- Adbot
-
ADBOT LOVES YOU
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2024 10:30
|
|
- Dixie Cretin Seaman
- Jan 22, 2008
-
all hat and one catte
-
Hot Rope Guy
|
good job taking a respectable photo for your profile
you need sound in the video and you still don't explain what your site will actually do or why anyone should care
statpedia's animated favicon is distracting and looks too much like the webpage loading animation so out of the corner of my eye i always think statpedia hasn't finished loading. this might be a good thing tho, since it makes me stay longer thinking maybe something useful or interesting is eventually going to load
|
#
?
Sep 15, 2012 22:44
|
|
- Ian McLean
- Sep 9, 2012
-
statpedia.org
Post Stats on Anything
|
good job taking a respectable photo for your profile
you need sound in the video and you still don't explain what your site will actually do or why anyone should care
statpedia's animated favicon is distracting and looks too much like the webpage loading animation so out of the corner of my eye i always think statpedia hasn't finished loading. this might be a good thing tho, since it makes me stay longer thinking maybe something useful or interesting is eventually going to load
updated video with audio: http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1630905008/1746637091?token=c00eca36
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2012 00:33
|
|
- nah
- Mar 16, 2009
-
|
ian f*cken owns
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2012 02:27
|
|
- Ian McLean
- Sep 9, 2012
-
statpedia.org
Post Stats on Anything
|
lol! Yeah there are kinks everywhere in that stat creator. It definitely needs a lot of work.
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2012 02:27
|
|
- 0xB16B00B5
- Aug 24, 2006
-
by Y Kant Ozma Post
|
please check google voice you have a message waiting for you
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2012 02:57
|
|
- 0xB16B00B5
- Aug 24, 2006
-
by Y Kant Ozma Post
|
if i give you 10,000 dollars will you waste my 30 minutes with as many awkward silences, uhms and likes as you do in the video?
god dammit if you give half a poo poo about your vision then sound like it
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2012 02:59
|
|
- Trig Discipline
- Jun 3, 2008
-
Please leave the room if you think this might offend you.
-
Grimey Drawer
|
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2012 04:05
|
|
- Ian McLean
- Sep 9, 2012
-
statpedia.org
Post Stats on Anything
|
if i give you 10,000 dollars will you waste my 30 minutes with as many awkward silences, uhms and likes as you do in the video?
if you give half a poo poo about your vision then sound like it
I thought it was a very informative video. I know it isn't the greatest, and I will probably make another version. I am not the perfect movie maker bro; although I did download this movie editor program that said I can edit out all the ums. I am much more concerned that statpedia is providing a search engine for statistics.
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2012 05:48
|
|
- horse_ebookmarklet
- Oct 6, 2003
-
can I play too?
|
Ian, thanks for ignoring my earlier post. it was srs and I put a good 10 minutes into it.
You are clearly currently putting a ton of time and effort into this. What are you going to do with kickstarter funding that you aren't doing now?
Traditionally with startups you work and hope it pays out, but you are approaching this in the opposite way. Get a payout, then hope it works.
With something like the elevation dock, they needed funding to begin production. What are you going to do with this funding that you can't do now?
edit: also join a Toastmasters in your area. You need to remove things like verbal pauses (um, uh) if you want to actually sell this.
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2012 06:06
|
|
- Ericadia
- Oct 31, 2007
-
Not A Unicorn
|
We could always help you make the video Ian.
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2012 06:24
|
|
- CaptainMeatpants
- Jun 1, 2010
-
|
here i've made a brief demo of how a good instructional video might play out for your project
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dPAZvxmLfcQ
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2012 06:31
|
|
- Ericadia
- Oct 31, 2007
-
Not A Unicorn
|
lmao
who are the 19 dongslaves that 'disliked' that video?
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2012 06:35
|
|
- CaptainMeatpants
- Jun 1, 2010
-
|
probably the people it's been used on
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2012 06:38
|
|
- Guido van Possum
- Apr 7, 2012
-
by T. Finninho
|
all i hear is a small dog yapping
----------------
This thread brought to you by a tremendous dickhead!
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2012 09:10
|
|
- Ian McLean
- Sep 9, 2012
-
statpedia.org
Post Stats on Anything
|
Ian, thanks for ignoring my earlier post. it was srs and I put a good 10 minutes into it.
You are clearly currently putting a ton of time and effort into this. What are you going to do with kickstarter funding that you aren't doing now?
Traditionally with startups you work and hope it pays out, but you are approaching this in the opposite way. Get a payout, then hope it works.
With something like the elevation dock, they needed funding to begin production. What are you going to do with this funding that you can't do now?
edit: also join a Toastmasters in your area. You need to remove things like verbal pauses (um, uh) if you want to actually sell this.
dude... 10 dollars for platnum member status to find your earlier post. I just want to say thanks everyone for all your input.
Should i just flash the investor proposals to the entire yospos world? Okay... here you go... please don't flame me too hard on this one. I am open to allowing someone edit a new version of the investor presentation if they think it needs improvements somewhere. I think statpedia is legit. It needs money, so going different avenues is definitely something worthwhile. All the current requirements of funding were listed by the team. I entered myself into the budget, and that is it. The development team decided the rest:
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1lJQk9_cDo4v3IfAext3zMIqSKoMuuxyWkaph5bbEg_c/edit#slide=id.g4e9534a_0_31
As far as paid subscription goes, no way jose. This data is never going to get used if people have to pay to see it.
Universities do have various systems of uploading data into things. I remember hearing some sociology students speaking about a particular system they use. Data for particle accelerators is coming in all the time. I don't need to reinvent how all these systems currently being used gather the data. I just need to get the data if there is some way it can contribute to statpedia, or pull websites display mechanisms of the data for search so their beautiful stuff can be found.
There are standard database formats that most data is stored. The tricky part is interpreting it in ways that people can understand. This is where chart labs so wonderfully comes into play. Presenting the data in some useful mechanism is super important, but also being able to search for the data and see the actual numbers is nice. Take this for example: http://mcmstv.web.cern.ch/mcmstv/#evd If this data was in statpedia, one could maybe use that data to show a graph of how often different types of particles are created.
What if I am a humanoid robot, and I want all these stats to make decisions. Maybe statpedia can help these robots. All the publicly posted data on statpedia should transfer into some standard format that any standard system out there can read. Need like the ultimate sql repository. There are so many varying database structures. An sql command prompt can be initially used to establish connections to varying databases. From here, tables can be called, and individuals and organizations can opt to host their database on statpedia allowing access to varying data for the search.
Some people may just want to render results from the the search. Some may prefer to use SQL to generate the tables for statpedia chart labs.
People want to be able to pull data, and turn it into meaningful stuff. I need one of those little import/export .sql buttons. Then, make a little window for someone to access to type in sql commands, then convert that stuff over into a matlab, octave, R type thing, go to the statistical design factory, then out it pops into search display.
I am trying to get this team spirit of fusion going for all these statistics. This is synergy stuff. Like serious synergy.
Free sql repository uploading place on statpedia. As long as everyone's total sql files are stored to its own unique id everything should be chill. Obviously we are going to know when people's and organizations sql files are being used within statpedia, and so we can create a YouTube type profit sharing system for all those stats.
With the sql connection thing, perhaps the users could fast forward and rewind this: http://mcmstv.web.cern.ch/mcmstv/#evd
maybe change the angle around. if the entire sql database is right there within it i can do a search within statpedia for particle accelerator data, and pop, its in search. Maybe one could host it on their own website, and plug in the final result of something amazing, then link it to statpeida.
There are endless possibilities with statistics. Infinity does still exist I believe.
and then we optimize this thing: http://code.google.com/edu/parallel/mapreduce-tutorial.html eventually optimized it into this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grover's_algorithm for most optimal database and search performance. Thinking in terms of endless possibilities, I suppose even that last search algorithm can be improved. That is if we can answer this question... http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=296126
Here is this guys answer: rrtucci
Posts: 6
I'll give you an analogy that might help you. Suppose you know a series that converges to a constant pi whose value you don't know a priori. Think of the Grover oracle as a subroutine that gives you only partial information about the series each time you call the subroutine. Your goal is to find the limit of the series. Grover's algorithm helps you to calculate that limit by calling the oracle fewer times than you would have to, classically.
By the way, here is a Matlab program ( http://qbnets.wordpress.com/2010/01/28/my-secret-life-as-a-captain-of-the-grovers-algorithm/ ) that I wrote of a more general version of Grover's algorithm(GA). This new version is more general in two important ways:
(1)It does not require that <s|t> be of small, where |s> is the starting state and |t> is the target state. (The original GA only works if <s|t> ~1/sqrt(N) )
(2)It converges with absolute certainty to the target state (The original GA converges only with a finite probability.)
Back to the data being imported into statpedia... if there was a way to use other already established systems that connect to a public sql window, that would work. Maybe statpedia could be allowed to crawl the database of entire systems collecting all the data for system input and format restructuring.
Otherwise, I could see there having to be all these custom database platforms linking externally into statpedia.
Good Stuff. Thanks again guys for all your input. It really means a lot.
Also, I am open to help with the video as mentioned in the previous comment. I would love to make a nice video.
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2012 12:28
|
|
- poty
- Jun 21, 2008
-
虹はどこで終わるのですか? あなたの魂の中で、または地平線で?
|
dude... 10 dollars for platnum member status to find your earlier post. I just want to say thanks everyone for all your input.
Should i just flash the investor proposals to the entire yospos world? Okay... here you go... please don't flame me too hard on this one. I am open to allowing someone edit a new version of the investor presentation if they think it needs improvements somewhere. I think statpedia is legit. It needs money, so going different avenues is definitely something worthwhile. All the current requirements of funding were listed by the team. I entered myself into the budget, and that is it. The development team decided the rest:
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1lJQk9_cDo4v3IfAext3zMIqSKoMuuxyWkaph5bbEg_c/edit#slide=id.g4e9534a_0_31
As far as paid subscription goes, no way jose. This data is never going to get used if people have to pay to see it.
Universities do have various systems of uploading data into things. I remember hearing some sociology students speaking about a particular system they use. Data for particle accelerators is coming in all the time. I don't need to reinvent how all these systems currently being used gather the data. I just need to get the data if there is some way it can contribute to statpedia, or pull websites display mechanisms of the data for search so their beautiful stuff can be found.
There are standard database formats that most data is stored. The tricky part is interpreting it in ways that people can understand. This is where chart labs so wonderfully comes into play. Presenting the data in some useful mechanism is super important, but also being able to search for the data and see the actual numbers is nice. Take this for example: http://mcmstv.web.cern.ch/mcmstv/#evd If this data was in statpedia, one could maybe use that data to show a graph of how often different types of particles are created.
What if I am a humanoid robot, and I want all these stats to make decisions. Maybe statpedia can help these robots. All the publicly posted data on statpedia should transfer into some standard format that any standard system out there can read. Need like the ultimate sql repository. There are so many varying database structures. An sql command prompt can be initially used to establish connections to varying databases. From here, tables can be called, and individuals and organizations can opt to host their database on statpedia allowing access to varying data for the search.
Some people may just want to render results from the the search. Some may prefer to use SQL to generate the tables for statpedia chart labs.
People want to be able to pull data, and turn it into meaningful stuff. I need one of those little import/export .sql buttons. Then, make a little window for someone to access to type in sql commands, then convert that stuff over into a matlab, octave, R type thing, go to the statistical design factory, then out it pops into search display.
I am trying to get this team spirit of fusion going for all these statistics. This is synergy stuff. Like serious synergy.
Free sql repository uploading place on statpedia. As long as everyone's total sql files are stored to its own unique id everything should be chill. Obviously we are going to know when people's and organizations sql files are being used within statpedia, and so we can create a YouTube type profit sharing system for all those stats.
With the sql connection thing, perhaps the users could fast forward and rewind this: http://mcmstv.web.cern.ch/mcmstv/#evd
maybe change the angle around. if the entire sql database is right there within it i can do a search within statpedia for particle accelerator data, and pop, its in search. Maybe one could host it on their own website, and plug in the final result of something amazing, then link it to statpeida.
