|
HineyBorelTheorem posted:this is a public service announcement nobody used it so crisis averted I guess? anyway, it is a real word, just not in english
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2012 17:53
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 9, 2024 03:53 |
|
|
linguistic prescriptivists 
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2012 17:57
|
|
|
you can't just, like, make a new word, maaaan
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2012 18:08
|
|
|
we are just discovering additional features of the language, slowly converging to the platonic ideal of english (hint: Its us english)
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2012 18:46
|
|
|
esperanto is the platonic ideal of language, imo
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2012 19:01
|
|
|
nope, its us english
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2012 19:01
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:nope, its us english
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2012 19:08
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:nope, its us english
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2012 19:32
|
|
|
you mean it's we english
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2012 19:36
|
|
|
Ronald Raiden posted:you mean it's we english it's the english of us americans, not of you english
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2012 19:36
|
|
|
I am actually an american 
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2012 19:37
|
|
|
nope, its ch engrish
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2012 20:07
|
|
|
cool this thread still exists for complaining about programming poo poo i guess i'm working on a dumb server thing for a game, and i'm using someone else's api library for it, and i'm weirded out because they used loving "Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike" for it who the gently caress does that for code? and apparently since i'm "building upon" it, i also have to license my thing under CC-AN-NC-SA-gently caress-YOU? ugh
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2012 21:27
|
|
|
DO WHAT THE gently caress YOU WANT TO PUBLIC LICENSE Version 2, December 2004 Copyright (C) 2004 Sam Hocevar <sam@hocevar.net> Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim or modified copies of this license document, and changing it is allowed as long as the name is changed. DO WHAT THE gently caress YOU WANT TO PUBLIC LICENSE TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR COPYING, DISTRIBUTION AND MODIFICATION 0. You just DO WHAT THE gently caress YOU WANT TO.
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2012 21:39
|
|
|
Anal Tributary posted:cool this thread still exists for complaining about programming poo poo i guess LOL you just got trolled by some  who doesn't want anyone to make money off his library.
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2012 21:43
|
|
|
Anal Tributary posted:cool this thread still exists for complaining about programming poo poo i guess keep using it until such time as you're actually making money off it then swap it out for something legal
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2012 22:19
|
|
|
Toady posted:DO WHAT THE gently caress YOU WANT TO PUBLIC LICENSE dont use a stupid hipster license. just use MIT/BSD/Apache like a real person
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2012 22:21
|
|
|
basically don't fix the theoretical problem until it actually becomes a real problem because chances are it'll never become a real problem
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2012 22:22
|
|
|
rotor spotting hi rotor hope you're having a good day i am not but tomorrow is a new one
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2012 22:22
|
|
|
pet a cat and maybe write a code and go to bed and tomorrow will start anew!
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2012 22:24
|
|
|
tinselt0wn posted:dont use a stupid hipster license. just use MIT/BSD/Apache like a real person you can just relicense WTFPL code under MIT/BSD/Apache "do what the gently caress you want to" man
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2012 22:24
|
|
|
Jonny 290 posted:rotor spotting
|
|
#
?
Jul 16, 2012 23:33
|
|
|
64bit oracle client doesn't work on osx lion perl on osx lion is 64bit because it's 2012 and it's a 64bit os you can't use dbd::oracle on osx.
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2012 00:14
|
|
|
Anal Tributary posted:who the gently caress does that for code? and apparently since i'm "building upon" it, i also have to license my thing under CC-AN-NC-SA-gently caress-YOU? ugh
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2012 01:10
|
|
|
^^^ gpl lets you sell it, you just have to provide the source. NC means you can't even sell ittef posted:linguistic prescriptivists þe engliſh language muſt be kept ſacred
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2012 01:41
|
|
|
yaoi prophet posted:^^^ gpl lets you sell it, you just have to provide the source. NC means you can't even sell it thought gpl3 changed that? not that it matters just use MIT licence for everything
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2012 02:01
|
|
|
in before "java owns --shagger" but based on the little bit of looking at them I've done, java's docs seem to be just so much loving better and more organized than pretty much everything else out there the more you know
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2012 02:10
|
|
|
no exp but i hear apple dev docs are p. well done
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2012 02:17
|
|
|
The man pages for std C are pretty cool.
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2012 02:17
|
|
|
perldoc is good
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2012 02:18
|
|
|
Sniep posted:no exp but i hear apple dev docs are p. well done they actually are pretty nice to read, but the problem is that they're slow as gently caress to navigate in xcode (even with an ssd) and the actual organization could be better
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2012 02:22
|
|
|
fidel sarcastro posted:thought gpl3 changed that? gpl3 means if i sell you a piece of hardware that runs code based on gpl code i can't use hardware restrictions to stop you from running custom code. tivo was the most famous example of this which is why this is called tivoization; they used the linux kernel but made it so that the tivo wouldn't run code not signed by them which means you can't actually run custom code on your tivo also haskell libraries tend to have decent docs, it helps that the type system kind of forces you to write right code. the problem is that some libraries lack decent example code in favor of just documenting what every function does
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2012 02:26
|
|
|
Jonny 290 posted:perldoc is good yeah it's really hard to beat cpan for this poo poo "I want to use oauth to create an account on my web app from Facebook. Oh look, there's 3 free libraries that do this with simple commands and they're all obsessively documented and comparing why you'd use one vs the other." i dunno, i want to try loving with ruby for a web app, but perl+cpan is so simple
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2012 02:28
|
|
|
Sulk posted:in before "java owns --shagger" but based on the little bit of looking at them I've done, java's docs seem to be just so much loving better and more organized than pretty much everything else out there PHP
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2012 02:28
|
|
|
Sulk posted:in before "java owns --shagger" but based on the little bit of looking at them I've done, java's docs seem to be just so much loving better and more organized than pretty much everything else out there java being the best is all-encompassing: best language best libs best frameworks best build tool best ide best docs
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2012 02:36
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:java being the best is all-encompassing: the new eclipse 4.2 seems nice. for some reason i can't get SWT to work right though based on the little tutorial thing built in, might be a 4.2 thing or it might be an OS X issue, not sure
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2012 02:42
|
|
|
Sulk posted:the new eclipse 4.2 seems nice. for some reason i can't get SWT to work right though based on the little tutorial thing built in, might be a 4.2 thing or it might be an OS X issue, not sure
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2012 02:59
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:java being the best is all-encompassing: how does it feel to be wrong?
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2012 03:09
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:java being the best is all-encompassing: I like c# esp since we stole all the good oss libs and frameworks from java and they work well w mvc too bad vs is getting more and more hosed 2008 was the best one
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2012 03:17
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 9, 2024 03:53 |
|
|
Sulk posted:the new eclipse 4.2 seems nice. for some reason i can't get SWT to work right though based on the little tutorial thing built in, might be a 4.2 thing or it might be an OS X issue, not sure eclipse is poo poo made by the unholy combination of academics, open sores shitheads and IBM
|
|
#
?
Jul 17, 2012 03:19
|
|