Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
rscott
Dec 10, 2009
It's almost like those in power will use whatever means available to them to make sure they hold onto that power and ethnic/cultural divides are a very handy tool for that.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

A Buttery Pastry
Sep 4, 2011

Delicious and Informative!
:3:

Benito Hitlerstalin posted:

Seeing as how Norway was quite literally dominated by foreign (white European) powers up until 1905 and subsequently invaded during WW2 that assertion, in regards to Norway, at least, seems dubious at best.
Norwegians like to pretend they were uniquely mistreated by Denmark, but I don't believe that was really true. Mostly because we're talking about an old-school non-democratic monarchy, which didn't really care about the lack of development in the provinces as long as it didn't threaten the state overall. Norway was basically in the same boat as Jutland during this period, only diverging when the Swedes took Norway in 1814, at which point Norway got to run itself to some degree. Jutland on the other hand was essentially ignored by Copenhagen until 1864, a few token efforts and the occasional uprising aside, at which point the vastly diminished Danish state finally started to care about it to some degree.

SickZip posted:

Ethnic cohesion has a really strong record when it comes to making a nation more cohesive and capable of building the kind of institutions that lead to a strong economy. Things like funding to schools, willingness to invest in infrastructure, social capital and engagement, the public's willingness to engage in collective action all have a negative correlation with ethnic diversity in places from America to Africa to Southeast Asia to nearly everywhere studied.

It's not a very nice observation, but its pretty solidly backed by the majority of research and it really does an amazing job of explaining quite a few historical phenomenon like why America never went full social democracy like Europe and why our labor movement never took off to the same extent and why Europe's social democracy is breaking down as it becomes more diverse.
That's ethnic cohesion though, not skin color.

AreWeDrunkYet
Jul 8, 2006
Probation
Can't post for 7 days!

Dusseldorf posted:

It lists buying power and the Netherlands is expensive.

Would it cause that stark of a difference? The rest of Northern Europe is pretty expensive too - that map just makes the Dutch look poor or something, which runs contrary to everything I've heard.

SickZip posted:

Ethnic cohesion has a really strong record when it comes to making a nation more cohesive and capable of building the kind of institutions that lead to a strong economy. Things like funding to schools, willingness to invest in infrastructure, social capital and engagement, the public's willingness to engage in collective action all have a negative correlation with ethnic diversity in places from America to Africa to Southeast Asia to nearly everywhere studied.

But what does it have to do with being white specifically?

quote:

when your country is 90% of one ethnicity (and you're white, on top of that)

AreWeDrunkYet fucked around with this message at 22:35 on Mar 12, 2014

Kamrat
Nov 27, 2012

Thanks for playing Alone in the dark 2.

Now please fuck off

IceAgeComing posted:

Its definitely getting better though; those figures are 2006 (there are newer ones available but I liked that map; the trend is the same though), and in the early 90s it was universally below 70 in Scotland...

Wow, that's extremely low. Things sure have improved a lot since then and it's good to hear it's getting even better! :)

A Buttery Pastry
Sep 4, 2011

Delicious and Informative!
:3:

AreWeDrunkYet posted:

Would it cause that stark of a difference? The rest of Northern Europe is pretty expensive too - that map just makes the Dutch look poor or something, which runs contrary to everything I've heard.
Yeah, the Netherlands isn't particularly expensive compared to its neighbors. Slightly more than the Germans, about the same as the French, the British, and the Swedes, slightly less than us Danes, and much less than the Norwegians. (Stavanger is 62% more expensive than New York!)

Linked map since it's interactive:

http://www.numbeo.com/cost-of-living/gmaps.jsp

Fake edit: Eh, the exact numbers depend on which exact measurement you choose, but the trend holds. Unsurprisingly, including rent pushes everyone down, since it's calibrated to New York standards.

Fojar38
Sep 2, 2011


Sorry I meant to say I hope that the police use maximum force and kill or maim a bunch of innocent people, thus paving a way for a proletarian uprising and socialist utopia


also here's a stupid take
---------------------------->

rscott posted:

It's almost like those in power will use whatever means available to them to make sure they hold onto that power and ethnic/cultural divides are a very handy tool for that.

I don't think it's anything like this, I think it's just that people have a tendency to distrust anyone who doesn't look like them or have a similar background and hence are more reluctant to fund things like social welfare because they think that people who aren't like them moochers will abuse the system.

