|
Vahakyla posted:At this moment, the once mighty Royal Navy is a practical joke, saved only by the swift action offered by Brazil and Argentina. Unacceptable. Her Majesty took this personally and is directly overseeing troop training 
|
#
¿
Sep 27, 2023 15:43
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 16, 2024 06:55 |
|
|
The Long Afternoon War - Mission 1 - Pontiac 2 AAR Flight Members: Pontiac 2-1 | Prime Pontiac 2-2 | Lumme Tasking: TARCAP Kills: 2x J-7 Losses: Pontiac 2-2 | Lumme Expended: 3x Super 530D, 2x Magic 2 Summary   Engagement 1 We departed Rio Turbio for a TARCAP orbit over an eastern leg of the straight of Magellan. After passing WP1 we were assigned to 262.00am MHz for control from Buzzard. Shortly after hitting WP2 we were vectored to two hot bandits South, we acquired on radar at 40nm and got NCTR returns consistent with Chinese J-7, we sorted targets for me to take the front, and wingman would take rear bandit. I launched a fox 1 (Super 530D) at 14nm, which achieved the first kill. Lumme launched his fox 1 at 12nm, his missile tracked but the bandit appeared to notch the shot forcing a miss, Lumme followed up with a fox 2 (Magic 2) at 4nm that the bandit successfully defeated with flares and forcing an overshoot. We attempted to reacquire, while unaware Panther 1 were on top of us and had already taken it. Engagement 2 + Loss of Pontiac 2-2 I requested an updated bandit BRA from Buzzard who relayed targets 12nm SW; I assumed this was our missing bandit from the previous engagement, but in reality was a fresh pair of J-7's. A furball ensued with 3 Panthers, Pontiac 2-2 and the two bandits, during which time Pontiac 2-2 was hit from behind with an R-60. Engagement 3 I had ended up on the far side of the furball and acquired a bandit at 7nm, unaware this was yet another fresh set of bandits I launched by second Fox 1 which the J-7 managed to jink, before my follow-up shot the bandit was splashed by Venom 1-2 | zerph1rum. Engagement 4 After a couple of minutes ABM had another couple of bandits, 20nm East. I was limited to fox 2 missiles and was forced defensive by the lead bandit, who was then splashed by Venom 1-2. After recommitting on the second bandit we came within 4nm when I saw a launch and was forced defensive, after defeating the missile I managed to take a high aspect fox 2 shot and secure the kill For the remaining mission; I continued TARCAP as long as I could before hitting fuel issues; erring on the side of safety, I requested a vector to nearest friendly airfield and ended up taking the landing at Rio Gallegos. The ground crew rolled out an uncharacteristically English welcome for me and pissed in my cockpit out of protest; not looking forward to the ferry flight back to Rio Turbio.. What went well? Lots of action, a couple of kills, very quick responses from ABM.
What could have gone better?
|
|
#
¿
Oct 15, 2023 15:52
|
|
|
The Long Afternoon War - Mission 2 - Pontiac 2 AAR Flight Members: Pontiac 2-1 | Prime Pontiac 2-2 | Lumme Pontiac 2-3 | Gronank Tasking: TARCAP Kills: 1x J-7 Losses: Pontiac 2-1 | Prime, Pontiac 2-2 | Lumme Expended: 4x Super 530D Summary Engagement 1 We departed Rio Turbio for a TARCAP around Waypoint 1, flying alongside Pontiac 1 after a mostly incident free group take-off. Before we hit our WP, each flight recieved a tasking; Pontiac 1 departed for their targets to the South West while we continued pushing South for our bandits. In flight, it was remarked that WP1 wasn't where we expected as we'd anticipated WP1 over water but nav was pointing back overland. Regardless, with bandits hot we continued and I used the land as visual reference for roughly where we were supposed to be. Just as we entered the engagement range, our RWR called radar launch warnings, which I assumed was our bandits taking the first shot - but turned out to be a hostile naval vessel. Having hit rMax and with superior numbers (3vs2) I chose to stay aggressive and launched my fox 1 at the lead bandit before putting him to radar gimbal, releasing counter measures and watching for the incoming missile trail. Having entered 10nm with RWR still blaring and unable to verify the success of my first missile I launched the second. Upon debrief, the first missile hit but didn't kill, and the second failed. Inside 5nm, I got eyes on both bandits and began to maneuverer for fox 2 missile launches. I'd failed to update my wingmen that I was merged, and 2-3 took a shot on a bandit within close proximity - I was visual on the launch and as a precaution defended against it in case of a tracking issue, but was struck by a fox 2 from my bandits wingman.  2-2 and 2-3 pulled North, whereupon 2-2 was hit by an SA-11 at Punta Arenas; and 2-3 turned and dispatched a J-7 that was still pursuing. 2-3 went to form with Pontiac who was engaged 2vs1 after losing their wingman, but found that Pontiac 1-1 had handled the situation by when he arrived, and given remaining fuel/ord returned safely to base. -- What went well?
What could have gone better?
|
|
#
¿
Oct 24, 2023 21:07
|
|
|
The Long Afternoon War - Mission 2 - Pontiac 2 AAR Flight Members: Pontiac 2-1 | Prime Pontiac 2-2 | Lumme Pontiac 2-3 | Gronank Tasking: TARCAP Kills: 2x J-7 Losses: Pontiac 2-2 | Lumme Expended: 3x Super 530D Summary Engagement 1 We departed Rio Turbio for a TARCAP between Lanus and Glacier. Enroute to Glacier Condor gave us a heads-up of bandit Mig-21's on CAP about 80nm from us, with a second group some distance behind them. We proceeded until about 20nm from Glacier at which point Condor gave us an update that their CAP had turned hot on us. Due to proximity of the enemy frigate, we opted to turn West back towards Lanus and drag them about 30nm clear of the frigates max range, once we were confident they were out of cover we turned to engage. I advised the flight that I would be looking to grab the lead bandit, and that 2-2 & 2-3 should grab the trail. 2-2 was the first to launch on his target, and my shot was shortly after. During the closure 2-2 had gotten slightly ahead of me and it transpired that I had inadventantly grabbed the rear bandit, meaning the enemy fighters were about 10nm closer than we thought. 2-2 was hit and although we didn't see a chute we've been informed the pilot survived his plunge to the Fjord below, his write up will surely follow. I saw the lead bandit who killed 2-2, but couldn't turn to engage without breaking my missile lock and so tried to maintain visual while keeping my target in gimbal for terminal guidance. Once I had confirmed I'd killed the wingman, I turned to engage the lead where I saw a subsequent explosion, and was warmed to hear 2-3 claim the kill. Engagement as recorded from 1-1's perspective (skip to 34:10 if it doesn't automatically) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gUoViHf6E5I&t=2050s We reformed and resumed our TARCAP, where things remained uneventful until the server [REDACTED] -- What went well?
What could have gone better?
The Angry Brit fucked around with this message at 12:37 on Nov 5, 2023 |
|
#
¿
Oct 29, 2023 19:45
|
|
|
The Long Afternoon War - Mission 3 - Pontiac 2 AAR Flight Members: Pontiac 2-1 | Prime Pontiac 2-2 | Lumme Pontiac 2-3 | Gronank Pontiac 2-4 | BlueNexa Tasking: TARCAP Kills: None Losses: None Expended: N/A Summary We departed Rio Turbio for a TARCAP around Cesar. We wanted to get ahead of the strikers so took an aggressive burn to fl35 and proceeded at speed, with an intent to visit the tanker periodically to keep the flight in the fight. As we approached Cesar, Condor confirmed picture clear so I split the flight so that 3&4 would fill up while 1&2 were on station. Unfortunately, the flight was unable to raise Shell on its listed frequency and after a period of trying to establish contact we gave up. 2-3 was already joker and recovered to Rio Gallegos, while 4 came to rejoin 1 and 2, and we dumped our tanks to reduce drag and extend what little fuel we still had. We continued our orbit for some time until we heard Strike had been successful at which point we were relieved by Condor and returned unexpectedly to Rio Gallegos due to the fuel issue stemming from the tankers radio failure. All of Pontiac 2 landed successfully, and will ferry to Rio Turbio after topping up on caffine to wake us up following a snoozy flight. -- What went well?
