|
It happens very rarely, but there are a couple of times when multiple pieces of evidence is valid to progress. I think it's happened at least once in this lp so far too.
|
#
¿
Dec 29, 2022 03:46
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 11, 2024 06:27 |
|
|
Also, a big part of being a lawyer is throwing off the witnesses. If they didn't throw the bone into the incinerator but did throw something else or even all of those into the incinerator, that's going to trip them up answering your question. They may unintentionally reveal something.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 25, 2023 15:26
|
|
|
He wanted our badge so badly, didn't he? Well he can have it!
|
|
#
¿
Feb 3, 2024 04:06
|
|
|
Dirk the Average posted:Clearly we just need to show our badge. That proves that we know the law, and thus know whether the evidence is legal or not! Makes perfect sense to me.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 6, 2024 14:16
|
|
|
davidspackage posted:Interesting, I hadn't considered that angle. Still, I feel like it misses something. Murdering a prosecutor just to get a conviction is extreme, and why did he need leverage on Lana to begin with, really? Or was it their respective roles in law enforcement? The chief wants convictions, so he forces his prosecutor Lana to... prosecute despite flimsy evidence? Meh. He didn't need leverage per se, he just wanted it because he's a blackmailing scumbag getting out ahead at the expense of others, see when his mask comes off during the trial.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 8, 2024 19:49
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 11, 2024 06:27 |
|
|
...! posted:Show the attorney badge 
|
|
#
¿
Feb 17, 2024 18:13
|
|