|
Lizard Combatant posted:
The thing that made me laugh more than anything here was the review of "entertaining". Edit: I just realized that At the Movies wasn't on the air when that movie came out, nor did that show ever give out stars. Also Ebert's name came first. Who would put Roper before Ebert??? Edit 2: also Ebert didn't give the movie 4 stars. I'm starting to think this box might not be trustworthy...which makes it all the funnier that they used a review that merely says "entertaining" axelblaze fucked around with this message at 21:02 on Nov 3, 2013 |
#
?
Nov 3, 2013 20:55
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 26, 2024 23:38 |
|
|
What I did for my Schindler's List poster is I took a random quote from his review and put no context into it. The same could've been done for that, despite At the Movies not existing. "J. Edger was a great/terrible film, but Leo's performance was the most entertaining and interesting thing about this film." Snip entertaining, and there ya go. Instant quick review!
|
|
#
?
Nov 3, 2013 21:58
|
|
|
So they released some character posters for The Hobbit. Not the greatest, but they are servicable. Except this one.  Kiimo, do you think you could wander over to the guys doing The Hobbit and show them a photo of what Martin Freeman actually looks like?
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2013 02:33
|
|
|
TheBigBudgetSequel posted:So they released some character posters for The Hobbit. Not the greatest, but they are servicable. They're aware that he's not playing a young Elijah Wood aren't they?
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2013 02:36
|
|
|
Young Freud posted:It's too bad GBS has gone to hell because this would make for an awesome Photoshop Phriday. I don't see why a photo shop thread wouldn't work in GBS 2.1. Someone should make this thread. Snooze Cruise fucked around with this message at 03:40 on Nov 4, 2013 |
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2013 03:38
|
|
|
Thank you movie poster thread for making me aware of Mr. Frost. Jeff Goldblum is awesome (although when is he not?)
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2013 06:54
|
|
|
mr.capps posted:I don't see why a photo shop thread wouldn't work in GBS 2.1. Someone should make this thread. You got it sir. EDIT: http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3580896 Enjoy. EDIT: Welp. That was sure quick. Good luck trying to make any Photoshop threads in there now...hah..ah...eh. CelticPredator fucked around with this message at 10:19 on Nov 4, 2013 |
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2013 07:46
|
|
|
Macaluso posted:Thank you movie poster thread for making me aware of Mr. Frost. Jeff Goldblum is awesome (although when is he not?)
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2013 14:07
|
|
|
TheBigBudgetSequel posted:So they released some character posters for The Hobbit. Not the greatest, but they are servicable. I think I'd prefer it if he wandered over and showed them what the sole of his size nine looks like. To ensure they put the elements on their next poster in proper focus, he should show it to them at a variety of distances from zero to several feet.
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2013 19:24
|
|
|
So today I fell down a Wikipedia hole in reading about Michael Cimino's career when I found this glorious poster for Sunchaser: 
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2013 20:30
|
|
|
I could care less. Doesn't that entire movie take place on the road? This looks like it's some kind of urban Straw Dogs.
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2013 20:33
|
|
|
Couldn't care less. COULDN'T, god drat it.
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2013 21:03
|
|
|
TheBigBudgetSequel posted:
Not sure what you mean. Last time I checked, Martin Freeman indeed had eyes that look in different directions and fleeces of skin joining his fingers together.
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2013 21:35
|
|
|
Jedit posted:I think I'd prefer it if he wandered over and showed them what the sole of his size nine looks like. To ensure they put the elements on their next poster in proper focus, he should show it to them at a variety of distances from zero to several feet. 11.5  and I'd love to if I didn't take part in the creation of the Grudge Match abomination and therefore can't really talk.
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2013 21:43
|
|
|
TheJoker138 posted:Couldn't care less. COULDN'T, god drat it. I thought this was just a common error that people make while speaking casually, I assumed that a professional marketing team would know how to say it correctly. I really shouldn't be as surprised as I am, I guess I'm not totally jaded yet.
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2013 22:06
|
|
|
.
boom boom boom fucked around with this message at 01:38 on Oct 6, 2014 |
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2013 22:29
|
|
|
Basebf555 posted:I thought this was just a common error that people make while speaking casually, I assumed that a professional marketing team would know how to say it correctly. I really shouldn't be as surprised as I am, I guess I'm not totally jaded yet. I assume it's meant to be a rhetorical question used as a response, e.g.  : I think that poster for The Hobbit is great! : I could care less?
|
|
#
?
Nov 4, 2013 23:27
|
|
|
All I can think of is that very strange scene in Charlotte's Web where another baby animal tells Wilbur that she "Could care less" and he goes on a long tirade over it, as if E. B. White is just straight up ranting through Wilbur's mouth. (Now if I weren't inconveniently on my phone right now, I'd go find the posters for the various film adaptations of Charlotte's Web. Later...)
|
|
#
?
Nov 5, 2013 03:56
|
|
|
Yodzilla posted:So today I fell down a Wikipedia hole in reading about Michael Cimino's career when I found this glorious poster for Sunchaser: If I didn't already like my avatar, I would crop this poo poo and use it.
|
|
#
?
Nov 6, 2013 04:35
|
|
|
Basebf555 posted:I thought this was just a common error that people make while speaking casually, I assumed that a professional marketing team would know how to say it correctly. I really shouldn't be as surprised as I am, I guess I'm not totally jaded yet. No, I was right, I could care less, because I care even less about what you're saying right now.
|
|
#
?
Nov 6, 2013 12:31
|
|
|
Lady Naga posted:No, I was right, I could care less, because I care even less about what you're saying right now. But is it the least you could care?
|
|
#
?
Nov 6, 2013 12:43
|
|
|
 A chinese movie theater used a photoshopped fan poster for Thor 2. Wanna see that movie 
|
|
#
?
Nov 6, 2013 15:15
|
|
|
How socially progressive of them.
|
|
#
?
Nov 6, 2013 15:30
|
|
|
New Anchorman 2 posters:    Some of the Photoshopping is a little awkward but that just kind of adds to it in this case. I like em 
|
|
#
?
Nov 6, 2013 16:05
|
|
|
Those are amazing.
|
|
#
?
Nov 6, 2013 16:14
|
|
|
Those are really poorly designed Jaegers.
|
|
#
?
Nov 6, 2013 18:22
|
|
|
axleblaze posted:Some of the Photoshopping is a little awkward but that just kind of adds to it in this case. I like em Besides Ferrell, are any of those characters well known enough that you don't have to put the movie's title on the poster? Carrell especially, since the dude has played a suited nebbish in literally every one of his movies.
|
|
#
?
Nov 6, 2013 18:35
|
|
|
Anchorman, to the best of my understanding, put Carrell on the map.
|
|
#
?
Nov 6, 2013 18:48
|
|
|
Irish Joe posted:Besides Ferrell, are any of those characters well known enough that you don't have to put the movie's title on the poster? Carrell especially, since the dude has played a suited nebbish in literally every one of his movies. Anyone who who saw the first one will definitely remember those characters. That seems to be the target audience for this movie, people who fondly remember the first one.
|
|
#
?
Nov 6, 2013 18:51
|
|
|
Irish Joe posted:Besides Ferrell, are any of those characters well known enough that you don't have to put the movie's title on the poster? Carrell especially, since the dude has played a suited nebbish in literally every one of his movies. I think you're severely underestimating the film's place in pop culture. Remember, this was the teaser poster: 
|
|
#
?
Nov 6, 2013 18:54
|
|
|
The building is his dick.
|
|
#
?
Nov 6, 2013 18:58
|
|
|
This is a good American Hustle poster
|
|
#
?
Nov 6, 2013 19:22
|
|
|
...of SCIENCE! posted:
Those are cheap tickets, dang.
|
|
#
?
Nov 6, 2013 20:07
|
|
|
How much does that translate to?
|
|
#
?
Nov 6, 2013 20:16
|
|
|
HUNDU THE BEAST GOD posted:How much does that translate to? Around 7 USD.
|
|
#
?
Nov 6, 2013 20:22
|
|
|
...of SCIENCE! posted:I think you're severely underestimating the film's place in pop culture. Remember, this was the teaser poster: Yeah, they wouldn't even need to put the title at the bottom and I'd immediately know what movie it was for. "Group of 70's-era men together" just says Anchorman, and that movie was absolutely huge.
|
|
#
?
Nov 6, 2013 20:48
|
|
|
As promised/warned earlier, posters for film adaptations of "Charlotte's Web". Here's the Hannah/Barbera version you probably saw dozens of times as a kid, and it had a hell of a tagline: The busy live-action version had a surprisingly nice teaser poster (with another strange tagline):  And a later poster that is slightly more indicative of what you're in for if you watch it. Holy poo poo, that cast list...   I also found out that the live-action version had some especially awful entries in the ever popular "Every single last drat character in this movie however unimportant needs their own poster with a HILARIOUS catchphrase, gently caress you" trend:      And finally, I found this thing. Every single thing about it is depressing: 
Rahonavis fucked around with this message at 00:55 on Nov 7, 2013 |
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2013 00:52
|
|
|
Why is that lamb checking out that pig's junk.
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2013 02:13
|
|
|
"Based on characters created by the author of Stuart Little"
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2013 02:27
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 26, 2024 23:38 |
|
|
Yodzilla posted:Why is that lamb checking out that pig's junk. It's clearly checking out his sweet rear end medal... get your mind out the drat gutter, boy.
|
|
#
?
Nov 7, 2013 02:49
|
|