Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Maple Leaf
Aug 24, 2010

Let'en my post flyen true
After knowing what the internet's done to it, is it okay to just wear a fedora? Like, say you need to be somewhere, and you're in a rush, and it's raining out... you just throw on a pair of shoes, a jacket, and the first hat off a rack, and it happens to be a fedora. Can you wear it in a situation like that without immediately being pinned as a troper/neckbeard/'from the internet'? Or should we just burn all the fedoras and save ourselves the trouble?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Improbable Lobster
Jan 6, 2012

"From each according to his ability" said Ares. It sounded like a quotation.
Buglord

Maple Leaf posted:

After knowing what the internet's done to it, is it okay to just wear a fedora? Like, say you need to be somewhere, and you're in a rush, and it's raining out... you just throw on a pair of shoes, a jacket, and the first hat off a rack, and it happens to be a fedora. Can you wear it in a situation like that without immediately being pinned as a troper/neckbeard/'from the internet'? Or should we just burn all the fedoras and save ourselves the trouble?

Don't wear formal hats to anything that isn't incredibly formal.

22 Eargesplitten
Oct 10, 2010



If you don't own any fedoras, the first hat off the rack won't be a fedora.

I get it, I get wanting to have something to wear with nicer clothes, something not as casual as a wool beanie. But it doesn't work. Give it up.

Lowly
Aug 13, 2009

Eh, it's not really the hat, it's the fact that the people are trying to make themselves more interesting or cool by wearing a hat and it's not working because a hat can't fix your personality. It could be any kind of hat, or it could be a different accessory. My boss (female) wears a fedora from time to time and it's fine, because she is a cool, normal person and not a hopeless goon.

Arc Hammer
Mar 4, 2013

Got any deathsticks?
Whatever happened to wearing a simple ball cap? Oh right, because only those stupid jocks and sports players wear those, unlike *me*, who is totally classy.

DaveWoo
Aug 14, 2004

Fun Shoe
So the latest Penny Arcade comic takes a (very mild) jab at fantasy author Brandon Sanderson.

Tropers were not amused:

Lightflame posted:

The latest strip is a childish Take That at my favourite author.

That's it, I am done with liking this comic.

Ninety posted:

What a childish, unnecessary Take That.

:qq:

Sham bam bamina!
Nov 6, 2012

ƨtupid cat

DaveWoo posted:

So the latest Penny Arcade comic takes a (very mild) jab at fantasy author Brandon Sanderson.

Tropers were not amused:



:qq:
Now I'm wondering how they took the China Miéville strip. :allears:

WickedHate
Aug 1, 2013

by Lowtax


Jesus, do they have to use their stupid loving trope name even in this situation?

Lottery of Babylon
Apr 25, 2012

STRAIGHT TROPIN'

1984 sucks.

Nineteen Eighty-Four film/book review by Belfagor 20th Jul 12 posted:

Anti-communism masked as alleged "anti-totalitarianism"

The term "totalitarianism" was a Cold War creation to compare Communism to Nazism, which is pure and simple bashing. Orwell's 1984 is a perfect example of this kind of propaganda. The book, praised beyond any objective quality, merely repeats stereotypes that would later make the fortune of Robert Conquest and similar alleged "historians". The worst part is, the author presents his view as the true Socialist one. But this is just Trotskyism and revisionism.

It's rather easy to see what lies behind the curtain: "doublethink" is a sick, twisted parody of dialectical materialism, the description of the Party doesn't show any kind of actual analysis and is just a pile of gratuitously anvilicious Complete Monster traits, Goldstein's section is nothing but an extremely heavy Author Filibuster moment to expose loads and loads of Trotskyist / Social Democratic propaganda.

As a Marxist-Leninist, I find this book utterly revolting and despicable. However, I must admit that it completely succeeds in its main target: to spread every possible lie about the Eastern Bloc and the men who carried on the results of the October Revolution, under the pretense of an "universal message of freedom" that is just imperialistic trash. It succeeds so well that most people believe this is a valid document to judge Soviet Union. What's next, Jurassic Park used as biology documentation in universities?

Belfagor, in the comments of his review posted:

quote:

I see nothing about Marxist-Leninism (which is an embarrassment to Marxism anyway,which originally was more like Bakunin)

I'm afraid, but I completely disagree. Marx himself wrote about the necessity of proletarian dictatorship, which Bakunin never agreed about. Lenin described imperialism using Marxist categories and thus added substantially to Marx and Engels' work. Marxism recognizes th necessity of authority in the socialist phase (which preceeds Communism) and, dialectically, sees the difference between bourgeois authority and proletarian authority.

Also, "Stalinism" is an improper term, sine Stalin didn't actually made a substantial progress from Lenin's work. Instead, he fortified the results of the Revolution through the proletarian dictatorship (always being faithful to Marx, Engels and Lenin's teaching) and, more important, he lead (not alone, of course) USSR against Nazi Germany. Putting USSR and Third Reich on the same level isn't just historically absurd, it's offensive.

Take it from a Marxist-Leninist, I don't recall Minarchists turning a confederation of feudal states into the second most powerful State of its time.

Belfagor, in the comments of his review posted:

^^ & ^ Dear lord, stop reading rubbish written using propaganda from the '30s and try to do an objective research. You could even find Oxford professors praising collectivization. I've had to sit through hours and hours of the exact things you repeat. Then I read another version that was far more supported (ever read Ludo Martens, for example?) and objective. Why don't you do the same? You know, that's what an accurate research is.

By the way, taking critics from who probably supports the US is frankly ludicrous.

Take it from a Marxist-Leninist, Orwell's writing was so awful that he deserved to be sent to a gulag.

I know this seems like a troll but looking at the author's edit history they were pretty active for a few months and weren't obviously a gimmick account.

FrozenVent
May 1, 2009

The Boeing 737-200QC is the undisputed workhorse of the skies.

Arcsquad12 posted:

Whatever happened to wearing a simple ball cap? Oh right, because only those stupid jocks and sports players wear those, unlike *me*, who is totally classy.

A ball cap with a suit isn't much better than a fedora with jeans. It's all about context, which tropers can't understand because they break everything down to its core components.

Swords were cool in Braveheart ergo swords will be cool in my WWII alternate history (With aliens who don't go through puberty). That kind of things.

Arc Hammer
Mar 4, 2013

Got any deathsticks?

Lottery of Babylon posted:



I know this seems like a troll but looking at the author's edit history they were pretty active for a few months and weren't obviously a gimmick account.

Reads like one of those Russian nationalists who went on the rampage against Company of Heroes 2 for misrepresenting the Great Patriotic War.

oldpainless
Oct 30, 2009

This 📆 post brought to you by RAID💥: SHADOW LEGENDS👥.
RAID💥: SHADOW LEGENDS 👥 - It's for your phone📲TM™ #ad📢

Was it a troper who insisted that swords were far superior to guns in a fight despite all evidence to the contrary? I remember some argument being the guy could run 20 feet and draw his sword and dissect a man before the other guy could aim a gun and fire.


e: thanks. It shouldn't come as a surprise.

oldpainless fucked around with this message at 04:58 on Oct 2, 2013

Arc Hammer
Mar 4, 2013

Got any deathsticks?
That would be Major Tom I believe.

WickedHate
Aug 1, 2013

by Lowtax

oldpainless posted:

I remember some argument being the guy could run 20 feet and draw his sword and dissect a man before the other guy could aim a gun and fire.

I feel second hand embarrassment for him now.

Smoking Crow
Feb 14, 2012

*laughs at u*

oldpainless posted:

Was it a troper who insisted that swords were far superior to guns in a fight despite all evidence to the contrary? I remember some argument being the guy could run 20 feet and draw his sword and dissect a man before the other guy could aim a gun and fire.


e: thanks. It shouldn't come as a surprise.

The best part is that Martello, who now posts on these very forums and was in Iraq at the time (I think) told him he was full of poo poo. iirc, Tom flipped his poo poo and told him that he obviously didn't know anything about war.

Nintendo Kid
Aug 4, 2011

by Smythe
It all came down to the troper misunderstanding a Mythbusters episode where they showed it was faster to stab a dude with a knife then he could aim and fire at you, so long as you were less than 15 feet away.

And how this does not scale up to a sword since the swinging motions and the like take a lot longer then a quick knife jab.

HEY GUNS
Oct 11, 2012

FOPTIMUS PRIME

Lottery of Babylon posted:

Take it from a Marxist-Leninist, Orwell's writing was so awful that he deserved to be sent to a gulag.
Orwell was a Communist, too, just not the same kind of Communist. :laugh:

Install Windows posted:

It all came down to the troper misunderstanding a Mythbusters episode where they showed it was faster to stab a dude with a knife then he could aim and fire at you, so long as you were less than 15 feet away.

And how this does not scale up to a sword since the swinging motions and the like take a lot longer then a quick knife jab.
Hell, in that context the knife would also be faster than the sword, which is why dudes carried knives back then too.

Aerial Tollhouse
Feb 17, 2011

Install Windows posted:

It all came down to the troper misunderstanding a Mythbusters episode where they showed it was faster to stab a dude with a knife then he could aim and fire at you, so long as you were less than 15 feet away.

And how this does not scale up to a sword since the swinging motions and the like take a lot longer then a quick knife jab.

Also, the mythbusters episode involved drawing, aiming and firing. In an actual war situation, soldiers would already have their guns drawn, obviously.

ArchangeI
Jul 15, 2010

HEGEL CURES THESES posted:

Orwell was a Communist, too, just not the same kind of Communist. :laugh:



As every good communist knows, the worst enemy is not the capitalist, the burguoise or the fascist but the communist who follows a slightly different ideology. They must be erradicated without mercy.

Srice
Sep 11, 2011

DaveWoo posted:

So the latest Penny Arcade comic takes a (very mild) jab at fantasy author Brandon Sanderson.

Tropers were not amused:



:qq:

The panel making fun of how he really likes magic systems is funny since according to tropers, that's something he's known for.

quote:

Magic A Is Magic A: Sanderson is fond of inventing new magic systems, and is careful to define them clearly and keep their use consistent. He has formulated what he calls Sanderson's First Law to describe the importance of maintaining this trope, and it is defined as follows:
"An author's ability to solve conflict satisfactorily with magic is directly proportional to how well the reader understands said magic."

In fact even people that like Sanderson can and do poke fun at his obsession with magic systems. I have a theory that some nerds are unable to get obvious jokes if there are no references in them.

Asgerd
May 6, 2012

I worked up a powerful loneliness in my massive bed, in the massive dark.
Grimey Drawer
Here's the Guns vs Swords thing. It doesn't get good until Martello shows up and starts laying down the law:

Martello posted:

Exelixi, do you really believe we don't issue swords because of logistics? And not because swords are obsolete? Take it from an Afghanistan veteran - no soldier in his right mind would use a sword instead of a firearm. And forget "no longer widely used." Try "not used at all." With the dubious exception of SOF operators who supposedly use the CRKT Hisshou, any soldier trying to bring a sword to deployment is going to get his rear end kicked and laughed at by the whole battalion.
As for the whole "melee weapons defeat modern body armor" thing, well that's a bunch of nonsense too. Just to amuse myself, I tested my Cold Steel Trench Hawk on a spare ESAPI plate I had lying around the house. The supposedly armor-piercing spike on the back of the tomahawk head acually broke off at the tip. The surrounding soft armor is a different matter, but the chances of getting close enough to use a sword are so slim as to be irrelevant.
Every time I see somebody write or hear them say "swords are better than guns in certain situations, " I think, right, plays too many video games.

Martello posted:

[...]

I mean, it really comes down to this. Do you really think, that even at a distance of six feet or so, a highly-trained swordsman could close that distance and hit me with a killing blow, before I can squeeze the trigger on my rifle?

Major Tom posted:

Yes.

Martello posted:

This from the guy who never actually got into the Army, let alone participated in actual combat. I was asking Exelixi, who at least claims to be a trained swordsman. Thanks for the input, though.

Major Tom posted:

With all due respect sir none, I actually made it into the Army. Not finishing training was not my choice. They ordered me out and like a good soldier I followed orders.
I. NEVER. QUIT.

Also, there's a trope for it!

HEY GUNS
Oct 11, 2012

FOPTIMUS PRIME

ArchangeI posted:

As every good communist knows, the worst enemy is not the capitalist, the burguoise or the fascist but the communist who follows a slightly different ideology. They must be erradicated without mercy.
I too have attempted to post in D&D.

Acute Grill
Dec 9, 2011

Chomp
I think this thread might need the "If you defend the fedora, you need to post a picture of yourself in a fedora" rule.

Keromaru5
Dec 28, 2012

Pictured: The Wolf Of Gubbio (probably)

This avatar made possible by a gift from the Religionthread Posters Relief Fund

Asgerd posted:

Here's the Guns vs Swords thing. It doesn't get good until Martello shows up and starts laying down the law:
Is there context I'm missing, or is Major Tom bragging about being kicked out of training?

Razorwired
Dec 7, 2008

It's about to start!

FrozenVent posted:

A ball cap with a suit isn't much better than a fedora with jeans. It's all about context, which tropers can't understand because they break everything down to its core components.

Swords were cool in Braveheart ergo swords will be cool in my WWII alternate history (With aliens who don't go through puberty). That kind of things.

The context for fedoras was that they kept bird poo poo and rain out of your Brylcreemed hair. You take them the gently caress off if you're indoors and if you're not Mos Def you're probably not pulling it off. If the guy who brought this up wants advice just post a picture of your fedora in YLLS and they'll let you know.

And as long as we're posting "best" Troperfics I think we're forgetting Shinji and Warhammer 40,000. When I first heard about this one I thought, "Okay, sounds dumb but Tropers mash poo poo together all the time. Let's see how they creep out on Shinji when he's in Space Marine armor or whatever. But nope, it's not about that. It's about how super cool Shinji would be if he sat around playing the loving tabletop game. That's the entire point of the text. Shinji finds a wargame for neckbeardy weirdos and starts talking to the figures. They teach him life lessons and make him "20 times more badass than his canon counterpart as a result".

The Trope page

quote:

Badass Boast:
Shinji gets a lot of these. For example:
Shinji (to his kidnappers): "I have walked as a god! I have fought as a god! You will not frighten me, LITTLE MAN!"
The Chaos Marine gets one in the very first chapter after the debacle with Minase and her boyfriend:
But see! He that has stolen from you has paid for it with his LIFE.
She that set herself above you now lies humbled and broken, the BLOOD of that she once loved on her hands.
He that follows you is now a HERO, respected by many.
And she who once held you in high regard, now WORSHIPS you.
Chaos IS. And in CHAOS all things are possible.

Clearly our generation's St. Crispin's Day speech.

And because it couldn't be Tropefic without plugging a flirty, fucktoy personality into a child character

quote:

Bi the Way - Rei's actions, thoughts, snarky comments, and preference for yuri over yaoi are consistent with somebody who's bisexual (and may also be another reason why she wants Shinji to have a harem...lucky bastard). The Farseer is also probably bi, but considering the nature of the Eldar is more likely to be a Depraved Bisexual. Then there are the bisexuals from canon Evangelion...

I know all the bisexual people I've ever met have been described by their snarky comments. Motherfuckers can't go two minutes without trying to be a Joss Whedon character.

Antivehicular
Dec 30, 2011


I wanna sing one for the cars
That are right now headed silent down the highway
And it's dark and there is nobody driving And something has got to give

Keromaru5 posted:

Is there context I'm missing, or is Major Tom bragging about being kicked out of training?

Nah, that's pretty much it. I recall some discussion from the last thread that he may have washed out in the "moment of truth" trap that's used early in training to get idiots out of the force, which sounds a hell of a lot like Major Tom to me.

Razorwired
Dec 7, 2008

It's about to start!

Antivehicular posted:

Nah, that's pretty much it. I recall some discussion from the last thread that he may have washed out in the "moment of truth" trap that's used early in training to get idiots out of the force, which sounds a hell of a lot like Major Tom to me.

Yeah, I think it's somewhere in their military thread but I'm not digging through 1120 pages for it. Basically he fell for the Moment of Truth test in which they say "One of you has lied on your paperwork. If you leave now nothing bad happens." If the previous threads are to be trusted this test is just a bluff to clear liability when your asthmatic rear end dies on a run. Anyway he peaced and tried to say that he "Was just following orders. I QUIT FOR MY COUNTRY LIKE A GOOD SOLDIER :911:"

But a random jump around that thread did bring up old favorite, Barkey.

quote:

I like to think so.
So on the women in combat thing... I have one berserk button when the issue is brought up.
Why the gently caress is the first thing they say "WOMEN CAN'T BE SPECIAL FORCES WHAT A TRAVESTY!"
Slow the gently caress down honey tits, you want to be spec ops? Show that women can handle 11B regular line Infantry and 19D cav scout poo poo before you go off and whine that you can't be in special forces.
Why do they always jump straight to special operations and recon whenever the argument of women in combat arms comes up? What? You're too good for Infantry, but it's a travesty that you can't be a green beret? Nut the gently caress up and start screaming bloody murder that you want to be 11B.[

I'd quote more but really it just devolves into sexism about women in the military after page 500.

ArchangeI
Jul 15, 2010

Razorwired posted:

And as long as we're posting "best" Troperfics I think we're forgetting Shinji and Warhammer 40,000. When I first heard about this one I thought, "Okay, sounds dumb but Tropers mash poo poo together all the time. Let's see how they creep out on Shinji when he's in Space Marine armor or whatever. But nope, it's not about that. It's about how super cool Shinji would be if he sat around playing the loving tabletop game. That's the entire point of the text. Shinji finds a wargame for neckbeardy weirdos and starts talking to the figures. They teach him life lessons and make him "20 times more badass than his canon counterpart as a result".


It is pretty much what happens when a fanfic author tries to make something awesome, gets recognition for writing something awesome, and then tries continually to top himself so that the sweet, sweet nectar of nerd recognition continues to flow. See also: Nobody Dies, which is a quality all of its own.

Apple Tree
Sep 8, 2013

Maple Leaf posted:

After knowing what the internet's done to it, is it okay to just wear a fedora? Like, say you need to be somewhere, and you're in a rush, and it's raining out... you just throw on a pair of shoes, a jacket, and the first hat off a rack, and it happens to be a fedora. Can you wear it in a situation like that without immediately being pinned as a troper/neckbeard/'from the internet'? Or should we just burn all the fedoras and save ourselves the trouble?

As well as what others have said, you wanna tailor your ambition to your skills. The more unusual a garment is, and the more out of mainstream fashion, the more style you'll need in working out an ensemble that makes it work as a whole. It's harder to gently caress up a pair of jeans than it is to gently caress up a pair of Regency trousers. When fedoras were in fashion and part of a normal outfit, the shops sold clothes that fashion designers had already created to go with the fedora look. Now if you wear one, you'll have to do the thinking that in the fedora era a professional would have done for you. It's harder to pull off because your work isn't already done.

Plus, you need a realistic assessment of what you have to work with in yourself. Every hat looks better on top of a handsome face. Every outfit looks better on a fine figure. Every fashion choice works better on someone charming. If you're an ugly customer with no suavity, then your face and figure and manner aren't going to do the work for you either.

So yeah, there are probably people who can pull off a fedora now. But they need more clothing smarts than they would have done in the thirties, and probably need to be better-looking as well.

All of this, of course, takes what TVTropes would call a 'lumper' rather than a 'splitter' to work out, and if you think the word 'lump' is a good one to express context, you probably should be playing it safe with your wardrobe.

Apple Tree fucked around with this message at 08:44 on Oct 2, 2013

BogDew
Jun 14, 2006

E:\FILES>quickfli clown.fli

Apple Tree posted:

When fedoras were in fashion and part of a normal outfit, the shops sold clothes that fashion designers had already created to go with the fedora look.
Plus haberdashers existed in order to have your mug measured and create a hat that matched your facial ratios. All of the off the rack hats suck cause they try to do one size fits all and look too big or small on most people's heads.

Apple Tree
Sep 8, 2013

WebDog posted:

Plus haberdashers existed in order to have your mug measured and create a hat that matched your facial ratios. All of the off the rack hats suck cause they try to do one size fits all and look too big or small on most people's heads.

Plus according to wikipedia there are all sorts of different shapes of fedora:

quote:

The hat is typically creased lengthwise down the crown and "pinched" in the front on both sides. Fedoras can also be creased with teardrop crowns, diamond crowns, center dents, and others, and the positioning of pinches can vary. The typical crown height is 4.5 inches (11.4 centimeters).

The brim is usually approximately 2.5 inches (6.3 centimeters) wide, but may be wider,[1] can be left "raw edged" (left as cut), finished with a sewn overwelt or underwelt, or bound with a trim-ribbon.

And different shapes are going to suit different faces and outfits. Wearing a generic 'fedora' is like wearing generic 'glasses': if you put a lot of thought into shape and style it might make you look sophisticated, and there's probably a shape for every face, but if you get it wrong you'll look like a dork.

TVTropes, on the other hand, only recognises two kinds: the Fedora of Asskicking and the Fedora of Action. You tell me the difference, because I can't work it out: they have the same Indiana Jones photo for both pages. (And yeah, Harrison Ford looked good in it, but then Harrison Ford looked like Harrison Ford.) If that's your range of options, you're probably not going to look like Harrison Ford. You're going to look like an overgrown kid playing dress-ups.

Plus there's the whole attitude thing. Think of Breaking Bad: Walter White has that distinctive and not entirely flattering hat that he wears to feel like a badass. Cranston's performance is an object lesson in why a hat needs the right face. When he first wears it, it looks stupid. It only looks badass when he's acquired that grim, mean expression and implacably confident body language. The same hat on the same head looks completely different depending on the manner of the wearer.

So your Joe Average in the thirties probably looked fine in a fedora. It was just what you wore to keep your head warm, not a piece of fancy dress, and that'd show in your behaviour. But if you wear it as a novelty because you want to look interesting ... well, nobody ever looks good in anything they put on to make themselves look interesting, because it screams 'I want to look interesting and I don't know how!' People look good in stuff they choose to look good, not badass or cool.

Oddly, TVTropes's giant Breaking Bad page does not list 'Nice Hat' as a trope. Not even as 'deconstructed' or 'subverted'. It does say 'Walter White from Breaking Bad wears one when in his Heisenberg persona' on the 'Nice Hat' page, but nothing on the 'Breaking Bad' page :shrug:

COBRARocky
Jul 28, 2013

quote:

This troper has a black trenchcoat, and he finds something primally satisfying about walking into the wind, hands in pockets, trenchcoat billowing around him, and his hair blowing back. However, people tend to move slightly away from him when he does it, and his girlfriend keeps telling him that he looks "sketchy."

made of bees
May 21, 2013

Apple Tree posted:

Oddly, TVTropes's giant Breaking Bad page does not list 'Nice Hat' as a trope. Not even as 'deconstructed' or 'subverted'. It does say 'Walter White from Breaking Bad wears one when in his Heisenberg persona' on the 'Nice Hat' page, but nothing on the 'Breaking Bad' page :shrug:

No, see, Heisenberg's hat is a porkpie. Totally different from a fedora.
:goonsay:

Lottery of Babylon
Apr 25, 2012

STRAIGHT TROPIN'

Razorwired posted:

Shinji and Warhammer 40,000

In Chapter 1 a thirteen-year-old girl refuses to date Shinji and is punished for it by attempted rape. :tvtropes:

Improbable Lobster
Jan 6, 2012

"From each according to his ability" said Ares. It sounded like a quotation.
Buglord

It's rare to see someone with so little self-awareness.

Apple Tree
Sep 8, 2013

made of bees posted:

No, see, Heisenberg's hat is a porkpie. Totally different from a fedora.
:goonsay:

You underestimate their willingness to turn anything anything anything into a trope. 'Nice Hat' literally means a nice hat, or even a scarf or, I dunno, a yarmulke? A turban? A hairslide?

quote:

Despite the name, this doesn't just cover hats, but most kinds of headgear, as long as it's cool.

If you wear it on your head and a fan likes it, it's a trope. :eng101:

Surprisingly, though, this page links to a trope that actually has some value, the 'Planet of Hats', which is to say, a sci fi scenario where everybody on an alien planet has a monocultural 'single defining characteristic'. You know, you could see that in the Turkey City Lexicon as a shorthand for saying 'Your alien civilisation is gimmicky and simplistic.'

Except that the Turkey City Lexicon already has this:

quote:

Funny-hat characterization

A character distinguished by a single identifying tag, such as odd headgear, a limp, a lisp, a parrot on his shoulder, etc.

...Yeah. The same basic idea, only this is 22 words long instead of 542. Using hats as examples. What a coincidence.

Apple Tree fucked around with this message at 14:34 on Oct 2, 2013

Count Chocula
Dec 25, 2011

WE HAVE TO CONTROL OUR ENVIRONMENT
IF YOU SEE ME POSTING OUTSIDE OF THE AUSPOL THREAD PLEASE TELL ME THAT I'M MISSED AND TO START POSTING AGAIN
Did anyone go through and mock The Whately Universe? http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Literature/WhateleyUniverse?from=Main.WhateleyUniverse
I'm pretty sure it's incomprehensible forum roleplaying, and it used to be spammed on every trope page.

The worst thing I saw was a Fetish Fuel page for some kid's show called The Backyardigans. I hope it's been deleted.

Flesnolk
Apr 11, 2012
All the Fetish Fuel stuff is gone, or at least shuttled onto another wiki.

Thwack!
Aug 14, 2010

Ability: Shadow Tag

Count Chocula posted:

The worst thing I saw was a Fetish Fuel page for some kid's show called The Backyardigans. I hope it's been deleted.

It has, thankfully, but I still was curious to see if there was even an article for that show.

Apparently, there is one. With 8557 pages no less. Hm.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

ANIME MONSTROSITY
Jun 1, 2012

by XyloJW
Can I still wear a paper summer fedora? :ohdear:

  • Locked thread