|
there's no point in talking about editors since the king of editors sublime text 2 is getting even better with the beta of sublime text 3. hows that?
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2013 19:49
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 11, 2024 00:08 |
|
|
macvim supremacy
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2013 19:50
|
|
|
spongeh posted:there's no point in talking about editors since the king of editors sublime text 2 is getting even better with the beta of sublime text 3. sublime text: for people who are too stupid to learn vim. sublime text. get it today.
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2013 19:55
|
|
|
use emacs
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2013 19:57
|
|
|
if you're not writing your computer things in vim then i dont know what the gently caress you are doing with your life
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2013 20:01
|
|
|
I can always do bay chat while I'm here 
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2013 20:16
|
|
|
spongeh posted:there's no point in talking about editors since the king of editors sublime text 2 is getting even better with the beta of sublime text 3. are there any decent xml plugins for sublime text yet? or should i stick with notepad++?
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2013 20:17
|
|
|
emacs is better and more thread-appropriate. elisp is fantastically poo poo but vim scripting is not really a thing.
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2013 20:18
|
|
|
tef posted:I can always do bay chat while I'm here hahahaha
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2013 20:18
|
|
|
Cybernetic Vermin posted:elisp is fantastically poo poo truth. and most people who are the kind of people to write emacs libraries are the kind of people who only like lisp in theory and just write a bunch of terrible procedural bullshit, which elisp encourages because of its buffer-based manipulations
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2013 20:22
|
|
|
Suspicious Dish posted:this argument sucks lets have a new one. pick one of the below: creative comedy option A: All lines must be 80 columns wide or fewer
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2013 20:28
|
|
|
Otto Skorzeny posted:hahahaha i am getting confused for a resident most days even when they hear me speak "Oh you're from the UK, so when did you move here?"
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2013 20:29
|
|
|
edit: you know what i'm not going to rub it in
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2013 20:30
|
|
|
tef posted:i am getting confused for a resident most days so when are you gonna move here
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2013 20:33
|
|
|
PleasingFungus posted:so when are you gonna move here probably never. I like living in a place where other people have healthcare who aren't me. too used to living in the first world. that and visas
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2013 20:34
|
|
|
tef posted:probably never. I like living in a place where other people have healthcare who aren't me. too used to living in the first world. don't worry i hear cameron's working on that
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2013 20:39
|
|
|
gucci void main posted:macvim supremacy switched from st2 to macvim last week, it owns so far haven't tried integrating any build tools or anything, though. i made my config from http://yoursachet.com/, which gets you up and running w a few plugins without being a total clusterfuck like janus was (at least when i tried it like a year or two ago and it kept breaking in spectacular ways)
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2013 20:43
|
|
|
my buddy's ex gf needed some crazy meds to even function and had no insurance, sf has a thing to assist those in that position, so theoretically as long as you stay in sf - wish granted minus the visa stuff
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2013 20:44
|
|
|
spongeh posted:there's no point in talking about editors since the king of editors sublime text 2 is getting even better with the beta of sublime text 3. did sublime text 3 fix the thing where the threading model was different across operating systems so some plugins wouldn't work on os x
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2013 20:45
|
|
|
gucci void main posted:macvim supremacy what is this macvim poo poo use a real vim you imitation nerds
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2013 20:52
|
|
|
horse mans posted:what is this macvim poo poo it is real vim except it allows for better color schemes. thats it
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2013 20:52
|
|
|
no you idiots you weren't supposed to argue about editors
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2013 20:54
|
|
|
there are literally no good general-purpose editors. there might be some good domain-specific ones tho
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2013 20:54
|
|
|
yaoi prophet posted:there are literally no good general-purpose editors. there might be some good domain-specific ones tho emacs
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2013 20:55
|
|
|
single-threaded ityool2013, i've had a plugin hard-lock emacs with no possible way to debug elisp is awful because it's a lisp
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2013 20:57
|
|
|
yaoi prophet posted:single-threaded ityool2013 strangely enough it takes a concerted, exhaustive effort to take a program first written in 1972 and make it support threads, not to mention the tens of millions of lines of code written to extend that program
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2013 20:59
|
|
|
horse mans posted:strangely enough it takes a concerted, exhaustive effort to take a program first written in 1972 and make it support threads, not to mention the tens of millions of lines of code written to extend that program im the one still using a text editor written in tyool 1972 j/k I'm using one written in 1976 instead
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2013 21:06
|
|
|
horse mans posted:strangely enough it takes a concerted, exhaustive effort to take a program first written in 1972 and make it support threads, not to mention the tens of millions of lines of code written to extend that program Turns out that effort is where most open sores projects fail.
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2013 21:07
|
|
|
horse mans posted:strangely enough it takes a concerted, exhaustive effort to take a program first written in 1972 and make it support threads, not to mention the tens of millions of lines of code written to extend that program well yeah i'm not saying that adding threading to emacs would be trivial, it just annoys me
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2013 21:09
|
|
|
Mr Dog posted:don't worry i hear cameron's working on that basically trex eaterofcadrs posted:my buddy's ex gf needed some crazy meds to even function and had no insurance, sf has a thing to assist those in that position, so theoretically as long as you stay in sf - wish granted any job I will get over here will have health care, it's the poors 
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2013 21:15
|
|
|
Suspicious Dish posted:no you idiots you weren't supposed to argue about editors 
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2013 21:15
|
|
|
tef posted:basically that's what i'm saying, sf provides for the poors, she was one of em
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2013 21:27
|
|
|
tef posted:zombywuf's work history: By poop janitor tef means I maintain his code.
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2013 21:29
|
|
|
Zombywuf posted:By poop janitor tef means I maintain his code. Nice!
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2013 21:31
|
|
|
trex eaterofcadrs posted:that's what i'm saying, sf provides for the poors, she was one of em
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2013 22:17
|
|
|
Progressive JPEG posted:how do poors even afford to live in sf bayview
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2013 22:26
|
|
|
Progressive JPEG posted:how do poors even afford to live in sf have you been to sf? they just sleep on the street, then go to their startup job where they feed them.
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2013 22:27
|
|
|
ultramiraculous posted:have you been to sf? they just sleep on the street, then go to their startup job where they feed them. A bespoke kitchen stocked with catered meals, custom-tailored to fit your nutritional profile.
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2013 22:30
|
|
|
quote:From: c-level
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2013 22:43
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 11, 2024 00:08 |
|
|
 Vim Yang 
|
|
#
?
Mar 17, 2013 23:08
|
|
