Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
shackleford
Sep 4, 2006

is this the "chome bad" thread?

chome has announced their intent to experiment with something they're calling "IP Protection" which superficially sounds similar to iCloud Private Relay and uses the same/similar underlying technologies but is apparently aimed at depriving third party trackers from getting the browser's IP address.

https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/9s8ojrooa_Q posted:

IP Protection is a feature that sends third-party traffic for a set of domains through proxies for the purpose of protecting the user by masking their IP address from those domains.

After receiving much feedback from the ecosystem, the design of the broader proposal is as follows:

* IP Protection will be opt-in initially. This will help ensure that there is user control over privacy decisions and that Google can monitor behaviors at lower volumes.

* It will roll out in a phased manner. Like all of our privacy proposals, we want to ensure that we learn as we go and we recognize that there may also be regional considerations to evaluate.

* We are using a list based approach and only domains on the list in a third-party context will be impacted. We are conscious that these proposals may cause undesired disruptions for legitimate use cases and so we are just focused on the scripts and domains that are considered to be tracking users.

We plan to test and roll out the feature in multiple phases. To start, Phase 0 will use a single Google-owned proxy and will only proxy requests to domains owned by Google. This first phase will allow us to test our infrastructure while preventing impact to other companies and gives us more time to refine the list of domains that will be proxied. For simplicity, only clients with US-based IP addresses will be granted access to the proxies for phase 0.

A small percentage of clients will be automatically enrolled in this initial test, though the architecture and design will evolve between this test and future launches. To access the proxy, a user must be logged in to Chrome. To prevent abuse, a Google-run authentication server will grant access tokens to the Google run proxy based on a per-user quota.

In future phases we plan to use a 2-hop proxy, as had previously been indicated in the IP Protection explainer.

lmao at:

1. the original name for this feature being "Gnatcatcher". you know, those gnats tracking your online activity that aren't big enough to have their own browser and invent the idea of "logging in" to your browser and forcibly conflate it with the idea of logging into the popular websites that you own. hope the EU competition authorities get a hold of the internal emails where they go "oh lol we can't call this Gnatcatcher" in like 5-7 years.

2. the google engineer going "IP means Intellectual Property"

3. the google engineer going "your list of google domains contains long dead google services inbox, wave, orkut" (also plus)

4. the google engineer going "if this is actually effective won't the first parties and third parties collude to expose the browser's real IP via the DOM"

5. "we are just focused on the scripts and domains that are considered to be tracking users […] In this experiment the only sites impacted are Google owned domains"

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply