|
Svartvit posted:Yes, Bashar's family on his father's side is from there. Was Saddam hiding in Tikrit? "When Saddam was found by the 4th Infantry Division, he was hiding only a few miles from his hometown in the town of ad-Dawr." (South of Tikrit).
|
# ? Jan 15, 2013 19:15 |
|
|
# ? May 25, 2024 18:52 |
|
I know Libya is very tribalistic in its social organisation, and Syria fairly so as well, so I guess it's only natural to seek the place where the loyalty is strongest. I guess it was the case in Iraq as well.
|
# ? Jan 15, 2013 19:23 |
|
Kaal posted:Devil Child is one of the most realistic and coherent posters here, and he regularly puts together quite convincing arguments that get trashed because they conflict with other people's idealist worldviews. Anyone who's defending Qutb as anything other than a mild reformist with serious character flaws is simply deluding themselves. No one is defending Qutb--in fact I think your characterization of him is the most defensive that's been posted so far. The surface temperature of Mars is about 186–268 Kelvins. Trying to make broad inferences based on complex extrapolation from a tiny amount of actual information is not a convincing argument. And Qutb has nothing to do with some hypothetical non-existent plan to reintroduce legal slavery in Egypt.
|
# ? Jan 16, 2013 00:11 |
|
quote:Secret State Department cable: Chemical weapons used in Syria Seems they concluded it was Agent 15/BZ, which a lot of people thought at the time.
|
# ? Jan 16, 2013 00:15 |
|
Brown Moses posted:Seems they concluded it was Agent 15/BZ, which a lot of people thought at the time. It was kind of a silly line in the sand to draw anyways. Chemical weapons are awful, but with the number of non-combatants being killed in Syria, it's ridiculous to say that we are OK with everything going on right now, but no chemical weapons. Sure the U.S. condemned the regime for what it was already doing, but how are chemical weapons a step up from that? I don't think that this is going to be the last straw and lead to anything substantial. Probably just a harshly worded speech. Edit: Watch Obama start a loving war. Volkerball fucked around with this message at 01:02 on Jan 16, 2013 |
# ? Jan 16, 2013 00:53 |
|
I have to figure the current financial trench warfare in DC is Obama's top concern right now. This might not even get a speech. As it is, it seems like the Syrian conflict is commanding less and less of the press's attention, especially with the conflict in Mali suddenly drawing a lot of attention.
|
# ? Jan 16, 2013 00:57 |
|
I'm assuming leaking the information was someone's way of trying to put more pressure on Obama ahead of the meeting.
|
# ? Jan 16, 2013 01:25 |
|
I doubt Obama even meant it that literally. One small, not 100% confirmed use of BZ isn't the same as a village or city getting shelled by Sarin or mustard gas. The latter is what I took from the red line comment.
|
# ? Jan 16, 2013 01:44 |
|
Volkerball posted:It was kind of a silly line in the sand to draw anyways. Chemical weapons are awful, but with the number of non-combatants being killed in Syria, it's ridiculous to say that we are OK with everything going on right now, but no chemical weapons. Sure the U.S. condemned the regime for what it was already doing, but how are chemical weapons a step up from that? I don't think that this is going to be the last straw and lead to anything substantial. Probably just a harshly worded speech. But I think you're right (about BZ). As others have pointed out, the "red line" was mainly directed against a large-scale chemical weapons attack like the kind seen at Halabja, where a mixture of really extremely deadly chemicals quickly and indiscriminately killed thousands of people in mere hours. There's a reason why the nations around the world tolerate other nations resolving their internal disputes with bomb and bullets, while not tolerating things like sarin, tabun and VX.
|
# ? Jan 16, 2013 01:56 |
|
Omi-Polari posted:...start a war? Allusion to a prophetic SA quote
|
# ? Jan 16, 2013 02:11 |
|
Chronojam posted:Allusion to a prophetic SA quote To add some value: quote:The United States on Tuesday poured cold water on a media report that chemical weapons had been used in the Syrian conflict, but reiterated that if Syrian President Bashar al Assad's government did resort to these weapons, it would be held to account.
|
# ? Jan 16, 2013 03:10 |
|
Is there any more info on that American in Syria?
|
# ? Jan 16, 2013 05:13 |
|
Pieter posted:"When Saddam was found by the 4th Infantry Division, he was hiding only a few miles from his hometown in the town of ad-Dawr." (South of Tikrit). If Assad ever needed to flee Damascus (which I doubt will happen soon if at all) I'd bet money he'd head to the coast, where Alawites live in greatest concentration and where the rebels are at their absolute weakest.
|
# ? Jan 16, 2013 05:29 |
|
Omi-Polari posted:Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhh. Okay. I remain dubious about that report of chemical weapons usage. So far the YouTube evidence that has been made available does not support the use of a nerve agent, and the use of a hallucinogenic incapacitant like BZ seems fairly unlikely as well*. Given the symptoms and reports, I believe that the victims were exposed to Wired has a good brief on the issue as well: http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2013/01/syria-agent-bz/ http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2012/12/did-syria-just-use-nerve-gas/ An independent review back in December suggested that the likely culprit was a weaponized industrial chemical such as chlorine, phosgene, or cyanogen chloride: http://www.osen-hunter.com/images/osenpdf/pdfs2012/f-l%2012-028%20december%2024.pdf *Specifically, BZ has many traits that conflict with the victim and doctor statements, and it has signifying traits that should have been reported but weren't: It has a significant delayed effect, it is odorless, and it does not cause apparent shortness of breath. All of which conflict with the primary symptoms that were reported. Conversely, it causes hallucinations and automatic behavior such as disrobing and grasping motions that were not evident in the videos nor mentioned in previous reports. And very significantly, there's no evidence that Syria has ever stockpiled BZ. I'm at a loss as to how someone would settle on BZ as the likely agent, given those counter-indications. However, BZ is reportedly a highly persistent material, so it should be possible to prove or disprove the theory by testing victims' clothing and the area where they were exposed. Kaal fucked around with this message at 07:41 on Jan 16, 2013 |
# ? Jan 16, 2013 07:03 |
|
Charliegrs posted:Is there any more info on that American in Syria? Nope, I asked Matthew Van Dyke as well, he doesn't know who he is, said he's probably just a war tourist. The Dept. of Homeland Security has been to reveal the list of words they use to monitor social media, which seems to confirm they must be regular readers of my blog and Twitter feed.
|
# ? Jan 16, 2013 08:20 |
|
Brown Moses posted:Nope, I asked Matthew Van Dyke as well, he doesn't know who he is, said he's probably just a war tourist. Good grief, with a list like that it's a wonder what website they aren't looking at.
|
# ? Jan 16, 2013 08:24 |
|
Brown Moses posted:Nope, I asked Matthew Van Dyke as well, he doesn't know who he is, said he's probably just a war tourist. This is pretty old news, note that the Forbes article is just a retread of a Daily Mail article from May of last year.
|
# ? Jan 16, 2013 08:58 |
|
i poo poo trains posted:If Assad ever needed to flee Damascus (which I doubt will happen soon if at all) I'd bet money he'd head to the coast, where Alawites live in greatest concentration and where the rebels are at their absolute weakest. Qardaha *is* a coastal town. Although I think it's more likely that Bashar would not go west, but rather get on a plane and fly directly from Damascus to Iran in exile. Unlike Saddam and Gaddafi, Bashar isn't completely isolated and he still have get-out-of-jail cards to play.
|
# ? Jan 16, 2013 14:53 |
|
Still lots of speculation on who was responsible for the blasts at Aleppo university yesterday - given the size of the blasts they were substantial explosives, certainly not homemade rockets (brown Moses has gone into all this on his blog) and so probably a presumably accidental attack by Syrian Air Force jet. No hard proof of that though however. Interestingly though Martin chulov, the guardian journalist in rebel held Aleppo, is reporting a lot of speculation - amongst rebels - that it was Jabhat al Nursa firing artillery/ heavy rockets from outside the city. (Via the guardian liveblog). That seems very possible given the videos we've seen.
|
# ? Jan 16, 2013 16:15 |
|
mediadave posted:Still lots of speculation on who was responsible for the blasts at Aleppo university yesterday - given the size of the blasts they were substantial explosives, certainly not homemade rockets (brown Moses has gone into all this on his blog) and so probably a presumably accidental attack by Syrian Air Force jet. No hard proof of that though however. I'm going to look into the claims it was a jet, it seems rather unlikely a jet flying at high altitude would hit two target 100m apart in a 30s to 2 minute period with unguided bombs.
|
# ? Jan 16, 2013 20:37 |
|
If it was a jet it must have looped back to drop the second bomb, that is for certain. Bombs would have to be released within a second to hit that close together otherwise. Eyewitnesses supposedly all claim to have seen or heard a jet too and it firing "missiles" (which I think actually refers to the countermeasures fired during the bombing dive, seen that called "missiles" by commentators and twitter users on other Syria videos before). The only alternative is a scud missile or the like, isn't it? The explosions certainly seem to big for mortar fire.
|
# ? Jan 16, 2013 21:51 |
|
neamp posted:If it was a jet it must have looped back to drop the second bomb, that is for certain. Bombs would have to be released within a second to hit that close together otherwise. I've just had a lengthy talk with a number of people on this, seems eyewitnesses are claiming the jet made two runs, firing a missile each time. It seems people in Aleppo agree it was a jet, but like with so many other things it's hard to be sure. I've just put together a post about Yugoslavian rocket launchers being smuggled into Syria, if that's your thing.
|
# ? Jan 16, 2013 22:24 |
|
Brown Moses posted:I've just put together a post about Yugoslavian rocket launchers being smuggled into Syria, if that's your thing. FWIW Iraqi army was (is no more?) one of the users of M79 Osa. One possible origin.
|
# ? Jan 16, 2013 22:55 |
|
Brown Moses posted:I'm going to look into the claims it was a jet, it seems rather unlikely a jet flying at high altitude would hit two target 100m apart in a 30s to 2 minute period with unguided bombs. The weird thing is, several reports I've read say the University lies in a government controlled sector of Aleppo. I would not rule out the Syrian Air Force bombing the university anyway, or possibly even by mistake, but it seems a bit odd. Here's one BBC report that mentions the university as being in a government controlled sector of Aleppo. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-21029034
|
# ? Jan 17, 2013 00:59 |
|
New Division posted:The weird thing is, several reports I've read say the University lies in a government controlled sector of Aleppo. I would not rule out the Syrian Air Force bombing the university anyway, or possibly even by mistake, but it seems a bit odd. Theres been speculation that some of the car bombs that went off in heavily secure areas of Damascus (like the intelligence headquarters) were actually planted by the regime in order to paint the rebels as terrorists to the international community. Theres never been proof of this obviously. But if they were willing to do that I dont see why they wouldnt bomb a university in a regime controlled area.
|
# ? Jan 17, 2013 01:55 |
|
Charliegrs posted:Theres been speculation that some of the car bombs that went off in heavily secure areas of Damascus (like the intelligence headquarters) were actually planted by the regime in order to paint the rebels as terrorists to the international community. Theres never been proof of this obviously. But if they were willing to do that I dont see why they wouldnt bomb a university in a regime controlled area. I can believe that the Syrian gov might carry out a false flag attack - but an aerial bombing obviously doesn't work as that as only the government has jets. And if they wanted to intimidate the student body, they could have just gone the tried and tested route of sealing off the campus with the army and sending the Shabiha in. If it was an aerial attack it must have been a mistake. I don't suppose it'll have much effect on the ground. Unless video comes out of the actual attack both sides will claim their stories as true, the international media have (for good reasons obviously) very much hedged, and in a couple of weeks it'll just be remembered as another bloddy incident in a terrible civil war.
|
# ? Jan 17, 2013 02:21 |
|
It could have just been a huge communication error, or a huge series of little communication errors.
|
# ? Jan 17, 2013 03:03 |
|
Here is a story that I'm not seeing much reputable coverage on; just this thing from Fox. It tells the story of some lady converting from Chistianity to Islam and being sent to "15 years in prison". http://www.foxnews.com/world/2013/01/16/egyptian-court-sentences-entire-family-to-15-years-for-converting-to/#ixzz2IAgic2Lz Can anyone provide more context on that? If that's the straight story that is kind of alarming. Edit: http://translate.google.com/transla...1383761&act=url from a post in Reddit. Essentially the charge was forgery not some kind of illicit conversion. Torpor fucked around with this message at 03:10 on Jan 17, 2013 |
# ? Jan 17, 2013 03:08 |
|
Torpor posted:Here is a story that I'm not seeing much reputable coverage on; just this thing from Fox. It tells the story of some lady converting from Chistianity to Islam and being sent to "15 years in prison". 1. You're not seeing much coverage of this other than Fox News. 2. It's from Fox News. Do you see a pattern?
|
# ? Jan 17, 2013 03:11 |
|
Alex DeLarge posted:1. You're not seeing much coverage of this other than Fox News. Normally that's a pretty good litmus test, but there isn't much English coverage of random Egyptian legal stuff anywhere ever. Torpor fucked around with this message at 03:20 on Jan 17, 2013 |
# ? Jan 17, 2013 03:12 |
|
Torpor posted:Normally that's a pretty good litmus test, but there isn't much English coverage of random Egyptian legal stuff anywhere ever. Al Jazeera, although Foxnews also reports that's a terrorist news network.
|
# ? Jan 17, 2013 05:00 |
|
Torpor posted:Normally that's a pretty good litmus test, but there isn't much English coverage of random Egyptian legal stuff anywhere ever. Check al-Ahram or Egypt Independent or some other credible source. Assume the story is made up if you can't find it there. That Fox News article is like a pastiche of what a faked story looks like, with not only all "sources" being PR dudes from fantasy institutions tasked with spreading the gospels, the very author of the article is not actually a Fox writer but a representative of one of the classic fantasy institutions ("protecting freedom and fighting terrorism").
|
# ? Jan 17, 2013 06:07 |
|
poo poo is going down in Algeria. Basically it seems that some kind of possible Al-Qaeda affiliated group took a bunch of people hostage at a gas complex, in order to force France out of Mali, or something. Algeria attacked with one or more helicopters, and it seems that there have been a lot of casualties, although numbers vary:quote:There is a lot of contradictory and unverified information coming out of Algeria. Here is a roundup: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/middle-east-live/2013/jan/17/algerian-islamists-hostages-standoff-live
|
# ? Jan 17, 2013 16:17 |
|
Here is a video taken in Syria*, 10-20 metes away from tanks that are actively shooting at the buildings near/that the videographer is in. http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=91e_1358349215 *According to video, it's taken from: Darayya, Rif-Dimashq Governorate, Syria
|
# ? Jan 17, 2013 18:48 |
|
mitztronic posted:Here is a video taken in Syria*, 10-20 metes away from tanks that are actively shooting at the buildings near/that the videographer is in. Maximum elevation aside the cameraman sure seemed calm, considering.
|
# ? Jan 17, 2013 19:33 |
|
Looks like the Obama administration wants the Turks and Jordanians to go in and seize Syria's chemical weapons. http://openchannel.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/01/17/16549397-us-asks-turkey-jordan-to-secure-chem-weapons-if-syria-crisis-worsens?lite quote:By R. Jeffrey Smith
|
# ? Jan 17, 2013 20:18 |
John Dough posted:poo poo is going down in Algeria. Basically it seems that some kind of possible Al-Qaeda affiliated group took a bunch of people hostage at a gas complex, in order to force France out of Mali, or something. Algeria attacked with one or more helicopters, and it seems that there have been a lot of casualties, although numbers vary: Holy poo poo. What a mess.
|
|
# ? Jan 17, 2013 22:24 |
|
A fairly worrying report from Rebel held Northern Syria: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jan/17/syria-crisis-alqaida-fighters-true-colours quote:they [al-Nusra] began to reveal themselves," said a senior rebel commander in Aleppo. "The situation is now very clear. They don't want what we want." quote:North of Aleppo, in the small forsaken hamlet of Dabek, al-Nusra, fighters had recently paid a visit. Their goal had been to damage a grave that was, in their eyes, too pretentious for Islamic traditions, which specify that all graves, no matter who is buried in them, must be modest.
|
# ? Jan 18, 2013 00:13 |
|
mediadave posted:A fairly worrying report from Rebel held Northern Syria: Sounds close to what was going on in Mali/Azawad before the French got involved.
|
# ? Jan 18, 2013 00:24 |
|
|
# ? May 25, 2024 18:52 |
|
At this point the whole country is hosed. Unless there's a diplomatic miracle in the offing the most likely scenario is months, if not years, of fighting until the government collapses, followed by months, if not years, of fighting between different groups in the country for overall control. Like I said many months ago, Syria is hosed.
|
# ? Jan 18, 2013 00:27 |