|
Socracheese posted:my theory of computation class prof threatened to make us program stuff for one of these: i envy the machine's penmanship 
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2013 00:58
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 11, 2024 11:31 |
|
|
Carthag posted:tell me why if more than one actor has a reference to an object, it indicates that either that object does too much or your actors' responsibilities overlap
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2013 01:01
|
|
|
xf86enodev posted:ah, the crazy 80s Socracheese posted:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E3keLeMwfHY&t=8s
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2013 01:11
|
|
|
oh, yep, that's 0.9. seems to be inconsistent as to whether you'll get 0.9 or not depending on the rest of the url judging by the fact that it's an invisible 1x1 png i assume it's some form of analytics
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2013 01:56
|
|
|
there have been no fewer than three exploits where you could run javascript on the tumblr dashboard in the past year or so, and one where you could use css to create fake 'banners' on your posts after they implemented that as a for-pay feature. there was also a thing where someone was editing the dashboard.php file or whatever live, inserted a w before the opening <?php, and saved they actively will not support people using the most popular extension to fix their poo poo and the tracked tags system is semi-functional at the best of times basically what i'm saying is that tumblr is really loving incompetent
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2013 01:57
|
|
|
marco wrote tumblr in php what do you expect
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2013 02:00
|
|
|
I still can't quite figure out what tumblr is for. It does a good job of hoovering up all the people who in times past would have gone to MySpace I guess.
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2013 02:07
|
|
|
Zombywuf posted:I still can't quite figure out what tumblr is for. It does a good job of hoovering up all the people who in times past would have gone to MySpace I guess. the main use cases are personal blogs, which are long-form twitter without the 'expectation' that having a wordpress blog would have (i.e., that you actually put thought into your posts) and for posting a lot of pictures
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2013 02:10
|
|
|
Zombywuf posted:I still can't quite figure out what tumblr is for. porn. (if you have to ask what something is for, the answer is almost always either sex or porn)
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2013 02:13
|
|
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:porn. This is why I was somewhat nonplussed. I hadn't noticed that much porn on it. Maybe I should look harder.
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2013 02:15
|
|
|
porn site:tumblr.com About 8,960,000 results (0.36 seconds) Ah, mystery solved.
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2013 02:16
|
|
|
Zombywuf posted:I still can't quite figure out what tumblr is for. It does a good job of hoovering up all the people who in times past would have gone to MySpace I guess. if you ignore the friends/followers thing which i p much do, its just free basic hosting. words that dont fit on twitter mainly for me
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2013 02:22
|
|
|
Zombywuf posted:porn site:tumblr.com it's 'art' and porn and 'art porn' tasteful nude greyscale ladies, so classy also tef (& me!) have little blogs on there, it's a pretty decent UI for popping out simple posts about w/e also some people use it for weird facebook/twitter/"social" poo poo avg user: 16-years-old, female e: and jonny probably not useful to list everyone who has a blog on tumblr
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2013 02:31
|
|
|
yaoi prophet posted:there was also a thing where someone was editing the dashboard.php file or whatever live, inserted a w before the opening <?php, and saved i like to imagine he was confused by the vimrc on the server.
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2013 02:39
|
|
|
PleasingFungus posted:it's 'art' and porn and 'art porn' mononcqc has a blog on tumblr it's good
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2013 02:51
|
|
|
ultramiraculous posted:So is this a bug regarding query strings or urls in general? The query string is a part of the URL in a get request. The first line of a get request is GET /url?query_string HTTP/1.1 nginx will not read the line past a certain number of characters, so if the URL is too long it never 'sees' the HTTP/1.1 at the end and drops into HTTP/0.9 mode, and therefore won't emit response headers because 0.9 didn't have them.
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2013 02:51
|
|
|
apache works fine idk why you'd worry about nginx
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2013 03:03
|
|
|
Zombywuf posted:This is why I was somewhat nonplussed. I hadn't noticed that much porn on it. Maybe I should look harder. Relevant to this thread, though, is the time their index.php was released to production with an 'i?php' instead of a '<?php' due to a vi editing error, dumping their source code incl. AWS keys tiny bug social network
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2013 03:09
|
|
|
I'm still waiting for someone to write a virus/worm that checks for an env var called AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY. That ought to be a fun day.
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2013 03:14
|
|
|
my stepdads beer posted:apache works fine idk why you'd worry about nginx nginx has fewer features, so the config is shorter and you don't have to read as much documentation that is seriously the reason web developers love nginx: they never learned to use apache. if your entire professional experience of the web is "rails server" and "firefox http://localhost:3000" actually reading about how to run a web server is probably p. terrifying.
