|
interesting. not that sure it is even a bad idea, presumably there's some bing search or so at the bottom of it (as building the whole thing is likely impossible), but probably there's a bunch of manual curating you could layer on top if you're actually making money off your customers being satisfied (as opposed to e.g. in practice making more money from the user searching again and again as they're presented with crap).
|
#
¿
May 11, 2023 09:45
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 18, 2024 14:32 |
|
|
mediaphage posted:how does it compare to duckduckgo underpinned by bing, does not mine your searches, and has the bangs. so it is worst-case equivalent. e: lacks duckassist though, so if you want your searches shipped to openai without hassle probably better to stick to ddg Cybernetic Vermin fucked around with this message at 11:49 on May 11, 2023 |
|
#
¿
May 11, 2023 11:02
|
|
|
yeah, i'm trying it out too but i don't see any way i can motivate what it'd cost the fact that i am running the numbers should reveal that i like it a lot though
|
|
#
¿
May 12, 2023 17:51
|
|
|
kagi is a real clear showcase that bing can be cleaned up to be useful, but bing itself remains pretty garbage. being able to banish a site from results is a killer feature, downright tempting to set up a cheaper alternative stealing just the ddg bangs and that banish feature.
|
|
#
¿
May 24, 2023 16:29
|
|
|
there's in general a fair few ad-funded services i'd rather pay for. if, notably, i could then also get them from companies not entirely captured by the ad business either way.
|
|
#
¿
May 25, 2023 14:34
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 18, 2024 14:32 |
|
|
i paid up $5 for the 300 searches. i am 99% sure that it used to be 100, which is rather too little, i think 300 will be enough for me though.
|
|
#
¿
Sep 27, 2023 12:09
|
|