SickZip
Jul 29, 2008

by FactsAreUseless

rscott posted:

It's almost like those in power will use whatever means available to them to make sure they hold onto that power and ethnic/cultural divides are a very handy tool for that.

Its almost like people instantly reach facile answers to complicated phenomenon based upon what makes them comfortable.

The huge declines in social cohesion you see in America that took off with the end of segregation occurred despite the government and occurred most strongly in areas of activity that the government was not involved in and could not care the least about (ie amateur sports leagues and such).

khwarezm
Oct 26, 2010

Deal with it.

computer parts posted:

Less likely to be invaded by Europeans.



Torrannor posted:


Edit: And back to the Europe map of wealth, look at Italy and understand why there are some people in Northern Italy that want to get rid of the south.

Also one of the reasons Catalans and Basques want Autonomy.

khwarezm fucked around with this message at 02:02 on Mar 13, 2014

Ms Adequate
Oct 30, 2011

Baby even when I'm dead and gone
You will always be my only one, my only one
When the night is calling
No matter who I become
You will always be my only one, my only one, my only one
When the night is calling



AreWeDrunkYet posted:

But what does it have to do with being white specifically?

They're less likely to be conquered and oppressed for hundreds of years, and even when they are, it's unlikely to be to the same degree that non-whites suffered. Like yeah, it happens, but it's a hell of a lot less likely than if you're some poor loving African or Asian or American society when suddenly these odd sails appear on the horizon.

Lycus
Aug 5, 2008

Half the posters in this forum have been made up. This website is a goddamn ghost town.
I didn't realize that Greece is still doing so much better than the rest of the Balkans.

Ardennes
May 12, 2002

Lycus posted:

I didn't realize that Greece is still doing so much better than the rest of the Balkans.

Well it has been apart of the European Union since 1981 so it did have a bit of a head start even if it has been a basket case since 2008.

Teddybear
May 16, 2009

Look! A teddybear doll!
It's soooo cute!


It's all the olive oil. Does wonders for longevity, I hear. Or at least so says like every "worlds oldest" blank.

Pope Hilarius II
Nov 10, 2008

SickZip posted:

Ethnic cohesion has a really strong record when it comes to making a nation more cohesive and capable of building the kind of institutions that lead to a strong economy.

Switzerland would like a word with you. Conversely, so would Somalia.

Really, you're oversimplifying this. It's possible for a person to have different overlapping national identities that in turn might be connected to a different ethnicity.

Zudgemud
Mar 1, 2009
Grimey Drawer

How come nobody mentions that the Iberian peninsula is literally crying in that picture?

Trench_Rat
Sep 19, 2006
Doing my duty for king and coutry since 86




spot_the_greater_metropolitan_capital_area_of_poland.png

ulvir
Jan 2, 2005

A Buttery Pastry posted:

Norwegians like to pretend they were uniquely mistreated by Denmark, but I don't believe that was really true. Mostly because we're talking about an old-school non-democratic monarchy, which didn't really care about the lack of development in the provinces as long as it didn't threaten the state overall. Norway was basically in the same boat as Jutland during this period, only diverging when the Swedes took Norway in 1814, at which point Norway got to run itself to some degree. Jutland on the other hand was essentially ignored by Copenhagen until 1864, a few token efforts and the occasional uprising aside, at which point the vastly diminished Danish state finally started to care about it to some degree.

Tell me more about how occupying the power of a foreign country (and then handing that country over to another country) is the same as maybe not governing properly within your own mainland state. :allears:

Redeye Flight
Mar 26, 2010

God, I'm so tired. What the hell did I post last night?

Trench_Rat posted:

spot_the_greater_metropolitan_capital_area_of_poland.png

It's kind of cool how you can pick out major cities and urban areas on the map in most places. I can see what I'm guessing are the capitals of all three Baltic countries, Kiev, and Budapest, all picked out by their higher purchasing power.

a pipe smoking dog
Jan 25, 2010

"haha, dogs can't smoke!"

Redeye Flight posted:

It's kind of cool how you can pick out major cities and urban areas on the map in most places. I can see what I'm guessing are the capitals of all three Baltic countries, Kiev, and Budapest, all picked out by their higher purchasing power.

Germany and Italy really mess with the pattern.

ulvir
Jan 2, 2005

It's fascinating that you still can kind of see traces of the east-west divide in Germany.

