|
Has Dave ever done a big breakdown of how the creative process has changed over the years? I'm especially curious about the changes that happened between Chris Kreski being in charge and Stephanie solidifying power in 2004.
|
#
?
Aug 24, 2012 21:36
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 25, 2024 16:46 |
|
|
The ROHcast Part I: The 187 Stick-Up Kids MRP, HulkaMatt, Grody and I shot the poo poo about 2007-08 ROH for awhile. It's a good listen!!!
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2012 06:08
|
|
|
Arbite posted:Has Dave ever done a big breakdown of how the creative process has changed over the years? I'm especially curious about the changes that happened between Chris Kreski being in charge and Stephanie solidifying power in 2004. I would be interested in hearing this if he did.
|
|
#
?
Aug 25, 2012 06:33
|
|
|
Arbite posted:Has Dave ever done a big breakdown of how the creative process has changed over the years? I'm especially curious about the changes that happened between Chris Kreski being in charge and Stephanie solidifying power in 2004. They are doing a call in show tonight so you may want to just ask Dave tonight.
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2012 21:44
|
|
|
MassRayPer posted:They are doing a call in show tonight so you may want to just ask Dave tonight. Do it! Ask the question! Sounds like it could be interesting.
|
|
#
?
Aug 26, 2012 21:45
|
|
|
MassRayPer posted:They are doing a call in show tonight so you may want to just ask Dave tonight.  LINES ARE OPEN RIGHT NOW. You too can be a creepy Lance Storm fangirl who calls in without a question!
|
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2012 03:07
|
|
|
Arbite posted:Has Dave ever done a big breakdown of how the creative process has changed over the years? I'm especially curious about the changes that happened between Chris Kreski being in charge and Stephanie solidifying power in 2004. You did it! Hurrah! Nice question.
|
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2012 05:01
|
|
|
LordPants posted:You did it! Hurrah! Nice question. Now I am sad I was busy and couldn't call in with that question. They would have wondered what in the hell was going on to cause that question to be asked twice in the same show.
|
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2012 05:20
|
|
|
MassRayPer posted:Now I am sad I was busy and couldn't call in with that question. They would have wondered what in the hell was going on to cause that question to be asked twice in the same show. We all need to call in one time and all ask Lance Storm if he has his dancing shoes on.
|
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2012 05:26
|
|
|
njsykora posted:We all need to call in one time and all ask Lance Storm if he has his dancing shoes on. If they take calls next week I want to call in and ask Lance what his thoughts were on his feud with Monty Brown in TNA.
|
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2012 05:29
|
|
|
I want to call in and ask Lance Storm questions about teaming up with Trevor Murdoch.
|
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2012 05:43
|
|
|
njsykora posted:
Do you have a question for Lance? No. Not really. Did you know he runs a wrestling academy? Yes. I looked into that once. I listened to that on my way back from Cleveland this morning and I was loving dying.
|
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2012 05:43
|
|
|
sportsgenius86 posted:Do you have a question for Lance? No. Not really. I listened to it at around 6am in the morning on my early walk and stuck through it. I was not rewarded for my persistence.
|
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2012 05:45
|
|
|
LordPants posted:You did it! Hurrah! Nice question. Thanks. I just don't see how anyone, least of all those who work there, think that the current system is better than the old. MassRayPer posted:Now I am sad I was busy and couldn't call in with that question. They would have wondered what in the hell was going on to cause that question to be asked twice in the same show. That would have been fun, and they might have talked longer about it. Oh well. Arbite fucked around with this message at 11:53 on Aug 27, 2012 |
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2012 11:51
|
|
|
Arbite posted:Thanks. I just don't see how anyone, least of all those who work there, think that the current system is better than the old. There's an Art to fishing a good answer out of Dave, sometimes I've gotten "Well, x is x" and sometimes I've gotten... Well, no I'm not sure I've actually gotten a long answer, but the idea is if you are specific and frame it directly he'll normally answer the question if he doesn't dismiss it out of hand. If it is more open he'll just skim the answer and not go into specifics. But then again I've heard him answer really vague questions about Japan in five minute long monologues so  I guess dave.txt is the answer. edit: Also, you haven't lived until Bryan has said "I'm not sure I understand that question" on the pod.
|
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2012 13:31
|
|
|
LordPants posted:There's an Art to fishing a good answer out of Dave, sometimes I've gotten "Well, x is x" and sometimes I've gotten... Well, no I'm not sure I've actually gotten a long answer, but the idea is if you are specific and frame it directly he'll normally answer the question if he doesn't dismiss it out of hand. If it is more open he'll just skim the answer and not go into specifics. But then again I've heard him answer really vague questions about Japan in five minute long monologues so
|
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2012 14:11
|
|
|
Oh God everybody listen to the LAW this week where the first caller talks about how lovely women are being treated in wrestling and then uses that to segue into talking about Todd Akin 
|
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2012 14:19
|
|
|
Karmine posted:Oh God everybody listen to the LAW this week where the first caller talks about how lovely women are being treated in wrestling and then uses that to segue into talking about Todd Akin goddamnit I was actually looking forward to the LAW this week because Agnew was out, and instead it's US politics on a Canadian radio show  EDIT: was worth listening to anyway, gently caress Agnew I hope he quits, he is unnecessary. Pollock was great & even handled some god-awful Title Bout Trivia contestants well. StupidSexyMothman fucked around with this message at 21:00 on Aug 29, 2012 |
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2012 16:15
|
|
|
Big Dave posted:What match would you have been most interested in buying? How can you not love this guy?
|
|
#
?
Aug 27, 2012 23:39
|
|
|
William Regal posted:I finally got to do @ColtCababa pod thingy the other day.Had a great time talking British Wrestling.Looks like we will be doing part 2 soon. gently caress yeah! William Regal and Colt talking catch as catch can sounds like a listen and a half.
|
|
#
?
Aug 29, 2012 20:33
|
|
|
I've been listening to less and less of the F4W/WO podcasts, but goddamn if Dave's newsletters aren't worth the monthly fee by themselves.quote:Next was supposed to be the results of the paternity test. Jeremy Borash came out and had the results, like this was some sort of a game show. Brilliant idea. Eric, what’s your phone number, we can do this reality show called Hillbilly Paternity Tests where you can recruit women from Appalachia who sleep around and are pregnant and every week find out who is the father. Yeah, I know it’s been done before on talk shows. But we can get Christopher Daniels as the host drinking that wine because he’s awesome as a talker or Borash himself. Yeah, I know, he’s got no talent and probably will go to some bar and brag that he’s the producer. Better than Borash, get Gene Okerlund as the host. And then bring in Hogan and Sting and Larry Zbyszko and Kevin Nash and Brutus Beefcake and we can’t forget the Nasty Boys and Bubba, get it on TV, and in a swerve, turn it into a wrestling promotion. We’ll beat Vince easy, particularly if we bring back Russo as a writer and have Sean Morley do his old porn star gimmick.
|
|
#
?
Aug 30, 2012 00:36
|
|
|
"Why would any person on the face of the Earth choose a tables match?" "Jesus Christ." "Who are these people?" "Whole thing just blows my mind." I just wanted to see Lawler go through a table. V  V
|
|
#
?
Aug 30, 2012 05:10
|
|
|
UltimoDragonQuest posted:"Why would any person on the face of the Earth choose a tables match?"
|
|
#
?
Aug 30, 2012 05:13
|
|
|
CVagts posted:I've been listening to less and less of the F4W/WO podcasts, but goddamn if Dave's newsletters aren't worth the monthly fee by themselves. I started with everything. And now I'm just the Dave shows, and the Vinny shows if someone says it's funny. But the Newsletters just keep giving. "Oh, History of Summerslam edition? Bo-Ring" *30 minutes later* "GODDAMNIT! Where did the time go?"
|
|
#
?
Aug 30, 2012 05:49
|
|
|
LordPants posted:I started with everything. And now I'm just the Dave shows, and the Vinny shows if someone says it's funny. But the Newsletters just keep giving. Yeah even if I didn't listen to a ton of the radio, the newsletters, headlines and back issues would make my sub worth it.
|
|
#
?
Aug 30, 2012 07:12
|
|
|
We have to wait for Regal, today's guest is Ricky Reyes, that miserable little toerag.
|
|
#
?
Aug 30, 2012 13:42
|
|
|
My favorite Dave exchange in the podcast this week was something to the effect ofquote:
I also enjoy it when Brian is so busy sperging out about something that he completely misses the point and Dave Meltzer of all people has to explain to him why something was funny, like the editing in the Kane video that made it seem like his story took hours. Tato fucked around with this message at 15:42 on Aug 30, 2012 |
|
#
?
Aug 30, 2012 15:38
|
|
|
My favorite audio moment from this week.
|
|
#
?
Aug 30, 2012 17:00
|
|
|
El Gallinero Gros posted:We have to wait for Regal, today's guest is Ricky Reyes, that miserable little toerag. Hey man, Rick Noon is podcast GOLD. ...seriously, it's a good episode.
|
|
#
?
Aug 30, 2012 17:26
|
|
|
It is, I just love using Regal-isms.....sunshine.
|
|
#
?
Aug 30, 2012 19:41
|
|
|
Todd WOULDN'T like the Raw anger management skits.
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2012 07:56
|
|
|
Jack Krauser posted:I felt the same way. Tables matches are fun, sorry. Personally, I feel like they're missing something. They go on forever and only one person goes through a table? Now, if you had a tables match under iron man rules (whoever puts their opponent through the most tables in 30 minutes is the winner), that would be fun.
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2012 11:47
|
|
|
Dr. Dirt posted:Personally, I feel like they're missing something. They go on forever and only one person goes through a table? Now, if you had a tables match under iron man rules (whoever puts their opponent through the most tables in 30 minutes is the winner), that would be fun. This is why I like tag team table matches, where both members of a team have to go through tables to be eliminated. They haven't done one in ages, of course, but to me those are the perfect use of a tables match.
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2012 14:17
|
|
|
CombineThresher posted:Hey man, Rick Noon is podcast GOLD. Do they just play that clip on repeat and laugh for an hour?
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2012 14:31
|
|
|
triplexpac posted:This is why I like tag team table matches, where both members of a team have to go through tables to be eliminated. Or matches like the Dudley/Hardy one where it had to be an offensive move so there is no way for accidents cause you to win.
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2012 14:41
|
|
|
bobkatt013 posted:Or matches like the Dudley/Hardy one where it had to be an offensive move so there is no way for accidents cause you to win. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xd_ZdqfiV8 Those rules are the best kind of table match rules. Though Big Show accidently stepping on the table was funny.
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2012 21:43
|
|
|
BillyMays posted:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xd_ZdqfiV8
|
|
#
?
Aug 31, 2012 21:52
|
|
|
Jack Krauser posted:Aaauughh the blurring is so bad in that video I tapped at 10 seconds. Here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u40Qjbo29y8
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2012 00:52
|
|
|
I love when Bryan asked Dave for today's equivalent to WCW Steve Austin. You could practically hear Dave's mind burning up trying to think of a hypothetical situation
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2012 17:59
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 25, 2024 16:46 |
|
|
triplexpac posted:I love when Bryan asked Dave for today's equivalent to WCW Steve Austin. You could practically hear Dave's mind burning up trying to think of a hypothetical situation That's an interesting question. What conclusion did they come to?
|
|
#
?
Sep 1, 2012 18:15
|
|
