discourse surrounding MCU X-Men. Where X-Men's general critique of how military-industrial capitalism enables racist fascism is suddenly completely absent from the movies, but CHUDs will still complain about how Disney has "turned X-Men woke."

This superhero team of terrified teenagers, alienated from their families because of a non-normative identity they discovered during puberty, has banded together under assumed names that affirm their identities, as part of a found family that fights fascist killbots and "human" supremacists. A true shame that X-Men has now, in the 2020's and no earlier, gone woke.

LionArcher
Mar 29, 2010


massive spider posted:

I get what the child soldier/kiddy warrior/infant cavalier scene was going for. Fighting back against Nightmare monsters in the dark and so on, the imagery is well worn territory, the problem is it doesn’t really tie into anything else in the films tone or quite work. Much like most elements in the rest of the picture.

I think stories about kids fighting always have a slightly transgressive edge to them but in the case of stuff like Peter Pan (or even Stranger Things for a more modern example) they’re usually from the POV of the kids, it’s their fantasy as they fight against a hostile (adult) world. Peter Pan isn’t a child soldier because his army is led by him, a child to repel all adults from their island. The stranger things kids are empowered by friendship as embodied by their DnD make believe game preparing them to fight actual monsters.

In this scene Thor, an adult man (ostensibly a mythical god but the movie has already established that “gods” are just the wealthy and elite) saying “ok kids time to pick up your weapons now” feels really weird. And the discomfort is played for a kind of joke too as an extension of the “Thor is dumb and out of touch” gag, before it’s revealed he actually has a plan.

It’s not really common in these movies that Thor himself is a Superman type inspirational figure, he’s a warrior from a warrior culture. That’s even expressly the argument he uses to tell the kids to fight- that’s what Asguardian kids do. But there was also a joke in the movie earlier about how asguardians ate kids when times got hard (though they feel guilty about it now of course).

Neither are the kids choosing to follow him out of inspiration or their own volition either, or fighting for Love the supposed theme of this movie, he’s literally just- telling them to fight and giving them weapons.

Obviously these are magical kids and as audiences we know that magical kids empowered by goodness can beat monsters, it’s not like, disturbing and a “bad example to kids” or something. But it is weird and doesent work.

This is a pretty good read. For instance, when the kids in Stranger things fight back against shadow government members and legit monsters, and when the teens arm themselves to stop bad poo poo from happening, it's loving rad. Because it's been set up as a theme, and because it is 100% justified because they need to help themselves since they can't trust/the adults are even there.

There is no reason in this movie that he gets the kids to help, instead of calling in Guardians for help, and so on. it's convenient for Thor to get help from the kids. The villain doesn't even want to hurt the kids, just use them as bait. The monsters aren't there to kill the kids, their there to stop Thor.

So basically the theme of that scene is super heroes and fighting is cool and good and should be a good time.

tsob
Sep 26, 2006

Chalalala~

LionArcher posted:

There is no reason in this movie that he gets the kids to help, instead of calling in Guardians for help, and so on. it's convenient for Thor to get help from the kids. The villain doesn't even want to hurt the kids, just use them as bait. The monsters aren't there to kill the kids, their there to stop Thor.

There is nothing in that scene that implies or says the shadow monsters Gorr are sending will avoid hurting or killing the kids, or even fail to target them if Thor moves away from the monsters entirely. Gorr didn't want to hurt them when they had use as bait, but there's nothing in the film to indicate he cares about them once they've lost any purpose as bait.

RBA Starblade
Apr 28, 2008

Going Home.

Games Idiot Court Jester

tsob posted:

There is nothing in that scene that implies or says the shadow monsters Gorr are sending will avoid hurting or killing the kids, or even fail to target them if Thor moves away from the monsters entirely. Gorr didn't want to hurt them when they had use as bait, but there's nothing in the film to indicate he cares about them once they've lost any purpose as bait.

If Thor popped over five seconds later there wouldn't have been any kids lol

Mameluke
Aug 2, 2013

by Fluffdaddy
Taika Waititi's X-Men would actually just be current-comics X-Men where Logan, Cyclops, and Jean Grey are in a throuple that amounts to the two men taking turns professing their love for Jean

TheNamedSavior
Mar 10, 2019

by VideoGames

LividLiquid posted:

They used to blame "middle America," and now they blame China. But at a certain point, you're just not allowing interracial couples to appease the Klan. Which is a terrible metaphor because they are absolutely still doing that.

