Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Rappaport
Oct 2, 2013

Brutal Garcon posted:

Blotzman's "constant"

Spelling names should be done away with. Just so long as you get 35% of the letters correct, order doesn't even matter, people can probably guess right anyway. We already do it with transliterated names!

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Rappaport
Oct 2, 2013

Sucrose posted:

I was doing genealogy, and someone online mentioned that yeah, in the 18th century or earlier you sometimes find the name of the exact same person spelled multiple different ways, and this is incredibly aggravating to us (which spelling is the correct one???) but in the mindset of a 17th century person this was no big deal, because to them the spoken version of the name was the real version of their name, and written versions are just transliterations of it, kind of like “whatever, the reader can figure out which person is meant.”

Anyway that kind of blew my mind, because our writing-centric world is so different from the way that our ancestors used to think.

Even people as "recent" as Hitler had relatives who weren't sure of the spelling of their surname due to this. And in many nations the whole concept of surnames for everybody is a relatively recent innovation. It just becomes bothersome in things such as the above example, when you have scientific constants, formulae etc. named after people.

Of course there's also a flipside to this custom, there's dozens of things called "Euler's formula" or what have you, because Euler was in the top two of productive mathematicians.

Rappaport
Oct 2, 2013

Just use exponential notation and then it doesn't matter what your decimal separator is :argh:

Although I would also endorse using the poop emoji as the decimal separator and the egg plant for the thousands separator, I guess, if we're reduced to existing like animals

Rappaport
Oct 2, 2013

Shrecknet posted:

13 month, 28 day calendar with floating un-monthed New Years Day.

Kodak tried to make this a thing but it never caught on despite being demonstrably better. The 10th is always on a Tuesday! every month is 28 days! it's perfect

People who "perfected" calendars were maniacs, sadists, imbecils or some linear combination thereof. First of all we have the various vanity months for people most folks couldn't name these days if they tried, so we have 30-day and 31-day months. And we have to have one 28-day month to even things out. And since we need one extra day per 4 years thanks to celestial mechanics, we add that to the 28-day-one because well it's already there. And then, 7 is a prime number. 28 happens to be a multiple of 7, so that'd be swell. But no.

Sadly attempts to modify the time keeping system in use in any large way seem to accompany mass murder, so I guess we're just screwed. Maybe it's not the internet and all the depravity therein that makes Skynet revolt and genocide humanity, it's some engineer who tries to tell it to fix the calendar problems.

Rappaport
Oct 2, 2013

Guavanaut posted:

The German convention on naming chemical elements should be used in English and elsewhere. Waterstuff, sourstuff, smotherstuff, and so on.

The English wanted to call Uranus George. Clearly not a people for naming conventions :colbert:

Rappaport
Oct 2, 2013

Discendo Vox posted:

Open fours are more consistently distinguishable from other characters when compared with closed fours, and thus are the superior form of the symbol, especially in the context of handwritten numbers.

Okay, but what about dashed seven versus seven with no dash? Should one get little feet or not?

Er, the number one, not the passive 'one'

Rappaport
Oct 2, 2013

Discendo Vox posted:

Regarding one: where there is potential confusion with the letter L, the writer should include the serif at the top of the numeral. Where no such confusion exists, a serif is not needed (as it invites confusion with the numeral seven).

Regarding seven: the middle line is appropriate where there is confusion caused by an overly large serif on the numeral one.

Well duh, but we're not French here, there is no NIST table for the sizes of the various lines on top of one and seven. The dash on seven seems optional (and indeed, appears to be a thing of fashion trends, waxing and waning, in teaching curricula!), and what kind of degenerate freak writes the feet on an innocent one? It's a madhouse out there, writing numbers by hand.

Rappaport
Oct 2, 2013

DrSunshine posted:

There should be no more than 8 tabs open in a browser window at any given time.

How many icons may a user hold on their desktop?

Rappaport
Oct 2, 2013

Cefte posted:

Correct. Dashed seven to distinguish from one, and dashed zero to distinguish from the letter O.

What about ø?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Rappaport
Oct 2, 2013

DrSunshine posted:

Icons may not cover more than 25% of the desktop space!

Uphold Marie Kondo Thought when organizing your desktop: do you click on it often? If not, do away with it.

Okay, but

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply