Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
Mr. Fall Down Terror
Jan 24, 2018

by Fluffdaddy

zone posted:

russian general-mayor (lit. major general) is the equivalent of a brigadier general in the NATO classification.
their general-leytenants (lieutenant-general) are the equivalents of major-generals.
a general-polkovnik (colonel-general) is the equivalent of a lieutenant general.
general-armii (army general) is a 4 star general.

god this doesn't scan for gilbert and sullivan at all, jeez

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

PederP
Nov 20, 2009


The Ukrainian ambassador to Denmark asked that we please do not start integrating refugees, and in fact, should not really consider them refugees, but rather 'displace people'. The Danish municipal authorities in some cases sent Ukrainian children to Danish language classes the same week as they arrived, and some Ukrainians apparently think that's taking a rather pessimistic approach to the situation. More sensible municipalities are focusing on making sure children have access not just to education, but also start having a social life again and interacting with children - and making the wellbeing a priority over the 'welcome to Denmark, we expect you to become part of society from day 1 for your sake and ours'. It's a bit of a sensitive topic really how the refugees are to be considered in relation to integration and assimilation policies. I can understand some Ukrainians being disturbed by efforts to assimilate them the moment they cross the border. Employers (public and private sector both) are openly salivating in the press at the additional labor coming into the country.

MikeC
Jul 19, 2004
BITCH ASS NARC

headspace posted:

"Everything outside of the Donbas was just a feint". Edit: I don't how announcing all this helps them at all. Things are clearly going very poorly for them.

https://twitter.com/polinaivanovva/status/1507400322829930500?s=20&t=7h2IGKKTy1G2XY4ZP5WONQ

Lmao. So the botched assault which saw them just leave 300 paratroopers stranded was just part of the plan.

So yeah, as expected, pull back from the West while taking out Eastern Ukraine in bite size pieces. Explains the stop in forward momentum on the western bank and the pullback all along the main road out from Sumy and Konotep. The "pocket" will probably be evacuated too in the coming week.

So yeah, I guess someone actually got through to Putin on the what reality is.

Tomn
Aug 23, 2007

And the angel said unto him
"Stop hitting yourself. Stop hitting yourself."
But lo he could not. For the angel was hitting him with his own hands

KitConstantine posted:

The claim I've seen is 7 generals and 20 total officers, so like generals + colonels + ??? Other levels of officer

The thing is we're still seeing quotes like this running around:

Youth Decay posted:

They've lost 6 or 7 out of 20ish generals in Ukraine at this point, they're having to pull in troops from the easternmost portion of the country and attempted to do so in Syria and Belarus.

I THINK the original source of the 20 generals quote that I can recall is a Twitter thread claiming that "There's only 20 major generals in Russia, so losing so many major generals is absolutely wild!" and after that it seems like the "twenty generals" figure just became this mutating anchoring point even if the definition of the twenty things changes. And like I said, near as I can recall the original claim of twenty major generals total wasn't even true.

Not to pick on Youth Decay specifically, it just seems like this is a bit of misinformation that's taken on a life of its own and I think it'd be helpful for someone who actually knows what's going on to remind us what the actual figures are because I think we're at the point where everyone says twenty, so twenty it is.

with a rebel yell she QQd
Jan 18, 2007

Villain


Tomn posted:

I think I'm starting to dislike this Orban fella. I mean, "we can't risk Hungarian weapons shipments getting bombed"? Right, because we're hearing so many reports about the Polish shipments getting struck, right?

It's all just bullshit. The real reason is one of the main campaign points of Orban's government is cheap gas. "Low living costs" is their slogan. If they have to increase gas prices, they lose the election. I honestly start to believe if they win the election they will change their tone, because at that point it wont matter that much anymore.

If Orban somehow loses the election, I will be dancing on the streets of Budapest. Watch the news on April 3.

KitConstantine
Jan 11, 2013

New satellite imagery from Maxxar of the exploded ship/port damage
https://twitter.com/Maxar/status/1507398872074756135?s=20&t=e6RtaOalPgd0XHwQxWUHxA
I wonder what that brown patch on the right-upper part of the port in the second picture is/was.

KitConstantine
Jan 11, 2013

Tomn posted:

The thing is we're still seeing quotes like this running around:

I THINK the original source of the 20 generals quote that I can recall is a Twitter thread claiming that "There's only 20 major generals in Russia, so losing so many major generals is absolutely wild!" and after that it seems like the "twenty generals" figure just became this mutating anchoring point even if the definition of the twenty things changes. And like I said, near as I can recall the original claim of twenty major generals total wasn't even true.

Ooooh I misread and thought you meant 'total officers killed'. I had an early meeting this morning so my reading comprehension isn't all it could be.

The '20 generals' claim appears in this BBC report sourced to 'analysts' - I'm not sure if there's more concrete sourcing than that
https://twitter.com/anders_aslund/status/1504901745641771012?s=20&t=WhU97XgW_Brh94A5S160IQ

Edit: this Foreign Policy article credits the 20 number to "western intelligence officials" so equally vague
https://foreignpolicy.com/2022/03/21/russia-generals-dead-ukraine/

eke out
Feb 24, 2013



KitConstantine posted:

New satellite imagery from Maxxar of the exploded ship/port damage
https://twitter.com/Maxar/status/1507398872074756135?s=20&t=e6RtaOalPgd0XHwQxWUHxA
I wonder what that brown patch on the right-upper part of the port in the second picture is/was.

There was an absolute shitload of ammo firing off in those videos, I think they hit offloaded munitions that were sitting on the dock.

Staluigi
Jun 22, 2021

headspace posted:

"Everything outside of the Donbas was just a feint". Edit: I don't how announcing all this helps them at all. Things are clearly going very poorly for them.

https://twitter.com/polinaivanovva/status/1507400322829930500?s=20&t=7h2IGKKTy1G2XY4ZP5WONQ

"With the Ukranians fully ensnared by the genius of Operation Bloodm, we will be transitioning to the implementation of Operation Victory Wine"

Djarum
Apr 1, 2004

by vyelkin

KitConstantine posted:

New satellite imagery from Maxxar of the exploded ship/port damage
https://twitter.com/Maxar/status/1507398872074756135?s=20&t=e6RtaOalPgd0XHwQxWUHxA
I wonder what that brown patch on the right-upper part of the port in the second picture is/was.

Judging by the before and after photos it was likely supplies that got destroyed in the strike and fires that followed. It's amazing the fuel tanks didn't explode as well.

Bar Ran Dun
Jan 22, 2006




KitConstantine posted:

New satellite imagery from Maxxar of the exploded ship/port damage
https://twitter.com/Maxar/status/1507398872074756135?s=20&t=e6RtaOalPgd0XHwQxWUHxA
I wonder what that brown patch on the right-upper part of the port in the second picture is/was.

Looks like a cargo pile. Visually I’m guessing scrap metal?

mobby_6kl
Aug 9, 2009

by Fluffdaddy

KitConstantine posted:

New satellite imagery from Maxxar of the exploded ship/port damage
https://twitter.com/Maxar/status/1507398872074756135?s=20&t=e6RtaOalPgd0XHwQxWUHxA
I wonder what that brown patch on the right-upper part of the port in the second picture is/was.

Is there any solid info on what took it out? Was it a Tochka or something? That's a really great hit but I'm curious why they didn't gently caress up the whole port even more.

Paladinus
Jan 11, 2014

heyHEYYYY!!!

KitConstantine posted:

You think the only way this official communicated his opinion was via Twitter and this isn't just echoing his private communications to the person addressed?

Saakashvili is currently in prison. I very much doubt he has any channels of communication with Lukashenko now.

Marshal Prolapse
Jun 23, 2012

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS

KitConstantine posted:

I said former in the post, but yes being in jail would also make it difficult lol. That's why I asked. Thank you!