There are endless possibilities with statistics. Infinity does still exist I believe.
and then we optimize this thing: http://code.google.com/edu/parallel/mapreduce-tutorial.html eventually optimized it into this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grover's_algorithm for most optimal database and search performance. Thinking in terms of endless possibilities, I suppose even that last search algorithm can be improved. That is if we can answer this question... http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=296126
Here is this guys answer: rrtucci
Posts: 6
I'll give you an analogy that might help you. Suppose you know a series that converges to a constant pi whose value you don't know a priori. Think of the Grover oracle as a subroutine that gives you only partial information about the series each time you call the subroutine. Your goal is to find the limit of the series. Grover's algorithm helps you to calculate that limit by calling the oracle fewer times than you would have to, classically.
By the way, here is a Matlab program ( http://qbnets.wordpress.com/2010/01/28/my-secret-life-as-a-captain-of-the-grovers-algorithm/ ) that I wrote of a more general version of Grover's algorithm(GA). This new version is more general in two important ways:
(1)It does not require that <s|t> be of small, where |s> is the starting state and |t> is the target state. (The original GA only works if <s|t> ~1/sqrt(N) )
(2)It converges with absolute certainty to the target state (The original GA converges only with a finite probability.)
Back to the data being imported into statpedia... if there was a way to use other already established systems that connect to a public sql window, that would work. Maybe statpedia could be allowed to crawl the database of entire systems collecting all the data for system input and format restructuring.
Otherwise, I could see there having to be all these custom database platforms linking externally into statpedia.
Good Stuff. Thanks again guys for all your input. It really means a lot.
Also, I am open to help with the video as mentioned in the previous comment. I would love to make a nice video.
agreed
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2012 12:31
|
|
- 0xB16B00B5
- Aug 24, 2006
-
by Y Kant Ozma Post
|
dude... 10 dollars for platnum member status to find your earlier post. I just want to say thanks everyone for all your input.
Should i just flash the investor proposals to the entire yospos world? Okay... here you go... please don't flame me too hard on this one. I am open to allowing someone edit a new version of the investor presentation if they think it needs improvements somewhere. I think statpedia is legit. It needs money, so going different avenues is definitely something worthwhile. All the current requirements of funding were listed by the team. I entered myself into the budget, and that is it. The development team decided the rest:
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1lJQk9_cDo4v3IfAext3zMIqSKoMuuxyWkaph5bbEg_c/edit#slide=id.g4e9534a_0_31
As far as paid subscription goes, no way jose. This data is never going to get used if people have to pay to see it.
Universities do have various systems of uploading data into things. I remember hearing some sociology students speaking about a particular system they use. Data for particle accelerators is coming in all the time. I don't need to reinvent how all these systems currently being used gather the data. I just need to get the data if there is some way it can contribute to statpedia, or pull websites display mechanisms of the data for search so their beautiful stuff can be found.
There are standard database formats that most data is stored. The tricky part is interpreting it in ways that people can understand. This is where chart labs so wonderfully comes into play. Presenting the data in some useful mechanism is super important, but also being able to search for the data and see the actual numbers is nice. Take this for example: http://mcmstv.web.cern.ch/mcmstv/#evd If this data was in statpedia, one could maybe use that data to show a graph of how often different types of particles are created.
What if I am a humanoid robot, and I want all these stats to make decisions. Maybe statpedia can help these robots. All the publicly posted data on statpedia should transfer into some standard format that any standard system out there can read. Need like the ultimate sql repository. There are so many varying database structures. An sql command prompt can be initially used to establish connections to varying databases. From here, tables can be called, and individuals and organizations can opt to host their database on statpedia allowing access to varying data for the search.
Some people may just want to render results from the the search. Some may prefer to use SQL to generate the tables for statpedia chart labs.
People want to be able to pull data, and turn it into meaningful stuff. I need one of those little import/export .sql buttons. Then, make a little window for someone to access to type in sql commands, then convert that stuff over into a matlab, octave, R type thing, go to the statistical design factory, then out it pops into search display.
I am trying to get this team spirit of fusion going for all these statistics. This is synergy stuff. Like serious synergy.
Free sql repository uploading place on statpedia. As long as everyone's total sql files are stored to its own unique id everything should be chill. Obviously we are going to know when people's and organizations sql files are being used within statpedia, and so we can create a YouTube type profit sharing system for all those stats.
With the sql connection thing, perhaps the users could fast forward and rewind this: http://mcmstv.web.cern.ch/mcmstv/#evd
maybe change the angle around. if the entire sql database is right there within it i can do a search within statpedia for particle accelerator data, and pop, its in search. Maybe one could host it on their own website, and plug in the final result of something amazing, then link it to statpeida.
There are endless possibilities with statistics. Infinity does still exist I believe.
and then we optimize this thing: http://code.google.com/edu/parallel/mapreduce-tutorial.html eventually optimized it into this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grover's_algorithm for most optimal database and search performance. Thinking in terms of endless possibilities, I suppose even that last search algorithm can be improved. That is if we can answer this question... http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=296126
Here is this guys answer: rrtucci
Posts: 6
I'll give you an analogy that might help you. Suppose you know a series that converges to a constant pi whose value you don't know a priori. Think of the Grover oracle as a subroutine that gives you only partial information about the series each time you call the subroutine. Your goal is to find the limit of the series. Grover's algorithm helps you to calculate that limit by calling the oracle fewer times than you would have to, classically.
By the way, here is a Matlab program ( http://qbnets.wordpress.com/2010/01/28/my-secret-life-as-a-captain-of-the-grovers-algorithm/ ) that I wrote of a more general version of Grover's algorithm(GA). This new version is more general in two important ways:
(1)It does not require that <s|t> be of small, where |s> is the starting state and |t> is the target state. (The original GA only works if <s|t> ~1/sqrt(N) )
(2)It converges with absolute certainty to the target state (The original GA converges only with a finite probability.)
Back to the data being imported into statpedia... if there was a way to use other already established systems that connect to a public sql window, that would work. Maybe statpedia could be allowed to crawl the database of entire systems collecting all the data for system input and format restructuring.
Otherwise, I could see there having to be all these custom database platforms linking externally into statpedia.
Good Stuff. Thanks again guys for all your input. It really means a lot.
Also, I am open to help with the video as mentioned in the previous comment. I would love to make a nice video.
same
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2012 12:32
|
|
- Sneaks McDevious
- Jul 29, 2010
-
by LITERALLY AN ADMIN
|
dude... 10 dollars for platnum member status to find your earlier post. I just want to say thanks everyone for all your input.
Should i just flash the investor proposals to the entire yospos world? Okay... here you go... please don't flame me too hard on this one. I am open to allowing someone edit a new version of the investor presentation if they think it needs improvements somewhere. I think statpedia is legit. It needs money, so going different avenues is definitely something worthwhile. All the current requirements of funding were listed by the team. I entered myself into the budget, and that is it. The development team decided the rest:
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1lJQk9_cDo4v3IfAext3zMIqSKoMuuxyWkaph5bbEg_c/edit#slide=id.g4e9534a_0_31
As far as paid subscription goes, no way jose. This data is never going to get used if people have to pay to see it.
Universities do have various systems of uploading data into things. I remember hearing some sociology students speaking about a particular system they use. Data for particle accelerators is coming in all the time. I don't need to reinvent how all these systems currently being used gather the data. I just need to get the data if there is some way it can contribute to statpedia, or pull websites display mechanisms of the data for search so their beautiful stuff can be found.
There are standard database formats that most data is stored. The tricky part is interpreting it in ways that people can understand. This is where chart labs so wonderfully comes into play. Presenting the data in some useful mechanism is super important, but also being able to search for the data and see the actual numbers is nice. Take this for example: http://mcmstv.web.cern.ch/mcmstv/#evd If this data was in statpedia, one could maybe use that data to show a graph of how often different types of particles are created.
What if I am a humanoid robot, and I want all these stats to make decisions. Maybe statpedia can help these robots. All the publicly posted data on statpedia should transfer into some standard format that any standard system out there can read. Need like the ultimate sql repository. There are so many varying database structures. An sql command prompt can be initially used to establish connections to varying databases. From here, tables can be called, and individuals and organizations can opt to host their database on statpedia allowing access to varying data for the search.
Some people may just want to render results from the the search. Some may prefer to use SQL to generate the tables for statpedia chart labs.
People want to be able to pull data, and turn it into meaningful stuff. I need one of those little import/export .sql buttons. Then, make a little window for someone to access to type in sql commands, then convert that stuff over into a matlab, octave, R type thing, go to the statistical design factory, then out it pops into search display.
I am trying to get this team spirit of fusion going for all these statistics. This is synergy stuff. Like serious synergy.
Free sql repository uploading place on statpedia. As long as everyone's total sql files are stored to its own unique id everything should be chill. Obviously we are going to know when people's and organizations sql files are being used within statpedia, and so we can create a YouTube type profit sharing system for all those stats.
With the sql connection thing, perhaps the users could fast forward and rewind this: http://mcmstv.web.cern.ch/mcmstv/#evd
maybe change the angle around. if the entire sql database is right there within it i can do a search within statpedia for particle accelerator data, and pop, its in search. Maybe one could host it on their own website, and plug in the final result of something amazing, then link it to statpeida.
There are endless possibilities with statistics. Infinity does still exist I believe.
and then we optimize this thing: http://code.google.com/edu/parallel/mapreduce-tutorial.html eventually optimized it into this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grover's_algorithm for most optimal database and search performance. Thinking in terms of endless possibilities, I suppose even that last search algorithm can be improved. That is if we can answer this question... http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=296126
Here is this guys answer: rrtucci
Posts: 6
I'll give you an analogy that might help you. Suppose you know a series that converges to a constant pi whose value you don't know a priori. Think of the Grover oracle as a subroutine that gives you only partial information about the series each time you call the subroutine. Your goal is to find the limit of the series. Grover's algorithm helps you to calculate that limit by calling the oracle fewer times than you would have to, classically.
By the way, here is a Matlab program ( http://qbnets.wordpress.com/2010/01/28/my-secret-life-as-a-captain-of-the-grovers-algorithm/ ) that I wrote of a more general version of Grover's algorithm(GA). This new version is more general in two important ways:
(1)It does not require that <s|t> be of small, where |s> is the starting state and |t> is the target state. (The original GA only works if <s|t> ~1/sqrt(N) )
(2)It converges with absolute certainty to the target state (The original GA converges only with a finite probability.)
Back to the data being imported into statpedia... if there was a way to use other already established systems that connect to a public sql window, that would work. Maybe statpedia could be allowed to crawl the database of entire systems collecting all the data for system input and format restructuring.
Otherwise, I could see there having to be all these custom database platforms linking externally into statpedia.
Good Stuff. Thanks again guys for all your input. It really means a lot.
Also, I am open to help with the video as mentioned in the previous comment. I would love to make a nice video.
5
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2012 20:18
|
|
- 0xB16B00B5
- Aug 24, 2006
-
by Y Kant Ozma Post
|
ian i spent 100 dollars on app.net and you havent convinced me yet to give you even 10
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2012 20:25
|
|
- Sagebrush
- Feb 26, 2012
-
|
dude... 10 dollars for platnum member status to find your earlier post. I just want to say thanks everyone for all your input.
Should i just flash the investor proposals to the entire yospos world? Okay... here you go... please don't flame me too hard on this one. I am open to allowing someone edit a new version of the investor presentation if they think it needs improvements somewhere. I think statpedia is legit. It needs money, so going different avenues is definitely something worthwhile. All the current requirements of funding were listed by the team. I entered myself into the budget, and that is it. The development team decided the rest:
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1lJQk9_cDo4v3IfAext3zMIqSKoMuuxyWkaph5bbEg_c/edit#slide=id.g4e9534a_0_31
As far as paid subscription goes, no way jose. This data is never going to get used if people have to pay to see it.
Universities do have various systems of uploading data into things. I remember hearing some sociology students speaking about a particular system they use. Data for particle accelerators is coming in all the time. I don't need to reinvent how all these systems currently being used gather the data. I just need to get the data if there is some way it can contribute to statpedia, or pull websites display mechanisms of the data for search so their beautiful stuff can be found.
There are standard database formats that most data is stored. The tricky part is interpreting it in ways that people can understand. This is where chart labs so wonderfully comes into play. Presenting the data in some useful mechanism is super important, but also being able to search for the data and see the actual numbers is nice. Take this for example: http://mcmstv.web.cern.ch/mcmstv/#evd If this data was in statpedia, one could maybe use that data to show a graph of how often different types of particles are created.
What if I am a humanoid robot, and I want all these stats to make decisions. Maybe statpedia can help these robots. All the publicly posted data on statpedia should transfer into some standard format that any standard system out there can read. Need like the ultimate sql repository. There are so many varying database structures. An sql command prompt can be initially used to establish connections to varying databases. From here, tables can be called, and individuals and organizations can opt to host their database on statpedia allowing access to varying data for the search.
Some people may just want to render results from the the search. Some may prefer to use SQL to generate the tables for statpedia chart labs.
People want to be able to pull data, and turn it into meaningful stuff. I need one of those little import/export .sql buttons. Then, make a little window for someone to access to type in sql commands, then convert that stuff over into a matlab, octave, R type thing, go to the statistical design factory, then out it pops into search display.
I am trying to get this team spirit of fusion going for all these statistics. This is synergy stuff. Like serious synergy.
Free sql repository uploading place on statpedia. As long as everyone's total sql files are stored to its own unique id everything should be chill. Obviously we are going to know when people's and organizations sql files are being used within statpedia, and so we can create a YouTube type profit sharing system for all those stats.
With the sql connection thing, perhaps the users could fast forward and rewind this: http://mcmstv.web.cern.ch/mcmstv/#evd
maybe change the angle around. if the entire sql database is right there within it i can do a search within statpedia for particle accelerator data, and pop, its in search. Maybe one could host it on their own website, and plug in the final result of something amazing, then link it to statpeida.
There are endless possibilities with statistics. Infinity does still exist I believe.
and then we optimize this thing: http://code.google.com/edu/parallel/mapreduce-tutorial.html eventually optimized it into this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grover's_algorithm for most optimal database and search performance. Thinking in terms of endless possibilities, I suppose even that last search algorithm can be improved. That is if we can answer this question... http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=296126
Here is this guys answer: rrtucci
Posts: 6
I'll give you an analogy that might help you. Suppose you know a series that converges to a constant pi whose value you don't know a priori. Think of the Grover oracle as a subroutine that gives you only partial information about the series each time you call the subroutine. Your goal is to find the limit of the series. Grover's algorithm helps you to calculate that limit by calling the oracle fewer times than you would have to, classically.
By the way, here is a Matlab program ( http://qbnets.wordpress.com/2010/01/28/my-secret-life-as-a-captain-of-the-grovers-algorithm/ ) that I wrote of a more general version of Grover's algorithm(GA). This new version is more general in two important ways:
(1)It does not require that <s|t> be of small, where |s> is the starting state and |t> is the target state. (The original GA only works if <s|t> ~1/sqrt(N) )
(2)It converges with absolute certainty to the target state (The original GA converges only with a finite probability.)
Back to the data being imported into statpedia... if there was a way to use other already established systems that connect to a public sql window, that would work. Maybe statpedia could be allowed to crawl the database of entire systems collecting all the data for system input and format restructuring.
Otherwise, I could see there having to be all these custom database platforms linking externally into statpedia.
Good Stuff. Thanks again guys for all your input. It really means a lot.
Also, I am open to help with the video as mentioned in the previous comment. I would love to make a nice video.
i just wanted to say you should try clicking the little question mark at the bottom left corner of someone's post and see what happens
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2012 20:34
|
|
- Ian McLean
- Sep 9, 2012
-
statpedia.org
Post Stats on Anything
|
I didn't read the earlier post because I didn't pay for the platinum member status. Although I am considering paying it just because I think this forum is legit.
I will probably read through this entire post a few times because there is a lot of good input.
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2012 20:34
|
|
- dragon enthusiast
- Jan 1, 2010
-
|
lads i think were witnessing the development of a new form of trolling
Poe's Troll, also known as TobleroneTrollangular
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2012 20:40
|
|
- Adbot
-
ADBOT LOVES YOU
|
|
#
?
May 11, 2024 10:30
|
|
- BooLoo
- Oct 18, 2010
-
SLAM TIME
|
I didn't read the earlier post because I didn't pay for the platinum member status. Although I am considering paying it just because I think this forum is legit.
if i buy you platinum will you make a stat just for me
|
#
?
Sep 16, 2012 20:53
|
|