Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
PederP
Nov 20, 2009

Antigravitas posted:

The real reason is that he's literally Merkel (except less daring and more arrogant). And that was why people voted for his party.

I, for one, would've liked a younger and more competent chancellor, but there was a sustained and loud smear campaign against her and her party in the lead up to the election for some mysterious reason.

It's really horrible how an autocratic petrostate is able to greatly influence the democratic process of countries with much larger economies. I am not claiming that Kremlin is solely responsible for all political ills in the world - but they've done a tremendous job at prodding, poking and stirring to push things very much in the direction Putin wants. I think this is a failing of western intelligence agencies. Defending against such subversion is every bit as relevant as counter-terrorism and whatever else they spend their time and money on.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

DTurtle
Apr 10, 2011


Discendo Vox posted:

How is this playing domestically, is the question.
Completely terribly. A majority of Germans is in favor of delivering heavy weapons. The leadership of the largest opposition party is trying to force a vote in the Bundestag on delivering heavy weapons next week. The smaller coalition partners are mostly in favor of doing more. I don't recall any open criticism coming from the leadership of the SPD thus far.

Atreiden posted:

Is all of Germany's Politicians just owned by Russia? Hell Scholz got a nice letter from a group of prominent Germans asking him to stop weapon deliveries so Ukraine would surrender.
That list of prominent Germans is a random list of various political scientists, journalists, members of anti-war groups, former members of parliament, former members of anti-war groups, and a musician. That would be like calling out the US because of the statements of some local DSA chapters.

Kraftwerk posted:

Are there any specific names or parties in Germany who a pro Ukranian interventionist German could vote for?
Crazily enough: the Greens.

Antigravitas posted:

I, for one, would've liked a younger and more competent chancellor, but there was a sustained and loud smear campaign against her and her party in the lead up to the election for some mysterious reason.
Merkel was not up for election any more, or are you referring to Baerbock and the Greens?

DTurtle fucked around with this message at 21:37 on Apr 22, 2022

Der Kyhe
Jun 25, 2008

Affi posted:

Russia has been doing similar things on Gotland. Buying homes and a (1 I believe) resort suspected of being funded by the Russian state. While also attempting to buy a harbour.

It would theoretically set up a crimea like possibility where little green men lock down the regiment and secure the airport and harbour while they bring in more.

Thank you for proving that I am not insane with this concern. :D

Der Kyhe fucked around with this message at 21:38 on Apr 22, 2022

Antigravitas
Dec 8, 2019

Die Rettung fuer die Landwirte:

Kraftwerk posted:

Are there any specific names or parties in Germany who a pro Ukranian interventionist German could vote for?

SZ posted:

The previous "tripwire logic" of the alliance is no longer sufficient in the face of Russian action, says Baerbock. Instead of first abandoning the Baltic states in the event of aggression and then liberating them again, Nato must be in a position to repel an attack immediately and comprehensively. To this end, Baerbock and Landsbergis point out, NATO troops must be deployed on the eastern flank. This begins with increasing the numbers of the armed forces.

Pretty much the only party serious about… well, anything, tbh

GaussianCopula
Jun 5, 2011
Jews fleeing the Holocaust are not in any way comparable to North Africans, who don't flee genocide but want to enjoy the social welfare systems of Northern Europe.

PederP posted:

It's really horrible how an autocratic petrostate is able to greatly influence the democratic process of countries with much larger economies. I am not claiming that Kremlin is solely responsible for all political ills in the world - but they've done a tremendous job at prodding, poking and stirring to push things very much in the direction Putin wants. I think this is a failing of western intelligence agencies. Defending against such subversion is every bit as relevant as counter-terrorism and whatever else they spend their time and money on.

In this case you can't blame Russia. She plagiarized stuff for her book and lied about it.

In a just world that would have ended her political career.


PederP posted:

Scholz to me looks to be a man who fears the aftermath of this war. He fears a long war where Russia will require years to force a peace on Ukraine - and where Putin will be angry at Germany and the west. He fears a new cold war. He doesn't want to prolong this - and he has no faith heavy weapons for Ukraine will do anything but just that. He doesn't want Ukraine to suffer and lose - but he naively wants a quick peace so the world can go back to how it was before 2014. He knows Putin isn't quite as stable a business partner as he once thought, but he has stated before that good relations with Russia is more important than standing up to their territorial expansionism.

