|
such insight
|
# ? Dec 6, 2013 18:09 |
|
|
# ? Jun 12, 2024 12:45 |
|
and here I was thinking the exact opposite
|
# ? Dec 6, 2013 18:12 |
|
in conclusion, libya is a land of contrast
|
# ? Dec 6, 2013 18:15 |
|
static and dynamically typed languages are the same sides of two different coins.
|
# ? Dec 6, 2013 18:46 |
|
the real difference is between static and weak typing
|
# ? Dec 6, 2013 19:16 |
|
I am a type fascist
|
# ? Dec 6, 2013 19:20 |
|
Malcolm XML posted:I am a type fascist Adolf Hindley-Milner
|
# ? Dec 6, 2013 19:32 |
|
Nomnom Cookie posted:the real difference is between static and weak typing you mean strong and weak ask a interviewee the difference between strong, weak, static, dynamic typing for head explosions 90% of the time. also the only unacceptable one is weak typing. Every language that defaults to weak typing is horrible because the people who use them are horrible
|
# ? Dec 6, 2013 19:49 |
|
kraftwerk singles posted:Adolf Hindley-Milner moooods
|
# ? Dec 6, 2013 20:01 |
|
MeruFM posted:also the only unacceptable one is weak typing. Every language that defaults to weak typing is horrible because the people who use them are horrible lhwya
|
# ? Dec 6, 2013 20:05 |
|
MeruFM posted:you mean strong and weak strong typing and static typing are the same thing
|
# ? Dec 6, 2013 21:12 |
|
Nomnom Cookie posted:strong typing and static typing are the same thing now snatch this pebble from my hand
|
# ? Dec 6, 2013 21:14 |
|
MeruFM posted:also the only unacceptable one is weak typing. Every language that defaults to weak typing is horrible because the people who use them are horrible no, weak typing is better than strong typing. the way a value is stored in the computer is an implementation detail that programmers should not have to think or care about. (except in special cases like embedded systems where worrying about memory is necessary ofc)
|
# ? Dec 6, 2013 21:17 |
|
thread's looping, close it
|
# ? Dec 6, 2013 21:18 |
|
this morning someone tweeted about how maybe by the year 2045 we'll make a compiler that can tell you when you're missing a semicolon and where instead of complaining about an unspecified syntax error 6 lines down my first reaction was that even if that happened, programmers would universally reject it because they're masochistic idiots who love doing things like writing boilerplate type conversion code
|
# ? Dec 6, 2013 21:23 |
|
Cocoa Crispies posted:thread's looping, close it yeah but you can't prove that it's looping
|
# ? Dec 6, 2013 21:24 |
|
bugchasing but https://github.com/twbs/bootstrap/issues/3057quote:douglascrockford commented 2 years ago
|
# ? Dec 6, 2013 21:26 |
|
jesus christ
|
# ? Dec 6, 2013 21:28 |
|
ahaha that owns douglas crockford is an idiot who makes things for people who hate javascript for not being excessively spergy
|
# ? Dec 6, 2013 21:28 |
|
tbc all you have to do is upgrade from php to node.js, which is faster than php and automatically handles semicolons and has the same sloppy typing as php
|
# ? Dec 6, 2013 21:29 |
|
i mean just so we're all clear on this, this is a person, and many people in agreement with him, saying that there is a bug in syntactically unimpeachable code that does exactly what it's supposed to because it will stop working if it is passed through a third-party tool that does not properly parse the language
|
# ? Dec 6, 2013 21:31 |
|
Tiny Bug Child posted:i mean just so we're all clear on this, this is a person, and many people in agreement with him, saying that there is a bug in syntactically unimpeachable code that does exactly what it's supposed to because it will stop working if it is passed through a third-party tool that does not properly parse the language tbc was right
|
# ? Dec 6, 2013 21:32 |
|
Tiny Bug Child posted:this morning someone tweeted about how maybe by the year 2045 we'll make a compiler that can tell you when you're missing a semicolon and where instead of complaining about an unspecified syntax error 6 lines down we have a compiler that does this, it's called clang, everyone loves it, destroy police
|
# ? Dec 6, 2013 21:49 |
|
i want browsers that refuse to render bad html and css
|
# ? Dec 6, 2013 22:33 |
|
and make them the only browsers available
|
# ? Dec 6, 2013 22:33 |
|
MeruFM posted:i want browsers that refuse to render bad html and css here u go, credit otto if you fork this source to port it to qt or whatever C++ code:
|
# ? Dec 6, 2013 22:37 |
|
humanity is not capable of making an actually functional browser the only one available so there's not much hope for your hypothetical Sperg Explorer
|
# ? Dec 6, 2013 22:38 |
|
MeruFM posted:and make them the only browsers available IE already exists though
|
# ? Dec 6, 2013 22:38 |
|
MeruFM posted:i want browsers that refuse to render bad html and css there was a time when i served my website with the content-type: application/xhtml+xml header, which forces browsers to abandon rendering on the slightest markup error. it worked fine because my markup is perfect and my comments system wouldn't accept invalid html. unfortunately more obscure browsers couldn't handle the header and i had to revert to text/html what i'm saying is that i'm too perfect for this fallen world, and bad html and css is the internet you deserve
|
# ? Dec 6, 2013 22:43 |
|
qntm posted:there was a time when i served my website with the content-type: application/xhtml+xml header, which forces browsers to abandon rendering on the slightest markup error. it worked fine because my markup is perfect and my comments system wouldn't accept invalid html. unfortunately more obscure browsers couldn't handle the header and i had to revert to text/html im always sad that html is not xml
|
# ? Dec 6, 2013 22:47 |
|
i want my compiler to error out if my program has any warnings i want my browser to fail to render if my html has any errors i want my car's engine to seize if i turn without activating the blinker i want planes to crash into the runway if anyone has wireless on in their Kindle for i am sperg and i can tolerate no imperfection
|
# ? Dec 6, 2013 22:52 |
|
i'm happy i can make messages and displays appear on other computers
|
# ? Dec 6, 2013 22:52 |
|
Tiny Bug Child posted:i want my car's engine to seize if i turn without activating the blinker this is actually a fantastic idea. a several-thousand-dollar a pop tax on being a fuckhead
|
# ? Dec 6, 2013 22:58 |
|
Tiny Bug Child posted:i want my compiler to error out if my program has any warnings one of the reasons that planes very rarely crash into runways is that the software controlling their electronics is written not in php, but in a language with a compiler that errors out if their program has any warnings (and they take those warnings very seriously). they also have book-length programming style guides that must be followed to the letter
|
# ? Dec 6, 2013 23:30 |
|
Tiny Bug Child posted:i want my car's engine to seize if i turn without activating the blinker i also want this for everybody else's car
|
# ? Dec 6, 2013 23:38 |
|
JewKiller 3000 posted:one of the reasons that planes very rarely crash into runways is that the software controlling their electronics is written not in php, but in a language with a compiler that errors out if their program has any warnings (and they take those warnings very seriously). they also have book-length programming style guides that must be followed to the letter it didn't stop toyota from being shat on by sperges when they releasing their code after the cop crashing fiasco
|
# ? Dec 7, 2013 00:02 |
|
MeruFM posted:it didn't stop toyota from being shat on by sperges when they releasing their code after the cop crashing fiasco perhaps thats because they did not in fact follow the programming guide to the letter
|
# ? Dec 7, 2013 03:30 |
i will never use bootstrap on a non-inherited project ever again fwiw it has nothing to do with any of what's going on in that link
|
|
# ? Dec 7, 2013 03:39 |
|
what is your gripe with bootstrap sulk
|
# ? Dec 7, 2013 03:52 |
|
|
# ? Jun 12, 2024 12:45 |
|
one complaint i hear a lot is that bootstrap makes sites look same-y because customizing it is hard. apparently this is supposed to be easier with bootstrap 3
|
# ? Dec 7, 2013 04:06 |