One of China's most popular drama shows (The Untamed) is literally about two gay monster hunters. (One of whom becomes an evil wizard while the other stays good.)

The novel it's based on straight up had them gently caress and kiss in it, they removed it BUT kept...literally everything else. It's literally just "two gay guys with everything but the sex and kissing". Most of the audience knows they're gay, they just are barely on the line to get it pass the censors without making it unrecognizable. China is not the real villain here. In fact, they could probably get pass China's censors with minimal effort (Steven loving Universe airs in the loving middle east, tho they often just cut episodes out, even if it's one part of a two parter), while having actual gay people be a thing in the loving MCU, but they won't.

Because it's not China, it's loving Disney. Disney could probably overthrow the CPC over night with their media empire alone, but they won't because they are just as cowardly, racist, and fascist as the "communists" are. Ironically Disney's "NO IT'S CHINA" defense will probably lead to "gay liberals" joining the military just to shoot up those "evil gay bashers" (even tho China's culture was a million times more friendly to Gay people before the ugly british empire tried to conquer them) when or if (Gods, I hope it's an "if") WW3 comes up.

If you want representation in the MCU, vote third party, and STRONGLY campaign for FORCED unionization of every company in america. That's the only way we're gonna see Valkyrie make out with a chick on screen at this point.

Rarity
Oct 21, 2010

~*4 LIFE*~

TheNamedSavior posted:

One of China's most popular drama shows (The Untamed) is literally about two gay monster hunters. (One of whom becomes an evil wizard while the other stays good.)

The novel it's based on straight up had them gently caress and kiss in it, they removed it BUT kept...literally everything else. It's literally just "two gay guys with everything but the sex and kissing". Most of the audience knows they're gay, they just are barely on the line to get it pass the censors without making it unrecognizable. China is not the real villain here. In fact, they could probably get pass China's censors with minimal effort (Steven loving Universe airs in the loving middle east, tho they often just cut episodes out, even if it's one part of a two parter), while having actual gay people be a thing in the loving MCU, but they won't.

Because it's not China, it's loving Disney. Disney could probably overthrow the CPC over night with their media empire alone, but they won't because they are just as cowardly, racist, and fascist as the "communists" are. Ironically Disney's "NO IT'S CHINA" defense will probably lead to "gay liberals" joining the military just to shoot up those "evil gay bashers" (even tho China's culture was a million times more friendly to Gay people before the ugly british empire tried to conquer them) when or if (Gods, I hope it's an "if") WW3 comes up.

If you want representation in the MCU, vote third party, and STRONGLY campaign for FORCED unionization of every company in america. That's the only way we're gonna see Valkyrie make out with a chick on screen at this point.

Lmao

josh04
Oct 19, 2008


"THE FLASH IS THE REASON
TO RACE TO THE THEATRES"

This title contains sponsored content.

president xi removes his mask - to reveal the twisted face of michael eisner!

LividLiquid
Apr 13, 2002

TheNamedSavior posted:

Because it's not China, it's loving Disney.
:hmmyes:

While I don't agree with everything you said, they'll absolutely find a new scapegoat for this the moment China stops being a convenient one because it has nothing to do with China. They just think "who gets to count as people" is an apolitical question and to come down on the side of "all people count as people" would be them being political.

the holy poopacy
May 16, 2009

hey! check this out
Fun Shoe
Considering how much Disney does try to pander to Chinese audiences and how badly they gently caress it up, I wouldn't be surprised if it was an honest attempt by Disney to make it more acceptable to China. But even then, the fact that that's what they go with still says more about Disney than about China.

live with fruit
Aug 15, 2010

LionArcher posted:

This is a pretty good read. For instance, when the kids in Stranger things fight back against shadow government members and legit monsters, and when the teens arm themselves to stop bad poo poo from happening, it's loving rad. Because it's been set up as a theme, and because it is 100% justified because they need to help themselves since they can't trust/the adults are even there.

There is no reason in this movie that he gets the kids to help, instead of calling in Guardians for help, and so on. it's convenient for Thor to get help from the kids. The villain doesn't even want to hurt the kids, just use them as bait. The monsters aren't there to kill the kids, their there to stop Thor.

So basically the theme of that scene is super heroes and fighting is cool and good and should be a good time.

Love and Thunder was the worst MCU movie in a while about earning its "Where are the other Avengers pass?". A lot of it would've been easier had Thor just called the Guardians (or Captain Marvel).

LividLiquid
Apr 13, 2002

"Why didn't the movie stop dead in its tracks and explain why people from other movies aren't there" is not the bulletproof criticism people think it is.

It didn't do those things because we don't need that scene in every movie past the fifth one in this over decade-old series. They're not there because they couldn't be, or they would be. Stopping to say that every time, or to make some glib Whedonesque joke about it, is not something anybody actually wants, whether they think they do or not.

live with fruit
Aug 15, 2010

LividLiquid posted:

"Why didn't the movie stop dead in its tracks and explain why people from other movies aren't there" is not the bulletproof criticism people think it is.

It didn't do those things because we don't need that scene in every movie past the fifth one in this over decade-old series. They're not there because they couldn't be, or they would be. Stopping to say that every time, or to make some glib Whedonesque joke about it, is not something anybody actually wants, whether they think they do or not.

The MCU has gotten a lot better at telling stories that can avoid this problem altogether. You'd have to go back to Winter Soldier to find an MCU movie where the assistance of other Avengers, like asking the Guardians of the Galaxy to help with an intergalactic mission that ultimately requires Thor to conscript children into battle, is so obvious but not utilized.

tsob
Sep 26, 2006

Chalalala~

live with fruit posted:

The MCU has gotten a lot better at telling stories that can avoid this problem altogether. You'd have to go back to Winter Soldier to find an MCU movie where the assistance of other Avengers, like asking the Guardians of the Galaxy to help with an intergalactic mission that ultimately requires Thor to conscript children into battle, is so obvious but not utilized.

The movie did explain why he didn't ask the Guardians for help. He knows there are hundreds of people already calling them for assistance for a start, so they're kind of busy and secondly, because when he goes to confront Gorr at the Gate of Eternity he's doing so on a time limit. He has to get there as fast as possible, because Gorr knows where it is, has the key and is on his way there. As is, without stopping beyond to talk to Jane, he barely makes it in time. In order to get the Guardians help he'd also need some way to contact them, which I don't think he has, or some way to locate them given he has no idea where they are in the universe, which he definitely doesn't have.

As for the Avengers? Most of the ones he knows are dead. Tony? Dead. Natasha? Dead. Cap? Effectively dead. Hawkeye? Retired. Captain Marvel? Could be anywhere in the universe, and again, he has not only no idea where she is, but no idea how to contact her. The only maybe active Avenger he's really familiar with who is likely to be somewhere on Earth, even if he took the time to locate him and explain why he wants his help is Bruce; who, last Thor saw, had a basically unhealable injury preventing him from using one of his arms (though it looks like he's healed it regardless in She-Hulk), and probably about to retire himself. In that regard, his best bet would be Dr. Strange, but even then he only kinda knows Dr. Strange, in that he was at the guy's house once and I'm not sure he even knows where the Sanctum is, beyond "somewhere in New York", given how lackadaisical he is about Earth in general.

He could go there, but he'd have to hope the guy is even around and not busy with other threats somewhere else in our universe or other dimensions, explain the situation and then teleport them both to Eternity. Which would probably get him there too late to stop Gorr, and also quite possibly too late to help the kids. Who, even if you want to insist that Gorr wasn't going to harm them, Thor has no way of knowing regardless; so as far as Thor is concerned, he has to get to the Gate of Eternity to help the kids asap as well as to stop Gorr. Not "as soon as I nip across to New York, talk to a guy I kinda know". Which is presuming he'd even thought about asking Dr. Strange for help in the first place, given he's only ever met him briefly in rather trying times and may not have kept him in mind for just such a situation.

The Guardians are the only ones he could ask for help who are directly shown in the movie though, so the only ones the movie might care to address him asking for help. Which it has, since they're busy and he has no idea how to get their help anyway.

tsob fucked around with this message at 06:25 on Jul 30, 2022

josh04
Oct 19, 2008


"THE FLASH IS THE REASON
TO RACE TO THE THEATRES"

This title contains sponsored content.