I think he has more direct fears that Putin might destroy his chancellorship by cutting natural gas supplies to Germany, which would mean Scholz gets to do nothing but deal with that fallout for the next 2-3 years before he is voted out of office.

Pope Hilarius II
Nov 10, 2008

Edgar Allen Ho posted:

The 7000 missing ground troops are ominous. Some are surely dead, but I wouldn't want to be a civilian in an area where the survivors are "foraging."

Let's not forget that there may also be some Russian soldiers who have deserted their posts or have outright defected and have ended up with the "Free Russia" brigade. Their numbers aren't known, obviously, but they exist. Their combat patches look very interesting also.

Atreiden
May 4, 2008

DTurtle posted:

That list of prominent Germans is a random list of various political scientists, journalists, members of anti-war groups, former members of parliament, former members of anti-war groups, and a musician. That would be like calling out the US because of the statements of some local DSA chapters.

Sure except the German government seems to act like they are of the same mind as the letter-writers.

cinci zoo sniper
Mar 15, 2013




GaussianCopula posted:

I think he has more direct fears that Putin might destroy his chancellorship by cutting natural gas supplies to Germany, which would mean Scholz gets to do nothing but deal with that fallout for the next 2-3 years before he is voted out of office.

Has he considered that he may destroy his chancellorship himself and get written into history as failson?

sofokles
Feb 7, 2004

Fuck this

PederP posted:

It's really horrible how an autocratic petrostate is able to greatly influence the democratic process of countries with much larger economies. I am not claiming that Kremlin is solely responsible for all political ills in the world - but they've done a tremendous job at prodding, poking and stirring to push things very much in the direction Putin wants. I think this is a failing of western intelligence agencies. Defending against such subversion is every bit as relevant as counter-terrorism and whatever else they spend their time and money on.

There's gotta be a percentage there of the outgoing troll traffic that is just business, cheap trolls selling their craft in a marketplace.

WAR CRIME GIGOLO
Oct 3, 2012

The Hague
tryna get me
for these glutes

cinci zoo sniper posted:

Has he considered that he may destroy his chancellorship himself and get written into history as failson?

Hahaha do they ever

GaussianCopula
Jun 5, 2011
Jews fleeing the Holocaust are not in any way comparable to North Africans, who don't flee genocide but want to enjoy the social welfare systems of Northern Europe.

cinci zoo sniper posted:

Has he considered that he may destroy his chancellorship himself and get written into history as failson?

He banks on the fact that his domestic agenda will leave a more lasting impression than the fate of Ukraine. He might even calculate that other countries will supply enough weapons to ensure victory for Ukraine and simply values 100k votes in a regional election over the lives of Ukrainians, who can't vote for the SPD.

And it's important to keep in mind that the Greens and FDP are enabling him and could form a government with the Union, which is very hawkish on Ukraine/Russia since Merkel is gone.

Owling Howl
Jul 17, 2019

PederP posted:

It's really horrible how an autocratic petrostate is able to greatly influence the democratic process of countries with much larger economies. I am not claiming that Kremlin is solely responsible for all political ills in the world - but they've done a tremendous job at prodding, poking and stirring to push things very much in the direction Putin wants. I think this is a failing of western intelligence agencies. Defending against such subversion is every bit as relevant as counter-terrorism and whatever else they spend their time and money on.

Reliance on fossil fuel imports has always been a security issue but now that Russia is full mask off it's evident that it's no longer a manageable issue and it must to be at the top of the agenda. It's fortunate that it meshes with the climate agenda. Rendering extraction economies irrelevant will certainly not prevent wars but it will limit what they can get away with and how much damage they can do.

cinci zoo sniper
Mar 15, 2013




GaussianCopula posted:

He banks on the fact that his domestic agenda will leave a more lasting impression than the fate of Ukraine. He might even calculate that other countries will supply enough weapons to ensure victory for Ukraine and simply values 100k votes in a regional election over the lives of Ukrainians, who can't vote for the SPD.

And it's important to keep in mind that the Greens and FDP are enabling him and could form a government with the Union, which is very hawkish on Ukraine/Russia since Merkel is gone.

Hmm, sounds grim. Interesting, but grim.

Der Kyhe
Jun 25, 2008

cinci zoo sniper posted:

Hmm, sounds grim. Interesting, but grim.

And if this works out, Ukraine wins because of the other nations, it puts Germany again in the wrong side of history, and makes Scholz the weak-minded weasel of a person who seriously undermined EU as an equal or effective platform for its members, and also as a non-entity as a security policy in case of anything short of full-scale invasion. So Mission Accomplished?

Dapper_Swindler
Feb 14, 2012

Im glad my instant dislike in you has been validated again and again.

TulliusCicero posted:

Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact alive and well

"Old Men. Running the world.

A New Age!"

At least it sounds like most Germans hate these spineless fraternizers

arnt the elections in May? like i feel like if it matters, alot of these guys are gonna eat poo poo.


PederP posted:

It's really not to be underestimated how entrenched the image of Russia as an unstoppable juggernaut has become in the minds of many old men in Europe (and Mearsheimer). I think Scholz and his ilk aren't just risk-averse, selfish goblins who will happily sacrifice Ukraine if that is the cost of appeasing Russia and keeping the economic relations going. They are greedy and selfish - but there's also an aspect of fear. Scholz had his formative years in the socialist youth party - he travelled to DDR for rallies and events. In those days, the USSR was the overlord of the DDR. Even decades later, such formative experiences aren't easily dispelled. The same goes for many who had their formative years preparing for war with the USSR - or to avoid it. Anyone who was politically in the cold war in Europe - especially in the countries on the borders of the curtain - cannot easily banish the ghost of the Soviet juggernaut.

So we hear again and again from such people: "Russia will eventually win - or withdraw behind an iron curtain and prepare for the grand confrontation". They do not believe, in their heart of hearts, that Ukraine can win or that the Russian regime could be forced to sign a peace not in their favor. They see Ukraine, surprisingly to them, did not fold - and now everything is scary. To someone shivering in the ghost-light of the Soviet Union - the only thing that matters is how quickly peace can be reached and how quickly the relations with Russia can start to be repaired.

Scholz to me looks to be a man who fears the aftermath of this war. He fears a long war where Russia will require years to force a peace on Ukraine - and where Putin will be angry at Germany and the west. He fears a new cold war. He doesn't want to prolong this - and he has no faith heavy weapons for Ukraine will do anything but just that. He doesn't want Ukraine to suffer and lose - but he naively wants a quick peace so the world can go back to how it was before 2014. He knows Putin isn't quite as stable a business partner as he once thought, but he has stated before that good relations with Russia is more important than standing up to their territorial expansionism.

I am not sure what will happen when these people realize Russia can lose, and lose badly. Will they not believe it until it happens? Perhaps. And how will they react? My guess is with panic. They will still be stuck in a mindset of Russia having the potential to be a great power, no matter what.

I hope Scholz is replaced by a younger, less cold-war-traumatized, Russian gas money suckling, politician. I am not sure Germany can have a healthy relations with Russia (and Eastern Europe) until someone else is chancellor. Half of Europe will dislike him greatly after this. He is fast becoming a divisive figure and an embarrassment for Germany.

Read these pre-war quotes from him on Russia:

https://www.russiamatters.org/analysis/olaf-scholz-russia

i think alot of it is cold war fears in the generations that lived when the soviets were still a super power and they could write its failed soviet afgan war and then implosion as a fluke. because then russia won/"won" a bunch of smaller wars. Now its clear to most people who were born during or after the fall of the USSR that this is loving stupid belief and that putin isnt some cunning tsar with some giant imperial guard and jets to block out the sun. he is an old middle manager spook who was good at being the ultimate manager sociopath and now he loving over gambled and shits hosed for his country. yeah alot of its greed or indifference for sholtz but i think he truly believes that russia will just sweep Europe like loving COD MW3.

Morningwoodpecker
Jan 17, 2016

I DIDN'T THINK IT WAS POSSIBLE FOR SOMEONE TO BE THIS STUPID

BUT HERE YOU ARE

PederP posted:

It's really horrible how an autocratic petrostate is able to greatly influence the democratic process of countries with much larger economies. I am not claiming that Kremlin is solely responsible for all political ills in the world - but they've done a tremendous job at prodding, poking and stirring to push things very much in the direction Putin wants. I think this is a failing of western intelligence agencies. Defending against such subversion is every bit as relevant as counter-terrorism and whatever else they spend their time and money on.

They've been prodding and stirring as after the fall of the USSR and losing the cold war they can't really do much else. It's asymmetric warfare. Troll farms are cheap and western liberal democracies value freedom of speech highly(ish) so they are very vulnerable to it.

