|
Been a while since I got chudgirl'd 
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2023 05:01
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 28, 2024 10:04 |
|
|
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2023 05:31
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2023 05:36
|
|
|
More   https://i.imgur.com/ERhFxbu.jpg wesleywillis fucked around with this message at 06:50 on Aug 26, 2023 |
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2023 06:12
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2023 06:20
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2023 06:27
|
|
|
Probably NWS https://i.imgur.com/JdiVixq.jpg
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2023 06:48
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pbapYZSjdp0
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2023 07:38
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2023 07:58
|
|
|
lol these are all 404'ed.
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2023 08:27
|
|
|
Grey Cat posted:https://soundcloud.com/grey-6093051...=social_sharing Oh poo poo buddy I gotta dig a lil deeper
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2023 09:07
|
|
|
 
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2023 09:52
|
|
|
Sacrilege. Please do not sully the pig’s blessed balls.
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2023 13:43
|
|
|
I cast reduce trump
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2023 14:07
|
|
|
Croccers posted:lol these are all 404'ed. Oh for gently caress....... E: I checked on my phone and got 404'd but on my laptop they were fine. wesleywillis fucked around with this message at 14:21 on Aug 26, 2023 |
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2023 14:09
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2023 14:17
|
|
|
Croccers posted:lol these are all 404'ed. Imgur’s started cracking down on horny and gross.
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2023 14:53
|
|
|
 
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2023 14:54
|
|
|
I do not like this rebranding of the Guam flag
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2023 16:16
|
|
|
Cartoon Man posted:Imgur’s started cracking down on horny and gross. I tried on my phone and they didn't work (don't have the SA App if that makes a difference) but they did work on my laptop. Fake edit: Just confirmed they all still do on laptop.
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2023 16:19
|
|
|
https://i.imgur.com/fA4gEps.mp4
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2023 16:39
|
|
|
Grey Cat posted:Look at who's playing 4D chess over here, I never thought to replace Trump with Trump. OK if you say so, I guess 
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2023 16:41
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2023 16:49
|
|
|
Oh I hate it. It's good. Jemak posted:OK if you say so, I guess It was a genuine comment. There's almost enough garfield and friends to do the entire lineup.
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2023 16:57
|
|
|
HEEEERRREEEESSS DONALD!!
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2023 16:58
|
|
|
Grey Cat posted:It was a genuine comment. Oh thank you, I didn't mean to be defensive. I've been here for too drat long.
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2023 17:23
|
|
|
Blitter posted:https://i.imgur.com/8VyCwF8.mp4
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2023 23:02
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2023 00:57
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2023 01:46
|
|
|
Made me think of--
|
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2023 02:47
|
|
|
Something Awful and the golden age of Photoshop Phridays is basically the entire reason I took on image editing as a hobby back in the early 2000s. I've done hundreds of em around here over the past two-plus decades. One of the things I realized early on when it comes to Photoshopping is that stylistically there are as many approaches as there are to telling a joke. Are you going broad or subtle? Are you using text? If you're going w a pop-culture reference, do you go for low-hanging fruit (less inventive, maybe wider appeal) or some deep cut (maybe funnier, maybe lose some viewers)? Is "put [A] into [B]" enough to tell the joke? Just like details can bog down a joke told in person, sometimes other visual elements (even if they're funny) can hurt more than help, distracting the viewer and diffusing(?) the joke's impact. When you're dealing with a bad source image, you have several options (listed in general order of my personal preference): 1) You can doll it up as best you can and get it looking good enough that it doesn't distract from whatever joke you're trying to tell. 2) You can sometimes dial down the quality of other elements to match the worst one. There are a number of ways to do this; sometimes you can get there by pulling everything out of normal context, using filters or other tricks to make it into an oil painting, a low-res video game or something, masking the drop in overall quality by making the joke about something else. 3) You can lean into it and make the bad image quality part of the joke; this can work really well if you have a good enough idea. 4) You can go in a different direction altogether and reduce reliance on the image's quality. The most obvious example is animation, a great tool for taking attention away from the image itself and placing it on whatever the image is doing. I'm writing this out because I'm so pissed about the quality of the Trump mugshot pic. The skin tone is weird even for Trump, the resolution sucks, the lighting is a pain in the rear end, the whole thing just screams you can gently caress with adjustments all you want pal, it's still gonna look like poo poo. When I do jokes for SA I typically go for as much photorealism as I possibly can, and this pic has just sucked the motivation right out of me. It's like if I needed one more reason to hate this loving guy, that's the cherry on top. Fuckin rear end in a top hat can't even take a decent picture sitting still in front of a camera three feet away from him. 
rivetz fucked around with this message at 10:07 on Aug 27, 2023 |
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2023 10:04
|
|
|
Alas jail cameras are notoriously cheap because they just need the bare minimum quality to identify somebody. The rest of their budget can then be spent on I swear some jails use a Game Boy camera.
|
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2023 10:24
|
|
|
The lighting on all nineteen of those mugshot pics was really lovely.
|
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2023 11:35
|
|
|
rivetz posted:Something Awful and the golden age of Photoshop Phridays is basically the entire reason I took on image editing as a hobby back in the early 2000s. I've done hundreds of em around here over the past two-plus decades. One of the things I realized early on when it comes to Photoshopping is that stylistically there are as many approaches as there are to telling a joke. Are you going broad or subtle? Are you using text? If you're going w a pop-culture reference, do you go for low-hanging fruit (less inventive, maybe wider appeal) or some deep cut (maybe funnier, maybe lose some viewers)? Is "put [A] into [B]" enough to tell the joke? Just like details can bog down a joke told in person, sometimes other visual elements (even if they're funny) can hurt more than help, distracting the viewer and diffusing(?) the joke's impact. tl;dr
|
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2023 13:18
|
|
|
Kirk Vikernes posted:tl;dr I really almost threw in the, "I ain't reading all that but I'm happy for you or sorry that happened" Thank you for taking the snarky bullet.
|
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2023 13:25
|
|
|
https://i.imgur.com/6NUAyXf.mp4 e: Well mine's just a worse Blitterpost Splicer fucked around with this message at 13:28 on Aug 27, 2023 |
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2023 13:25
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2023 13:55
|
|
|
Quick and easy  
|
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2023 14:17
|
|
|
Icon Of Sin posted:Quick and easy 
|
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2023 15:11
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 28, 2024 10:04 |
|
|
What is this from?
|
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2023 15:48
|
|
