Christian HOFenberg Appreciation Station

The Something Awful Forums > Discussion > Sports Argument Stadium > The Football Funhouse > Christian HOFenberg Appreciation Station

«‹›5 »

Roasted Donut: Aug 24, 2007; NWA WHITE POWERRR!!!!

I hope Christian Hackenberg is loving brutally murdered irl

# ? Sep 3, 2016 06:47

Adbot: ADBOT LOVES YOU

# ? Apr 28, 2024 17:15

Derpies: Mar 11, 2014; by sebmojo

sean10mm posted:

Locker is a good parallel except Hack seems even worse. Put another way, a career 79.0 passer rating looks wildly optimistic for Hack right now, and that's where Locker ended up.

Both guys had eerily similar (bad) college stats:
code:
Passing
Year	School		Conf	Class	Pos	G	Cmp	Att	Pct	Yds	Y/A	AY/A	TD	Int	Rate
2013	Penn State	Big Ten	FR	QB	12	231	392	58.9	2955	7.5	7.4	20	10	134.0
*2014	Penn State	Big Ten	SO	QB	13	270	484	55.8	2977	6.2	5.3	12	15	109.4
*2015	Penn State	Big Ten	JR	QB	13	192	359	53.5	2525	7.0	7.2	16	6	123.9
Career	Penn State					693	1235	56.1	8457	6.8	6.5	48	31	121.4
code:
Passing
Year	School		Conf	Class	Pos	G	Cmp	Att	Pct	Yds	Y/A	AY/A	TD	Int	Rate
2007	Washington	Pac-10	FR	QB	12	155	328	47.3	2062	6.3	5.1	14	15	105.0
2008	Washington	Pac-10	SO	QB	4	50	93	53.8	512	5.5	5.7	1	0	103.6
2009	Washington	Pac-10	JR	QB	12	230	394	58.4	2800	7.1	6.9	21	11	130.1
*2010	Washington	Pac-10	SR	QB	12	184	332	55.4	2265	6.8	6.6	17	9	124.2
Career	Washington					619	1147	54.0	7639	6.7	6.2	53	35	119.1
Low completion % + low Y/A = garbage generally.

e: College rating is totally different from NFL passer rating by the way.

Before reading this statline I never realized how truly awful both those QBs are/were.

# ? Sep 3, 2016 08:08

Alaois: Feb 7, 2012

So Steve Young, who was great in college but sucked in Tampa, which was a complete and utter dumpster fire at the time, and then later was one of the greatest QBs of all time, is completely comparable to Christian Hackenberg, who loving sucked like crazy in college and seems to show absolutely no proof of not absolutely loving sucking in New York.

# ? Sep 3, 2016 08:18

Pungry: Feb 26, 2011; JUST PICK ONE. ANY ONE.

RocktheCaulk posted:

Before reading this statline I never realized how truly awful both those QBs are/were.

I'm a hugely biased Husky fan so take what I say with a grain of salt but I think it is unfair to compare the two without also comparing rushing totals. Locker could actually run. His freshman year, he almost ran for 1000 yards. After his injury in his sophomore year, he never really recovered and couldn't break 400 yards, but his rushing is part of what made Locker attractive. Christian Hackenburg cannot run. At all. I'm going to hang up and listen now.

# ? Sep 3, 2016 10:12

a neat cape: Feb 22, 2007; Aw hunny, these came out GREAT!

Locker beat Nebraska in a bowl game while completing like 2 passes

# ? Sep 3, 2016 11:16

Grittybeard: Mar 29, 2010; Bad, very bad!

Alaois posted:

So Steve Young, who was great in college but sucked in Tampa, which was a complete and utter dumpster fire at the time, and then later was one of the greatest QBs of all time, is completely comparable to Christian Hackenberg, who loving sucked like crazy in college and seems to show absolutely no proof of not absolutely loving sucking in New York.

No that was me and Warcrimes arguing about whether Johnny Manziel.

# ? Sep 3, 2016 16:46

warcrimes: Jul 6, 2013; I don't know what's it called, I just know the sound it makes when it takes a J4G's life.

Alaois posted:

So Steve Young, who was great in college but sucked in Tampa, which was a complete and utter dumpster fire at the time, and then later was one of the greatest QBs of all time, is completely comparable to Christian Hackenberg, who loving sucked like crazy in college and seems to show absolutely no proof of not absolutely loving sucking in New York.

It was a Manziel comparison and is still loving stupid.

# ? Sep 3, 2016 19:25