|
MeruFM posted:Intellij needs a little icon on folders that have different files from the repository. pretty sure modified files turn blue in the project tree. not sure what it looks like in the fancy new dark theme.
|
#
?
Dec 21, 2012 22:21
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 11, 2024 04:06 |
|
|
rotor posted:pretty sure modified files turn blue in the project tree. it does show blue for the file itself but i mean a color change on the folder to show that a file inside has changed. Cascading visual representation.
|
|
#
?
Dec 21, 2012 22:28
|
|
|
MeruFM posted:it does show blue for the file itself but i mean a color change on the folder to show that a file inside has changed. o i c yeah, that's sort of lovely.
|
|
#
?
Dec 21, 2012 22:36
|
|
|
I am a babby pycharm user. when I alt tab out of my project I get errors saying it can't save workspace.xml~. I have like 50 of them. deleting them or changing the project folder doesn't help. halp.
|
|
#
?
Dec 21, 2012 22:47
|
|
|
Luigi Thirty posted:I am a babby pycharm user. when I alt tab out of my project I get errors saying it can't save workspace.xml~. I have like 50 of them. deleting them or changing the project folder doesn't help. halp. sounds like you have a copy of workspace.xml open in vi somewhere
|
|
#
?
Dec 21, 2012 22:53
|
|
|
idk what a "perl guy" would even do i write a shitload of perl, but it's mostly just mashing text around. e.g. i have a list of register names and values so i regex it into some data structure then go through that and spit out "mov [$baseaddr + $regaddr{$name}], $regval{$name};" black magic according to engineers around here, but its childs play compared to what i assume someone with the "perl guy" label would use
|
|
#
?
Dec 21, 2012 23:01
|
|
|
JawnV6 posted:idk what a "perl guy" would even do in my experience perl guys typically write perl and read a lot of xkcd.
|
|
#
?
Dec 21, 2012 23:04
|
|
|
so maybe give that a shot
|
|
#
?
Dec 21, 2012 23:04
|
|
|
JawnV6 posted:idk what a "perl guy" would even do there are people who use perl for mashing one text file into another, as god intended, and then there are the 'perl guys' who contribute to cpan.
|
|
#
?
Dec 21, 2012 23:28
|
|
|
http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=2664804&userid=0&perpage=40&pagenumber=61#post410661695 garbage like this
|
|
#
?
Dec 21, 2012 23:30
|
|
|
JawnV6 posted:hell is other people's makefiles Windows developers re-inventing makefiles with batch files (not even command files) wrapped around msbuild or nmake. I keep on thinking they cannot get worse, and yet.
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2012 00:28
|
|
|
programming is suffering, build systems are torture
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2012 01:18
|
|
|
programming is fun, programming for others is suffering
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2012 01:22
|
|
|
in before rotor gets flashbacks to the object oriented bash scripts
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2012 01:22
|
|
|
makefiles are ok as long as you're not doing a bunch of crazy poo poo in there. crazy poo poo goes in shell/perl/python/whatever scripts.
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2012 01:32
|
|
|
tef posted:in before rotor gets flashbacks to the object oriented bash scripts did i ever tell you about that thing? it was literally the worst thing i have ever seen.
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2012 01:33
|
|
|
rotor posted:makefiles are ok as long as you're not doing a bunch of crazy poo poo in there. crazy poo poo goes in shell/perl/python/whatever scripts. at least those are readable makefiles are black magic and the random extra files created don't help. cleaning up therefore involves: deleting everything that I didn't make.
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2012 01:36
|
|
|
yes. i experienced something similar on a decade old ant horror that was handed down from previous projects. i think the ant script may have started when they were a phd student, taken through the next couple of startups, before landing in this one. i can't really remember much about it. i never had any clue how it worked. it seemed to use macros heavily, and implemented some form of composition between them, using a myriad of files to do anything. ant itself is terrible. i think it's the most verbose language i've used. it felt like a bizzaro scripting language. all the easy poo poo was hundreds of declarations, and many of the more awkward things were one liners. the rest of the developers were reduced to cargo culting. it was awful, but replacing it was too much effort and everything else was more important.
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2012 01:39
|
|
|
MeruFM posted:at least those are readable Are there any reasonable make alternatives?
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2012 01:40
|
|
|
building software sucks and every attempt to make it better has failed
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2012 01:41
|
|
|
Modern build systems get seduced into integrating testing and packaging which invariably ends up a cluster gently caress as both are still very non-mature areas.
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2012 01:49
|
|
|
FamDav posted:Are there any reasonable make alternatives? work at a place that have properly setup and integrated an IDE into their build flow. Then you're just passing around eclipse setting files. do a pull and voila, instant workstation. oh but you might need your local sandbox sql/java/python/j2ee/spring/apache/tomcat/jboss/dilz servers setup
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2012 01:53
|
|
|
MeruFM posted:work at a place that have properly setup and integrated an IDE into their build flow. Then you're just passing around eclipse setting files. We're 98% vim/emacs.
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2012 02:03
|
|
|
FamDav posted:Are there any reasonable make alternatives? all build systems will evolve until they are turing complete in some way. for scripted languages, it's less painful because you can write your build system in the same language. for languages where you build a binary, congratulations you now need another build system.
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2012 02:09
|
|
|
maven 
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2012 02:14
|
|
|
yeah maven is tits
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2012 02:21
|
|
|
FamDav posted:We're 98% vim/emacs. there's only 2 places like this: academia and hipster shops which are you?
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2012 02:38
|
|
|
Nomnom Cookie posted:yeah maven is tits that means its good right
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2012 02:40
|
|
|
Suspicious Dish posted:that means its good right mvn 3 is v good, mvn 1 was loving awful and 2 was not that good
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2012 02:43
|
|
|
tef posted:i can't really remember much about it. i never had any clue how it worked. it seemed to use macros heavily, and implemented some form of composition between them, using a myriad of files to do anything. #define BUILD_C_FILE(x) <target src="x" />
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2012 03:22
|
|
|
maven is the best build system.
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2012 04:06
|
|
|
MeruFM posted:there's only 2 places like this: academia and hipster shops We do search/optimization/AI software and have about 25% PhD so I guess the first.
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2012 04:45
|
|
|
Suspicious Dish posted:that means its good right yes maven is even better than getting a beej from your mom
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2012 05:05
|
|
|
Shaggar posted:maven is the best build system. i've been using leiningen lately, it seems to own.
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2012 05:08
|
|
|
salted hash browns posted:i've been using leiningen lately, it seems to own. 
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2012 05:21
|
|
|
phpVirtualBox posted:phpVirtualBox I'm guessing his marriage falling apart has to do with poor choices, like writing an interface for virtualbox in php.
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2012 05:23
|
|
|
guess he shouldn't have had that affair with ruby
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2012 05:30
|
|
|
Shinku ABOOKEN posted:the only enhancement is lambda as λ (because lambda is a noun and thus terrible as a keyword). the rest is worthless. That's why lambdas in C use ^
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2012 05:42
|
|
|
what about \, it even looks like one
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2012 05:52
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 11, 2024 04:06 |
|
|
yaoi prophet posted:what about \, it even looks like one ^ looks like a lamba more than \
|
|
#
?
Dec 22, 2012 05:56
|
|