|
Avenging Dentist posted:you're an idiot aaaaaaaaah though i still can't believe you shits rise to shaggar's crap every time yet when I call perl obsolete and you just waft over it as if it's true Jonnty fucked around with this message at 05:16 on Dec 31, 2012 |
#
?
Dec 31, 2012 05:05
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 11, 2024 17:34 |
|
|
Jonnty posted:aaaaaaaaah perl doesn't support putting arrays inside other arrays java does, but it's lovely about it
|
|
#
?
Dec 31, 2012 05:07
|
|
|
Jonnty posted:though i still can't believe you shits rise to shaggar's crap every time yet when call perl obsolete and you just waft over it as if it's true perl is no longer the swiss army knife, or the duct tape. when larry let go of perl 5, it took a while for the community to respond. many left, moving to languages it isn't so much that perl 5 is obsolete, the constant threat of perl 6 undermines perl 5 adoption. not so say that perl 6 will happen in my lifetime, but perl 5 will always be seen as old.
|
|
#
?
Dec 31, 2012 05:21
|
|
|
Jonnty posted:aaaaaaaaah of course its obsolete. its like the oldest of the p-langs
|
|
#
?
Dec 31, 2012 06:22
|
|
|
tef posted:
perl 5 was "seen as old" before you were born tef
|
|
#
?
Dec 31, 2012 06:34
|
|
|
tef posted:the constant threat of perl 6
|
|
#
?
Dec 31, 2012 06:59
|
|
|
hi ad
|
|
#
?
Dec 31, 2012 07:45
|
|
|
Nevergirls posted:In retrospect Larry's statement that "Perl 6 will give you the big knob." always seemed threatening
|
|
#
?
Dec 31, 2012 08:13
|
|
|
i learned C++ for the same reason I learn any other pl i see software written in it and i see job postings listing it as a requirement the combination of the 2 is important job postings but no non-github/foss software = hipster software but no job postings = dead
|
|
#
?
Dec 31, 2012 08:46
|
|
|
i learned cpp as my first language because i was a stubborn teen, but i learned a lot from those days of toil.
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 31, 2012 08:48
|
|
|
learning cpp ages ago means i can actually understand c# even though all i've used for anything is python and php 
|
|
#
?
Dec 31, 2012 09:01
|
|
|
gucci void main posted:tbc's ultimate fantasy has come true welp. those crusty old irrelevant beardos always say languages are just toys until you can write an interpreter for it in the same language. god knows this won't shut them up but it's nice to have that to throw in their face
|
|
#
?
Dec 31, 2012 09:23
|
|
|
Luigi Thirty posted:learning cpp ages ago means i can actually understand c# even though all i've used for anything is python and php that's "p" much all you need. and you don't need python
|
|
#
?
Dec 31, 2012 09:23
|
|
|
Jonnty posted:though i still can't believe you shits rise to shaggar's crap every time yet when I call perl obsolete and you just waft over it as if it's true perl is obsolete tho
|
|
#
?
Dec 31, 2012 09:24
|
|
|
I kinda want to learn modern c++ with everything being stack-based, raii everywhere, no globals, no virtual functions, no new but that's pretty much like lisp in that it's pretty much like lisp and nobody does ideologically pure c++ in the real world
|
|
#
?
Dec 31, 2012 12:16
|
|
|
Win8 Hetro Experie posted:I kinda want to learn modern c++ with everything being stack-based, raii everywhere, no globals, no virtual functions, no new lol
|
|
#
?
Dec 31, 2012 16:04
|
|
|
Win8 Hetro Experie posted:I kinda want to learn modern c++ with everything being stack-based, raii everywhere, no globals, no virtual functions, no new
|
|
#
?
Dec 31, 2012 16:39
|
|
|
terminator 4: rise of the lisp machines
|
|
#
?
Dec 31, 2012 17:05
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Dec 31, 2012 18:29
|
|
|
videos from 29c3 are already up hash tables are still vulnerable to denial of service attackshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wGYj8fhhUVA breaking rsa is easier than you thinkhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IuSnY_O8DqQ
|
|
#
?
Dec 31, 2012 18:32
|
|
|
tef posted:videos from 29c3 are already up https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IuSnY_O8DqQ&t=3060s lol
|
|
#
?
Dec 31, 2012 18:55
|
|
|
tef posted:
tl;dr: are my 4096 bit keys with one-year replacement schedules vulnerable yet?
|
|
#
?
Dec 31, 2012 18:59
|
|
|
i don't know c++ and I like it that way 
|
|
#
?
Dec 31, 2012 19:07
|
|
|
Cocoa Crispies posted:tl;dr: are my 4096 bit keys with one-year replacement schedules vulnerable yet? yes if your random number generator is hosed. 1024 rsa is botnet/nsa factorable.
|
|
#
?
Dec 31, 2012 20:51
|
|
|
who decided you shouldn't use virtual functions in c++
|
|
#
?
Dec 31, 2012 20:54
|
|
|
Gazpacho posted:who decided you shouldn't use virtual functions in c++ idiot fucklords
|
|
#
?
Dec 31, 2012 20:57
|
|
|
Gazpacho posted:who decided you shouldn't use virtual functions in c++ me because i've seen what happens when you use virtual functions in c++
|
|
#
?
Dec 31, 2012 21:04
|
|
|
so basicallyJerry SanDisky posted:idiot fucklords
|
|
#
?
Dec 31, 2012 21:04
|
|
|
Suspicious Dish posted:me because i've seen what happens when you use virtual functions in c++ virtual destructors are really important e: typing that sentence made me hate c++ because thats a thing that you need to know about
|
|
#
?
Dec 31, 2012 21:12
|
|
|
Cocoa Crispies posted:tl;dr: are my 4096 bit keys with one-year replacement schedules vulnerable yet? also: newer versions of ruby don't have hash dos attacks
|
|
#
?
Dec 31, 2012 21:50
|
|
|
tef posted:also: newer versions of ruby don't have hash dos attacks how can you make a dos-proof hash? isn't just a matter of time until somebody finds different keys with the same hash?
|
|
#
?
Dec 31, 2012 21:57
|
|
|
Hey, qt 5 was released a couple of weeks ago. I might want to do a thing in qt 5.
|
|
#
?
Dec 31, 2012 21:57
|
|
|
so i've had two people i've spoken with at two different companies now (in screening type chats) mention not my using tdd/tests in my code. the second one seemed more understanding as to why i'd not used it yet, but i guess i'm probably going to have to spend at least a little time familiarizing myself. i still can't get a good gauge on how many companies actually use tdd (even if it can be a good thing), though, as i've never had it mentioned until the last few days and thus i'm going off a very small sample size.
|
|
#
?
Dec 31, 2012 22:00
|
|
|
everyone wants to hire rubyists who know how to test, regardless of if their firm does it or not the thought might be that it's a good way to gauge how much they Care
|
|
#
?
Dec 31, 2012 22:02
|
|
|
Cocoa Crispies posted:everyone wants to hire rubyists who know how to test, regardless of if their firm does it or not meaning who cares, me or them? i'd definitely care to learn it, but i'd also like to think that i could actually make use of it at some point if i did.
|
|
#
?
Dec 31, 2012 22:11
|
|
|
its supposed to be you, lovingly curating your bespoke gems for no other compensation other than a hastily-tossed-out "good job"
|
|
#
?
Dec 31, 2012 22:12
|
|
|
Gazpacho posted:who decided you shouldn't use virtual functions in c++ whoever says that doesn't understand c++ or object oriented programmer basically what I'm saying is someone not named bjarne stroustrupp
|
|
#
?
Dec 31, 2012 22:21
|
|
|
gucci void main posted:meaning who cares, me or them? i'd definitely care to learn it, but i'd also like to think that i could actually make use of it at some point if i did. they care if they're worth working for if you're worth hiring, you care too
|
|
#
?
Dec 31, 2012 22:29
|
|
|
Having to write tests for your code is a good problem to have. A worse problem is not having anybody understanding the concept of software testing in general or why you want to spend time "writing tests" when you could just put it on the test server, man! and if you get any bugs, work through them even though you're trying to actually learn the Right Way
|
|
#
?
Dec 31, 2012 22:35
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 11, 2024 17:34 |
|
|
Test... server???
|
|
#
?
Dec 31, 2012 23:11
|
|