|
Ogmius815 posted:You forgot to use the nested parenthesis. What a dogshit post.
|
#
¿
Mar 6, 2024 17:17
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 17, 2024 18:47 |
|
|
Zapp Brannigan posted:I can't imagine who on Earth might have put this judge into "I'm not taking anymore loving poo poo" mode recently???? This is the same judge that was on the Donziger case? One can only speculate.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 28, 2024 19:15
|
|
|
https://youtu.be/uErKI0zWgjg?si=3gWvcLQGwA1agyJs
|
|
#
¿
Mar 29, 2024 19:49
|
|
|
US libs to Palestinians
|
|
#
¿
Apr 17, 2024 16:53
|
|
|
GlyphGryph posted:Not like any of the anti-Biden folks in this thread aren't all for sending them the same exact message. I’m willing to believe that some people just prefer to not see their nation being complicit in the slaughter of hundreds of thousands of Palestinians. volts5000 posted:Don't forget the entirety of the Republican Party, or do they not have any agency and only liberals can make things happen/not happen? Im not seeing a denial here!
|
|
#
¿
Apr 17, 2024 17:07
|
|
|
GlyphGryph posted:This is exactly my point, you realize that, right? Rhetorically, they seem prefectly willing to sacrifice any number of Palestinian lives as long as it means they personally can say they weren't complicit with it. I don’t think that’s exactly your point at all, I said nothing about personal complicity.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 17, 2024 17:15
|
|
|
GlyphGryph posted:Replace it with complicity-by-proxy in my response as well then, if thats what you want, then, it's not meaningfully different in any way I can determine except describing it as personal complicity would be more honest and probably a little less grossly immoral as a result, if they're seriously arguing a Trump-led US would be less complicit. You are arguing with positions you imagine me to have, whether out of a guilty conscience or not it is hard to say.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 17, 2024 17:29
|
|
|
GlyphGryph posted:I can only argue with the points you're actually making to the extent I can decipher them, not whatever you believe to be the case inside your head, and as far as I can tell your argument was that they want to reduce their sense of complicity. If there's something I misunderstood, could you try to rephrase your argument in a more clear way? My original point, if you can even call it that, was a quick reply to a shrek image macro where I stated that a certain demographic was comfortable with the slaughter. You then joined in, after all a hit dog will holler, and your claims have been becoming stranger.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 17, 2024 17:44
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 17, 2024 18:47 |
|
|
GlyphGryph posted:Then why were you talking about the response to your second point, then? The one you made in the post I actually, y'know, quoted, before the response. What, my contention that some people you characterise as anti-Biden might genuinely wish for the slaughter to stop and not just a means to undermine America as you seem to think? Yeah I’ll stand by that. You are free to entertain whatever misguided beliefs about me you wish.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 17, 2024 18:02
|
|