|
Sam, Joy Stickem here. Have you heard about video games? They were a popular pastime in the late 20th century.
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2024 22:00
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 1, 2024 03:47 |
|
|
im jerk joystickems and those alien bastards are gonna pay for making my games woke
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2024 23:03
|
|
|
Booky posted:speaking of dooky, why does jack trades keep complaining about anime...... they just did that earlier in the rpg thread of all places and ????
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2024 23:27
|
|
|
man nurse posted:jack trades
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2024 23:35
|
|
|
Joey McChrist posted:nintendya tapes nintendya own beezwax.
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2024 23:40
|
|
|
Wiggly Wayne DDS posted:i'm glad you're trying to will your destructive powers at other bad posters Let booky submit a top 10 list, no questions asked.
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2024 23:40
|
|
|
death to anime rpgs where are the manga rpgs
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2024 05:56
|
|
|
man nurse posted:jack trades
|
|
#
?
Apr 18, 2024 06:32
|
|
|
every time some freak talks about how great AI is going to be in 2045 in the Games forum, i want to dissolve their posts in acid leaving a dripping hole in the forums code i hope at some point the forum can take a unilateral anti-AI stance because it sucks to read their posts every time and it's not the same poster either, it's different randos who Mr Bean into various threads with their pants down blathering. like this time it was the RPG thread with someone who kept having to be told over and over that they didn't understand a thing about how AI works. but it's also happened in the steam thread and it's happened in other threads and it bites every time
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2024 05:36
|
|
|
I don't care about ai one way or the other Seems overblown The rpg thread sounds pretty awful based on this thread alone though
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2024 05:43
|
|
|
The 7th Guest posted:every time some freak talks about how great AI is going to be in 2045 in the Games forum, i want to dissolve their posts in acid leaving a dripping hole in the forums code 7th Guest is right, as a lurker it's getting really tedious to read
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2024 06:13
|
|
|
havent really seen any of this in the threads i read so it seems like something where you just punish people for posting bad imo, which is gonna be 99% of posts about ai. dont really think we need a list of forbidden topics or anything
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2024 06:17
|
|
|
studio mujahideen posted:havent really seen any of this in the threads i read so it seems like something where you just punish people for posting bad imo, which is gonna be 99% of posts about ai. dont really think we need a list of forbidden topics or anything We already have that list but I'm pretty sure it's just, rightly, vtubers at the moment
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2024 06:20
|
|
|
RBA Starblade posted:We already have that list but I'm pretty sure it's just, rightly, vtubers at the moment Hrm... isn't there a vtuber who was named something like AI Miku or whatever? I say AI should be banned just off association
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2024 06:22
|
|
|
is the vtuber ban because goons were too creepy over them? or some other reason
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2024 07:16
|
|
|
let's ban ai discussion because every time it comes up it's always one dumbass endlessly refreshing the thread and replying to everyone dogpiling on them for pages and pages of tiresome nonsense
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2024 07:17
|
|
|
studio mujahideen posted:havent really seen any of this in the threads i read so it seems like something where you just punish people for posting bad imo, which is gonna be 99% of posts about ai. dont really think we need a list of forbidden topics or anything We actually do have banned topics on SA. Aside from those topics that are obviously criminal and whose bans don't really need to be litigated, there's vtubers and posts depicting actual deaths. With vtubers it's a pretty soft ban. Nobody's going to nuke your post for bringing it up on occasion but the rules let anybody with a star tap the sign if a digression on the topic goes on too long. With deaths it's a hard ban with pretty instant punishments that very few people think is worth testing, much less challenging. Occasionally those very few people will broach the topic on loosening the ban but, to say that allowing people to post clips of other human beings dying on camera would drastically hamper others' experience of a thread is to put it very mildly. Usually the topic ends as quickly as it was brought up. I'm okay with the topic of AI-the-buzzword (not AI the science fiction conceit or AI the computer controlled entities in games) being softbanned in the Games forum in the same way vtubers are. Not necessarily because discussion about ai as a topic is inherently problematic, obviously, but because the many times it's been brought up it's only been to a thread's detriment. Trad Games has already taken the stance of explicitly allowing some ai posting because generating art for a personal tabletop or play-by-post roleplaying campaign is about as anodyne an application of the technology you can imagine. It's not outlandish or out of line to suggest another subforum do the opposite.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2024 07:44
|
|
|
Games has banned topics. For example: The games industry
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2024 08:01
|
|
|
Leal posted:Games has banned topics. For example: The games industry and gamers.txt, despite people like kale trying to bombard every thread with that stupid poo poo
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2024 08:05
|
|
|
What if we just ban posting?
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2024 08:09
|
|
|
Scholtz posted:What if we just ban posting? Hm. Keep talking. No wait, don't!
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2024 09:10
|
|
|
RBA Starblade posted:We already have that list but I'm pretty sure it's just, rightly, vtubers at the moment vtubers aren't even a banned topic just a banned thread posting about them is fine as long as you're Normal about it and not posting about how kawaii your oshi's butt is or whatever. and if not you get probed just like you would for getting creepy about any other anime stuff. what's banned is making a separate thread that no non vtuber fans will ever read (and so nobody will report / probe the post where someone eventually gets weird) Yaoi Gagarin posted:is the vtuber ban because goons were too creepy over them? or some other reason yeah adtrw went though multiple iterations of closing the thread due to creeps, eventually remaking it, a few months later closing again etc until eventually they just said no more threads RPATDO_LAMD fucked around with this message at 09:35 on Apr 24, 2024 |
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2024 09:28
|
|
|
Folks, we’ve come a long way. it’s time to repeal the « no gamergate » rule
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2024 12:58
|
|
|
I propose a new rule called "Punch Jay Rust on the arm"
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2024 13:02
|
|
|
the only AI that has EVER mattered and WILL ever matter is the sick rear end enemy pathing behavior in the original F.E.A.R.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2024 13:18
|
|
|
This is Radiant AI erasure, how dare you. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pjbx6-KQoRg mutata fucked around with this message at 15:31 on Apr 24, 2024 |
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2024 15:29
|
|
|
behead those who post AI
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2024 17:39
|
|
|
ban all AI: Somnium Files chat.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2024 17:54
|
|
|
People do already talk about gamergate here and there, that's not really a rule any more. Mostly because anyone pro gamergate would be hurled into the sea. If AI discussion is derailing a thread definitely report at least so one of us can come in and try to shut it down. As for an actual rule I would leave that up to the boss. VG, that is.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2024 18:25
|
|
|
16-bit Butt-Head posted:behead those who post AI
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2024 18:31
|
|
|
I have reason to believe HopperUK is an AI moderator. For example, has anyone ever seen them outside? I rest my case.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2024 18:31
|
|
|
Red Alert 2 Yuris Revenge posted:I have reason to believe HopperUK is an AI moderator. For example, has anyone ever seen them outside? I rest my case. I mean this is fair I don't really go outside. It's awful out there.
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2024 18:37
|
|
|
HopperUK posted:the boss. VG, that is. picturing kirby with an eye patch and green beret
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2024 22:44
|
|
|
Yaoi Gagarin posted:picturing kirby with an eye patch and green beret 
|
|
#
?
Apr 24, 2024 22:46
|
|
|
every time i've seen ai discussion on here (like the recent rpg thread stuff) its been boring and tedious at best... please do something about this scourge
|
|
#
?
Apr 25, 2024 05:49
|
|
|
did you try quoting the boring tedious posters and saying "Shut Up!!!"
|
|
#
?
Apr 25, 2024 05:59
|
|
|
RPATDO_LAMD posted:did you try quoting the boring tedious posters and saying "Shut Up!!!" Shut Up!!!
|
|
#
?
Apr 25, 2024 06:02
|
|
|
RPATDO_LAMD posted:did you try quoting the boring tedious posters and saying "Shut Up!!!" i couldn't because the discussion had already moved on...... its a shame too those ai tl posters were really silly
|
|
#
?
Apr 25, 2024 06:02
|
|
|
On the one hand, I don't know if we needed a specific "don't talk about AI" rule because if people are posting bad, they should be told to knock it off or probed regardless of whether it's talking about AI. On the other I agree that any time these discussions start up, none of them are interesting/good to read and tend to quickly devolve into multi page derails and slapfights. In Games, the mods are generally of the mindset that we're not here to strictly enforce some sort of top-down culture on what the forum should be, that should be driven by the posters and we're just here to With that mindset, I think the idea is that how things should work is that someone starts kicking off about [thing], are told bluntly by the rest of the thread to shut the gently caress up about [thing], and then either they drop it, or they double down and things get lovely and by that time someone has reported it and a mod can step in to move things along. In practice, with something like AI though where the same sort of posts are recurring over and over again and have so little chance of leading to any actual interesting/good discussion, that gets exhausting for people in the thread who just want to talk about whatever the thread is actually for. I don't know if the answer is "make a rule for no AI discussion" though because that feels like a bandaid solution where a better change might just be us mods coming down firmer on people who derail threads with this sort of poo poo.
|
|
#
?
Apr 25, 2024 06:38
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 1, 2024 03:47 |
|
|
The site-wide rule for Bad AI Posting should be that if a non-mod, non-IK catches somebody doing it, they have the ability to appoint themselves Junior Deputy IK on the spot and tell that person to shut up and the Bad AI Poster isn't really supposed to fight back or argue.
|
|
#
?
Apr 25, 2024 07:12
|
|