Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
rotor
Jun 11, 2001

classic case of pineapple derangement syndrome

qirex posted:

that's all there is. people have been chasing this for decades and it turns out it's not actually good at much besides being another screen

idk man that magic leap poo poo would be badass and i dont see why they cant make it happen with this thing unless there's something they're not telling us

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

MrMoo
Sep 14, 2000

r u ready to WALK posted:

I don’t get why they didn’t add a bunch of ddr5 slots in the new Mac Pro and marketed the unified memory as up to 192gb of l2 cache and vram instead

Presumably any enterprise SSD you chuck in there will be equivalent to the performance of DDR memory being outside the CPU package.

Beeftweeter
Jun 28, 2005

OFFICIAL #1 GNOME FAN

rotor posted:

things i want to do with an AR headset:

* tilt brush, but interacting with the physical world
* setting little AR creations all over the place that you only see in AR
* display live tips about how to use a device overlaid on the device itself
* pokemon go but like turbo hyper edition

things i never want to do with an AR headset
* answer email
* use a browser
* be on zoom
* interact in any way at all with iTunes

what about facetime with life-size representations of your contact's torso

haveblue
Aug 15, 2005



Toilet Rascal

Beeftweeter posted:

like, if you can use those cameras to just take pictures or video it might be kinda useful to me personally but not if it's as much as a really good mirrorless system + a couple lenses

it can take stereo pictures and video and they're displayed in 3D inside the headset

Beeftweeter
Jun 28, 2005

OFFICIAL #1 GNOME FAN

haveblue posted:

it can take stereo pictures and video and they're displayed in 3D inside the headset

ok it will definitely be used for porn then

GATOS Y VATOS
Aug 22, 2002


rotor posted:

things i want to do with an AR headset:

* tilt brush, but interacting with the physical world
* setting little AR creations all over the place that you only see in AR
* display live tips about how to use a device overlaid on the device itself
* pokemon go but like turbo hyper edition

things i never want to do with an AR headset
* answer email
* use a browser
* be on zoom
* interact in any way at all with iTunes

:agreed:

rotor
Jun 11, 2001

classic case of pineapple derangement syndrome
ikea cabinet build instructions but in AR would be fuckin tight, i could potentially finally assemble something right the first time

qirex
Feb 15, 2001

rotor posted:

idk man that magic leap poo poo would be badass and i dont see why they cant make it happen with this thing unless there's something they're not telling us

magic leap reels were all fake though. you can't realistically make content that actually adapts to anything besides "put something on a flat surface"

poty
Jun 21, 2008

虹はどこで終わるのですか? あなたの魂の中で、または地平線で?

Expo70 posted:

shame you can't do anything with them

what concerns me is everybody is going to see this and go "hmm yes, how can we gimp our existing stuff to copy this?"

i don't care about overpriced VR headsets that are just wearable phones unless there's something to actually DO on them that can't be done elsewhere

agree op disappointing that there was no secret killer app, only the same sort of stuff that meta already showed but executed better

rotor
Jun 11, 2001

classic case of pineapple derangement syndrome

av/post combo is v strong here

haveblue
Aug 15, 2005



Toilet Rascal

rotor posted:

* display live tips about how to use a device overlaid on the device itself

this was what AR was supposed to be for, looking at stuff and being able to dive deeper into it instantly without taking your eyes off it

it turns out humans get really skeeved out by the even the possibility of someone doing it to them

rotor
Jun 11, 2001

classic case of pineapple derangement syndrome

qirex posted:

you can't realistically make content that actually adapts to anything besides "put something on a flat surface"

I'm not sure thats true any more

rotor
Jun 11, 2001

classic case of pineapple derangement syndrome

haveblue posted:

this was what AR was supposed to be for, looking at stuff and being able to dive deeper into it instantly without taking your eyes off it

it turns out humans get really skeeved out by the even the possibility of someone doing it to them

??

Sagebrush
Feb 26, 2012

rotor posted:

idk man that magic leap poo poo would be badass and i dont see why they cant make it happen with this thing unless there's something they're not telling us

the magic leap poo poo like the whale jumping out of the floor was completely fake, and you know it because there is no way you can use an illuminated screen to make part of the outside world darker. AR in its current state can project glowing lines over the world but it can't make a dark blue whale appear floating in front of you.

unless you do a total stereo video passthrough as apple is doing here, but that's not what magic leap was selling.

armpit_enjoyer
Jan 25, 2023

my god. it's full of posts
i could agree to using itunes on the thing but only! if they crank that skeumorphism dial until it breaks

neutral milf hotel
Oct 9, 2001

by Fluffdaddy
https://twitter.com/goth600/status/1665810214342529024

qirex
Feb 15, 2001

rotor posted:

I'm not sure thats true any more

but apple and disney with all the resources in the whole rear end world can't do it?

Beeftweeter
Jun 28, 2005

OFFICIAL #1 GNOME FAN

rotor posted:

I'm not sure thats true any more

granted what we saw were all mockups but they didn't even show that. in fact i'm not sure we saw anything interact with anything, just covering up real stuff

rotor
Jun 11, 2001

classic case of pineapple derangement syndrome

Sagebrush posted:

unless you do a total stereo video passthrough as apple is doing here, but that's not what magic leap was selling.

I am aware that the magic leap poo poo was all fake, my point is that it is now possible/likely possible with this new apple device but it is worrying that we dont have demos for it

Sagebrush
Feb 26, 2012

rotor posted:

ikea cabinet build instructions but in AR would be fuckin tight, i could potentially finally assemble something right the first time

one of my grad students built a prototype of this and i really hope he takes it further and i'm baffled that none of the big companies have done it yet. it's such an insanely obvious application

post hole digger
Mar 21, 2011

Jonny 290
May 5, 2005



[ASK] me about OS/2 Warp

i cannot breathe lmao

qirex
Feb 15, 2001

Sagebrush posted:

one of my grad students built a prototype of this and i really hope he takes it further and i'm baffled that none of the big companies have done it yet. it's such an insanely obvious application

if you make $10 per cabinet spending 5 million dollars making an ar manual that only the world's wealthiest people can use isn't money well spent

Cybernetic Vermin
Apr 18, 2005

i will also say that "on a plane" is a good pitch. not about to pay for it, but i'd enjoy some deep immersive poo poo on just about any kind on a plane.

haveblue
Aug 15, 2005



Toilet Rascal
ikea even already has an AR app, but it just lets you see a tiny video on your phone of what the furniture would look like against that wall

infernal machines
Oct 11, 2012

we monitor many frequencies. we listen always. came a voice, out of the babel of tongues, speaking to us. it played us a mighty dub.

rotor posted:

i really wish they had talked & demo'd more about the AR abilities and a lot less about watching movies and answering email.

frankly, it makes me suspicious.

nobody but nobody has a use case for these things that isn't games or maybe meetings, but strapped to your face

rotor
Jun 11, 2001

classic case of pineapple derangement syndrome

qirex posted:

but apple and disney with all the resources in the whole rear end world can't do it?

idk man i'm seeing a shitload of sensors and cameras and poo poo and ARKit is pretty robust so I am left wth a couple options:

(1) all that poo poo doesnt really work very well or
(2) this demo was premature and they dont have a lot of good demo content yet

None of these seem really likely.

qirex
Feb 15, 2001

apple has spent years and billions of dollars employing hundreds of very smart people on this and "powerpoint floating in space" is the best they could come up with

haveblue
Aug 15, 2005



Toilet Rascal
I would go with 2, this device has been so secret there are so few third party devs working on it

Cybernetic Vermin
Apr 18, 2005

infernal machines posted:

nobody but nobody has a use case for these things that isn't games or maybe meetings, but strapped to your face

though that *might* be shareholder talk and there might yet be stuff that makes no money but is neat. though that pitch is way way better if it didn't cost $35 million

GATOS Y VATOS
Aug 22, 2002


rotor posted:

av/post combo is v strong here

I need somebody to photoshop eyes on this av's goggles

rotor
Jun 11, 2001

classic case of pineapple derangement syndrome

haveblue posted:

I would go with 2, this device has been so secret there are so few third party devs working on it

this is my guess but i could certainly be wrong

Expo70
Nov 15, 2021

Can't talk now, doing
Hot Girl Stuff

Pulcinella posted:

Triple posting but…

See this Bret Victor rant.
http://worrydream.com/ABriefRantOnTheFutureOfInteractionDesign/

It is rather disappointing to that “screens, but they float now” is basically the only way people can imagine the future.

Edit: Mark Fisher except it’s the slow Minority Reportification of the future.

Man, it kills me so bad.

the fact we don't split front and back end of "real" software the same way we do the web is both really good (security, privacy) but really bad (coherence, latency, interoperability)

the way i try explaining this is as if you had a polymorphic dashboard of primitives which can read stuff going on in a software you can't see and then just hook into and display or input relationships between those values and tweak those of others like sort of ux gloop that has some context inference and understands what its dealing with and can sort of envelop different portions of those softwares and pass information between them -- so software just sort of melts together and the boundary between something like blender and unreal engine or a laptop and a desktop in the same space just disappears -- like api discovery on steroids between desktop programs, where they can share spit-swap memory the same way they share files with some sort of master scheduling system for project objects between programs in realtime without the clumsiness of copying and pasting, or arbitrary datatypes by passing them through different analogues or something

like the revolution the operating system brought to computers initially, but *again* from scratch with all the lessons of human limitation and hindsights

likewise, the separation of compile-time and runtime was not something i was raised with and the fact you have to stop to change something instead of being able to change it safely while running costs so much time

like the entire way we think about human/computer interaction feels like its locked in ideas from the 1980's and it just won't ever move on

i gave a talk once like 10 years ago in london on this at some stupid event for yuppies when and i made the mistake of actually saying things i really thought to a room of technocrats which totally went over their heads

the cow-eyed looks i got basically told me "i can't even explain this adequately, let alone build it, so this isn't happening in my lifetime"

Sagebrush
Feb 26, 2012

Cybernetic Vermin posted:

i will also say that "on a plane" is a good pitch

time to barf any% speedrun WORLD RECORD

infernal machines
Oct 11, 2012

we monitor many frequencies. we listen always. came a voice, out of the babel of tongues, speaking to us. it played us a mighty dub.

rotor posted:

idk man i'm seeing a shitload of sensors and cameras and poo poo and ARKit is pretty robust so I am left wth a couple options:

(1) all that poo poo doesnt really work very well or
(2) this demo was premature and they dont have a lot of good demo content yet

None of these seem really likely.

both seem incredibly likely, idk what you're talking about

Beeftweeter
Jun 28, 2005

OFFICIAL #1 GNOME FAN

haveblue posted:

I would go with 2, this device has been so secret there are so few third party devs working on it

we've known about this thing for literally years

Sagebrush
Feb 26, 2012

qirex posted:

apple has spent years and billions of dollars employing hundreds of very smart people on this and "powerpoint floating in space" is the best they could come up with

the richest company on earth didn't bother hiring a couple of game devs or cg artists to make a really cool sizzle reel demo?

qirex
Feb 15, 2001

rotor posted:

idk man i'm seeing a shitload of sensors and cameras and poo poo and ARKit is pretty robust so I am left wth a couple options:

(1) all that poo poo doesnt really work very well or
(2) this demo was premature and they dont have a lot of good demo content yet

None of these seem really likely.

I'll add (3) "unique" content is so difficult and expensive to make it's not worth doing. we've had VR and AR for basically a decade now and there's some games and the ikea app that draws a kallax in your living room

Sagebrush posted:

the richest company on earth didn't bother hiring a couple of game devs or cg artists to make a really cool sizzle reel demo?

that was supposed to be the disney sizzle reel

infernal machines
Oct 11, 2012

we monitor many frequencies. we listen always. came a voice, out of the babel of tongues, speaking to us. it played us a mighty dub.

Cybernetic Vermin posted:

though that *might* be shareholder talk and there might yet be stuff that makes no money but is neat. though that pitch is way way better if it didn't cost $35 million

and also $3500 a unit

you don't generally create weird art with a $3500 paintbrush. i mean you could, but on average that's not going to select for the people creating weird art

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Beeftweeter
Jun 28, 2005

OFFICIAL #1 GNOME FAN

infernal machines posted:

both seem incredibly likely, idk what you're talking about

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply