|
Detroit Q. Spider posted:http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16815260027 I wonder how it scales across non 1280x720 59.94 or 1920x1080 29.97 resolutions Does it have a deinterlacer? 80 bucks does not give me faith.
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2013 02:20
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 3, 2024 10:40 |
|
|
pagancow posted:get schooled here nerds sorry but I already know the history of the ar-15, thx.
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2013 02:24
|
|
|
pagancow posted:I wonder how it scales across non 1280x720 59.94 or 1920x1080 29.97 resolutions hey i didnt say it would be any good. just that it exists. somehow i doubt there's a real big market for hi end separate atsc tuners
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2013 03:15
|
|
|
Detroit Q. Spider posted:http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16815260027 No audio over HDMI Stereo audio only (how are they messing that up? Shouldn't it just be passed through?) No channel changing over HDMI Well not a bad start. Also expensive for what it is, but I guess the market is small.
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2013 06:56
|
|
|
Samuel L. ACKSYN posted:has anyone ever had avidemux, um, work my favorite thing about 2.6 is that they removed "save selection as jpeg images", because "2.6 is time based, not frame based." i wonder how they managed to get the right cursor key working.
|
|
#
?
Jun 28, 2013 23:28
|
|
|
I just found a bug in iOS 6 photo viewer through photostream. If you upload a jpg with an sRGB profile embedded, it will not display correctly, even if it's encoded for sRGB. If you upload a jpg with No profile embedded, but it was encoded for sRGB, it will display correctly. Mail seems to handle the file correctly, as if you Mail a JPG with sRGB ICC profile embedded you will see it correctly there. YVCPOS birch
|
|
#
?
Jul 4, 2013 15:01
|
|
|
I'm at my parents house and they are watching Nikita and they are like "this is the greatest tv show its so good!!!" and all I can see is open shutter shots all over the place, lol what is this scrub tier poo poo? who shoots open shutter? 180degree master shutter race, gods one true shutter speed
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2013 04:28
|
|
|
pagancow posted:I just found a bug in iOS 6 photo viewer through photostream. Sounds like the photo viewer is trying to do its own color management and loving it up
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2013 04:33
|
|
|
pagancow wtf are you talking about? I'm glad you asked https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OTqR7XkBEj4&t=90s
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2013 04:53
|
|
|
pagancow posted:pagancow wtf are you talking about? I'm glad you asked actually informative and very nicely presented. thanks pagancow
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2013 05:02
|
|
|
the YVCPOS life is hard. gettin mad at huge flaws nobody else notices. i've had people get mad at me when I don't watch things on their scrub tier setups
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2013 05:04
|
|
|
Cubemario posted:the YVCPOS life is hard. gettin mad at huge flaws nobody else notices. i've had people get mad at me when I don't watch things on their scrub tier setups ignorance is bliss
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2013 06:11
|
|
|
pagancow posted:pagancow wtf are you talking about? I'm glad you asked while a 180-degree shutter was the "ideal" shutter, in reality a lot of film cameras actually had a 172-degree shutter, giving you 1/50th second exposure time at 24fps. for the majority of cameras the shutter angle was fixed. 
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2013 06:16
|
|
|
do real cameras use shutters that don't overexpose the corners of the frame because that spinning pacman is making me sperg the f out
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2013 08:39
|
|
|
pagancow posted:I'm at my parents house and they are watching Nikita and they are like "this is the greatest tv show its so good!!!" and all I can see is open shutter shots all over the place, lol what is this scrub tier poo poo? ~my motion blur
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2013 10:01
|
|
|
pagancow posted:I'm at my parents house and they are watching Nikita and they are like "this is the greatest tv show its so good!!!" and all I can see is open shutter shots all over the place, lol what is this scrub tier poo poo? okay, so what does open shutter mean? 360 degrees?
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2013 12:31
|
|
|
Wheany posted:okay, so what does open shutter mean? 360 degrees? it just means the shutter is always open so the frame is exposed for the duration it's in front of the aperture, i.e. 1/24th of a second.
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2013 12:59
|
|
|
Cubemario posted:the YVCPOS life is hard. gettin mad at huge flaws nobody else notices. i've had people get mad at me when I don't watch things on their scrub tier setups people thought i was straight crazy when i talked about how awesome s-video was as a kid. i knew the truth tho
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2013 13:23
|
|
|
Wheany posted:okay, so what does open shutter mean? 360 degrees? basically if you film this way and I ran the country, your camera license would be stripped. yes I would make a license for you to use a camera so you weren't killing images. more dangerous than a gun
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2013 14:41
|
|
|
pagancow posted:I'm at my parents house and they are watching Nikita and they are like "this is the greatest tv show its so good!!!" and all I can see is open shutter shots all over the place, lol what is this scrub tier poo poo?
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2013 15:08
|
|
|
Corla Plankun posted:do real cameras use shutters that don't overexpose the corners of the frame because that spinning pacman is making me sperg the f out unlike that video, in an irl film movie camera the shutter disc is quite a bit bigger than a frame.
