|
That's one of the most generic modern movie posters I've seen. What's the point of the text above "Into Darkness"?
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2013 11:18
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 10, 2024 05:28 |
|
|
Cheesus posted:That's one of the most generic modern movie posters I've seen. What's the point of the text above "Into Darkness"? It's an international poster designed to show off the actors. Don't worry too much about it.   
Aatrek fucked around with this message at 13:24 on Mar 21, 2013 |
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2013 11:47
|
|
|
There's a bit of a Star Trek 3 vibe going on, from the fact that the main characters aren't in uniform to the whole crashing the Enterprise thing.
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2013 11:53
|
|
|
Oh poo poo, I had forgotten Peter Weller is in this. My recent viewing of season five of 24 suddenly has my mind interpreting the apparent plot in a whole new way. 
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2013 12:40
|
|
|
I'm a little worried, based on the trailers alone, that we won't see much of space or space ships in this movie. I just hope that we get at least one ship to ship battle in this one... Then again, I'm sure that most audiences don't give two fucks about that stuff anyway.
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2013 14:03
|
|
|
Rocket Ace posted:I'm a little worried, based on the trailers alone, that we won't see much of space or space ships in this movie. I think the majority of people expect some spaceships when they see a movie called Star Trek, actually.
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2013 14:09
|
|
|
Benedict Cumberbatch...  Is it bad that I hope the bad guy wins this time around?
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2013 14:14
|
|
|
Good gravy, but that's all some terrible dialogue terribly delivered. Every single line in that trailer was just awful. I sure hope it's just weird editing.
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2013 14:29
|
|
|
AlternateAccount posted:Good gravy, but that's all some terrible dialogue terribly delivered. Every single line in that trailer was just awful. I sure hope it's just weird editing. It's kind of hard to make that judgment completely devoid of any context, isn't it?
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2013 14:29
|
|
|
The lack of reverence for the starship Enterprise is troubling to me. I think it's plain stupid to destroy it in the SECOND movie. The audience has next to zero attachment to it before they toss it away. Disappointing 
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2013 15:03
|
|
|
octoroon posted:It's kind of hard to make that judgment completely devoid of any context, isn't it? Not really, plenty of trailers pull it off just fine.
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2013 15:03
|
|
|
Blade_of_tyshalle posted:Oh poo poo, I had forgotten Peter Weller is in this. My recent viewing of season five of 24 suddenly has my mind interpreting the apparent plot in a whole new way.
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2013 15:09
|
|
|
I said come in! posted:Not really, plenty of trailers pull it off just fine. Yeah, I mean every single line spoken in the trailer elicits a "Who in the hell talks like that?!" I really hope the villain has a lot more nuance than what is shown here, which is basically just super-smug revenge monkey.
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2013 15:51
|
|
|
I like Cumberbatch but the internet's crush on him is getting out of hand.
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2013 16:01
|
|
|
Cellophane S posted:I like Cumberbatch but the internet's crush on him is getting out of hand. I do like him, but I haven't liked anything he has actually been in. Sherlock was an overrated show.
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2013 16:21
|
|
|
I said come in! posted:I do like him, but I haven't liked anything he has actually been in. Sherlock was an overrated show. I though Sherlock was a pleasant surprise, especially I discovered the series by accident after I saw the Guy Ritchie movie. The middle episodes in both seasons were weak, but the rest were pretty fantastic. Plus seeing Cumberbatch dancing in a Youtube video was hilarious. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZSgdyNZABt0
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2013 17:42
|
|
|
I perked right the gently caress up when I heard Weller's voice. Hopefully he gets shot up and rebuilt into a ROBOAdmiral. I mean poo poo, they both have Prime Directives.
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2013 17:45
|
|
|
Cellophane S posted:The lack of reverence for the starship Enterprise is troubling to me. I think it's plain stupid to destroy it in the SECOND movie. The audience has next to zero attachment to it before they toss it away. Disappointing Well that might not even be the Enterprise. It could be another of the same class. And as far as the audience being attached to it I think most casual fans will still be attached to this one given it's the same shape and dimensions if it is indeed the Enterprise going down.
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2013 18:28
|
|
|
It's not the Enterprise crashing into the ocean.
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2013 18:30
|
|
|
Aatrek posted:It's not the Enterprise crashing into the ocean.
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2013 18:35
|
|
|
The nacelles are all wrong. Edit: on the crashing ship, that is. Aatrek fucked around with this message at 18:58 on Mar 21, 2013 |
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2013 18:39
|
|
|
Aatrek posted:The nacelles are all wrong. I have been saying that all a long.
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2013 18:44
|
|
|
Aatrek posted:The nacelles are all wrong. In nuTrek, they replace the ship then crash it 
McSpanky fucked around with this message at 20:42 on Mar 21, 2013 |
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2013 18:59
|
|
|
Cellophane S posted:I like Cumberbatch but the internet's crush on him is getting out of hand. It's a refreshing break from Nathan Fillion love, at least.
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2013 19:46
|
|
|
Aatrek posted:It's an international poster designed to show off the actors. Don't worry too much about it. Yet again, the not gays as said by Mr. Plinkett.
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2013 19:56
|
|
|
does Spock still get to pick and choose Starfleet regulations to follow when it comes to his love interest, Uhuararararara (spelling might be off)?
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2013 20:25
|
|
|
Rhyno posted:I perked right the gently caress up when I heard Weller's voice. Hopefully he gets shot up and rebuilt into a ROBOAdmiral. I mean poo poo, they both have Prime Directives. Literally, because of his character in 24 and how he seems to play utter bastard shitheads in everything, I am fully expecting his character to be part of whatever Cumberbatch is doing. Like when Cumberbatch says "you have no idea what you have done" or whatever, it's like maybe Weller is a corrupt Admiral and Cumberbatch is trying to destroy Starfleet because of him somehow. Cumberbatch, Cumberbatch, Cumberbatch!
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2013 21:24
|
|
|
Blade_of_tyshalle posted:Literally, because of his character in 24 and how he seems to play utter bastard shitheads in everything, I am fully expecting his character to be part of whatever Cumberbatch is doing. Like when Cumberbatch says "you have no idea what you have done" or whatever, it's like maybe Weller is a corrupt Admiral and Cumberbatch is trying to destroy Starfleet because of him somehow. My theory is that Starfleet found the Botany Bay, or another ship like it, years ago and is either using the supermen as Section 31 agents or performed illegal genetic engineering experiments on existing agents. Either way Harrison got screwed by them and wants to bring the program to light, killing them is just gravy.
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2013 22:05
|
|
|
The MSJ posted:There's a URL hidden in the scene where Carol is in her underwear (clever, that). It leads to a site with a new poster. Ah, of course, the classic character triumvirate of Kirk, Spock, and...Uhura. Well it makes sense, Karl Urban isn't a leading movie star or anyth... Yeah, I dunno. 
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2013 22:29
|
|
|
I too lament when black females are given a lead role.
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2013 23:00
|
|
|
Astroman posted:Ah, of course, the classic character triumvirate of Kirk, Spock, and...Uhura. Well it makes sense, Karl Urban isn't a leading movie star or anyth... Did you not watch the first movie? McCoy is clearly not a main character in this incarnation of Star Trek, but Uhura is.
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2013 23:17
|
|
|
Christopher Lloyd is the bad guy in "Star Trek 3: The Search for Spock".
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2013 23:39
|
|
|
Art Alexakis posted:Christopher Lloyd is the bad guy in "Star Trek 3: The Search for Spock". And in Star Trek 4 they use Christopher Lloyds vehicle to time travel 
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2013 23:50
|
|
|
1st AD posted:Did you not watch the first movie? McCoy is clearly not a main character in this incarnation of Star Trek, but Uhura is. How is she a lead character? She didn't do anything.
|
|
#
?
Mar 21, 2013 23:59
|
|
|
Astroman posted:Karl Urban isn't a leading movie star or anyth... He pretty much isn't though. Zoe Saldana is at least as much of a leading movie star as he is, if not arguably more of one. I love Urban--and specifically his Bones--as much as the next guy, but Uhura is clearly a huge character in these movies. It makes perfect sense. Plus who wants a poster packed with four white guys?
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2013 00:04
|
|
|
I said come in! posted:How is she a lead character? She didn't do anything. She does at least as much as McCoy. In terms of people "doing stuff" last movie it roughly goes Kirk, Spock, Scotty, and then Spock again anyway.
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2013 00:37
|
|
|
So, Geo. Takei posted on his facebook that some fan or other pointed out that the shuttle appears to have "Takay" written on the side of it. Anyone else hear anything about this? I think it would be pretty awesome if it was a shout-out to our boy Sulu.
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2013 00:40
|
|
|
Sulu is in the movie, what's he need a clumsy rear end shout-out for?
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2013 00:41
|
|
|
I said come in! posted:How is she a lead character? She didn't do anything. She did as much as anyone not named Spock or Kirk and is the primary love interest of one of the aforementioned characters.
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2013 00:57
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 10, 2024 05:28 |
|
|
Yeah let's try to sell a four-quadrant blockbuster to every demographic with nothing but dudes holding guns on the poster.
|
|
#
?
Mar 22, 2013 00:58
|
|