|
are there videogame and nerd jokes in ruby itself. please say yes
|
# ? Dec 5, 2012 17:48 |
|
|
# ? May 9, 2024 10:34 |
|
Socracheese posted:python and ruby serve the same general purpose but ruby is sorta weird and isnt as widely adopted hahahahahaha
|
# ? Dec 5, 2012 17:49 |
|
as a sophisticated and experienced programmer let me just say *a literal stream of vomit and poo poo gushes from all my orifices at once*
|
# ? Dec 5, 2012 17:50 |
|
Socracheese posted:wrong, python owns for what it is, which is basically to be an intelligent version of php lol python is like php's retarded cousin
|
# ? Dec 5, 2012 17:51 |
Socracheese posted:python and ruby serve the same general purpose but ruby is sorta weird and isnt as widely adopted ruby is definitely much more difficult for a new programmer to learn than python Jonny 290 posted:whenever i read about ruby i imagine anime eyed cartoon coders frolicking with woodland creatures in a glittery candyland the community is obviously pretty anime cause rvm. i've been meaning to try and check out rbenv but i don't think it has as much community support yet. do you like hashes all over the loving place? then ruby is the language for you Jonny 290 posted:are there videogame and nerd jokes in ruby itself. please say yes to be honest, none that i've seen, but who knows considering the rvm anime mentioned above
|
|
# ? Dec 5, 2012 17:51 |
|
ruby is both an honorary p language and dumb anime crap though
|
# ? Dec 5, 2012 17:51 |
|
most of what i do with python and php is using it with web template files and postgres. at work we have some php middleware that we made really hastily and glued features on and applied band-aids and the functionality could be much better and my boss thought it'd be cool to redo the whole thing in python with a better overall structure now that we know what we need. I think the templating in django or jinja2 is nicer and cleaner but honestly its mostly v similar
|
# ? Dec 5, 2012 18:00 |
|
but php was there to get the whole thing off the ground and I didn't really have a ton of php!!! moments so i have to agree with tbc to some extent e: but seriously gently caress javascript tho Socracheese fucked around with this message at 18:11 on Dec 5, 2012 |
# ? Dec 5, 2012 18:03 |
|
it never occurred to me how prescient the comment is, that one year of experience repeated ten times does not mean ten years of experience and then i read this thread
|
# ? Dec 5, 2012 18:18 |
|
python is to ruby what protestantism is to catholicism, or vice versa.
|
# ? Dec 5, 2012 19:35 |
how would you write a language shaggar?
|
|
# ? Dec 5, 2012 19:48 |
|
ruby owns. code ruby its cool.
|
# ? Dec 5, 2012 19:49 |
|
MononcQc posted:python is to ruby what protestantism is to catholicism, or vice versa. ruby is to python what calvinism is to anglicinism. perl is catholicism
|
# ? Dec 5, 2012 20:22 |
|
so the javascript codebase on our project was a total mess, zero organization, global variables all over the place and i decided to refactor the whole thing using a revealed module format, reckoning it had the greatest correspondence with how the existing code was actually used. ok great, four days later i have a codebase that doesn't make me want to vomit when i look at it, modules are organized based on their functionalities instead of what page someone happened to be writing when they first needed the code, and oh yeah i eliminated thousands and thousands of lines of redundant, duplicated code. it's just too bad that eclipse's javascript support is terrible and i've lost any kind of autocomplete or content assist on anything. i really hope having this poo poo on my resume won't make it completely impossible to get a real loving job in the next year or two.
|
# ? Dec 5, 2012 20:25 |
|
nah dont worry about it theres a lack of javascript developers these days
|
# ? Dec 5, 2012 20:26 |
|
HORATIO HORNBLOWER posted:it's just too bad that eclipse's javascript support is terrible and i've lost any kind of autocomplete or content assist on anything. webstorm can do beastly autocomplete on js files
|
# ? Dec 5, 2012 20:36 |
|
MononcQc posted:python is to ruby what protestantism is to catholicism, or vice versa. both are terrible for the same reasons and promoted by equally terrible people.
|
# ? Dec 5, 2012 20:43 |
|
Shaggar posted:both are terrible for the same reasons and promoted by equally terrible people. lol
|
# ? Dec 5, 2012 20:44 |
|
HORATIO HORNBLOWER posted:it's just too bad that eclipse's javascript support is terrible and i've lost any kind of autocomplete or content assist on anything.
|
# ? Dec 5, 2012 20:53 |
|
ive never really heard a coherent critique of python besides "wah whitespace, also nothing supports 3.x yet " i mean i understand the failings javascript and php and whatnot have but whenever people talk about how they dont like python it usually ends up that they just dont like django or w/e feel free to prove me wrong here, im curious
|
# ? Dec 5, 2012 20:55 |
|
abraham linksys posted:ive never really heard a coherent critique of python besides "wah whitespace"
|
# ? Dec 5, 2012 20:58 |
|
do your homework
|
# ? Dec 5, 2012 20:58 |
|
Jerry SanDisky posted:do your homework
|
# ? Dec 5, 2012 20:59 |
|
Jerry SanDisky posted:do your homework
|
# ? Dec 5, 2012 21:00 |
|
shocker: most "engineers" or "programmers" who criticize A Thing are likely to do it while knowing nothing about the Thing in question, or have ever used it, or even have ever talked to someone who has used Thing. Most "engineers" or "shaggars" will read A Thing Is Bad on hacker news and then parrot it, helplessly, like a spasm, everywhere they tread, like someone with diarhhea.
|
# ? Dec 5, 2012 21:01 |
|
I don't like python...it just doesn't get me hot like Scala can
|
# ? Dec 5, 2012 21:11 |
|
abraham linksys posted:ive never really heard a coherent critique of python besides "wah whitespace, also nothing supports 3.x yet " aside from pythons ugly syntax and bad coding conventions, its super immature and doesnt have the nice library or framework support of a proper language like java or c#. basically its a language that doesnt do anything well enough to justify its existance as a language but its gonna exist anyway cause its for people who dont want to use java or c# because they're java and c#.
|
# ? Dec 5, 2012 21:13 |
|
it does millions of things just fine and any good programmer will realize its limitations and use a better tool the moment it's necessary and the constraints no longer make sense, just like every other piece of poo poo language
|
# ? Dec 5, 2012 21:15 |
|
ive never thought python was particularly ugly. its always seemed like the most self-explanatory syntax out there, tbh ive never really had a problem i needed to solve that python didn't have a library for. i like it well enough. easy and fun to write drat i havent coded in like a month now i want to write some python
|
# ? Dec 5, 2012 21:17 |
|
gucci void main posted:the community is obviously pretty anime cause rvm. i've been meaning to try and check out rbenv but i don't think it has as much community support yet. the important parts of the community support rbenv, rvm is only good if you're a bipolar anime enthusaist like its author
|
# ? Dec 5, 2012 21:19 |
|
WHOIS John Galt posted:it does millions of things just fine and any good programmer will realize its limitations and use a better tool the moment it's necessary and the constraints no longer make sense, just like every other piece of poo poo language it doesnt do anything that a real language (java or c#) doesnt do better.
|
# ? Dec 5, 2012 21:27 |
|
* unicode (in every way) * clunky ternary operator syntax * the fact that the wsgi plugin for Apache is basically an implementation of Apache * single element tuples * pretend timezone support * lack of real anonymous functions * the pop3 standard library * the imap standard library * the email standard library * the urllib standard library * the urllib2 standard library * strings are strings of strings * this: code:
* Re-ignited the whole tabs vs. spaces thing * I don't like the colour * I remember when all this was fields
|
# ? Dec 5, 2012 21:28 |
|
Shaggar posted:it doesnt do anything that a real language (java or c#) doesnt do better. but that's not the point and that's not how people solve problems
|
# ? Dec 5, 2012 21:29 |
|
abraham linksys posted:ive never really heard a coherent critique of python besides "wah whitespace, also nothing supports 3.x yet " things I whine about in python strings are iterable. except they return strings. this breaks code that works on lists. it also makes it hard to tell the difference between a string and a list default function arguments are evaluated at compile time. this confuses people with mutable default arguments. threading is bad. coroutines would be nicer than the generator stuff. the exception hierarchy is somewhat mangled. real lexical scope would be nice. quote:i mean i understand the failings javascript and php and whatnot have but whenever people talk about how they dont like python it usually ends up that they just dont like django or w/e your welcome
|
# ? Dec 5, 2012 21:30 |
|
they got real closures in 2.7.x i think
|
# ? Dec 5, 2012 21:30 |
|
Who would win in a fight: Guido or Matz? I pick Matz because he probably has some sick ninja skills.
|
# ? Dec 5, 2012 21:35 |
|
tef posted:threading is bad
|
# ? Dec 5, 2012 21:35 |
|
FamDav posted:Who would win in a fight: Guido or Matz? Matz Is a Ninja So We Are Nice
|
# ? Dec 5, 2012 21:36 |
|
Zombywuf posted:* unicode (in every way) they fixed this in python 3 by making the bytestring handling terrible. quote:* lack of real anonymous functions oh god the std lib is terrible for protocols
|
# ? Dec 5, 2012 21:37 |
|
|
# ? May 9, 2024 10:34 |
|
WHOIS John Galt posted:but that's not the point and that's not how people solve problems well what problem are you solving? if you're fixing a bug in python or a python lib/framework for then fine ok use python. if you're solving a real world problem then you dont start with a tool you know isnt gonna do everything you need (unless you like pain).
|
# ? Dec 5, 2012 21:37 |