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2013 16:49
|
|
|
I wish I still had my old film movie camera, or still had access to one of the nice ones I used to use, so I could get a couple of pics and show you guys what the shutter disc and aperture gate actually looked like.
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2013 16:54
|
|
|
Detroit Q. Spider posted:people thought i was straight crazy when i talked about how awesome s-video was as a kid. i knew the truth tho rgb scart supremacy
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2013 19:54
|
|
|
in college i shot some movie on color reversal with this crank camara and edited it with a razor blade and double perf splicing tape. that was the poo poo
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2013 21:14
|
|
|
spankmeister posted:rgb scart supremacy svideo adequacy we werent fancy
|
|
#
?
Jul 7, 2013 21:15
|
|
|
it really bothers me that Adobe Lightroom doesn't have a luminance vs saturation curve you can adjust to give your self a secret light saturation rolloff like film. ~my film emulation lut techniques~
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2013 00:10
|
|
|
pagancow posted:it really bothers me that Adobe Lightroom doesn't have a luminance vs saturation curve you can adjust to give your self a secret light saturation rolloff like film. is this what gives film that "contrasty" look, esp. like old technicolor?
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2013 00:44
|
|
|
it desaturates stuff that's in the upper 40% range because digital cameras have no problem seeing bright colorful things, but film does (and so does your eye to an extent)
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2013 01:12
|
|
|
so basically highlights get a little washed out? what was it in the mid to late 90s where every movie looked kind of flat and almost under contrasted? was it some trend in how it was shot w/r/t aperture or just the film stock most studios were using at the time?
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2013 01:19
|
|
|
depends on the movie you're talking about. there are a variety of techniques. i'm not really aware of any 90s movies that i'd call "under contrasted". ACE/ENR/bleach bypass were popular special film development processes that increased the contrast, but they could be combined with stuff like pre- and post-flashing (where the film is exposed to a small, controlled amount of light either before or after shooting) to get various effects.
Doc Block fucked around with this message at 01:38 on Jul 8, 2013 |
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2013 01:30
|
|
|
been working on a show with a lot of go pro footage in it. i thought it looked really funky but the producer kept making comments like "wow i love this go pro stuff, that go pro look is great" so i ignored it. i finally decided to count the frames and it turns out all our go pro stuff has had some pulldown unnecessarily applied to it during ingest (head ingest guy thinks it is a software bug but i don't know). anyhow, i put together a quick program to batch ingest go pro footage with ffmbc, and now it all looks perfect. now the producer keeps asking 'what's wrong with the go pro footage' so i've started applying a frame duping filter to mimic the look of the bad footage.
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2013 01:36
|
|
|
next he's going to tell you he loves the lovely super-duper mega rolling shutter that go pros have.
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2013 01:40
|
|
|
he said 'trust me, it's really in right now' (or something like that). he's probably right, i dont know. he's not a bad guy, just very tv people
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2013 01:43
|
|
|
Doc Block posted:depends on the movie you're talking about. there are a variety of techniques. i'm not really aware of any 90s movies that i'd call "under contrasted". ACE/ENR/bleach bypass were popular special film development processes that increased the contrast, but they could be combined with stuff like pre- and post-flashing (where the film is exposed to a small, controlled amount of light either before or after shooting) to get various effects. idk but maybe im describing it wrong. most of the movies im thinking of were relatively small budget and/or not really visually oriented (friday, theres something about mary, a couple others i just cant think of) and to me they all look a little washed out or undercontrasted. like the black level was set too high or something.
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2013 01:52
|
|
|
maybe your TV in the 90s was really bad
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2013 02:01
|
|
|
chumpchous posted:maybe your TV in the 90s was really bad yeah im not talking about now or anything, its not like we have ways to watch whatever movie we want at any time 
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2013 02:56
|
|
|
chumpchous posted:he said 'trust me, it's really in right now' (or something like that). he's probably right, i dont know. he's not a bad guy, just very tv people hosed up film processing is really in right now? although i guess with instagram or whatever "things that look like poo poo" are in right now
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2013 02:59
|
|
|
in this case it was hosed up, but it worked. it just ended up looking very rough, which is what he wanted to see
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2013 03:01
|
|
|
Quine Connoisseur posted:hosed up film processing is really in right now? i saw a picture the other day that was an actual old picture that looked like poo poo naturally (in an old fmaily photo album alongside a bunch of normal pictures) and it surprised the hell out of me
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2013 03:09
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 3, 2024 10:40 |
|
|
Install Gentoo posted:i saw a picture the other day that was an actual old picture that looked like poo poo naturally (in an old fmaily photo album alongside a bunch of normal pictures) and it surprised the hell out of me no that was a print from the new Walgreens Familygram Photo Service
|
|
#
?
Jul 8, 2013 03:11
|
|