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2013 05:06
|
|
|
apache does a gently caress ton of stuff and the configuration format is scary to those who have never had to configure x11
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2013 05:08
|
|
|
nginx is mostly used for ~performance reasons~
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2013 05:09
|
|
|
tef posted:configure x11 you dont have to do this anymore its 2013
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2013 05:12
|
|
|
Suspicious Dish posted:you dont have to do this anymore its 2013 and then your linux breaks...
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2013 05:25
|
|
|
yreah your linux breaks but not by that
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2013 05:35
|
|
|
tef posted:nginx is mostly used for ~performance reasons~ i tried to find some benchmarks but realised what i was doing and stopped. hope this helps someone.
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2013 06:07
|
|
|
tef posted:nginx is mostly used for ~performance reasons~ Benchmarks say it is supposed to be better at serving static files, which is why it totally belongs in front of my fails stack.
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2013 06:17
|
|
|
Spoiler: Most nginx benchmarks also involve badly configured Apache configurations
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2013 06:17
|
|
|
that's a representative sample tho
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2013 06:19
|
|
|
the only reason apache is as popular as it is mod_php the only 2 reasons people don't like nginx are 1. it's written by a russian, 2. they don't know where to copy and paste their htaccess file from
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2013 06:51
|
|
|
there's nothing wrong with using apache, but if you honestly think that simpler configuration is not a good reason to use something thats public facing like a web server is, then you're an idiot. yospos bitch.
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2013 07:17
|
|
|
Nomnom Cookie posted:if more than one actor has a reference to an object, it indicates that either that object does too much or your actors' responsibilities overlap that seems pretty strict threads can just be like concurrently handling a bunch of crap inside an object so you spin off a bunch of threads to do that and the object knows its own im/mutable state and blah blah
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2013 08:01
|
|
|
make a copy problem solved
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2013 08:10
|
|
|
Carthag posted:that seems pretty strict whatever i guess? the idea of multiple threads executing inside one object gives me the willies ive been spending a lot of time using Storm lately and its whole thing is basically distributed actor model. scale your processing to n cores and actor instances process messages serially. its pretty sick and tight like akka would be if akka's delivery guarantee was better than gently caress YOU I BURNT YOUR MAIL
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2013 08:24
|
|
|
xf86enodev posted:the only reason apache is as popular as it is mod_php
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2013 09:13
|
|
|
tef posted:apache does a gently caress ton of stuff and the configuration format is scary to those who have never had to configure x11 apache was the first web server I ever used back when I was a teenager with grand designs on "hosting my own web page" it was years before I discovered that no, hosting a web page is not actually a mind-bogglingly difficult enterprise-level system administration task requiring wading through pages and pages of .htaccess documentation, you can just do it with a four-line script in any p-lang
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2013 15:17
|
|
|
is running apache super hard? back when i hosed around with it it was just putting in the correct paths in the config and then if you were feeling really wild youd mess with DirectoryIndex stuff or something i think i had set up mod_perl to handle my .phtml pages (before i knew it was a php extension). but i guess those who tried to bothack my perl masquerading as php got owned in the end so alls end that ends well
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2013 15:30
|
|
|
Notorious b.s.d. posted:nginx has fewer features, so the config is shorter and you don't have to read as much documentation nginx is a good proxy apache for everything else
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2013 16:08
|
|
|
tef posted:nginx is mostly used for ~performance reasons~ lol i used to do a little work for a Very Large firm that ran all their marketing sites on ibm websphere. the app servers were a dozen or so 8-way SPARC servers with 128 GB of RAM. seriously $300k a pop. the front-end servers, shared between all applications on all app servers, were a pair of sun fire v100s. these cost about $2k. they each had one, 500 MHz SPARC. websphere uses apache for the front end, and this was more than adequate to route requests for every site combined. tl;dr: "performance" is not a thing for front-end web stuff. if you somehow run out of resources on the front end, buy an f5. Notorious b.s.d. fucked around with this message at 16:15 on Feb 23, 2013 |
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2013 16:10
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 11, 2024 11:31 |
|
|
trex eaterofcadrs posted:nginx is a good proxy unless you are a php shop, apache is always just a proxy for something else. what makes it the "best" proxy is that it's very flexible and supports every imaginable feature if you ever need more than what apache will do for you as a reverse proxy, the next step up isn't nginx, it's a real lb pair Notorious b.s.d. fucked around with this message at 16:15 on Feb 23, 2013 |
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2013 16:13
|
|