In other news: speculative ID of the 7th general killed
https://twitter.com/RALee85/status/1507404485542518785?t=fL64JOmg7J2iIlLOLYkcRw&s=19

Edit: as penance I also offer this very funny video
https://twitter.com/JuntaChronicles/status/1507051564548169730?t=1P-aF3j4VJYISJR3VXEqyQ&s=19

Luca looks like a guy who stars in both low rent porn and Steven Segal movies.

Alchenar
Apr 9, 2008

headspace posted:

"Everything outside of the Donbas was just a feint". Edit: I don't how announcing all this helps them at all. Things are clearly going very poorly for them.

https://twitter.com/polinaivanovva/status/1507400322829930500?s=20&t=7h2IGKKTy1G2XY4ZP5WONQ

Can we have a moment for how poo poo the quality of that map is? Guess this is what happens when anyone who can touch a computer has fled the country.

Bar Ran Dun
Jan 22, 2006




Djarum posted:

Judging by the before and after photos it was likely supplies that got destroyed in the strike and fires that followed. It's amazing the fuel tanks didn't explode as well.

It’s a bulk pile, see the concrete block barrier around it.

Marshal Prolapse
Jun 23, 2012

by Jeffrey of YOSPOS
https://twitter.com/kyivindependent/status/1507415889385332747?s=21&t=8a2XdRcOZe9rcr6jmxxCow

This may be the one and only acceptable use of NFTs, it’s being sold for a charity and only a charity and everyone knows they’re just getting a little thank you sticker for helping out. Same with the Gregg Popovich one. Basically a digital PBS fundraiser reward.

Fuligin
Oct 27, 2010

wait what the fuck??

Marshal Prolapse posted:

https://twitter.com/kyivindependent/status/1507415889385332747?s=21&t=8a2XdRcOZe9rcr6jmxxCow

This may be the one and only acceptable use of NFTs, it’s being sold for a charity and only a charity and everyone knows they’re just getting a little thank you sticker for helping out. Same with the Gregg Popovich one. Basically a digital PBS fundraiser reward.

no nfts
not even once

with a rebel yell she QQd
Jan 18, 2007

Villain


Charlotte Hornets
Dec 30, 2011

by Fritz the Horse
Russian map actually seems to be close to reality in that briefing. Expected them to throw more red paint at random areas

Rad Russian
Aug 15, 2007

Soviet Power Supreme!

Bar Ran Dun posted:

It’s a bulk pile, see the concrete block barrier around it.

Yeah, just a trash pile that existed there forever. You can see it up close from the ship perspective, in the pre-port attack video about Orsk that was docked there published by Russian news. The video was posted earlier in the thread, I think it was taken a couple of days prior to the attack on the ship. It's a HUGE pile.

EDIT: This video: https://www.yahoo.com/news/russian-military-tv-dispatch-showed-010613686.html
Scroll to the end of the video

Rad Russian fucked around with this message at 19:09 on Mar 25, 2022

ZombieLenin
Sep 6, 2009

"Democracy for the insignificant minority, democracy for the rich--that is the democracy of capitalist society." VI Lenin


[/quote]

Djarum posted:

The NSM is roughly the same range as the YJ-18 and SSC-5 and is stealthier than either. The AGM-158C has longer range and is fully stealth. Also there is a some differences in between how the USN operates in terms of fleet defense then Russia or China but that isn't really public knowledge for obvious reasons. But they are modernizing their ASM, mainly due to China's push to have a blue water Navy and the likely scenario in a Taiwanese conflict.

It is! But those are not slated for actual deployment until around 2024 or 2025 if I recall correctly. There are also so other interim stopgaps the USN has toyed with like repurposing the SM-6 (which was originally designed as a SAM) as an ASM in the meantime.

But I have zero doubts that the USN is addressing this problem. The only reason I am even talking about this at all was the up thread chatter about the US potentially giving Harpoons to Ukraine.

My comment was only intended to say that if that does happen, while it would definitely be a huge boost to Ukraine’s capacity to tussle with the Russian Black Sea Fleet, it really is not necessarily game changing because of the short range of the Harpoons, and because (on paper at least) the Russian navy ought to be able to counter a small number of Harpoons shot at their ships.

It should only cause anxiety for the Russian Navy if NATO gave enough Harpoons to Ukraine that Ukraine could realistically fire 4 or more Harpoons at once at a single target—a better number would be 6 or more.

mmkay
Oct 21, 2010

KitConstantine posted:

New satellite imagery from Maxxar of the exploded ship/port damage
https://twitter.com/Maxar/status/1507398872074756135?s=20&t=e6RtaOalPgd0XHwQxWUHxA
I wonder what that brown patch on the right-upper part of the port in the second picture is/was.

The google maps photos were done in mid-2020 and there's no specific building there, just seems like an unloading area:
https://earth.google.com/web/@46.75069725,36.77426242,5.23239926a,1090.5535176d,35y,-0h,0t,0r

Barrel Cactaur
Oct 6, 2021

Kraftwerk posted:

Unless I’m horribly out of date, I thought harpoons were the mainline ASMs used by most of the US navy in concert with Exocet missiles for a lot of European navies and some less developed countries. Pretty sure the Iraqis and Argentinians have been able to score some pretty nasty hits with Exocets in the past.

Are there some new technologies in play now for anti ship missiles or has naval weapon development suffered because nobody expected any serious naval conflict after the Cold War??

Are tomahawks also considered anti ship missiles or are they just cruise missiles occasionally used for ASM duty? It’s an area of modern warfare I barely understand at this point.

You can always slum it and use a general purpose anti surface missile against a ship. The main difference at the tomohawks power is targeting and that's basically turns it into a money problem. The US military hasn't had a money problem in over 50 years.

DekeThornton
Sep 2, 2011

Be friends!
Are there other NATO or western options available to ship to Ukraine. I know we use SAAB RBS 15s here in Sweden, but I really doubt we would be willing, or even capable, to give any of those away. We also have a naval version of the Hellfire, but that seems more like something against smaller craft.


Does the French or the UK have anything good?

headspace
Apr 25, 2014

Alchenar posted:

Can we have a moment for how poo poo the quality of that map is? Guess this is what happens when anyone who can touch a computer has fled the country.

Barrel Cactaur
Oct 6, 2021

mmkay posted:

The google maps photos were done in mid-2020 and there's no specific building there, just seems like an unloading area:
https://earth.google.com/web/@46.75069725,36.77426242,5.23239926a,1090.5535176d,35y,-0h,0t,0r

Looks like a pile of trash.

SlowBloke
Aug 14, 2017

DekeThornton posted:

Are there other NATO or western options available to ship to Ukraine. I know we use SAAB RBS 15s here in Sweden, but I really doubt we would be willing, or even capable, to give any of those away. We also have a naval version of the Hellfire, but that seems more like something against smaller craft.


Does the French or the UK have anything good?

MBDA has plenty of picks, depending on which stockpiles you want to use. Exocet, Aster, Marte, Teseo and so on.

Eric Cantonese
Dec 21, 2004

You should hear my accent.

DekeThornton posted:

Are there other NATO or western options available to ship to Ukraine. I know we use SAAB RBS 15s here in Sweden, but I really doubt we would be willing, or even capable, to give any of those away. We also have a naval version of the Hellfire, but that seems more like something against smaller craft.


Does the French or the UK have anything good?

At least with the Hellfire and the RBS 15, you can't use something like that with the Soviet-derived equipment Ukraine mainly uses. That's why a lot of the stuff we're sending over is either standalone portable stuff (like MANPADS) or older equipment from NATO nations that is getting replaced with new US stuff (like the proposed Polish Mig 29s and Slovakian S300 systems). It sounds like we're sending over more ordinance and things like better drones that are easy to learn how to use, but there's a lot of stuff we can't necessarily throw over there because Ukraine can't readapt to use them within a short amount of time.

FishBulbia
Dec 22, 2021

not good

https://twitter.com/NeilPHauer/status/1507418723480743945

Nenonen
Oct 22, 2009

Mulla on aina kolkyt donaa taskussa

Gros Tarla posted:

Your kinda underselling it. They did not merely kill one of their own commanders. They squashed it with a tank.

Both of you are vastly overselling it. Without further evidence we just don't know how it happened. Tanks and APC's are helluva dangerous vehicles for other traffic because they're not designed with road safety first in mind, and I bet the attitudes of Russian generals' personal drivers is not safety oriented either. It's more likely that this was a traffic accident a la George Patton rather than a plot to murder their commander.

I guess we'll soon have the dash cam recording.

e: beaten like a Russian tank brigade commander

Nenonen fucked around with this message at 19:22 on Mar 25, 2022

cinci zoo sniper
Mar 15, 2013




mobby_6kl posted:

Is there any solid info on what took it out? Was it a Tochka or something? That's a really great hit but I'm curious why they didn't gently caress up the whole port even more.

It’s either Tochka or air-dropped something. Tochka would be by far the simplest and cheapest way to go about this.

Alchenar posted:

Can we have a moment for how poo poo the quality of that map is? Guess this is what happens when anyone who can touch a computer has fled the country.

To be honest, it seems perfectly functional. Also shows much smaller gains than half of Russian propaganda “OSINT” maps that I have seen.

Charlotte Hornets posted:

Russian map actually seems to be close to reality in that briefing. Expected them to throw more red paint at random areas

If the storytelling is pivoting to “Donbas has always been the objective”, then it makes sense to see what we see.

with a rebel yell she QQd
Jan 18, 2007

Villain


headspace posted:

"Everything outside of the Donbas was just a feint". Edit: I don't how announcing all this helps them at all. Things are clearly going very poorly for them.

And in a couple of weeks when they get kicked out from Donbas the official line will be "Everything outside of Russia was a feint".

Morrow
Oct 31, 2010

A breakdown of the Russian military means the disintegration of security across much of Eurasia. It's a major food exporter and the major economic presence in Central Asia. The next few years will make us wish for the calm and stability of 2020-21.

Djarum
Apr 1, 2004

by vyelkin

ZombieLenin posted:

It is! But those are not slated for actual deployment until around 2024 or 2025 if I recall correctly. There are also so other interim stopgaps the USN has toyed with like repurposing the SM-6 (which was originally designed as a SAM) as an ASM in the meantime.

But I have zero doubts that the USN is addressing this problem. The only reason I am even talking about this at all was the up thread chatter about the US potentially giving Harpoons to Ukraine.

My comment was only intended to say that if that does happen, while it would definitely be a huge boost to Ukraine’s capacity to tussle with the Russian Black Sea Fleet, it really is not necessarily game changing because of the short range of the Harpoons, and because (on paper at least) the Russian navy ought to be able to counter a small number of Harpoons shot at their ships.

It should only cause anxiety for the Russian Navy if NATO gave enough Harpoons to Ukraine that Ukraine could realistically fire 4 or more Harpoons at once at a single target—a better number would be 6 or more.

Well if they are phasing out older Harpoons the range for most targets wouldn’t be an issue. I believe that a large amount of the US and UK inventory has been upgraded to the long range variant which should give them enough range to reach out and touch most viable targets that would be of any value to Russia.

Any Harpoon launch would be multiple missiles going at anything larger than a patrol boat or transport, which you won’t likely waste a missile on anyway since less expensive/important arms can take them out just as easily.

If Ukraine acquires Harpoons that would likely be the end of the Russian Navy in theater as well as supply by sea. Either they would take enough lumps and lose that capability for good or they would smartly move out of range of them to avoid losing any irreplaceable material.

FishBulbia
Dec 22, 2021

Morrow posted:

A breakdown of the Russian military means the disintegration of security across much of Eurasia. It's a major food exporter and the major economic presence in Central Asia. The next few years will make us wish for the calm and stability of 2020-21.

Without Russian CSTO defense there is nothing stopping Azerbaijan from trying to deal with Armenia in a uhh conclusive way, with Turkish support of course.

FishMcCool
Apr 9, 2021

lolcats are still funny
Fallen Rib

Morrow posted:

A breakdown of the Russian military means the disintegration of security across much of Eurasia. It's a major food exporter and the major economic presence in Central Asia. The next few years will make us wish for the calm and stability of 2020-21.

If the past few years taught me anything, we should be always be enjoying the current year because somehow the next will inevitably get worse.

GhostofJohnMuir
Aug 14, 2014

anime is not good

headspace posted:

"Everything outside of the Donbas was just a feint". Edit: I don't how announcing all this helps them at all. Things are clearly going very poorly for them.

https://twitter.com/polinaivanovva/status/1507400322829930500?s=20&t=7h2IGKKTy1G2XY4ZP5WONQ

if they had just taken this tack from the beginning and concentrated all of their planning and military strength on these limited objectives then i think there's a good chance they would have quickly achieved those objectives and perhaps avoided the worst of the sanctions

i suppose at this point russia's best outcome is to occupy as much of eastern ukraine as they can, exhaust the ukrainian military into a deadlock, and hope at some point western nations get tired of the sanctions and armament regimes

i wonder if ukrainian advances in the wake of coming russian redeployments will make further western support more or less likely

mobby_6kl
Aug 9, 2009

by Fluffdaddy

Nenonen posted:

Both of you are vastly overselling it. Without further evidence we just don't know how it happened. Tanks and APC's are helluva dangerous vehicles for other traffic because they're not designed with road safety first in mind, and I bet the attitudes of Russian generals' personal drivers is not safety oriented either. It's more likely that this was a traffic accident a la George Patton rather than a plot to murder their commander.

I guess we'll soon have the dash cam recording.
Didn't we see that guy on a stretcher a few days ago? That read like an accident tbh.

FishMcCool posted:

If the past few years taught me anything, we should be always be enjoying the current year because somehow the next will inevitably get worse.
Really spectacular timing on putin's part here. Super great for depression.


Djarum posted:

Well if they are phasing out older Harpoons the range for most targets wouldn’t be an issue. I believe that a large amount of the US and UK inventory has been upgraded to the long range variant which should give them enough range to reach out and touch most viable targets that would be of any value to Russia.

Any Harpoon launch would be multiple missiles going at anything larger than a patrol boat or transport, which you won’t likely waste a missile on anyway since less expensive/important arms can take them out just as easily.

If Ukraine acquires Harpoons that would likely be the end of the Russian Navy in theater as well as supply by sea. Either they would take enough lumps and lose that capability for good or they would smartly move out of range of them to avoid losing any irreplaceable material.
I'm thinking any harpoons would be better than none. Ukraine might have some of their own stuff but I doubt it sufficient quantities if at all.

BTW what happened to the railguns? Did that get killed off? This is a good opportunity to do some field testing.

mobby_6kl fucked around with this message at 19:34 on Mar 25, 2022

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Cugel the Clever
Apr 5, 2009
I LOVE AMERICA AND CAPITALISM DESPITE BEING POOR AS FUCK. I WILL NEVER RETIRE BUT HERE'S ANOTHER 200$ FOR UKRAINE, SLAVA

Nenonen posted:

Tanks and APC's are helluva dangerous vehicles for other traffic because they're not designed with road safety first in mind
To be fair, civilian vehicles are designed with wild disregard for the safety of anyone but the people inside (and even that's iffy). Hence the massive spike in fatalities on American streets in the last few years as idiots keep buying larger and larger gas guzzlers.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5