Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Vampire Panties
Apr 18, 2001
nposter
Nap Ghost

Mr Teatime posted:

Harbour pilots don’t literally drive the ship it’s still done by the regular crew. Ships do have multiple main power generators and it’s standard practise during manoeuvring to keep multiple on the board in order to avoid blackouts due to one making GBS threads the bed. Your power management system can poo poo the bed anyway and black you out despite this but ships have emergency back up power in the form of battery supply for minor systems and an emergency generator which will come online on a dead switchboard, this takes about a minute and only powers a select amount of emergency systems including one of the 4 steering gear motors.

Full recovery after a blackout involves the engine room restarting numerous systems and pumps and takes time and that’s in ideal circumstances. If the ship blacked out so close to the bridge there is literally almost nothing the crew could have done to stop an accident like this, even if you somehow dropped the anchors or slammed the engine in reverse it ain’t going to stop in that distance.

you would think there would be a more robust backup system for a 200m dollar floating apartment complex

but then sex arses would cost an extra 10 cents :capitalism:

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Vampire Panties
Apr 18, 2001
nposter
Nap Ghost

Cable Guy posted:

NTSB has released their drone inspection footage.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CwgOHpZlxvc

it seems like a bad design that the entire bridge ripped off the pilings, instead of the impacted section

Vampire Panties
Apr 18, 2001
nposter
Nap Ghost
this is an immensely ignorant question, but does the type of bridge affect the time it would take to rebuild?

could they build a suspension bridge so this doesn't happen again without construction taking more time than replacing the truss bridge?

Vampire Panties
Apr 18, 2001
nposter
Nap Ghost

A Wizard of Goatse posted:

no infrastructure of any meaningful size has been built or maintained in the area for the better part of a century so the idea it can be done at all is purely speculative tbh

On that note, is there any reason to rebuild the bridge at all? IIRC there's other hazmat corridors available that they're adding lanes to?

Vampire Panties
Apr 18, 2001
nposter
Nap Ghost

GABA ghoul posted:

We do joke about this a lot, but it's kinda true that if that bridge had a gun, none of this would have happened. If the pillars had a defense mechanism like a tomahawk launcher with tactical nukes in the 1-2 kiloton range that ship would have been vaporized before it could do any damage. Make of that what you will

What if they built a bunch of wind turbines, and then reversed them to blow the ship back on course

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Vampire Panties
Apr 18, 2001
nposter
Nap Ghost
The boat was setting on a 27 day voyage, and it hit the bridge 7 days ago? they're fine

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply