Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
OneEightHundred
Feb 28, 2008

Soon, we will be unstoppable!

Misunderstood posted:

That said, as others have pointed out it is functionally identical, in origin and usage as “idiot, moron,” etc. I wonder if there is any possibility that the current value-neutral descriptors like “developmentally delayed” or “intellectually disabled” have been intentionally made so dry and clunky to avoid making them appealing insults.
"Mentally retarded" was supposed to be the dry, technical, neutral, sanitized label in the first place.


The only success story I can think of for any of this type of thing went the other way around: The "neurodivergence" framing improving the perception of some conditions, like we're at the point where saying someone is "autistic" is... not great? But not always negative? Better than it would have been 20 years ago at least. But that partly happened because society decided "divergent" ways of thinking were valuable in some contexts. A bunch of conditions are still nowhere near that, like a fetal diagnosis of Down's syndrome is followed by abortion of the pregnancy 90% of the time.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply