|
https://twitter.com/JosephBarnhurst/status/1653272779222061056?s=20
|
#
¿
May 3, 2023 02:21
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 11, 2024 19:48 |
|
|
https://twitter.com/jostewart/status/1653502306615283730?s=20
|
|
#
¿
May 3, 2023 07:16
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/verge/status/1725900140781703168?s=46 If this is the news coming from the new deal, then gently caress that go back to the drawing board
|
|
#
¿
Nov 20, 2023 17:08
|
|
|
Long for the day either Capitalism dies or the idea of infinite growth dies and just keeping steady is a-okay
|
|
#
¿
Dec 1, 2023 16:06
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/sagaftra/status/1732240277224693817?s=20 Welp, it's done But what's with the numbers? 38% turnout and it still passed? And coinciding with this is Voice Actors expressing disappointment: looks like a lot of them wanted stronger measures against AI but got thrown under the bus. Well that sucks 
SgtSteel91 fucked around with this message at 06:07 on Dec 6, 2023 |
|
#
¿
Dec 6, 2023 06:01
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 11, 2024 19:48 |
|
|
Pinterest Mom posted:Well, they don't need to pay you again, they could just scan you and throw the scan in the trash, but they do need to pay you again if they want to actually use the scan in any way. That's one of the key pieces of the contract, that any use of digital replicas needs to be authorised by the person who got scanned for that specific use (so there can't be a blanket clause in a contract "WB can use my scan for any future project", they need to come back to the performer for every project they want to use it in), and paid as if they actually did the work. But what if a company uses the scans to make “Actor X” who is a Cronenburg amalgamation of different actors who consented to getting scanned? Does it count as a new entity and they don’t need to pay the actor anymore since they’ll say it’s not their specific scan they’re using?
|
|
#
¿
Dec 6, 2023 20:46
|
|