Who's out asking the Guardians for help? Do the Guardians help people?

BioEnchanted
Aug 9, 2011

He plays for the dreamers that forgot how to dream, and the lovers that forgot how to love.

josh04 posted:

Who's out asking the Guardians for help? Do the Guardians help people?

That's kind of a dumb question given the movie shows them doing so. They may not have done intentionally before, but clearly they are now. People's motivations and missions change with circumstances. Before they were just loving around, but NOW there are billions of distress calls coming in simultaneously probably not intended for them but certainly not picky enough to not be broadcasting on every frequency they can. And Star Lord may be kind of a dingus, but he's not the type to leave people hanging like that.

josh04
Oct 19, 2008


"THE FLASH IS THE REASON
TO RACE TO THE THEATRES"

This title contains sponsored content.

Taking it at face value just makes it weirder that they dump the extremely powerful guy who was helping them out. Not exactly effective altruism there, Starlord.

CelticPredator
Oct 11, 2013
🍀👽🆚🪖🏋

It makes sense from starlords pov bc Thor is really stupid and annoying.

Karloff
Mar 21, 2013

TIP posted:

Yeah, I'm not trying to argue that Ghostbusters has good politics or anyone involved had good politics. Just saying that having a protagonist who's antagonist is a government functionary doesn't mean the movie is a libertarian screed.

Director Ivan Reitman did declare himself as a Libertarian and concurred when asked that the film was anti-epa. Obviously the main goal of Ghostbusters is to be a fun film, but that stuff is definitely intentional on his part at least.

Karloff fucked around with this message at 15:05 on Jul 30, 2022

Bogus Adventure
Jan 11, 2017

More like "Bulges Adventure"

Karloff posted:

Director Ivan Reitman did declare himself as a Libertarian and concurred when asked that the film was anti-epa. Obviously the main goal of Ghostbusters is to be a fun film, but that stuff is definitely intentional on his part at least.

Man, the '80s really sucked.

Away all Goats
Jul 5, 2005

Goose's rebellion

josh04 posted:

Who's out asking the Guardians for help? Do the Guardians help people?

The entire reason they meet Thor in the first place was because they were responding to a distress signal.

theironjef
Aug 11, 2009

The archmage of unexpected stinks.

Hoping to loot a ship full of freshly dead corpses but yes.

oldpainless
Oct 30, 2009

This 📆 post brought to you by RAID💥: SHADOW LEGENDS👥.
RAID💥: SHADOW LEGENDS 👥 - It's for your phone📲TM™ #ad📢

The guardians help others but they also help themselves

Bogus Adventure
Jan 11, 2017

More like "Bulges Adventure"
The Guardians of the Galaxy are really a space-based branch of Heroes for Hire

josh04
Oct 19, 2008


"THE FLASH IS THE REASON
TO RACE TO THE THEATRES"

This title contains sponsored content.

Away all Goats posted:

The entire reason they meet Thor in the first place was because they were responding to a distress signal.

All ships are obliged to respond to a distress call; it's a little different to running an emergency services triage like they appear to be in Thor 4. Idk it's not the biggest thing in the world but it seemed weird to me in the cinema; they were introduced as borderline-criminal rogues, now they're space cops.

CelticPredator
Oct 11, 2013
🍀👽🆚🪖🏋

Yeah but they were gonna steal the parts for salvage lol

Xealot
Nov 25, 2002

Showdown in the Galaxy Era.

Bogus Adventure posted:

Man, the '80s really sucked.

"Remember how 15 years ago there was this groundswell of empathy and a profound rejection of systems built on greed and oppression? Well gently caress all that, let's make money, greed is good."

Lifepuzzler
Nov 5, 2009

josh04 posted:

Who's out asking the Guardians for help? Do the Guardians help people?

They see a distress signal as a potential to extort a reward. That's how I take it anyway.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

TheNamedSavior
Mar 10, 2019

by VideoGames

Xealot posted:

"Remember how 15 years ago there was this groundswell of empathy and a profound rejection of systems built on greed and oppression? Well gently caress all that, let's make money, greed is good."

As MLK said, gently caress the white moderate. He didn't actually say that exactly. But close.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply