|
 Goatse Cake Puddin posted:I'm totally going to serve tea this way from now on. Countdown to someone scalding the hell out of their face...
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2013 21:17
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 31, 2024 05:14 |
|
|
This is the dog equivalent of that nerdy kid in gym class who just shoves his glove out in front of his face when the ball is thrown to him.
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2013 21:27
|
|
|
DrBouvenstein posted:This is the dog equivalent of that nerdy kid in gym class who just shoves his glove out in front of his face when the ball is thrown to him. 
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2013 21:37
|
|
|
A GLISTENING HODOR posted:
Goatse aside... whoever made that cake is incredibly talented.
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2013 21:50
|
|
|
Brother Jonathan posted:According to The Daily Mail, the old urban legend about the man buying a dog and getting a rodent is true. A man in Argentina bought what he thought was a toy poodle but was actually a ferret on steroids: I'd totally buy a ferret with poofy poodle fur.
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2013 22:26
|
|
|
TEGGS posted:I'd totally buy a ferret with poofy poodle fur. You don't want a ferret on steroids. You just don't.
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2013 22:28
|
|
|
A GLISTENING HODOR posted:
Holy poo poo they even included the wedding ring 
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2013 22:47
|
|
|
Hahaha, I'm from Argentina and I saw that in a few local papers/news sites. Never did know if it was anything more than an urban legend, though.
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2013 23:34
|
|
|
Hremsfeld posted:Holy poo poo they even included the wedding ring It's goatse. Of course they included the wedding ring. How else are people going to recognise it?
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2013 23:39
|
|
|
Hremsfeld posted:Holy poo poo they even included the wedding ring Without the ring, it's just a gaping butthole, not goatse.
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2013 23:46
|
|
|
Beeswax posted:Hahaha, I'm from Argentina and I saw that in a few local papers/news sites. Never did know if it was anything more than an urban legend, though. Man, Argentina must have some really crappy urban legends.
|
|
#
?
Apr 9, 2013 23:57
|
|
|
Hremsfeld posted:Holy poo poo they even included the wedding ring I had to click on it again to make sure. I was hoping it would be an actual engagement ring as part of an elaborate proposal.
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2013 00:27
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2013 03:14
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2013 03:23
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2013 05:00
|
|
|
 From here. If you have kids, or know anything about Max and Ruby, perhaps you too will piss yourself with laughter like I did at this picture.
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2013 16:35
|
|
|
Found this on IMGUR      
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2013 19:09
|
|
|
Most animals that have receptors outside of the visible spectrum are for the UV spectrum. So its not so much colors we can't perceive but different forms of light we normally don't notice. Example:  This shows the same fish in normal light and how UV reflects off its scales. While UV is higher up in the spectrum and probably attenuates faster then visible light in water, it would help to see 'shiny' things easier while hunting for prey.
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2013 19:19
|
|
|
SPACE HOMOS posted:Most animals that have receptors outside of the visible spectrum are for the UV spectrum. So its not so much colors we can't perceive but different forms of light we normally don't notice. Including humans   Known as Blaschko's lines, they are usually only visible under UV light but some people are born with them visible
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2013 19:32
|
|
|
AlistairCookie posted:
I have kids. I laughed. Then I wondered if there is a Max and Ruby fetish art thing going around the net. Then I quickly tried to forget I thought that. e; poo poo; 
schwenz has a new favorite as of 19:41 on Apr 10, 2013 |
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2013 19:38
|
|
|
SPACE HOMOS posted:Most animals that have receptors outside of the visible spectrum are for the UV spectrum. So its not so much colors we can't perceive but different forms of light we normally don't notice. It could also be colors we can't perceive, though. Example: A flower and a painting of a flower can look the same to human eyes, because we've mixed the pigments in the paint so that they excite our red, green, and blue receptors the same way. But there might be subtle differences in other parts of the visible spectrum, such that a butterfly wouldn't be fooled. The same way a non-colorblind person can detect the differences between subtly different greens in the traditional "colorblindness tests".
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2013 20:00
|
|
|
 If you don't get it, it's a lubricant ad. Kanfy has a new favorite as of 20:49 on Apr 10, 2013 |
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2013 20:24
|
|
|
I was looking for this one the other day. It's easily one of my favorite pictures because of everyone's reactions when they get what's going on. Don't ruin it for yourself: she's sitting on a post
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2013 20:36
|
|
|
MindlessHavok posted:I was looking for this one the other day. It's easily one of my favorite pictures because of everyone's reactions when they get what's going on. I had to read the spoiler because my eyes suck and I wasn't able to read the text other than Gel Manix
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2013 20:40
|
|
|
The text isn't in English so it wouldn't have been much use.
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2013 20:42
|
|
|
No, but "lubricant" is clear in most languages.
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2013 20:43
|
|
|
GreenNight posted:No, but "lubricant" is clear in most languages. Yeah, that's why I didn't try to explain the joke, figured people would get that particular word. E: Aleph Null posted:Until I read the spoiler, I thought it said something about "hubris". Yeah, put it in spoilers now since it's a bit unclear. Kanfy has a new favorite as of 20:49 on Apr 10, 2013 |
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2013 20:47
|
|
|
GreenNight posted:No, but "lubricant" is clear in most languages. Until I read the spoiler, I thought it said something about "hubris".
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2013 20:47
|
|
|
Wade Wilson posted:Found this on IMGUR Mantis shrimp are kind of neat animals, but this comic (?) is absolutely insufferable.
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2013 21:08
|
|
|
Gilgameshback posted:Mantis shrimp are kind of neat animals, but this comic (?) is absolutely insufferable. So it's pretty par for the course for an Oatmeal offering.
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2013 21:12
|
|
|
Gilgameshback posted:Mantis shrimp are kind of neat animals, but this comic (?) is absolutely insufferable. Yeah, that's the Oatmeal. If you're ever looking for lovely hyperbole, sanitized "wacky" hijinks and ugly art, make sure you're first stop is The Oatmeal! He's also kind of a lovely dude (but he does give a lot to charity and genuinely supports some good causes so that puts him way ahead of a ton of people).
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2013 21:13
|
|
|
Zelder posted:Yeah, that's the Oatmeal. If you're ever looking for lovely hyperbole, sanitized "wacky" hijinks and ugly art, make sure you're first stop is The Oatmeal! Didn't he publicly apologize for being such a terrible person and vow to not be so terrible? Might be thinking of some other webcartoonist
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2013 21:23
|
|
|
Super Waffle posted:Didn't he publicly apologize for being such a terrible person and vow to not be so terrible? Might be thinking of some other webcartoonist Yeah he made a rape "joke" that was hardly a joke and then said "yeah that was dumb and terrible".
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2013 21:26
|
|
|
Super Waffle posted:Didn't he publicly apologize for being such a terrible person and vow to not be so terrible? Might be thinking of some other webcartoonist He "apologized" for making a rape joke in one of his comics, in a very defensive manner. Apart from that he responds to criticism with a lot of self-righteous indignation about how he bought his sister a house or something.
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2013 21:26
|
|
|
Giving money you can easily spare to charity for PR doesn't mitigate being a worthless cynical shitbag. In other news: 
Sad lions has a new favorite as of 22:03 on Apr 10, 2013 |
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2013 21:49
|
|
|
SPACE HOMOS posted:Most animals that have receptors outside of the visible spectrum are for the UV spectrum. So its not so much colors we can't perceive but different forms of light we normally don't notice. But what colour is that UV light perceived at by animals with those cones ? 
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2013 22:49
|
|
|
Fozaldo posted:But what colour is that UV light perceived at by animals with those cones ? A color you can physically never experience. Its like trying to imagine a 4-D object, your brain is literally unable to comprehend it Unrelated picture: 
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2013 22:53
|
|
|
Super Waffle posted:A color you can physically never experience. Its like trying to imagine a 4-D object, your brain is literally unable to comprehend it In the future, we will inject our eyes with nano-cones and invent new forms of art that the "simple sighted" will be unable to see.
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2013 23:02
|
|
|
Super Waffle posted:A color you can physically never experience. Its like trying to imagine a 4-D object, your brain is literally unable to comprehend it We are all literally 4d objects.
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2013 23:08
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 31, 2024 05:14 |
|
|
xxEightxx posted:We are all literally 4d objects. They mean four physical dimensions and you goddamn know it
|
|
#
?
Apr 10, 2013 23:11
|
|