|
Ender.uNF posted:I'm not sure what you're referencing with the c# transition. The run times installed side by side and you can use old assemblies in the newer one so it was relatively painless. Now that we're on the other side it's a non-issue. You could run things side by side, but you couldn't use an API with generics from a .NET 1.1 app, and things could be inconvenient the other way around as well. It is indeed a non-issue now, but I'm sure there was a lot of gnashing about it at the time. rjmccall posted:Well, I asume that they haven't stopped shipping the old system libraries. That's permanent disk footprint, and it's a pretty serious memory footprint if any applications need them. I'm aware that disk footprint isn't a traditional area of concern for Microsoft. The Surface RT actually just has a single ".NET for Windows Store" installed which strips out a fairly significant portion of the .NET library (though as far as I know, it still maitains a fair number of the duplicate generic/non-generic equivalents).
|
# ? Dec 5, 2012 17:44 |
|
|
# ? Jun 5, 2024 09:02 |
|
Lowtax is talking poo poo on Radium in YOSPOS and it's hilarious.
|
# ? Dec 5, 2012 19:20 |
|
Lowtax posted:(20:40:15) Choochacacko: the original publishing method ken used was amazing Wooooooooowww.
|
# ? Dec 5, 2012 19:24 |
|
Lowtax posted:(17:03:26) SAAssLowtax: is the DNS issue causing the forums to be down? I knew search was hard, but come on.
|
# ? Dec 5, 2012 19:45 |
|
code:
|
# ? Dec 5, 2012 19:52 |
|
BiohazrD posted:
Two layers isn't so bad. Sometimes layering HashMaps can't be avoided, only abstracted so it's not as obvious that you're layering them: code:
|
# ? Dec 5, 2012 20:01 |
|
I haven't touched YOSPOS since I joined. Do I want to start?
|
# ? Dec 5, 2012 20:02 |
|
Doctor w-rw-rw- posted:I haven't touched YOSPOS since I joined. Do I want to start?
|
# ? Dec 5, 2012 20:03 |
|
Doctor w-rw-rw- posted:I haven't touched YOSPOS since I joined. Do I want to start? As with Linux, only if your time is worthless.
|
# ? Dec 5, 2012 20:25 |
|
Novo posted:As with Linux, only if your time is worthless. Everyone on SA's time is worthless.
|
# ? Dec 5, 2012 20:27 |
|
Star War Sex Parrot posted:Says the GBS poster to an anime aficionado. If the SA Forums could be summed up in a post, here it is folks.
|
# ? Dec 5, 2012 20:59 |
|
Asked the apps engineer at $chip_vendor that is writing their optimization guide if he had a recommendation for a profiler.optimization expert posted:Sorry, I'm not too familiar with profilers, but...
|
# ? Dec 5, 2012 21:06 |
|
Star War Sex Parrot posted:Says the GBS poster to an anime aficionado. YOSPOS looks pretty terrible. If I want to read stupid posts I'd rather go to reddit or hacker news. --- Today's horror for me is the fact that while debugging some bugs on Android I found out the default encoding for HTTP requests on the devices I was using was not UTF8 but ISO-something-or-other. Why can't everyone just use Unicode and UTF-{8,16,32}?
|
# ? Dec 5, 2012 21:07 |
|
BiohazrD posted:
|
# ? Dec 5, 2012 21:08 |
Doctor w-rw-rw- posted:YOSPOS looks pretty terrible. If I want to read stupid posts I'd rather go to reddit or hacker news. You're gonna get it now.
|
|
# ? Dec 5, 2012 21:10 |
|
Manslaughter posted:You're gonna get it now.
|
# ? Dec 5, 2012 21:12 |
|
Star War Sex Parrot posted:People are allowed to not like YOSPOS, but in my experience it just means that you take yourself too seriously. The Programming Languages thread is pretty good. Between these two threads I've learned alot about paroting poo poo about languages that I'll never use.
|
# ? Dec 5, 2012 21:16 |
|
The wikipedia thread and the computer puns threads are worthwhile.
|
# ? Dec 5, 2012 21:25 |
|
Star War Sex Parrot posted:People are allowed to not like YOSPOS, but in my experience it just means that you take yourself too seriously. what if I just got bored with it after a while
|
# ? Dec 5, 2012 21:30 |
|
Star War Sex Parrot posted:People are allowed to not like YOSPOS, but in my experience it just means that you take yourself too seriously. lol
|
# ? Dec 5, 2012 21:36 |
|
Plorkyeran posted:what if I just got bored with it after a while Hey, this made me realize this is me. Likely related to the fact that I'm getting olderish (35). Though, after checking out the programming languages thread, I'm enjoying that... Not sure how this is a coding horror, though.
|
# ? Dec 5, 2012 21:50 |
|
Doctor w-rw-rw- posted:Today's horror for me is the fact that while debugging some bugs on Android I found out the default encoding for HTTP requests on the devices I was using was not UTF8 but ISO-something-or-other. Why can't everyone just use Unicode and UTF-{8,16,32}? The default encoding of ISO-8859-1 was set back in the dawn of time before the UTF encodings were hewn from the very rock of the IETF standards mines. (i.e. no-one could be bothered implementing unicode back in the day when the internet was a lot more racist and changing it is hard)
|
# ? Dec 5, 2012 21:56 |
|
Star War Sex Parrot posted:People are allowed to not like YOSPOS, but in my experience it just means that you take yourself too seriously. edit: my mental picture of YOSPOS posters is slightly chubby teens wearing cardigans and shades while sneering
|
# ? Dec 5, 2012 22:40 |
|
Volte posted:Actually it's because their idea of funny is posting "gas and ban the op" or "this thread is garbage" or some low effort pun about how the OP should get out in literally every thread lighten up tightass, its a thing called humor. my contribution, some code I found in ActiveLdap earlier today: code:
Novo fucked around with this message at 22:46 on Dec 5, 2012 |
# ? Dec 5, 2012 22:44 |
|
Volte posted:my mental picture of YOSPOS posters is slightly chubby teens wearing cardigans and shades while sneering Nice!
|
# ? Dec 5, 2012 22:57 |
YOSPOS is like that one guy in high school that was a jerk but got all the chicks That programming thread is amazing. This javascript deserves a repost. quote:゚ω゚ノ= /`m´)ノ ~┻━┻ //*´∇`*/ ['_']; o=(゚ー゚) =_=3; c=(゚Θ゚) =(゚ー゚)-(゚ー゚); (゚Д゚) =(゚Θ゚)= (o^_^o)/ (o^_^o);(゚Д゚)={゚Θ゚: '_' ,゚ω゚ノ : ((゚ω゚ノ==3) +'_') [゚Θ゚] ,゚ー゚ノ :(゚ω゚ノ+ '_')[o^_^o -(゚Θ゚)] ,゚Д゚ノ:((゚ー゚==3) +'_')[゚ー゚] }; (゚Д゚) [゚Θ゚] =((゚ω゚ノ==3) +'_') [c^_^o];(゚Д゚) ['c'] = ((゚Д゚)+'_') [ (゚ー゚)+(゚ー゚)-(゚Θ゚) ];(゚Д゚) ['o'] = ((゚Д゚)+'_') [゚Θ゚];(゚o゚)=(゚Д゚) ['c']+(゚Д゚) ['o']+(゚ω゚ノ +'_')[゚Θ゚]+ ((゚ω゚ノ==3) +'_') [゚ー゚] + ((゚Д゚) +'_') [(゚ー゚)+(゚ー゚)]+ ((゚ー゚==3) +'_') [゚Θ゚]+((゚ー゚==3) +'_') [(゚ー゚) - (゚Θ゚)]+(゚Д゚) ['c']+((゚Д゚)+'_') [(゚ー゚)+(゚ー゚)]+ (゚Д゚) ['o']+((゚ー゚==3) +'_') [゚Θ゚];(゚Д゚) ['_'] =(o^_^o) [゚o゚] [゚o゚];(゚ε゚)=((゚ー゚==3) +'_') [゚Θ゚]+ (゚Д゚) .゚Д゚ノ+((゚Д゚)+'_') [(゚ー゚) + (゚ー゚)]+((゚ー゚==3) +'_') [o^_^o -゚Θ゚]+((゚ー゚==3) +'_') [゚Θ゚]+ (゚ω゚ノ +'_') [゚Θ゚]; (゚ー゚)+=(゚Θ゚); (゚Д゚)[゚ε゚]='\\'; (゚Д゚).゚Θ゚ノ=(゚Д゚+ ゚ー゚)[o^_^o -(゚Θ゚)];(o゚ー゚o)=(゚ω゚ノ +'_')[c^_^o];(゚Д゚) [゚o゚]='\"';(゚Д゚) ['_'] ( (゚Д゚) ['_'] (゚ε゚+(゚Д゚)[゚o゚]+ (゚Д゚)[゚ε゚]+(゚Θ゚)+ (゚ー゚)+ (゚Θ゚)+ (゚Д゚)[゚ε゚]+(゚Θ゚)+ ((゚ー゚) + (゚Θ゚))+ (゚ー゚)+ (゚Д゚)[゚ε゚]+(゚Θ゚)+ (゚ー゚)+ ((゚ー゚) + (゚Θ゚))+ (゚Д゚)[゚ε゚]+(゚Θ゚)+ ((o^_^o) +(o^_^o))+ ((o^_^o) - (゚Θ゚))+ (゚Д゚)[゚ε゚]+(゚Θ゚)+ ((o^_^o) +(o^_^o))+ (゚ー゚)+ (゚Д゚)[゚ε゚]+((゚ー゚) + (゚Θ゚))+ (c^_^o)+ (゚Д゚)[゚ε゚]+(゚ー゚)+ ((o^_^o) - (゚Θ゚))+ (゚Д゚)[゚ε゚]+(゚Θ゚)+ (o^_^o)+ (゚Θ゚)+ (゚Д゚)[゚ε゚]+(゚Θ゚)+ (゚Θ゚)+ ((゚ー゚) + (o^_^o))+ (゚Д゚)[゚ε゚]+(゚Θ゚)+ ((o^_^o) - (゚Θ゚))+ (o^_^o)+ (゚Д゚)[゚ε゚]+(゚Θ゚)+ ((o^_^o) - (゚Θ゚))+ (c^_^o)+ (゚Д゚)[゚ε゚]+(゚Θ゚)+ (゚Θ゚)+ ((゚ー゚) + (o^_^o))+ (゚Д゚)[゚ε゚]+(゚Θ゚)+ ((o^_^o) - (゚Θ゚))+ (o^_^o)+ (゚Д゚)[゚ε゚]+(゚ー゚)+ ((o^_^o) - (゚Θ゚))+ (゚Д゚)[゚ε゚]+((゚ー゚) + (゚Θ゚))+ (゚Θ゚)+ (゚Д゚)[゚o゚]) (゚Θ゚)) ('_'); vv Sorry but the smilies broke it, I had no choice...you shouldn't have said anything, I browse with images turned off! Polio Vax Scene fucked around with this message at 23:16 on Dec 5, 2012 |
|
# ? Dec 5, 2012 23:02 |
|
Volte posted:Actually it's because their idea of funny is posting "gas and ban the op" or "this thread is garbage" or some low effort pun about how the OP should get out in literally every thread Mostly for new threads, but long running ones don't have those specific insults.
|
# ? Dec 5, 2012 23:12 |
|
Manslaughter posted:YOSPOS is like that one guy in high school that was a jerk but got all the chicks Don't edit that post to turn off smilies. They're perfect as they are.
|
# ? Dec 5, 2012 23:12 |
|
Aleksei Vasiliev posted:the horror is prefixing the variable with m_ Why? It's a member variable of a class.
|
# ? Dec 5, 2012 23:13 |
|
In general I am of the opinion that if marking the scope of variables in their names is ever useful then you have far too many things in scope.
|
# ? Dec 5, 2012 23:24 |
|
How much is Hungarian notation despised here? I had to adopt it due to my predecessor and I've kept using it, though not in objects (it seems weird to get $oObject->sName instead of $oObject->Name), and as we move towards an OO framework in PHP I suspect that will drop off each more. It does give me a nice built in temp variable name though - $s for strings, $b for booleans, $a for arrays, etc. $i is for integers but that's one thing that's already in common use, in for loops at least. It also allows for reusing names among types. For example, $sQuery is the database query, $rQuery is the resource that it gets, instead of having to do $query and $result or what not. Not that I'm saying I love it, and the only reason I'm doing it is legacy, but ... it doesn't seem too horrible. I'm sure I'll still use $a, $s, etc. for temp variables after I move on from it.
|
# ? Dec 5, 2012 23:32 |
|
Plorkyeran posted:In general I am of the opinion that if marking the scope of variables in their names is ever useful then you have far too many things in scope. It makes it easier to write constructors and setters though. It's about the one bit of hungarianish notation I like.
|
# ? Dec 5, 2012 23:34 |
|
That's ridiculous. Accessors are just one example of where this owns.code:
|
# ? Dec 5, 2012 23:35 |
|
What is it about temporary variables that makes people not want to give them meaningful names?
|
# ? Dec 5, 2012 23:38 |
|
Jabor posted:What is it about temporary variables that makes people not want to give them meaningful names? for ($NumberOfIterations = 0; $NumberOfIterations <= 100; $NumberOfIterations++) {
|
# ? Dec 5, 2012 23:40 |
|
Everyone knows what 'i' is, so you don't need to reinvent the wheel. But seriously, foreach errday.
|
# ? Dec 5, 2012 23:42 |
|
Golbez posted:How much is Hungarian notation despised here? I had to adopt it due to my predecessor and I've kept using it, though not in objects (it seems weird to get $oObject->sName instead of $oObject->Name), and as we move towards an OO framework in PHP I suspect that will drop off each more. It does give me a nice built in temp variable name though - $s for strings, $b for booleans, $a for arrays, etc. $i is for integers but that's one thing that's already in common use, in for loops at least.
|
# ? Dec 5, 2012 23:46 |
|
Golbez posted:How much is Hungarian notation despised here? I had to adopt it due to my predecessor and I've kept using it, though not in objects (it seems weird to get $oObject->sName instead of $oObject->Name), and as we move towards an OO framework in PHP I suspect that will drop off each more. It does give me a nice built in temp variable name though - $s for strings, $b for booleans, $a for arrays, etc. $i is for integers but that's one thing that's already in common use, in for loops at least. The original point of Hungarian (apps hungarian, I believe) was to show the purpose of the variable in front of it, almost like a soft typedef. The example I've always heard is, you've got a variable called rwOffset, your offset into a dataset by rows. Or, you've just captured user input into a string, so you do usName (for unsafe string). This made sense in the days of 80 characters before autocomplete. Now, just call it RowOffset and UnsantizedName. bool bVariable and int iVariable doesn't make any sense to me in any context, really.
|
# ? Dec 5, 2012 23:50 |
|
Volte posted:Unless you're in some kind of untyped wasteland
|
# ? Dec 5, 2012 23:52 |
|
|
# ? Jun 5, 2024 09:02 |
|
Plorkyeran posted:In general I am of the opinion that if marking the scope of variables in their names is ever useful then you have far too many things in scope. Even granting this for the sake of argument you still need a way to avoid name collisions between private fields and accessors for them in, for example, C++.
|
# ? Dec 5, 2012 23:55 |