DarkCrawler
Apr 6, 2009

by vyelkin
Portugal is really not doing too well, huh? Only blue west of the Oder–Neisse.

computer parts
Nov 18, 2010

PLEASE CLAP

DarkCrawler posted:

Portugal is really not doing too well, huh? Only blue west of the Oder–Neisse.

They're only 60% urban.

DrSunshine
Mar 23, 2009

Did I just say that out loud~~?!!!
In that case, does it mean that it'd be a lot cheaper, if say I wanted to take a trip overseas to somewhere in Western Europe, to travel to Portugal or Spain? As a poor graduate student, I've always wanted to visit Europe, but was always intimidated by the cost.

Grand Fromage
Jan 30, 2006

L-l-look at you bar-bartender, a-a pa-pathetic creature of meat and bone, un-underestimating my l-l-liver's ability to metab-meTABolize t-toxins. How can you p-poison a perfect, immortal alcohOLIC?


DrSunshine posted:

In that case, does it mean that it'd be a lot cheaper, if say I wanted to take a trip overseas to somewhere in Western Europe, to travel to Portugal or Spain? As a poor graduate student, I've always wanted to visit Europe, but was always intimidated by the cost.

Yeah. Most anywhere south of Rome (other than big resort areas like Capri) is cheap too.

Old James
Nov 20, 2003

Wait a sec. I don't know an Old James!

DrSunshine posted:

In that case, does it mean that it'd be a lot cheaper, if say I wanted to take a trip overseas to somewhere in Western Europe, to travel to Portugal or Spain? As a poor graduate student, I've always wanted to visit Europe, but was always intimidated by the cost.

Hell yes.

It was over a decade ago, but my last backpacking trip through Europe I stopped at hotels in Amsterdam and Frankfurt and paid about $70-$100 while an equally furnished room at a pension in downtown Lisbon (prime location) was less than $20. Also Spain and Portugal have amazing weather, architecture, and history.

A Buttery Pastry
Sep 4, 2011

Delicious and Informative!
:3:

ulvir posted:

Tell me more about how occupying the power of a foreign country (and then handing that country over to another country) is the same as maybe not governing properly within your own mainland state. :allears:
Your position here is one that assumes the Oldenburg monarchy was a nation state, which it absolutely wasn't. It was a conglomeration of primarily Danish, Norwegian, and German territory, with Copenhagen at the center, ruled by Germans. The use of "occupying" is also ridiculous, unless you think Scotland is currently occupied by the UK. As for the whole "mainland state" thing, have you looked at Denmark? It's a bunch of territory connected by sea, so how does Norway really stand out? The idea that water separates is a pretty modern invention, until recently it connected.

In regards to "handing over", what should the king of Denmark have done? The people telling him to give up Norway to Sweden were the leaders of the UK, Prussia, Austria, Russia, and Sweden. Besides, the crown prince certainly didn't just cave in, he helped ensure Norway get about the best possible deal they could, given their precarious position.

DrSunshine posted:

In that case, does it mean that it'd be a lot cheaper, if say I wanted to take a trip overseas to somewhere in Western Europe, to travel to Portugal or Spain? As a poor graduate student, I've always wanted to visit Europe, but was always intimidated by the cost.
I visited some of the White Towns of Andalusia, and poo poo was cheap as gently caress (That was the case in general, but more so in the countryside), especially if you cook your own meals. A lot of stuff to look at too, if you're into old buildings, mountains, and nature in general.

Torrannor
Apr 27, 2013

---FAGNER---
TEAM-MATE

Old James posted:

Hell yes.

It was over a decade ago, but my last backpacking trip through Europe I stopped at hotels in Amsterdam and Frankfurt and paid about $70-$100 while an equally furnished room at a pension in downtown Lisbon (prime location) was less than $20. Also Spain and Portugal have amazing weather, architecture, and history.

Hey now, we have amazing architecture and history here in Germany, too :colbert:

But yes, it is a lot cheaper.

Take the plunge! Okay!
Feb 24, 2007



Italy is pretty much that Bugs Bunny Florida gif, at least if you ask the Lega nord.

Phlegmish
Jul 2, 2011



ulvir posted:

It's fascinating that you still can kind of see traces of the east-west divide in Germany.

Much less than I expected, honestly. In fact, East Germany seems to have about as much purchasing power as the Netherlands.

Would be interesting if the map had a date.

Divorced And Curious
Jan 23, 2009

democracy depends on sausage sizzles

Torrannor posted:

Hey now, we have amazing architecture and history here in Germany, too :colbert:

But yes, it is a lot cheaper.

You still see the east-west divide in costs of travel (food, accommodation, etc) in Germany too, which I found interesting.

Shbobdb
Dec 16, 2010

by Reene

DrSunshine posted:

In that case, does it mean that it'd be a lot cheaper, if say I wanted to take a trip overseas to somewhere in Western Europe, to travel to Portugal or Spain? As a poor graduate student, I've always wanted to visit Europe, but was always intimidated by the cost.

Go to Greece. It's got amazing history* and it is sooooo cheap. Just really absurdly cheap. Portugal and Spain are also amazing but Greece is even cheaper. So good.

*Note: most of that history has been exported to other nations.

A Buttery Pastry
Sep 4, 2011

Delicious and Informative!
:3:

Shbobdb posted:

Go to Greece. It's got amazing history* and it is sooooo cheap. Just really absurdly cheap. Portugal and Spain are also amazing but Greece is even cheaper. So good.

*Note: most of that history has been exported to other nations.
Are you sure Greece is cheaper? The map I linked earlier makes it seem like that's not true (Groceries in most Greek cities are 50% more expensive than in Malaga), and it certainly seemed cheaper when I was in Andalusia. Greece also has ravenous Nazis/dogs, if you don't like being (b)eaten.

DrSunshine
Mar 23, 2009

Did I just say that out loud~~?!!!

Shbobdb posted:

Go to Greece. It's got amazing history* and it is sooooo cheap. Just really absurdly cheap. Portugal and Spain are also amazing but Greece is even cheaper. So good.

*Note: most of that history has been exported to other nations.

Yes, but I am an Asian dude and I heard about what happened to that one Asian dude in Greece! Golden Dawn is scary!!:ohdear:

EDIT:

Old James posted:

Hell yes.

It was over a decade ago, but my last backpacking trip through Europe I stopped at hotels in Amsterdam and Frankfurt and paid about $70-$100 while an equally furnished room at a pension in downtown Lisbon (prime location) was less than $20. Also Spain and Portugal have amazing weather, architecture, and history.

That actually sounds pretty sweet! I'm from California so the weather should be pretty familiar to me. Thanks for the tips guys!

DrSunshine fucked around with this message at 16:09 on Mar 13, 2014

Bates
Jun 15, 2006

DrSunshine posted:

In that case, does it mean that it'd be a lot cheaper, if say I wanted to take a trip overseas to somewhere in Western Europe, to travel to Portugal or Spain? As a poor graduate student, I've always wanted to visit Europe, but was always intimidated by the cost.

Prague, Krakow, Budapest and Slovenia is also a pretty good route with manageble distances - you get some really great cities and a bit of the Alps. Just stay out of Austria and the tourist traps in Italy and you'll be fine.

SurgicalOntologist
Jun 17, 2004

Bosnia's real cheap too, had a wonderful time last summer in Mostar, Sarajevo, and surrounding countryside.

Shbobdb
Dec 16, 2010

by Reene

A Buttery Pastry posted:

Are you sure Greece is cheaper? The map I linked earlier makes it seem like that's not true (Groceries in most Greek cities are 50% more expensive than in Malaga), and it certainly seemed cheaper when I was in Andalusia. Greece also has ravenous Nazis/dogs, if you don't like being (b)eaten.

I'm just going off personal experience . . . personal experience that is also pre-Olympics. Plus the whole Nazi-thing is an understandable turn-off.

ulvir
Jan 2, 2005

A Buttery Pastry posted:

Your position here is one that assumes the Oldenburg monarchy was a nation state, which it absolutely wasn't. It was a conglomeration of primarily Danish, Norwegian, and German territory, with Copenhagen at the center, ruled by Germans. The use of "occupying" is also ridiculous, unless you think Scotland is currently occupied by the UK. As for the whole "mainland state" thing, have you looked at Denmark? It's a bunch of territory connected by sea, so how does Norway really stand out? The idea that water separates is a pretty modern invention, until recently it connected.

In regards to "handing over", what should the king of Denmark have done? The people telling him to give up Norway to Sweden were the leaders of the UK, Prussia, Austria, Russia, and Sweden. Besides, the crown prince certainly didn't just cave in, he helped ensure Norway get about the best possible deal they could, given their precarious position.

Well, seeing as how it takes even modern ships about a day to sail from Oslo to the coast of Denmark, I'd say Norway stands out from your assorted islands which can reach land pretty swiftly, actually. All I was hinting at is that the stance that Norwegians should stop feeling displeased with 300 years of Danish rule and 85 years of Swedish rule because "hey, some citizens in Denmark wasn't all happy either!" is a kind of a odd one. And since Scotland is about to hold a Referendum this year, it would seem that a significant portion of the population want the English to sod off and let Scotland be sovereign.

But thanks for the cliff-noted history lesson about Denmark, though. Wasn't aware of the nuances there. As for the "handing over" comment, that wasn't meant all too serious. I'm aware of what the Napoleonic wars entailed. Not eventually doing what the other powers wanted would make things bad for all involved parties.

A Buttery Pastry
Sep 4, 2011

Delicious and Informative!
:3:

ulvir posted:

Well, seeing as how it takes even modern ships about a day to sail from Oslo to the coast of Denmark, I'd say Norway stands out from your assorted islands which can reach land pretty swiftly, actually.
The entire west coast of Denmark south of the North Jutlandic Island is farther away from Copenhagen than Oslo though, unless you're on a plane. Meanwhile, the difference between Oslo and Copenhagen becomes less and less pronounced as you go up the Norwegian west coast. A day isn't exactly that much time either, considering that the trek from Viborg in Northern Jutland down to the markets in Slesvig took around 2 weeks as far as I know. Not like they had trains.

ulvir posted:

All I was hinting at is that the stance that Norwegians should stop feeling displeased with 300 years of Danish rule and 85 years of Swedish rule because "hey, some citizens in Denmark wasn't all happy either!" is a kind of a odd one.
My point is basically just that it's not really a nationalist issue during the Danish-Norwegian union, since the whole arrangement is essentially feudal. Yes, Norway would probably have been better off independent, assuming it could remain so, but that has more to do with how terrible the political system was than anything else. It's not like Danish serfs had a nice time during the period either, and very few people outside of Copenhagen would really have benefited from the Oldenburg empire. Jutland in particular was really empty outside the coasts, and it took our defeat at the hands of the Germans in 1864 before anything was really done to develop it. (Using penal labor, of course.)

ulvir posted:

And since Scotland is about to hold a Referendum this year, it would seem that a significant portion of the population want the English to sod off and let Scotland be sovereign.
Sure, but it's not occupied. I'm 100% in favor of the Scots leaving the English, and the same goes for the Norwegians (althistorically) breaking their union with Denmark voluntarily back in 1814 instead of being forced to*, I just don't think we should call it occupation.

*Well, it would be better if they had remained and had been able to impose their progressive constitution on Denmark, but I wouldn't deny a people the right to their own state.

ulvir posted:

But thanks for the cliff-noted history lesson about Denmark, though. Wasn't aware of the nuances there. As for the "handing over" comment, that wasn't meant all too serious. I'm aware of what the Napoleonic wars entailed. Not eventually doing what the other powers wanted would make things bad for all involved parties.
It's okay, my own comment could have been a bit more diplomatic. My point is basically just that looking at the past through the lens of nationalism/ethnicity doesn't always make sense.

A Buttery Pastry fucked around with this message at 19:48 on Mar 13, 2014

Vincent Van Goatse
Nov 8, 2006

Enjoy every sandwich.

Smellrose

computer parts posted:

Less likely to be invaded by Europeans.

After 1945, perhaps.

Torrannor
Apr 27, 2013

---FAGNER---
TEAM-MATE

ALL-PRO SEXMAN posted:

After 1945, perhaps.

Though to be fair, while WW2 reduced much of the continent to rubble and killed an unbelievable number of people, this is still not quite the level of destruction that the indigenous societies of America suffered.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Deltasquid
Apr 10, 2013

awww...
you guys made me ink!


THUNDERDOME

Shbobdb posted:

I'm just going off personal experience . . . personal experience that is also pre-Olympics. Plus the whole Nazi-thing is an understandable turn-off.

Having gone to Greece this very summer, I can guarantee the nazis are being overblown in Greece. It's like not going to the UK because the EDL scares you.

Friendly reminder the communist party is still more popular than the Golden Dawn. And all of the other parties are more popular than either.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply