very risky blowjob posted:

from what i've seen on twitter it's inaccessible via the clearnet (and they had an alternate url for like, a week, but it also got deplatformed), but still accessible via tor

Fluffdaddy posted:

He has spent the last 5 hours using the tools he does have to look into this.

sourdough posted:

The Kins posted:

What would you suggest as a feasible additional hurdle or detection method? Reg dates? Certain account characteristics? Or some other identification method?

I'm curious about what you're thinking here, because I'm not seeing a lot of ways to reasonably, consistently detect a specific miscreant outside of an account login. Even ignoring VPNs, IP addresses change constantly, and occasionally mark an entire state or ISP rather than a single person. Payment details are out of the reach of even Jeff, who only receives a generic transaction ID number from the payment processor. And I'd hope that nobody's willing to do the Twitter Verified submit-your-ID-documents thing for here, of all places.

Monathin posted:

Yeah this is how I would do it. You might need to figure out a loophole for negative post accounts for the FYAD regulars but beyond that, make it a number that's hard to acquire in one day without attracting some mod suspicion. Like 30-50 or whatever the old j4g standards used to be.

e: Like, to be clear, as stated, nothing is going to be foolproof but having two different types of gates (pay for an account that purchases are linked to, post enough that you get clear to buy avs for others) will deter all but the most insane people.

mr_jolly posted:

Now I've thought about it for a few seconds, yeah, i can see it'd be pretty hard/impossible to know which registered user bought a title if the payment processor won't give any details.