|
I’m legit wondering. is there a compujter that isn’t a Turing machine. quantum computers don’t count because they aren’t real.
|
# ? Dec 7, 2023 23:33 |
|
|
# ? May 5, 2024 18:02 |
|
ibm just released a new quantum computer op https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/2023/12/6/23990752/quantum-computers-ibm-google-honeywell-china-supercomputer-artificial-intelligence
|
# ? Dec 7, 2023 23:36 |
|
do they explain how it works?
|
# ? Dec 7, 2023 23:39 |
|
yeah kinda. its not really very useful right now though. tbh i don't think any of them are, but they do exist ibm's site has a lot more info about it https://www.ibm.com/quantum/technology
|
# ? Dec 7, 2023 23:40 |
|
oh yeah billions of dollars and vast resources to make something that doesn’t work. fart
|
# ? Dec 8, 2023 00:02 |
|
technically all computational devices we'll ever build are merely finite state machines, not turing machines, since the latter is defined to have an infinite tape
|
# ? Dec 8, 2023 02:48 |
|
what's the point of having an infinite tape? you're never gonna be able to use most of it. seems like some dick measuring contest thing
|
# ? Dec 8, 2023 03:01 |
|
Silver Alicorn posted:oh yeah billions of dollars and vast resources to make something that doesn’t work. fart f35?
|
# ? Dec 8, 2023 03:03 |
|
oh i thought you said trillions
|
# ? Dec 8, 2023 03:03 |
|
Silver Alicorn posted:do they explain how it works? if u claim to understand it, ur lying - bongo titties physics man
|
# ? Dec 8, 2023 03:41 |
|
idk every quantum computer I have seen has a lot of impressive looking copper blocks and piping but doesn't look like an actual machine that can do work. I think its all woo
|
# ? Dec 8, 2023 03:43 |
|
Silver Alicorn posted:idk every quantum computer I have seen has a lot of impressive looking copper blocks and piping but doesn't look like an actual machine that can do work. I think its all woo uh, can any computer do work? they generally arent applying any force to displace anything
|
# ? Dec 8, 2023 03:45 |
|
they do generate a lot of heat and move air.
|
# ? Dec 8, 2023 03:45 |
|
Silver Alicorn posted:they do generate a lot of heat and move air. the air moving isnt part of the computer tho, its an externality to the computer. its not part of the function of it imo
|
# ? Dec 8, 2023 03:47 |
|
if you want to talk externalitys, the computations of the computer cause a lot of people and or machines to do work
|
# ? Dec 8, 2023 03:48 |
|
is that supposed to be a good thing?
|
# ? Dec 8, 2023 03:50 |
|
probably not. most of the work seems to be devoted to making a number go up for some of the worst people
|
# ? Dec 8, 2023 03:51 |
|
Silver Alicorn posted:idk every quantum computer I have seen has a lot of impressive looking copper blocks and piping but doesn't look like an actual machine that can do work. I think its all woo i don't know a whole lot about how these things work but apparently they are having trouble stabilizing the cubits to the point where they're not making so many errors that they're basically useless. there was an interview with ibm's head quantum computing guy and i thought it was pretty telling when asked if their new quantum computer can do computations that a regular computer can't, replied with something to the effect of like, "oh, yeah, they can do calculations" like, not faster, more of them, ones impossible to solve currently, etc. — just that they can do unspecified calculations, sometimes
|
# ? Dec 8, 2023 03:52 |
|
Beeftweeter posted:i don't know a whole lot about how these things work but stopped reading here
|
# ? Dec 8, 2023 03:54 |
|
fart simpson posted:stopped reading here well the rest of it is about an interview with someone who probably does
|
# ? Dec 8, 2023 03:55 |
|
i think its honorable of you to start your post with a warning to not read the rest of it
|
# ? Dec 8, 2023 03:56 |
|
oh i forgot to mention it was on the 38 minute long program "60 minutes"
|
# ? Dec 8, 2023 03:56 |
|
Deep Dish Fuckfest posted:what's the point of having an infinite tape? you're never gonna be able to use most of it. seems like some dick measuring contest thing also obviously you use the infinite tape as a measure for your infinitely long hog
|
# ? Dec 8, 2023 03:58 |
|
when I was younger I was really keen on making a P'' machine but I never quite figured it out
|
# ? Dec 8, 2023 03:59 |
|
and by not quite I mean not even close. I did however implement half of a risc style cpu in logisim
|
# ? Dec 8, 2023 04:00 |
|
my video card isn’t. need to upgrade badly
|
# ? Dec 8, 2023 04:12 |
|
I've a geforce 2 gts I can sell you
|
# ? Dec 8, 2023 04:13 |
|
video cards with programmable shaders are Turing complete, op. but they suck at it.
|
# ? Dec 8, 2023 04:17 |
|
Silver Alicorn posted:I've a geforce 2 gts I can sell you might be an upgrade
|
# ? Dec 8, 2023 04:19 |
|
The Management posted:video cards with programmable shaders are Turing complete, op. but they suck at it. thank you for giving a real answer.
|
# ? Dec 8, 2023 04:27 |
|
doesn't that mean the geforce 2 is technically turing complete
|
# ? Dec 8, 2023 04:30 |
|
it’s literally in the name https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/geforce/turing/
|
# ? Dec 8, 2023 04:50 |
|
The Management posted:it’s literally in the name close thread.
|
# ? Dec 8, 2023 04:56 |
|
Beeftweeter posted:doesn't that mean the geforce 2 is technically turing complete the geforce 2 didn't have programmable shaders. the first few generations of graphics cards that did have programmable shaders weren't turing complete either since you had no way to control the flow of execution in the shader. so no general if statements or loops that can't be unrolled at compile time. the closest to an if statement was that some instructions supported conditional predicates, but there were no instructions that modified the instruction pointer like jumps basically to be turing complete you need the wonderful ability to get stuck in infinite loops, something modern gpus can do with aplomb as evidenced by the regularity with which windows kills my graphics drivers when i write buggy shaders
|
# ? Dec 8, 2023 13:06 |
|
Deep Dish Fuckfest posted:the geforce 2 didn't have programmable shaders. the first few generations of graphics cards that did have programmable shaders weren't turing complete either since you had no way to control the flow of execution in the shader. so no general if statements or loops that can't be unrolled at compile time. the closest to an if statement was that some instructions supported conditional predicates, but there were no instructions that modified the instruction pointer like jumps nerd!
|
# ? Dec 8, 2023 13:59 |
|
Beeftweeter posted:yeah kinda. its not really very useful right now though. tbh i don't think any of them are, but they do exist I think they spend more time designing fancy cases to put these in than the computers themselves.
|
# ? Dec 8, 2023 19:10 |
|
Dijkstracula posted:technically all computational devices we'll ever build are merely finite state machines, not turing machines, since the latter is defined to have an infinite tape busy beaver fucks you up
|
# ? Dec 9, 2023 06:24 |
|
they are turd machines
|
# ? Dec 9, 2023 06:33 |
|
Deep Dish Fuckfest posted:the geforce 2 didn't have programmable shaders. the first few generations of graphics cards that did have programmable shaders weren't turing complete either since you had no way to control the flow of execution in the shader. so no general if statements or loops that can't be unrolled at compile time. the closest to an if statement was that some instructions supported conditional predicates, but there were no instructions that modified the instruction pointer like jumps huh i thought it did but i guess it was the geforce 3 that had them first anyway that was pretty interesting. fart is just being a jock
|
# ? Dec 9, 2023 06:40 |
|
|
# ? May 5, 2024 18:02 |
|
akadajet posted:I think they spend more time designing fancy cases to put these in than the computers themselves. i still have no idea what they supposedly do. what os does a quantum computer run?
|
# ? Dec 9, 2023 06:41 |