|
|
# ¿ Jun 20, 2023 02:24 |
|
|
# ¿ May 10, 2024 00:47 |
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQCvtPS2fLc Seems there are seven separate systems for surfacing the sub.
|
# ¿ Jun 20, 2023 04:15 |
|
A 1000m depth. If a submersible is cracked, the water fills the airspace in about 100ms, and creates a compression ratio of 100:1 (a diesel engine is about 13:1) which ignites anything inside at 20,000°C. At 3800m it's a 380:1 compression ratio.
|
# ¿ Jun 20, 2023 08:36 |
|
SwissDonkey posted:What's gonna get you first, the crushing injuries or being vaporised by the heat from compression? I suppose the water puts the out the carbonised humans in 200ms?
|
# ¿ Jun 20, 2023 08:53 |
|
I doubt they imploded though. Some French guy said the implosion can be picked up on sonar and happens in 20 milliseconds at that depth. With that stupid frame thing around it and all the bits to catch on. I think they might be entangled on the Titanic or the wreckage in the trench around it due to the strong currents. Therefore the seven (7) separate systems to get positively buoyant do gently caress all. Maybe an electrical/hardware/software failure or fire?
|
# ¿ Jun 20, 2023 09:20 |
|
Look at all that poo poo on it designed to get entangled. Blow fucked around with this message at 09:31 on Jun 20, 2023 |
# ¿ Jun 20, 2023 09:28 |
|
Can a mod change the thread title to Submersible on expedition to Titanic missing please?
|
# ¿ Jun 20, 2023 11:00 |
|
Deptfordx posted:I wonder how detectable an implosion would be. Paging Flying Lemur to the thread.
|
# ¿ Jun 20, 2023 11:23 |
|
Does anyone understand exactly how the submersible communicates with the surface ship?
|
# ¿ Jun 20, 2023 12:42 |
|
Ralph Crammed In posted:In this article here - https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundland-labrador/titanic-submersible-titan-missing-day-3-1.6881595?cmp=rss Listen to this guy. LISTEN | Colin Taylor speaks with CBC Radio's As It Happens:
|
# ¿ Jun 20, 2023 12:54 |
|
Ralph Crammed In posted:
I want the long answer dude. How do the text messages get back and forth down there?
|
# ¿ Jun 20, 2023 13:04 |
|
^^^ P.J. HarveyRalph Crammed In posted:Starlink, evidently. As far as I can tell, it's whatever kind of internet Starlink sends out. As to how well that works under miles of water? Not great, evidently! To be fair, this hasn't been a problem for anyone up until now, so I can't blame anyone for not really knowing how well wifi or whatever Starlink is works in the deep abyss. I personally, as a billionaire, would have used a 3.8km long fibre optic cable on a sturdy cable attached to the submersible for comms. Although I suppose that could get entangled. Maybe some directionally-focused sonar system as well? And the big rear end winch on a ship could pull you up with great force if you were to become entangled, whereas with dumping ballast at zero buoyancy there is gently caress all force to break free at first. Good thing I'm not a billionaire Blow fucked around with this message at 13:30 on Jun 20, 2023 |
# ¿ Jun 20, 2023 13:27 |
|
stealie72 posted:They're in a pressure vessel, they won't get the bends. ^^^
|
# ¿ Jun 20, 2023 14:17 |
|
Most excellent thread title change.
|
# ¿ Jun 20, 2023 14:20 |
|
Grey Cat posted:I think my post history has memorialized it enough for myself. May the posts get lost in the annals of the interwebs. Same.
|
# ¿ Jun 22, 2023 09:29 |
|
Blow posted:I doubt they imploded though. Some French guy said the implosion can be picked up on sonar and happens in 20 milliseconds at that depth. Well, I was wrong about the implosion, but that's cause the French guy said it would have been immediately picked up on sonar. Which turns out it was. I also made up the 100ms thing. I think it's much faster than that. All the other poo poo I said was actual physics.
|
# ¿ Jun 23, 2023 04:41 |
|
Seth Pecksniff posted:This is incorrect Yeah nah. There's coral in that pic.
|
# ¿ Jun 23, 2023 06:01 |
|
Rust Martialis posted:Modelling sub implosion
|
# ¿ Jun 23, 2023 06:36 |
|
at people posting that haven't read every post in this thread.
|
# ¿ Jun 23, 2023 08:55 |
|
EVERY TIME GOING posted:For every 10 meters of saltwater depth, multiple sites say that pressure increases linearly by another atmosphere. So if the ill-fated explorers were still descending at a depth of about half a kilometer, then the pressure surrounding them would've been 50 atmospheres (Titanic settled at the edge of the Abyssal zone at 400 atmos) when something in Titan's hull began to fail. The following catastrophic pressure equalization took the craft's internal sea-level atmo to the outdoor 50 in a near instant, which is a hell of a lot of force to exert on the human body. Even a much smaller 9 atmo change, referring to this oil rig decompression article, Here you go buddy.
|
# ¿ Jun 23, 2023 09:05 |
|
I'm also reminded of the time when I was a kid and made an A-frame "shelter" out of some lovely logs and sticks. I was laying in it, just chilling out reading a book and heard a creaking noise. I was like "Hmmm. That's interesting." Then the structure I had built with my own hands had a catastrophic failure and collapsed. I suppose I'm wondering if there was a bit of a creaking sound that was audible just before they ignited (diesel power) and were then crushed/extinguished.
|
# ¿ Jun 23, 2023 09:21 |
|
|
# ¿ May 10, 2024 00:47 |
|
Dr. Cool Aids posted:guess you're all lubed up and ready to go but until this one detail is ironed out you can't start really going to town gently caress off mate. I'm all about the science my dear goon. E: I suppose most things when you increase the pressure make sounds. So maybe the thing was popping and creaking all the way down? Blow fucked around with this message at 09:32 on Jun 23, 2023 |
# ¿ Jun 23, 2023 09:28 |