Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
freeasinbeer
Mar 26, 2015

by Fluffdaddy
Some republican talking head was saying that the senate doesn’t sit til the 23rd, and indicated that was the deadline in their eyes.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

freeasinbeer
Mar 26, 2015

by Fluffdaddy
The supposed reason McCarthy backed off in 2015 is because he was having an affair with another rep

freeasinbeer
Mar 26, 2015

by Fluffdaddy

evilweasel posted:

look at all the people who hate him, if that was true they'd have leaked all the info already

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...denies-all.html

Better link to Vox explainer: https://www.vox.com/2015/10/9/9488323/mccarthy-ellmers-affair

freeasinbeer fucked around with this message at 21:33 on Jan 4, 2023

freeasinbeer
Mar 26, 2015

by Fluffdaddy

Main Paineframe posted:

There's only ~20 people objecting to that dweeb, and the other ~190 people aren't necessarily interested in immediately tossing their favorite overboard just to please a small and extremely demanding faction.

Also, they needed a majority vote just to adjourn the House so they can stop rerunning the vote and go spend a couple days wheeling and dealing. The small faction blocked that for a while just to humiliate that one dweeb.

They are getting pissed that McCarthy is giving up more and more, in particular they seem pissed that the 20 might “jump the line” on committee assignments.

They might not be onboard to give ‘em all that they want.

freeasinbeer
Mar 26, 2015

by Fluffdaddy

Raenir Salazar posted:

Could they get a procedural ruling from the clerk to attempt to switch the vote to some kind of Ranked Voting with Instant Runoff? That might still not get to 218 but might speed up the process.

No?

And why would anyone want to speed the process?

Fundamentally this doesn’t really matter for the United States til July with the debt ceiling, because dem controlled senate and presidency means the house wont pass any laws.

Any oversight they do will be bullshit like hunter bidens laptop investigations.

Edit: also remember the current clerk was appointed by the dems, and it is usually their last official act to elect the opposing parties speaker, she has no incentive to bend the rules to empower republicans.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

freeasinbeer
Mar 26, 2015

by Fluffdaddy

Oracle posted:

yeah she ain't gettin 'paid for this poo poo until they pass it.

She’s also gonna lose her job by tradition, so she might not care?

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply