Jonny 290 posted:lol
|
|
# ? Nov 29, 2012 16:22 |
|
|
# ? May 9, 2024 01:51 |
|
no i was just lolling at the this aint' happen thing all this poo poo is 10 yr old code, i gently caress with it as little as possible and no i dont do the space thing but i do use 4 space tabstops
|
# ? Nov 29, 2012 16:23 |
|
Zombywuf posted:Coffeescript normalises the syntax to something non-associative elaborate
|
# ? Nov 29, 2012 17:46 |
|
https://github.com/satyr/coco/wiki/wtfcs
|
# ? Nov 29, 2012 20:15 |
|
don't hold it like that
|
# ? Nov 29, 2012 20:18 |
|
Jonny 290 posted:lol lol perl is so ugly also ftp in tyool2012
|
# ? Nov 29, 2012 22:16 |
|
i actually like perl syntax and i don't care what anybody says
|
# ? Nov 29, 2012 22:20 |
Is there a secret to making obj c more concise, readable, whatever? I'm writing a texas hold em thing. In C# a crude way to find an (IComparable) score value for the best full house, given a player's pocket and a set of community cards, is something like: code:
Obj-C requires roughly four times as much screenspace for all that, even when I try hard. I really like a lot of XCode/Cocoas's features, but this is orful. Shameproof fucked around with this message at 23:19 on Nov 29, 2012 |
|
# ? Nov 29, 2012 22:38 |
|
there's enough poker games already, just stop
|
# ? Nov 29, 2012 22:51 |
|
why isn't my c as concise as my python?????
|
# ? Nov 29, 2012 22:53 |
That would be a fair comparison, but half of the clutter doesn't even have to do with it being static & weak typed. Plus Cocoa is being continuously developed and some of it is really state of the art. I can get a date object representing 10PM on the first Tuesday after August 10 2012 by passing the string "10PM on the first Tuesday after August 10 2012." Has any effort been put into making data sets easier to pass around?
|
|
# ? Nov 29, 2012 23:03 |
|
I dunno, maybe use an NSPredicate?
|
# ? Nov 29, 2012 23:11 |
Carthag posted:I dunno, maybe use an NSPredicate? Oh there we go. Are you generally supposed to inherit from NSPredicate or just use that crazy string-passing approach?
|
|
# ? Nov 29, 2012 23:19 |
|
tftp supremacy
|
# ? Nov 29, 2012 23:28 |
|
lmao ftpcode:
|
# ? Nov 29, 2012 23:40 |
|
dont j if your network is fast, it'll just slow you down if your network is slow do J it's better
|
# ? Nov 29, 2012 23:53 |
|
Lysidas posted:dont j if your network is fast, it'll just slow you down last time I did this I was on wifi between two modern macs
|
# ? Nov 30, 2012 00:03 |
smoke a J before you hit the hay
|
|
# ? Nov 30, 2012 00:16 |
|
Cocoa Crispies posted:lmao ftp lol linux
|
# ? Nov 30, 2012 00:38 |
|
Shameproof posted:Oh there we go. Are you generally supposed to inherit from NSPredicate or just use that crazy string-passing approach? I've mostly just made predicates with strings, it's pretty fast. not sure what pitfalls there might be to subclassing nspredicate, but its probably easier to use an nsblockpredicate than to subclass if you cant express the predicate with a string.
|
# ? Nov 30, 2012 01:12 |
|
haters need to remember that i am working for a company supporting a sole client who runs everything about their business in the most cartoonishly hyperconservative ways possible nothing changes over there without dragging them kicking and screaming its a bad environment to learn in but im taking it all in stride and will work for a real company soon.
|
# ? Nov 30, 2012 01:14 |
|
Jonny 290 posted:haters need to remember that perl owns
|
# ? Nov 30, 2012 02:18 |
|
Jonny 290 posted:haters need to remember that perl owns
|
# ? Nov 30, 2012 02:39 |
|
http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?noseen=0&threadid=2262300&perpage=40&pagenumber=336#post410079468
|
# ? Nov 30, 2012 06:19 |
|
Jonny 290 posted:its a bad environment to learn in but im taking it all in stride and will work for a real company soon. seeing how not to do things has value too
|
# ? Nov 30, 2012 08:20 |
|
AWWNAW posted:http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?noseen=0&threadid=2262300&perpage=40&pagenumber=336#post410079468 yaoi prophet posted:What about the shared libraries your compiler uses? What about all the other OS stuff? Better do all your development in a VM, snapshot it, and toss that in the repo just to be safe. wait do windows people not keep the chef recipes to set up their dev environment in version control?
|
# ? Nov 30, 2012 12:12 |
|
Cocoa Crispies posted:wait do windows people not keep the chef recipes to set up their dev environment in version control? windows people are gross so of course
|
# ? Nov 30, 2012 14:52 |
|
holy poo poo last night i just started doing bong rips and drinking really strong coffee while i read Object Oriented Perl and i finally loving started to get it perl naked OO isn't that bad at all Moose is actually pretty loving cool
|
# ? Nov 30, 2012 16:49 |
|
Moose makes Perl OO tolerable. Perl OO by itself is p bad compared to other OO languages.
|
# ? Nov 30, 2012 16:52 |
|
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
|
# ? Nov 30, 2012 16:52 |
|
wolffenstein posted:Moose makes Perl OO tolerable. Perl OO by itself is p bad compared to other OO languages. it does seem clunky compared to what little i know of, say, the python model, but eh
|
# ? Nov 30, 2012 17:33 |
|
Cocoa Crispies posted:wait do windows people not keep the chef recipes to set up their dev environment in version control? i've never used .net or any windows dev but in ~*haskell*~ you just set up a .cabal file which lists all your package version dependencies so you can say 'i need any version of foo after 2.7, any version of bar in 4.2.0-6.9, and any version of baz at all' and then it has a dependency solver i assume most languages have something similar
|
# ? Nov 30, 2012 17:50 |
|
Jabor posted:Why would you think it is a joke? Did whoever teach you revision control say "don't check binaries in" and you thought he meant all binaries instead of just your build outputs?
|
# ? Nov 30, 2012 17:52 |
|
yaoi prophet posted:i've never used .net or any windows dev but in ~*haskell*~ you just set up a .cabal file which lists all your package version dependencies so you can say 'i need any version of foo after 2.7, any version of bar in 4.2.0-6.9, and any version of baz at all' and then it has a dependency solver yeah so does the .net stuff. but the jokers in that linked post arent talking about that, they're talking about including not only the binary compiled dependency libraries but also the compiler + all its resources as well.
|
# ? Nov 30, 2012 18:24 |
|
Shaggar posted:yeah so does the .net stuff. but the jokers in that linked post arent talking about that, they're talking about including not only the binary compiled dependency libraries but also the compiler + all its resources as well. right, and that's braindead
|
# ? Nov 30, 2012 18:34 |
|
nothings as good as maven tho.
|
# ? Nov 30, 2012 18:35 |
|
svn add "C:\Program Files (x86)" yeah sure ok
|
# ? Nov 30, 2012 18:39 |
|
Jonny 290 posted:holy poo poo last night i just started doing bong rips and drinking really strong coffee while i read Object Oriented Perl and i finally loving started to get it
|
# ? Nov 30, 2012 18:41 |
|
Shaggar posted:yeah so does the .net stuff. but the jokers in that linked post arent talking about that, they're talking about including not only the binary compiled dependency libraries but also the compiler + all its resources as well. the only thing that makes that untenable is the hosed-up state of microsoft's compiler/toolchain/sdk distribution
|
# ? Nov 30, 2012 19:01 |
|
|
# ? May 9, 2024 01:51 |
|
TONSIL HOCKEY posted:i learned about 150% of my coding languages while high as tits
|
# ? Nov 30, 2012 19:31 |