Atreiden
May 4, 2008

Canada getting in on giving Ukraine heavy weapons.

https://twitter.com/Osinttechnical/status/1517595114411020288

quote:

April 22, 2022 – Ottawa, Ontario – National Defence / Canadian Armed Forces

As the Prime Minister of Canada, Justin Trudeau, committed earlier this week, Canada has provided heavy artillery to the Security Forces of Ukraine, as Ukraine has requested. To this end, Canada has now delivered a number of M777 howitzers and associated ammunition to the Security Forces of Ukraine, in conjunction with our American Allies. While this equipment comes from the inventory of the Canadian Armed Forces, the capability will be replenished.

The M777 lightweight 155-mm towed howitzer is lighter and smaller, yet more powerful than any gun of its kind. The M777 provides indirect firepower capable of accurately hitting targets at a range of distances up to 30km.

Additionally, Canada has provided Ukraine with a significant number of additional Carl Gustaf anti-armour ammunition, as Ukraine has requested, and this capability will also be replenished.

Finally, Canada is also in the process of finalizing contracts for a number of commercial pattern armoured vehicles, which will be sent to Ukraine as soon as possible, and a service contract for the maintenance and repair of specialized drone cameras that Canada has already supplied to Ukraine.

Since January 2022, Canada has committed over $118 million in military equipment to support Ukraine. In Budget 2022, Canada also allocated $500 million in additional military aid for Ukraine for the 2022-23 fiscal year.

https://www.canada.ca/en/department...or-ukraine.html

Mr Luxury Yacht
Apr 16, 2012


Somewhat significant since Canada only has something like 30 M777s total and 60 or so howitzers for the entire army outside of old WW2 pieces for training and avalanche duty so even if they sent like, 12, that would be 25% of the Canadian Army's entire artillery capability lol.

We're just so loving bad at procurement. Canada has a similar military budget to Israel and Turkey but you'd never know it with the equipment we've got.

Hell compare what Finland has with like, less than half of the military budget Canada has.

Mr Luxury Yacht fucked around with this message at 22:54 on Apr 22, 2022

the popes toes
Oct 10, 2004

Der Kyhe posted:

Pretty much the same story, although this war sealed the deal not because of Russian attack to Ukraine, but because Germany single-handedly demonstrated that EU is completely useless as a sufficient security system. Against proper invasion maybe, but if you are not attacked, but rather infested by the little green men sent by Putin & Pals, until there is no plausible deniability Germany will give just us the cold shoulder and block all meaningful actions as an EU preceding the invasion because it would be against their economic interests to care about the Finnish regions in the periphery of the EU.

And basically all of my family living in Eastern Finland, I am really loving concerned over those oligarch land grabs, their building projects and the little green men of Putin. That one guy for Christs sake built an forward operations base for airborne cavalry in his private island in Puumala and few years back the military raided in Turku what was basically a marine corps base in Turku archipelago. Before this March our government just sat on its hands and let it happen because "Putin might get upset if we did something about it".

I think rather Germany has demonstrated that it is economicly unreliable due to their fear of austerity, which of course is ironic. Of all the second order effects, I did not expect Germany to lose political clout. It didn't have to happen and it does weaken the EU as an integral body. "Their must be order" I guess only applies domestically.

sofokles
Feb 7, 2004

Fuck this

Owling Howl posted:

Reliance on fossil fuel imports has always been a security issue but now that Russia is full mask off it's evident that it's no longer a manageable issue and it must to be at the top of the agenda. It's fortunate that it meshes with the climate agenda. Rendering extraction economies irrelevant will certainly not prevent wars but it will limit what they can get away with and how much damage they can do.

Have a look at top 20 of the List of countries by net oil exports and find democratic nations able to collectively supply the eventual shortfall of Russian deliveries, considering that majority of deliveries from said democratic nations are already going to the good guys.

Edit: There is an energy crunch going on. Low income households are in for a rough time.

sofokles fucked around with this message at 23:22 on Apr 22, 2022

Zedsdeadbaby
Jun 14, 2008

You have been called out, in the ways of old.

Mr Luxury Yacht posted:

Hell compare what Finland has with like, less than half of the military budget Canada has.

To be fair, Canada lives next to the USA and Finland lives next to Russia. It's no surprise that one country has much less focus on procurement details for their military than the other.

Dr. Arbitrary
Mar 15, 2006

Bleak Gremlin
It's been a long time since I was in the military, and even then I heard a lot of stuff from a guy who knew a guy who knew a guy, but one thing that I remember hearing a lot about was that we had really good counter-battery capabilities.

Basically, if you fired a mortar at a US base, the return shot was already on the way by the time your shot landed.

That seems plausible if we've been spending the last 80 years planning for war against the Soviet Union, given their reliance on artillery.

I won't be surprised if what's being left out of the announcements about us sending artillery is that there's also a bunch of other equipment attached that dramatically increases their capabilities.

I don't think we'll see video of it happening, but if we start seeing pictures of Russian MLRS systems that look like they got blown up with half the rockets still in pods, I think we'll know what happened.

the popes toes
Oct 10, 2004

Nenonen posted:

If they really were preparing for an invasion, do you think they would be building marked helicopter pads? I would build a soccer field so I could land a whole wing of helicopters. It's just a really weird detail to arzy about, especially considering that it's not how Russia has started any of the recent wars.

Yeah, the US State Dept typically has tennis courts at the amb residence, which of course doubles as chopper pads if needed. Helos only need a little cleared space to land.

WAR CRIME GIGOLO
Oct 3, 2012

The Hague
tryna get me
for these glutes

Alright. Now we just need to give the ukrainians the Hand of God from Gears of war.

--

Looks like the war is alive on all fronts with arty shelling from kherson to Kharkiv. There will be a ground assault coming shortly.

Let's hope the ukrianian repel the second major assault the fascists are planning to conduct.

gay picnic defence
Oct 5, 2009


I'M CONCERNED ABOUT A NUMBER OF THINGS

Dr. Arbitrary posted:

It's been a long time since I was in the military, and even then I heard a lot of stuff from a guy who knew a guy who knew a guy, but one thing that I remember hearing a lot about was that we had really good counter-battery capabilities.

Basically, if you fired a mortar at a US base, the return shot was already on the way by the time your shot landed.

That seems plausible if we've been spending the last 80 years planning for war against the Soviet Union, given their reliance on artillery.

I won't be surprised if what's being left out of the announcements about us sending artillery is that there's also a bunch of other equipment attached that dramatically increases their capabilities.

I don't think we'll see video of it happening, but if we start seeing pictures of Russian MLRS systems that look like they got blown up with half the rockets still in pods, I think we'll know what happened.

The US has definitely sent a number of counter battery radars to Ukraine. Given Russian doctrine revolves around heavy reliance on artillery anything to reduce their ability to deploy it should throw them off balance.

Tuna-Fish
Sep 13, 2017

Dr. Arbitrary posted:

I won't be surprised if what's being left out of the announcements about us sending artillery is that there's also a bunch of other equipment attached that dramatically increases their capabilities.

... that's not being left out actually, counterbattery radar was high up on Ukraine's wishlist and US has openly provided systems. It's a complex enough system that it takes a while to train, so it might start becoming operational soon.

Atreiden
May 4, 2008

Ice cold. To steal a toilet and die.

https://twitter.com/HannaLiubakova/status/1517609827148705802

the popes toes
Oct 10, 2004

How more politically inconvenient than this? Oh, I know, not selling them to Ukraine.

France and Germany armed Russia with €273 million (£230 million) of military hardware now likely being used in Ukraine, an EU analysis shared with The Telegraph has revealed.

They sent equipment, which included bombs, rockets, missiles and guns, to Moscow despite an EU-wide embargo on arms shipments to Russia, introduced in the wake of its 2014 annexation of Crimea.


https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2022/04/22/exclusive-france-germany-evaded-arms-embargo-sell-weapons-russia/

Mr. Apollo
Nov 8, 2000

Mr Luxury Yacht posted:

Somewhat significant since Canada only has something like 30 M777s total and 60 or so howitzers for the entire army outside of old WW2 pieces for training and avalanche duty so even if they sent like, 12, that would be 25% of the Canadian Army's entire artillery capability lol.
Canada has 37 M777s and we’re sending them 4 along with the CF’s entire inventory of Excalibur 155mm shells.

cinci zoo sniper
Mar 15, 2013




Mr. Apollo posted:

Canada has 37 M777s and we’re sending them 4 along with the CF’s entire inventory of Excalibur 155mm shells.

Sounds like the howitzers aren’t even the real piece of news here. Or is this where we learn that Canada had 6 Excalibur shells total?

filthy regex
Oct 1, 2010

s/ (. Y .) / 8==D~~ /g

the popes toes posted:

How more politically inconvenient than this? Oh, I know, not selling them to Ukraine.

France and Germany armed Russia with €273 million (£230 million) of military hardware now likely being used in Ukraine, an EU analysis shared with The Telegraph has revealed.

They sent equipment, which included bombs, rockets, missiles and guns, to Moscow despite an EU-wide embargo on arms shipments to Russia, introduced in the wake of its 2014 annexation of Crimea.


https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2022/04/22/exclusive-france-germany-evaded-arms-embargo-sell-weapons-russia/

Looks like this info has already been kicking around for about a month. But I guess it's good to keep shining a light on it.
https://www.investigate-europe.eu/en/2022/eu-states-exported-weapons-to-russia/

the popes toes
Oct 10, 2004

From Mariupol, a few escaped civilians. Impossible not to sympathize. "Why does the world let this happen?"

https://twitter.com/Quicktake/status/1517496800571269120?cxt=HHwWgIC9nZrTnY8qAAAA

Mr. Apollo
Nov 8, 2000

cinci zoo sniper posted:

Sounds like the howitzers aren’t even the real piece of news here. Or is this where we learn that Canada had 6 Excalibur shells total?
The news articles quoting “unnamed National Defence sources” don’t give a quantity on the ammunition; just that it’s Canada’s entire stock that is left over from Afghanistan.

Charlz Guybon
Nov 16, 2010

WarpedLichen posted:

I think that's another key point.

On the invasion side, Russia is against Ukraine who have a ton of motivation never accept defeat. If Russia is on the "defensive", they might think they only need to hold out against the West's political will to give aid.

It remains to be seen how successful a future Ukrainian offensive will be but I think that will be the key indicator to how long this conflict will last.
Every town they take back will have new evidence of crimes. Betting that the Euros are going to give up is unwise.

Shes Not Impressed
Apr 25, 2004


Friend from the front sent me video of his uniform ripped apart by tank fire. Luckily he is alive ("This is the main thing" he said).
There was also a happy, tail wagging dog in the video. The dog's whereabouts are unknown now.
The Mosckali have been bombing his position for 2 days straight.

I'm reaching out to his sister in case anything happens to him because I'm not sure how I'd know other than not responding to my messages.

https://twitter.com/DAlperovitch/status/1517647859189006336?s=20&t=Ky9Mnzzt0nHVkfifhYt0Jw
https://twitter.com/Osinttechnical/status/1517625229807435776?s=20&t=Ky9Mnzzt0nHVkfifhYt0Jw

Fuschia tude
Dec 26, 2004

THUNDERDOME LOSER 2019

gay picnic defence posted:

The US has definitely sent a number of counter battery radars to Ukraine. Given Russian doctrine revolves around heavy reliance on artillery anything to reduce their ability to deploy it should throw them off balance.

Is this heavy artillery reliance a weak point or anachronism? Or is it still a perfectly viable way to structure a military?

the holy poopacy
May 16, 2009

hey! check this out
Fun Shoe

Fuschia tude posted:

Is this heavy artillery reliance a weak point or anachronism? Or is it still a perfectly viable way to structure a military?

Well, we're in the process of finding out. Although the answer may be inconclusive, since if it fails it may be difficult to separate failures of doctrine from failures of execution.

KillHour
Oct 28, 2007


the holy poopacy posted:

Well, we're in the process of finding out.

Wait, did I miss the part where we hosed around?

TheDeadlyShoe
Feb 14, 2014

Fuschia tude posted:

Is this heavy artillery reliance a weak point or anachronism? Or is it still a perfectly viable way to structure a military?

Artillery remains the King of Battle. It's not so much that the russians have too much artillery, it's that they have relatively little infantry because they re-organized a shrinking military around the same amount of gear, if that makes sense.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Charlz Guybon
Nov 16, 2010

Edgar Allen Ho posted:

The 7000 missing ground troops are ominous. Some are surely dead, but I wouldn't want to be a civilian in an area where the survivors are "foraging."

Most are surely dead and the remainder likely captured. Desertion in a hostile country during a time of war, even one where many speak the same language as you, is very difficult. Especially if you want to play bandit when the other side has hundreds of thousands of men under arms.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5