Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Tunicate
May 15, 2012

Funky See Funky Do posted:

Do we know what sort of hats they wore? Were there times when hats were ubiquitous and times (like today) when they were mostly worn for practical reasons?

What was believed to be a hat in the 1960's is now believed to have been a form of obligate parasite.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Tunicate
May 15, 2012

Knormal posted:

Yep, some of the most famous Victorian paleontologists were vehemently against the idea that birds could be dinosaurs for some reason and used their influence to successfully bury the idea until it was independently thought of in the 1970's. I think the prevailing line of thought at the time was birds and mammals were both warm-blooded and covered in something, so birds must be more closely related to mammals than reptiles, despite the bones of birds and dinosaurs having so many similarities.

It's purely an arbitrary labelling decision based on where you place a marker, same as why pterodactyls aren't dinosaurs

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply