|
Boris Galerkin posted:https://www.theregister.com/2023/06/12/astronaut_brain_recovery/ RE: silicon life, an even weirder, but potentially plausible form of life is one based on emergent dynamics of cold dusty plasma: https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn12466-could-alien-life-exist-in-the-form-of-dna-shaped-dust/ https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1367-2630/9/8/263/pdf Examples of dusty plasmas include Saturn's rings and interstellar clouds. The dynamics are very interesting. MHD fluid dynamics is already incredibly rich due to the addition of coupled EM physics - giving you different kinds of waves like Alfven waves and many other things. Dusty plasma kicks this up a notch. Energy in systems like these are pretty much equipartitioned between the degrees of freedom of that system. That means that things like free electrons tend to have high temperatures (velocities, roughly), whereas an incomparably more massive dust particle will be at a low temperature, encouraging stability. In addition, dust particles usually get a net negative surface charge, because negatively-charged electrons are more mobile than positively-charged protons or other ions, again due to their lower mass (this effect is also critical in lightning, where ice graupel gets a net charge). This multi-temperature system allows for the formation of all kinds of plasma structures, including plasma "crystals" and DNA-like double helixes, capable of replication in simulations. More prosaic plasma crystals replicate the same lattices found in ordinary crystalline materials like metals (these are all described by the space group). These systems can even result in arrangements strongly resembling galaxies and their formation - hinting at these complex structures being related to statistically universal phenomena. These structures can be stable due to the low temperatures of the dust phase. This kind of emergent complexity at the edge of chaos is exactly the sort of thing one needs for life. I personally think dusty-plasma life is more plausible than silicon life, but I wouldn't necessarily call it "likely". Who knows though? Unfortunately, richer dusty plasma dynamics are very hard to study on Earth. With the effects of gravity, dusty plasma systems are mostly confined to 2d, but the richer 3d dynamics can happen in microgravity. I imagine these structures would also be very hard to study in nature, in places like Saturn's rings, because a spacecraft would disrupt the structures. Here's a cool video of some experiments done in space: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kanYuBptuZ0 screenshot: cat botherer fucked around with this message at 19:04 on Jun 12, 2023 |
# ¿ Jun 12, 2023 18:53 |
|
|
# ¿ May 21, 2024 09:49 |
|
mediaphage posted:the fact that it can form a double helix i don't find particularly indicative of its relevance to whether it can be a basis for life, though. if we found discrete information storage that was conserved through replications, thats obv more interesting. The physics behind this is just so complex and interesting. It's the only thing I'm really aware of that could conceivably rival organic chemistry in that department. In addition, different sizes or species of dust particles could act like different "elements", capable of combining into stable arrangements in ways similar to chemical molecules. To be clear, I don't think that plasma life is necessarily probable, but I'd put it ahead of silicon-based life. At any rate, there is a lot more places dusty plasma in the universe than places capable of carbon- or silicon-based life, which helps right there. cat botherer fucked around with this message at 19:26 on Jun 12, 2023 |
# ¿ Jun 12, 2023 19:07 |
|
DrSunshine posted:What is the timescale on these types of emergent plasma phenomena? Could a hypothetical dusty plasma based life take place on extremely fast timescales that would be hard for us to recognize or observe? It doesn’t sound like the book you are talking about, but there’s a dry sci-fi read about intelligent life on a neutron star by the late physicist/tethers/laser sail guy Robert Forward, called Dragon’s Egg. quote:The star contains about half of a solar mass of matter, compressed into a diameter of about 20 kilometers (12 miles), making its surface gravity 67 billion times that of Earth. Its outer crust, compressed to about 7,000 kg per cubic centimeter, is mainly iron nuclei with a high concentration of neutrons,[1] overlaid with about 1 millimeter (0.039 inches) of white dwarf star material.[2] The atmosphere, mostly iron vapor, is about 5 centimeters (2.0 inches) thick. The star shrinks slightly as it cools, causes the crust to crack and produce mountains 5 to 100 millimeters (0.20 to 3.94 inches) high. Large volcanoes, formed by liquid material oozing from deep cracks, can be many centimeters high and hundred meters in diameter, and will eventually collapse, causing starquakes. The science is pretty spot on. For example, neutron stars do have very thin solid crusts, maybe complete with plate tectonics, or at least faults. Actual “starquakes” of these crusts have been detected by X-ray emissions. On the earth, quakes are caused by stress from mantle convection on the crust. On neutron stars, it’s apparently caused by flow of the interior material dragging field lines around. The changes in the extreme magnetic field then exert stress on the crust. The physics of a neutron star crust and atmosphere could potentially be complex enough to lead to life, but due to the crazy high temperatures, the timescales would be way shorter than a cold plasma whose dust might only be at a few kelvins - much lower than even carbon life. n.b.: Magnetic fields are “frozen” in conductors, of which plasma is a nearly perfect one. Fluid flow drags the field lines around, but the field lines impart stiffness in response - field lines are stiff in that they like to stay straight and not bend. Changes in the field can only slowly diffuse through the medium. This diffusion can actually be neglected for a lot of solar physics/solar wind stuff because the conductivity is high enough. In the case of superconductors, the field lines existing when a material first transitions into superconduction are totally frozen in. That’s why superconductors exclude magnetic fields they are subjected to, allowing for levitation. This is a big part of why MHD flow is so complex. cat botherer fucked around with this message at 00:32 on Jun 13, 2023 |
# ¿ Jun 13, 2023 00:11 |
|
aniviron posted:Do crop circles count as passive? Doesn't harm an animal, after all.
|
# ¿ Jun 22, 2023 01:46 |
|
LanceHunter posted:Aliens are alien His Master's Voice is a really good one. It's set at a military facility in Nevada that receives a seemingly-intelligent neutrino signal, and follows their futile efforts to understand it. On the subject of hyperintelligences, Golem XIV (full text) is another good one. Basically, the Cold War powers developed better and better supercomputers to control strategy, but past a certain point, the AIs would become uncooperative or go catatonic as they withdraw into ontological speculation. The book is presented as lectures given by the eponymous computer before it advanced into a higher/different intelligence regime and became unable to communicate with humans.
|
# ¿ Jun 22, 2023 18:58 |
|
https://www.sciencealert.com/a-big-gravitational-wave-announcement-is-coming-thursday-heres-why-were-excited This is cool: There's a major announcement coming soon about cosmic gravitational wave background - basically the same deal as cosmic background radiation, but gravity waves. CBR is from when the universe first became transparent, a few hundred thousand years after the Big Bang. However, the universe was always transparent to gravitational waves, so this could go back to 10^-32 seconds after the Big Bang.
|
# ¿ Jun 26, 2023 16:44 |
|
Boris Galerkin posted:Oh this is interesting. I remember watching a video on it from the PBS Spacetime guy last year or so I think. Good to know they’ve kept pushing along and have more to share. Also this came out today: https://thehill.com/opinion/technology/4067865-congress-doubles-down-on-explosive-claims-of-illegal-ufo-retrieval-programs/ quote:Asked June 26 about allegations of secret UFO retrieval and reverse-engineering programs, Senate Intelligence Committee Vice Chairman Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) made several stunning statements.
|
# ¿ Jun 27, 2023 16:58 |
|
Boris Galerkin posted:There’s a person in the physics/astronomy thread that says they’ve seen/heard rumors of detecting a supermassive black hole merger with gravitational waves.
|
# ¿ Jun 27, 2023 17:02 |
|
JWST has detected objects consistent with interpretation as dark stars, the size of supermassive black holes, dating from a few hundred million years after the Big Bang. https://www.livescience.com/physics...ive-dark-matter https://arxiv.org/pdf/2304.01173.pdf I had never heard of these hypothetical objects until recently. Here's the general idea: Supersymmetry (which has no real empirical evidence as of yet) predicts particles called "neutralinos," the lightest of which is an good candidate a good candidate for a weakly interacting massive particle (WIMP) explanation of dark matter. These hypothetical neutralinos are Marjona fermions, which are fermionic superpartners of gauge and/or Higgs bosons. Unlike standard (anti-) matter, they are their own antiparticles, and so self-annihilate (this is because they have real-valued wave functions, whereas regular fermionic particles and anti-particles have complex ones related by conjugation). These particles could conceivably form the majority of the mass of the universe as dark matter, but only diffusely - such that the timescales of annihilation of the diffusely scattered particles are greater than the current age of the universe. In this scenario, most of the original dark matter may have already annihilated (most soon after the Big Bang), explaining that most of the energy-mass of the universe is dark energy (I might be wrong about this). Dark stars are objects that could have existed in the early universe under this scenario. They would have mostly been made up of normal matter by this point in the Universe's history, but would have had some neutralino dark matter. Also, they wouldn't have been dark - instead of fusion, they would create energy from neutralino annihilation. Nowadays, such supermassive clumps of matter would immediately collapse into black holes. The radiation pressure from fusion, or degeneracy pressure is not sufficient to prevent collapse. However, the annihilation of these neutralinos would provide enough pressure to prevent this. There could have also been normal stellar-sized dark stars, which would have densified and started to undergo fusion after the neutralinos were exhausted. Dark stars also aren't dark. They would emit a fuckton of radiation but be cooler and less dense overall. This result is not confirmed as of yet. The smoking gun would be a helium absorption line, rather than an emission line, at a particular wavelength. If true, this would have some pretty big implications in fundamental physics as well as being loving nuts. cat botherer fucked around with this message at 01:20 on Jul 20, 2023 |
# ¿ Jul 20, 2023 01:13 |
|
GOAT probe
|
# ¿ Aug 2, 2023 15:28 |
|
GOAT probe still goated Voyager 2 phones home and says everything is cool https://arstechnica.com/space/2023/08/voyager-2-phones-home-and-says-everything-is-cool/ Rappaport posted:I thought cattle mutilation alien probes assaulted cows?
|
# ¿ Aug 7, 2023 15:10 |
|
|
# ¿ Sep 14, 2023 15:45 |
|
neutral milf hotel posted:they look real to me
|
# ¿ Sep 16, 2023 01:51 |
|
Heck Yes! Loam! posted:Mars is cold and thicc around the middle *Mars' axial tilt variation is massive and mathematically chaotic. IIRC, obliquity before about 15 Mya is basically impossible to know. Here's a Mars glacier (perspective generated from HiRISE) where you can see a lobe spreading out, complete with a terminal moraine: c.f. a glacier in a similar situation in the McMurdo Dry Valleys: https://www.antarcticglaciers.org/glacial-geology/glaciers-on-other-planets/types-of-glaciers-on-mars/
|
# ¿ Jan 19, 2024 17:43 |
|
The EMDrive just won't die. AFAIK, quantized inertia isn't the crackpottiest thing ever, but all of these modified Newtonian dynamics theories still fail to explain observations that show gravitational lensing in places spatially separated from normal matter. In the balance of all of it, it's still just really hard to get away from dark matter. I suppose the reasoning of DARPA is that it is worth it even with an infinitesimal chance of success. They've funded a lot of stupider stuff.
|
# ¿ Jan 24, 2024 18:24 |
|
The Chad Jihad posted:Huh, I thought that one got robustly debunked? I've always had a soft spot for the emdrive, I think it was the first time I got sucked into a 'miracle breakthrough'
|
# ¿ Jan 24, 2024 18:46 |
|
The immortal probe is still going! https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/nasas-voyager-1-resumes-sending-engineering-updates-to-earth quote:After some inventive sleuthing, the mission team can — for the first time in five months — check the health and status of the most distant human-made object in existence.
|
# ¿ Apr 23, 2024 13:07 |
|
Rappaport posted:How would you know?
|
# ¿ Apr 23, 2024 13:36 |
|
DrSunshine posted:Was that an idea based on the nuclear pulse rocket (Daedalus) concept, or the Project Starshot effort they're working on right now with the mini solar sail swarm? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fission-fragment_rocket cat botherer fucked around with this message at 18:38 on Apr 26, 2024 |
# ¿ Apr 26, 2024 18:35 |
|
|
# ¿ May 21, 2024 09:49 |
|
DrSunshine posted:
|
# ¿ Apr 26, 2024 19:30 |