|
lol if you litterally believe there will be some magical bettery revolution out of nowhere. battery tech has been poo poo forever despite it being the biggest problem for all electronics. its not a new problem and electic cars arent gonna make it go away.
|
# ? Aug 9, 2012 20:46 |
|
|
# ? May 9, 2024 03:03 |
|
my macbook air gets like 6 or 7 hours of battery life and the tesla has like at least a dozen macbook air sized batteries in it
|
# ? Aug 9, 2012 21:07 |
|
Shaggar posted:lol if you litterally believe there will be some magical bettery revolution out of nowhere. we don't need a magical revolution, they're getting better all the time, and we're getting better at not wasting that energy too
|
# ? Aug 9, 2012 21:18 |
|
actually it does need a revolution because the only advances in electic vehicles have been around decreasing weight and minor energy efficiency advances. that poo poo still gets terrible range.
|
# ? Aug 9, 2012 21:50 |
|
Shaggar posted:actually it does need a revolution because the only advances in electic vehicles have been around decreasing weight and minor energy efficiency advances. that poo poo still gets terrible range. and like 90% of driving people do is 40 or 50 miles a day during their commute
|
# ? Aug 9, 2012 21:53 |
|
0xB16B00B5 posted:and like 90% of driving people do is 40 or 50 miles a day during their commute boy howdy would i love not being able to drive an extra five miles without going home and charging or burning petrol in some wheezy 0.6L generator engine strapped to the back of my 'infinite range' e-car
|
# ? Aug 9, 2012 21:55 |
|
if you want to understand everything thats wrong w/ electric cars go watch the "documentary" who killed the electric car. the reality is the exact opposite of the conclusions in the film.
|
# ? Aug 9, 2012 21:58 |
|
as long as hybrid cars continue to be loving terrible for the environment i'll be happy
|
# ? Aug 9, 2012 22:02 |
|
eat poo poo commute havers
|
# ? Aug 9, 2012 22:02 |
|
Jonny 290 posted:boy howdy would i love not being able to drive an extra five miles without going home and charging or burning petrol in some wheezy 0.6L generator engine strapped to the back of my 'infinite range' e-car jonny dont be bitter because you need to drive a mile to borrow a cup of sugar from your nearest neighbor.
|
# ? Aug 9, 2012 22:06 |
|
0xB16B00B5 posted:jonny dont be bitter because you need to drive a mile to borrow a cup of sugar from your nearest neighbor. if i worked from home i could literally live top to bottom, everything from big screen tvs to soda crackers available within a 1 mile walk. sprawl aint the problem, its job drain
|
# ? Aug 9, 2012 22:09 |
|
vapid cutlery posted:as long as hybrid cars continue to be loving terrible for the environment i'll be happy
|
# ? Aug 9, 2012 22:17 |
|
we need more battery foam
|
# ? Aug 9, 2012 22:25 |
|
Jonny 290 posted:if i worked from home i could literally live top to bottom, everything from big screen tvs to soda crackers available within a 1 mile walk. sprawl aint the problem, its job drain and friday night entertainment too, what with the drinking and donuts in the walmart parking lot
|
# ? Aug 9, 2012 22:45 |
|
io dont see what would be wrong with a car using liquid batteries, like zinc-bromine or something. u could top it up at a station just like current fuels. deposit the old liquid to be re-electrolyzed. ez?? the alternative is fuel cells. we have ceramic cells that can run off natural gas at a fairly high efficiency. and in australia we already run cars off petroleum gas. not much of a stretch to make the transition
|
# ? Aug 10, 2012 08:11 |
|
computer
|
# ? Aug 10, 2012 08:11 |
|
https://plus.google.com/110981030061712822816/posts/KaSKeg4vQtz you see, programming is like politics. simplified by idiots to a range of stereotypes between extremes.
|
# ? Aug 10, 2012 10:43 |
|
Meanwhile, in reality, static typing is more liberal because it makes it easier to make changes to your project.
|
# ? Aug 10, 2012 11:51 |
|
Jonny 290 posted:boy howdy would i love not being able to drive an extra five miles without going home and charging or burning petrol in some wheezy 0.6L generator engine strapped to the back of my 'infinite range' e-car This, but unironically E: unironically unironically
|
# ? Aug 10, 2012 11:54 |
|
shrughes posted:Meanwhile, in reality, static typing is more liberal because it makes it easier to make changes to your project. I'd say the cost of static typing is inversely proportional to the size of your project. I am amazed how yegge has managed to bring terms into the typing debate with *less consistent meaning* than the ones currently in use.
|
# ? Aug 10, 2012 12:07 |
|
tef posted:I'd say the cost of static typing is inversely proportional to the size of your project. the quality of yegge's writing for a given piece is inversely proportional to how serious it is
|
# ? Aug 10, 2012 13:25 |
|
yegge meister
|
# ? Aug 10, 2012 13:41 |
|
Panic! At The cisco posted:yegge meister
|
# ? Aug 10, 2012 13:44 |
|
tef posted:https://plus.google.com/110981030061712822816/posts/KaSKeg4vQtz I truly fear we'll get into debates of software conservatives vs. software liberals, and at some point some jackass will say "of course but <person x> is a researcher for <liberal/conservative> software engineering" as if it were a contest. If that happens, I predict a loving hellhole and I can only imagine myself leaving the industry at once.
|
# ? Aug 10, 2012 13:59 |
|
im a computer libertarian
|
# ? Aug 10, 2012 14:01 |
Panic! At The cisco posted:im a computer libertarian internet forums archivist
|
|
# ? Aug 10, 2012 14:02 |
|
MononcQc posted:I truly fear we'll get into debates of software conservatives vs. software liberals, and at some point some jackass will say "of course but <person x> is a researcher for <liberal/conservative> software engineering" as if it were a contest. people who like static typing are the software conservatives
|
# ? Aug 10, 2012 14:16 |
|
Tiny Bug Child posted:people who like static typing are the software conservatives what about people who use Turing-complete type systems to do fancy meta-programming within the types?
|
# ? Aug 10, 2012 14:23 |
|
the realm of masochists and haskell programmers
|
# ? Aug 10, 2012 14:37 |
|
TiMBuS posted:io dont see what would be wrong with a car using liquid batteries, like zinc-bromine or something. u could top it up at a station just like current fuels. deposit the old liquid to be re-electrolyzed. ez?? anything where you need to exchange fluids is too complex for the public. unit exchanges could be possible iff they are lightweight and/or require infrequent changes. even then they're probably too complex. sticking a thing into a slot and squeezing it is about all the lowest common denominator can handle
|
# ? Aug 10, 2012 14:53 |
|
Panic! At The cisco posted:im a computer libertarian http://fdiv.net/2012/04/01/objectivist-c
|
# ? Aug 10, 2012 15:12 |
|
Shaggar posted:sticking a thing into a slot and squeezing it is about all the lowest common denominator can handle see also: how baby is made
|
# ? Aug 10, 2012 15:12 |
|
yes that was the joke
|
# ? Aug 10, 2012 15:12 |
|
TiMBuS posted:io dont see what would be wrong with a car using liquid batteries, like zinc-bromine or something. u could top it up at a station just like current fuels. deposit the old liquid to be re-electrolyzed. ez?? It would get rid of my bottle storage problems.
|
# ? Aug 10, 2012 15:25 |
|
Shaggar posted:sticking a thing into a slot and squeezing it is about all the lowest common denominator can handle and they still gently caress that up i had a coworker w/ a mercedes, he was wondering why it ran like poo poo, guy was putting 87 in it and not 93, so the knock sensors were going insane and retarding the timing and killing his performance, i told him to go to 93 cause he's loving his poo poo up and he's like "nah too expensive" then there's all the diesel in the gas and vice versa. everyone knows someone who has done that
|
# ? Aug 10, 2012 15:27 |
|
fidel sarcastro posted:see also: how baby is made corollary: not in this post, not in yours
|
# ? Aug 10, 2012 15:31 |
|
trex eaterofcadrs posted:and they still gently caress that up its totally cool to pour a quart of transmission fluid into your engine crankcase with the oil and run it for a while. cleans it up nicely
|
# ? Aug 10, 2012 15:35 |
|
TiMBuS posted:io dont see what would be wrong with a car using liquid batteries, like zinc-bromine or something. u could top it up at a station just like current fuels. deposit the old liquid to be re-electrolyzed. ez?? hydrogen fuel cells convert water to hydrogen & oxygen with electrolysis, put it in your car, and get water out the tailpipe
|
# ? Aug 10, 2012 15:38 |
|
Shaggar posted:sticking a thing into a slot and squeezing it is about all the lowest common denominator can handle then the solution is obvious: retrofit existing gas pumps as pneumatic exchangers of rechargeable D-batteries. first it sucks the empty batteries out of the car, then it pushes recharged batteries in, and you pay based on how many you exchange
|
# ? Aug 10, 2012 15:38 |
|
|
# ? May 9, 2024 03:03 |
|
Jonny 290 posted:its totally cool to pour a quart of transmission fluid into your engine crankcase with the oil and run it for a while. cleans it up nicely just get the seafoam
|
# ? Aug 10, 2012 15:41 |