What could have gone better?
|
|
#
¿
Nov 5, 2023 13:01
|
|
|
The Long Afternoon War - Mission 4 - Pontiac 2 AAR Flight Members: Pontiac 2-1 | Prime Pontiac 2-2 | Lumme Tasking: BARCAP Kills: 4x J-7 (Mig-21's) Losses: Pontiac 2-2 (SAM), Pontiac 2-1 (landing accident) Expended: 4x Super 530D, 2x Magic 2 Summary We left Rio Turbio heading towards our BARCAP on the western side of the primary CAP line. The take-off and initial flight went smoothly. Once we established our CAP, we received a call about two incoming bandits south of our position. 2-2 and I identified the bandits; I took the lead while 2-2 followed. I fired my first missile from 15nm, and 2-2 launched his from about 12nm.  (Credit to mlmp08)After losing contact with my missile and not seeing a hit, I launched my final missile from 10nm. Shortly after, I witnessed my bandit going down. Meanwhile, 2-2 had launched his second missile and taken down the second bandit. Reviewing the events, it became clear that we both targeted the same bandit, resulting in three missiles being fired for one kill. With both bandits eliminated, we headed North to resume our CAP. We informed Condor that we'd used up our medium-range missiles and requested to depart for a rearm, but our request was denied as another pair of bandits was incoming. Turning back South, I thought I spotted the targets. Since we were limited to our short-range Fox 2 missiles and visual with a close range BRA call, I decided to switch to Dog Fight mode, hoping to catch the targets in boresight, but despite our efforts, we couldn't lock on. Condor then reported 'merged bandits high,' when we realised the targets we were chasing were actually the parachuting pilots of the jets we had previously taken down, causing confusion. 2-2 and I immediately redirected our attention to the real threat, grateful that the bandits hadn't taken advantage of our confusion, and swiftly dispatched them with one short-range missile each.  We turned back towards our CAP point. However, I noticed a fireball where 2-2 should have been. During the dogfight, we had descended, and 2-2 had inadvertently moved into the SA-11's range, resulting in the loss of his aircraft. I returned to Rio Turbio, refueled, re-armed, and went back on station. No further bandit activity was reported, and after 20 minutes, it was time to head back. During my final approach, visions of a crying infant in my cockpit caused a momentary loss of concentration resulting in an unrecoverable stall and another lost aircraft. Despite this incident, I respectfully decline any suggested therapy. -- What went well?
What could have gone better?
|
|
#
¿
Nov 13, 2023 22:06
|
|
|
lolman posted:why argentina ? I think they're doing it alphabetically
|
|
#
¿
Nov 24, 2023 11:51
|
|
|
The Long Afternoon War - Mission 5 - Pontiac 2 AAR Flight Members: Pontiac 2-1 | Prime Pontiac 2-2 | Lumme Tasking: BARCAP Kills: 2x J-7 (Mig-21's); 1x (friendly) Mirage-2000 Losses: -3x airframes (Prime x1, Lumme x2) Expended: 4x Super 530D, 6x Magic 2 Summary Pontiac 2 was scrambled mid poker night at Rio Turbio, my wingman and I dashed to our airframes and pushed unrestricted climb outs to repel the air incursion that appeared to catch command by surprise. We switched 261 for Condor and requested vectoring and got tasked with a pair of J-7's to our South East. My wingman and I identified 2 bandits and at 15nm with solid radar lock and having confirmed intermittent NCTR that identified type as Mig-21 (which also covers the J-7); I launched my first fox 1. At this time, we were unaware that Pontiac 1 was merged in amongst the bandits, as our radar granularity is insufficient to pickout overlapping objects, and significantly exacerbated by not receiving IFF from Pontiac 1 which will become more relevant later.. My first fox 1 misses, having reviewed the situation I believe my missile was tracking correctly, but lost energy due to the bandit turning cold upon launch. I released a second fox 1 at 11nm; at this point, it's unclear whether my radar had switched from the bandit to Pontiac 1-1, as they were aligned and at a distance where the radar could not separate them, and with no IFF return I didn't question the shot. The missile was subsequently defeated, likely due to Pontiac 1-1's counter measures.  With both long range missiles expended we entered the merge. Through my NVG I made a clear visual ID on a J-7 and killed it with a 2nm fox 2 shot. Ahead of my through my NVG I could make out a number of aircraft but at a range I couldn't visually identify type.  Using the boresight dogfight mode acquisition, I began locking targets in sequence in order to IFF them. The first 2 targets I IFF'd returned friendly, but the third failed to respond. I called Condor to confirm bogey off my nose, and with confirmation took the shot. Regrettably, it turned out this was Pontiac 1-1. At this point I was winchester and my wingman had lost visual on each other. I returned to base while Lumme stayed on station and was quickly drawn in to a 2vs1 battle with a pair of J-7's bearing down on Pontiac 1-2. Unfortunately Lumme couldn't prevent P1-2's shoot down. He dispatched 1 bandit in very close range with a fox 2, the second bandit was quickly on his tale and Lumme was forced defensive spiral, ultimately resulting in a CFIT due to task saturation and night time lighting. I touched down at Rio Turbio and forgot to disable my Mode 4 IFF which after 60s weight on wheels automatically deletes the codes, rather than wait for ground crew to rearm the plane AND reset my IFF, I decided it'd be quicker to transition to a spare frame from the hanger. Somehow, Pontiac 2-2 was with me, and we set off again to continue our CAP. We checked in with Condor and headed to our previous CAP point, on route, we caught a J-11 on our RWR, we enquired with Condor who realised the bandit was only 10nm from us; he'd been presumed low flying and avoiding AWACS. My wingman and I turned in to the fight, but were defeated in quick succession by what we assume were fox 2's. -- What went well?
What could have gone better?
Court report Pontiac 2-1 was cleared of any criminal wrong doing but has been grounded for the upcoming days operation to attend sensitivity training following comments exchanged in the pilots common room area following the friendly fire incident Court room artists impression (who lazily got the nationalities wrong, but is otherwise very accurate) 
|
|
#
¿
Nov 25, 2023 12:00
|
|
|
 Dude Flight Brief 2x F-15E (Prime/Xeno426, Arbitary/radintorov) Brief: The Dude posted:Ok peeps, Uncle Sam's finally loosened the reigns and we're finally able to stretch our wings. It'll be a long day for us, we're flying all the way in from REDACTED, we'll appear in the battlespace above El Calafate where our CSAD escort will deport and we'll form up. From there we've got 3 nav points to clear heading South, at which point we'll proceed at the discretion of our escort. Mission: BAI of tgt 14-5 CSS, 27-3 CSS, 3 BDE HQ, 3-3 SPT BN, 4-5 SPT BN BDE Nav: Hot start near El Calafate, rdv with Escorts, proceed to SPOON, PLATE, COLO, hold pending SEAD/CAP clearance. On hot, push SW towards tgt locations. Egress in WPs in reverse. In case of Emergency Only, we have a divert at WP10 to Rio Gallegos - however, lets not.  (IMPRECISE DIAGRAM, FOR OUTLINE ONLY)  Loadout: 2x Aim9M, 2x Aim120C, 2x GBU-31(V)1/B (non-penetrator), 4x GBU-12, 3x Fuel Tank, AN-AAQ13, AN-AAQ14  Weapons employment: GBU-31's prioritised for HQ, GBU-12's for battalion/brigades Threats: * Primary threat SA-11 at Punta Arenas, we may be skirting the edge of its range; SEAD to mitigate. * Expect SHORAD in amongst our strike targets, we'll need to stay high but under 27,000 The Angry Brit fucked around with this message at 23:37 on Jan 5, 2024 |
|
#
¿
Jan 5, 2024 22:17
|
|
|
The Angry Brit posted:
The Long Afternoon War - Day 9 - Dude Flight AAR  Flight Members: Dude 1-1 | Prime / Xeno426 Dude 1-2 | Arbitrary/Radintorov Tasking: Deep Strike Kills: 4x Combat Supply Station, 2x HQ-7 LN (PLA SAM), 1x PLZ05 (PLA Arty Company) Losses: N/A Expended: 5x GBU-12, 2x GBU-31 Summary Dude 1-1 Prime posted:CENSOR NOTIFICATION: Details removed regarding ingress flight from REDACTED air base. -- What went well?
What could have gone better?
The Angry Brit fucked around with this message at 14:37 on Jan 21, 2024 |
|
#
¿
Jan 21, 2024 14:31
|
|
|
The Long Afternoon War - Mission 10 - Pontiac 1 AAR Flight Members: Pontiac 1-1 | Prime Pontiac 1-2 | Lumme Pontiac 1-3 | Gronack Tasking: BARCAP Kills: 1x J-7 (Mig-21's) Losses: -2x airframes (Prime, Lumme) Expended: 6x Super 530D Summary Pontiac 1-1 posted:Pontiac was on usual BARCAP duties on the Eastern flank of AO Arrow, we departed Rio Turbio as usual and made our ingress to our cap point. Key events
Aftermath & Fox 2 Heater investigation The History Books posted:Just ejected, Pontiac 1, fueled by rage, blamed maintainers for his predicament. -- What went well?
What could have gone better?
|
|
#
¿
Jan 29, 2024 20:57
|
|
|
 10 MAR 2010 FROM: RN TO: ALL ALLIED FORCES SUBJECT: UKCSG PROGRESS REPORT – HARRIER FORWARD POSTINGS Attention Allied Colleagues, I hope this missive finds you well. The HMS Invincibles' shakedown cruises are progressing steadily, and we extend our heartfelt thanks for your invaluable support during its recovery. For record, the UKCSG now comprises the following
As a token of appreciation, we are willing to send forward a Squadron of our Harrier GR.9's to the mainland, who we propose would temporarily integrate under CACC for smooth operation; naturally with delegated tactical authority to the 801st’s Flying Captain, who’ll be leading ashore. Could you please provide a brief list of possible bases for consideration? Runway lengths are a secondary concern; a cricket pitch or stretch of road can suffice, our Harriers are quite adaptable. With gratitude, Montgomery Flibberflab Admiral, Royal Navy HMS Invincible 
|
|
#
¿
Feb 2, 2024 00:51
|
|
|
Kaal posted:
Ileana, I thank you for your swift response and warm words of welcome. I find the notion of stationing the 801st anywhere but in closest reasonable proximity to the fight a lamentable squandering of resources. Ergo, I propose initially stationing at Rio Gallegos, and decanting to a FARP as the frontline develops. The runway will give our Gr.9's a chance to stretch their wings and alleviate any lethargy accrued having been stuck watching seamen toil these past months. Permit me to add, in due deference, that while the pilots of this generation may deploy this region afresh, the banner of the 801st does not. I should seek to avoid airbase cohabitation from the outset to mitigate any off duty wet interactions between our fine young fighting men over deeds of their fathers. Separately, might I enquire whether any thought has yet been given to the command structure under which the 801st might temporarily attach, or am I to infer from your reply that they shall operate under the aegis of your distinguished authority? Sincerely and with Regard, Montgomery Flibberflab Admiral, Royal Navy HMS Invincible P.S. I understand your forces are staged for an imminent operation; permit me to confess that a profound vexation assails me in contemplating our absence from the forthcoming fray. Strength and fortitude to you, dear Admiral.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 3, 2024 00:13
|
|
|
Kaal posted:
 Dear Ileana, I beg your pardon for the lapse in our correspondence; I trust this missive finds you in rude health and that the indefatigable Lt Cdr Fletcher has been making her presence felt ashore, alongside the 801st. You will, without a doubt, be heartened to learn that the UKCSG is ship-shape and Bristol fashion; I expect we'll be approaching the AO by March 19th. To delineate the composition of our task group:
While I trust you are well acquainted with the prowess of the 'Vince, I feel compelled to draw your esteemed attention to the Helge Ingstad. She boasts the latest Aegis combat system, and the Norwegian Captain has rather colourfully expressed his intentions regarding the Chinese fleet in terms not fit for logging nor restating in the presence of a lady. Rest assured, the bite can quite match the bark in this instance. Naturally, upon our arrival, the UKCSG will operate under the discretion of the Admiralty. For now hoever, the 801st shall continue their operations inland and you may continue to deploy them as you deem appropriate. With the warmest regards, Montgomery Flibberflab Admiral, Royal Navy HMS Invincible
|
|
#
¿
Feb 27, 2024 23:04
|
|
|
Royal Navy Internal Communication To: All Commanding Officers, Royal Navy From: Montgomery Flibberflab, Admiral, HMS Invincible Date: 17-Mar-2010 Subject: Request for Logistics Flight for Supplies and Coordination with South American Allies Classification: Confidential Priority: Immediate Attention Required Background: Esteemed Colleagues, In light of our impending deployment to the South Atlantic conflict zone, it has come to my attention that our esteemed crew chiefs have undertaken the noble task of cataloging our arsenal. Upon their diligent scrutiny, it was initially deemed that the 12 Apache Gunships housed within the Invincible were beyond salvage. However, subsequent reassessment by our dedicated crew suggests that restoration to operational status is indeed feasible, albeit requiring an infusion of substantial spares. I am pleased to report that our Chief Engineer has been in correspondance with the venerable Logistics Officer Walter Warehouse of Wattisham Airfield, who has demonstrated commendable diligence in procuring the requisite itinerary and stands poised to expedite dispatch to RAF Mildenhall at a moment's notice. I am lead to believe an A330 Atlas befitting our needs may be attainable and I trust a top notch aircrew can be mustered. Regrettably, my geographical remoteness precludes personal oversight of the forthcoming arrangements. Thus, I implore your valued assistance in finalising the intricate flight logistics from Mildenhall to the theater of operations. This endeavor necessitates delicate coordination with our esteemed CSAD allies to determine a suitable landing locale for the incoming flight. I must impress upon you the utmost confidentiality surrounding this operation. The revelation of our Gunships to our allies remains pending, as their purported loss was hitherto assumed. It is imperative that we manage the expectations and morale of our local forces with the utmost discretion. I beseech you to treat this matter with the gravity it deserves and expedite its execution with all due haste. Yours expectantly, Montgomery Flibberflab Admiral, Royal Navy HMS Invincible
|
|
#
¿
Mar 3, 2024 23:27
|
|
|
mlmp08 posted:Does this invincible have no harriers onboard and is purely a helo carrier? Or do the apaches live in a bag of holding?  Royal Navy Internal Communication To: All Commanding Officers, Royal Navy From: Montgomery Flibberflab, Admiral, HMS Invincible Date: 17-Mar-2010 Subject: RE: Request for Logistics Flight for Supplies and Coordination with South American Allies Classification: Confidential Priority: Immediate Attention Required Background: Dear Colleagues, A minor clarification to my previous missive, I of course meant four Apache gunships that can operate alongside our six Harriers; not twelve as I had originally been informed. Rest assured the root cause of the miscount has been identified and the culprit (a young Finnish exchange Officer) has received the sternest of reprimands and I've instructed a cohort of Officers to assemble a club to further exercise his penance. Furthermore, our Logistics Officer has confirmed all required spares can be shipped on a standard 463L pallet and weighs in at about 8, 000 lbs. Yours tipsily, Montgomery Flibberflab Admiral, Royal Navy HMS Invincible
|
|
#
¿
Mar 4, 2024 11:27
|
|
|
Flt. Lt. Wolfgang Flibberflab 801 Squadron Lead  Listen up my pedigree chums, Lt. Cdr. Fletcher's on some dubiously unmerited 'shore leave' so you're stuck with me on this occasion. Point of order before we progress, looks like our previous callsign was causing some confusion in the command circles. We wouldn't want to make their lives any more difficult, I heard they ran out of double ply bog roll in their lavvy and rumour has it their biscuit budget has been slashed this year. As such, Vincent will now universally be known as Enfield. On with business. The Argie Admiral's has us prosecuting more Support services and HQ's, we run the risk of becoming type cast! but we've done it before and done it well so lets make this happen. I expect another clean run, I don't want to be the one explaining to ol' Monty why he's missing airframes, you should see what happened to the last person who took him that message. The Admiral has proposed a somewhat Yonic looking flight plan for us, it'd be ungentlemanly to refuse.  OBJECTIVE * Primary target is Combat Support Services battalion and HQ company. * Secondary/TOO is formation of heavy armoured tanks. WEATHER Conditions should be somewhat improved from recent days, hopefully staying dry with cloud base around 8,000ft. Unremarkable wind conditions. Hopefully a bit less bloody sodden at Sophie. INTEL "The PLAGF 7th Armoured BDE is currently making a move against our Rio Gallegos defenders, and we will need your assistance in slowing them down. Taking out the tanks directly will be a difficult job, though the anti-tank forces in the Army are best equipped to do it. Striking against their headquarters, support, engineer, and artillery companies will reduce the enabling forces of the 7th BDE, and give the Army time to get to work." EXECUTION Approach the objective and survey the targets, no doubt we'll have some air defence to deal with so we'll prioritise those and pick them off with Mavs. Once the CSS is no more, we'll take stock of remaining fuel and weapons and decide whether or not to prosecute secondaries. There are blue ground forces in theatre; check and recheck before engaging. Wp's as follows
ARMAMENT Pilots discretion on this on this one, though I recommend we each have an LMAV or two so we can reach out to any SHORAD near the objective. Otherwise, a mix of bombs and APKWS as you see fit. NOTES Laser codes as follows,
|
|
#
¿
Mar 8, 2024 10:31
|
|
|
To whomever requires, In the spirit of the alliance I wish to extend the willingness of the British Armed Forces to participate in ground operations. The Invincible carries a detachment an SBS unit who you might understand are the keenest of beans for selection in any operation in the area of Goose Green. As a leader, I order no man to undertake a mission I myself would not; to that end, I authorise the immediate distribution of this image of me training this morning, rallying the men and raising their fighting spirit. May it strike fear in the hearts of our enemies!  With fire in my heart, Montgomery Flibberflab Admiral, Royal Navy HMS Invincible
|
|
#
¿
Apr 11, 2024 19:56
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 16, 2024 06:55 |
|
|
 FAO our allied forces, I have spoken with my number within the RAF and can relay their intent to utilise the cease fire to fly sorties with the RC-135. Her sniff is worthy of her snout so I trust she can provide some much needed intelligence updates forthwith.  Seek and ye shall find, Montgomery Flibberflab Admiral, Royal Navy HMS Invincible
|
|
#
¿
Apr 24, 2024 22:57
|
|